目的已有研究关注了上下级关系对员工创新的积极作用,对上下级关系中最具华人情境特色的情感关系及其对员工创新的双刃剑作用却鲜有关注。为此,整合交换理论的类亲情与类工具视角,探讨上下级情感关系通过责任知觉和心理依附影响员工突破式创新的双刃剑路径及边界。方法采用问卷调查法对480名员工展开两阶段数据采集,借助SPSS 26.0和Amos 24.0进行统计分析。结果上下级情感关系通过提高员工责任知觉正向影响员工突破式创新,领导积极语言框架强化了责任知觉的中介效应;上下级情感关系通过加深员工心理依附负向影响员工突破式创新,领导消极语言框架强化了心理依附的中介效应。结论情感视角是推动上下级关系在华人情境中研究进展的重要途径,责任知觉和心理依附共同构成了上下级情感关系对员工突破式创新的双刃剑路径,企业可以借力语言框架提升员工责任知觉和推动创新突破。
Abstract
In Chinese organizations where "guanxi orientation" is a typical feature, the superior-subordinate guanxi not only has high local research value, but is also closely related to the effective operation and innovation development of the organization. Previous studies only paid attention to the positive role of superior-subordinate guanxi on employee innovation, little attention has been paid to the emotional guanxi with the most Chinese situational characteristics and its double-edged sword effect on employee innovation. Many questions remain. For example, how to identify the emotional guanxi in the relationship between superiors and subordinates to promote the new progress of local research? Does supervisor-subordinate emotional guanxi have a positive effect on employees' breakthrough innovation just like supervisor-subordinate guanxi? Or are there negative effects? What are the internal mechanisms and boundaries? These bottlenecks make the defects of previous studies that ignored the relationship between superiors and subordinates and ignored its two sides increasingly exposed.
Integrating the perspective of "kinship-like" and "tool-like" of the exchange theory, this paper discusses the double-edged sword path and boundary of superior-subordinate emotional guanxi affecting employees' breakthrough innovation through felt responsibility and psychological attachment. We recruited 480 employees from Chinese enterprises in internet communication, intelligent manufacturing and financial securities industry to complete questionnaires using a two-wave research design. Employees were invited to report their perceived supervisor-subordinate emotional guanxi, leader's positive language framework and leader's negative language framework in the first data collection. Then, those participants who completed time 1 surveys were invited back to report their breakthrough innovation, felt responsibility, and psychological attachment. We employed SPSS 26.0 and Amos 24.0 to test our hypotheses.
The results of regression analyses showed that supervisor-subordinate emotional guanxi positively affected breakthrough innovation by improving felt responsibility, and leader's positive language framework strengthened the mediating effect of felt responsibility. Supervisor-subordinate emotional guanxi negatively affected breakthrough innovation by deepening psychological attachment, and the mediating effect of psychological attachment was strengthened by leader's negative language framework. The study promotes the research progress of superior-subordinate guanxi in the Chinese context from the emotional perspective, integrates the different perspectives of felt responsibility and psychological attachment, and deconstructs the double-edged sword effect of superior-subordinate emotional guanxi on breakthrough innovation.
关键词
上下级情感关系 /
突破式创新 /
责任知觉 /
心理依附 /
领导语言框架
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 陈加州, 凌文辁, 方俐洛. (2003). 企业员工心理契约的结构维度. 心理学报, 35(3), 404-410.
[2] 崔智淞, 王弘钰. (2019). 上下级关系对员工建设性越轨行为的激活机制研究: 一个被中介的调节模型. 预测, 38(1), 8-14.
[3] 代毓芳, 张向前, 郑文智. (2022). 上下级之间应该存在何种关系? 上下级关系图式. 心理科学进展, 30(1), 216-229.
[4] 邓玉林, 吴洁, 达庆利. (2021). 基于制度逻辑的不同上下级关系对员工创新行为的差异化影响机制研究. 中国管理科学, 29(9), 236-248.
[5] 郭晓薇, 范伟. (2018). 基于整合构念的中国情境下员工上下级关系量表开发与检验. 管理学报, 15(1), 20-29.
[6] 郭晓薇, 李成彦. (2015). 中国人的上下级关系: 整合构念的建立与初步检验. 管理学报, 12(2), 167-177.
[7] 江宇晖, 尚玉钒, 李瑜佳. (2019). 时间压力是扼杀还是激发个体创造力? 领导语言框架的调节作用. 科学学与科学技术管理, 40(7), 121-135.
[8] 尚玉钒, 李磊. (2015). 领导调节聚焦行为: 构念的开发与验证. 管理评论, 27(8), 102-116.
[9] 田晓明, 李锐. (2015). 自我牺牲型领导能促进员工的前瞻行为吗?——责任感知的中介效应及其边界条件. 心理学报, 47(12), 1472-1485.
[10] 万鹏宇, 王弘钰, 汲海锋. (2020). 产业技术创新战略联盟中的突破式创新研究. 经济纵横, 1, 96-105.
[11] 万鹏宇, 邹国庆, 汲海锋. (2019). 精神型领导对知识型员工创新绩效的影响——知识分享和领导认同的作用. 技术经济, 38(5), 29-37, 66.
[12] 王弘钰, 万鹏宇. (2020). 效能视角下共享型领导、越轨创新对创新绩效的影响. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 40(1), 84-97.
[13] 王弘钰, 邹纯龙. (2019). 上下级关系对员工越轨创新的影响机制研究. 华东经济管理, 33(4), 37-43.
[14] 汪曲, 李燕萍. (2017). 团队内关系格局能影响员工沉默行为吗: 基于社会认知理论的解释框架. 管理工程学报, 31(4), 34-44.
[15] 颜静, 樊耘, 张旭. (2016). 员工心理依附对其行为的影响——基于中国中小企业的实证研究. 管理评论, 28(4), 109-122.
[16] 张永军, 李亚, 邓传军, 刘智强. (2021). 团队间竞争对员工创造力和亲团队非伦理行为的影响: 基于调节焦点理论的情境作用研究. 珞珈管理评论, 1, 47-63.
[17] 朱苏丽, 龙立荣, 贺伟, 王忠军. (2015). 超越工具性交换: 中国企业员工—组织类亲情交换关系的理论建构与实证研究. 管理世界, 11, 119-134.
[18] Bastons, M. (2008). The role of virtues in the framing of decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 389-400.
[19] Chen, C. C., & Chen, X. P. (2009). Negative externalities of close guanxi within organizations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1), 37-53.
[20] Chen Y., Friedman R., Yu E. H., Fang W. H., & Lu X. P. (2009). Supervisor-subordinate Guanxi: Developing a three-dimensional model and scale. Management and Organization Review, 5(3), 375-399.
[21] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
[22] Gao, Y., & Liu, H. Y. (2021). How supervisor-subordinate Guanxi influence employee innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 2001-2014.
[23] Lee K. Y., Duffy M. K., Scott K. L., & Schippers M. C. (2018). The experience of being envied at work: How being envied shapes employee feelings and motivation. Personnel Psychology, 71(2), 181-200.
[24] Li Z., Duverger P., & Yu L. (2018). Employee creativity trumps supervisor-subordinate guanxi: Predicting prequitting behaviors in China's hotel industry. Tourism Management, 69, 23-37.
[25] Luo, J., & Zheng, J. B. (2018). The impact of servant leadership on proactive behaviors: A study based on cognitive evaluation theory. Psychology, 9(5), 1228-1244.
[26] Madjar N., Greenberg E., & Chen Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 730-743.
[27] Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2015). Felt obligations to reciprocate to an employer, preferences for mobility across employers, and gender: Three-way interaction effects on subsequent voice behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 36-45.
[28] Ren, S., & Chadee, D. (2017). Is guanxi always good for employee self-development in China? Examining non-linear and moderated relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 108-117.
[29] Riketta, M., & van Dick, R. (2005). Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(3), 490-510.
[30] Schmidt, G. B. (2016). How adult attachment styles relate to perceived psychological contract breach and affective organizational commitment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 28(3), 147-170.
[31] Wang H. H., Wu W., Liu Y. P., Hao S. Y., & Wu S. X. (2019). In what ways do Chinese employees speak up? An exchange approach to supervisor-subordinate Guanxi and voice behavior. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(3), 479-501.
[32] Yip J., Ehrhardt K., Black H., & Walker D. O. (2018). Attachment theory at work: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 185-198.
基金
*本研究得到国家自然科学基金项目（72161021）、教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（22XJC630005,22YJC630211）、重庆市教委科学技术研究项目（KJQN202300532）和重庆师范大学博士启动基金项目（21XWB033）的资助
PDF(1480 KB)
