共情在社会互动提取中的作用：第二人称的视角 &#x0002A;

张环; 李婧文; 王海曼; 沙玛丽&#x000b7;阿哈提; 何云凤; 卢春明

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230528

PDF(1238 KB)

心理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5) : 1254-1261. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230528

临床与咨询

共情在社会互动提取中的作用：第二人称的视角 ^*

张环^1,2,3, 李婧文², 王海曼², 沙玛丽·阿哈提², 何云凤^**4, 卢春明^**5

作者信息 +

The Effect of Empathy on Collaborative Remembering from A Second-Person Perspective

Zhang Huan^1,2,3, Li Jingwen², Wang Haiman², Ahati Shamali², He Yunfeng⁴, Lu Chunming⁵

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

共情是人们进行社会互动的基本能力。为了探究共情在社会互动提取中的作用,本研究采用“第二人称”视角,在双脑水平上考察共情对社会互动提取的影响。结果显示,在互动提取范式下,互动双方右侧颞顶联合区表现出脑间活动同步性的增强,且这种脑间活动同步性的增强在双方共情能力对记忆准确性的影响中起到了完全中介的作用。以上结果为理解共情影响社会互动提取的群体脑机制提供了实证依据。

Abstract

People usually retrieve and share past experience or knowledge with others, which promotes the formation of collective memory shared within group members. As a fundamental ability to collaborate with others, the effect of empathy on collaborative remembering has attracted widespread interest. Evidence based on behavioral studies has speculated that during the collaborative remembering process of two or more people, the speaker's selective retrieval practice of target items could induce the listener's synchronous “covert retrieval”. Neuroscience studies at the single-brain level revealed that the listener's brain activity during listening to the speaker's selective retrieval practice was similar to that of speaker in the process of remembering. In daily life, however, remembering takes place in a real-time two-way social interaction. Therefore, this study adopted a second-person perspective, and investigated the brain mechanisms of memory retrieval in social interaction and the effect of empathy in this process.
We used the retrieval practice paradigm of two-person interaction in the current study. All the participants were randomly paired into speaker-listener dyads. The neural activities in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and right temporal parietal junction (rTPJ) of both the speaker and the listener in each dyad were simultaneously recorded, using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)-based hyperscanning while they performed the interactive retrieval task. After the final retrieval test, the proportion of correct retrieval of related items was assessed. In order to measure the empathy index, all the participants were asked to complete the scale of “the Empathy Quotient, (EQ)” before the experiment.
Behavioral analysis showed that the dyads' empathy was positively correlated with their retrieval accuracy of related items under the retrieval practice paradigm of two-person interaction. The functional imaging results showed that compared to resting state, the interpersonal neural synchronization (INS) in right the temporal parietal junction (rTPJ) was significantly increased during collaborative remembering. Combining the behavioral results with the imaging results, we found that the increased INS in rTPJ was positively correlated with empathy and the retrieval accuracy of related items respectively. Finally, such increased INS mediated the relationship between empathy and the retrieval accuracy of related items in speaker-listener dyads.
To sum up, this study demonstrated that empathy had an effect on the outcome of collaborative remembering. In the process of this real-time social interaction, the INS in rTPJ was significantly increased compared to resting state, and such increased INS mediated the contribution of empathy to the retrieval accuracy of related items in speaker-listener dyads. Our results further support that the INS plays an important role in the study of social interaction as a reliable neuro-marker for measuring the relationship between two interactive brains.

导出引用

张环, 李婧文, 王海曼, 沙玛丽·阿哈提, 何云凤, 卢春明. 共情在社会互动提取中的作用：第二人称的视角 ^*[J]. 心理科学. 2023, 46(5): 1254-1261 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230528

Zhang Huan, Li Jingwen, Wang Haiman, Ahati Shamali, He Yunfeng, Lu Chunming. The Effect of Empathy on Collaborative Remembering from A Second-Person Perspective[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2023, 46(5): 1254-1261 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230528

参考文献

[1] 郭欢, 申荷永, 昝艺, 张道华, 蔡婷婷, 朱绘霖. (2016). 基于功能性近红外光谱技术的双人同步交互测量研究. 激光生物学报, 25(6), 523-530.
[2] 韩丽颖. (2005). 特质移情和状态移情及其对助人行为的影响研究 (硕士学位论文). 东北师范大学, 长春.
[3] 刘旭. (2013). 提取诱发遗忘的发展及其机制研究 (博士学位论文). 天津师范大学.
[4] 孟景, 沈林. (2017). 自闭症谱系障碍个体的共情及其理论与神经机制. 心理科学进展, 25(1), 59-66.
[5] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
[6] 殷庆. (2020). 不同类型情绪记忆传递的神经同步性 (硕士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
[7] 岳童, 黄希庭, 刘光远. (2018). 催产素对共情反应的影响及其作用机制. 心理科学进展, 26(3), 442-453.
[8] 张环, 侯双, 王海曼, 廉宇煊, 杨海波. (2020). 他人在场条件下的社会分享型提取诱发遗忘. 心理学报, 52(6), 716-729.
[9] 张环, 王欣, 刘一贝, 曹贤才, 吴捷. (2021). 成员关系对协作提取成绩的影响. 心理学报, 53(5), 481-493.
[10] 赵俊茹, 李幼穗. (2003). 交流方式对儿童青少年合作行为影响的发展研究. 心理科学, 26(3), 545-546.
[11] Anderson M. C., Bjork R. A., & Bjork E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063-1087.
[12] Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(21), 163-175.
[13] Barrett, L. F., & Simmons, W. K. (2015). Interoceptive predictions in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(7), 419-429.
[14] Clark, S. S., & Giacomantonio, S. G. (2015). Toward predicting prosocial behavior: Music preference and empathy differences between adolescents and adults. Empirical Musicology Review, 10(1-2), 50-65.
[15] Coman, A., & Hirst, W. (2015). Social identity and socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting: The effects of group membership. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), 717-722.
[16] Cuc A., Koppel J., & Hirst W. (2007). Silence is not golden: A case for socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 18(8), 727-733.
[17] Cui X., Bryant D. M., & Reiss A. L. (2012). NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals increased interpersonal coherence in superior frontal cortex during cooperation. NeuroImage, 59(3), 2430-2437.
[18] Fachner J. C., Maidhof C., Grocke D., Pedersen I. N., Trondalen G., Tucek G., & Bonde L. O. (2019). “Telling me not to worry..” Hyperscanning and neural dynamics of emotion processing during guided imagery and music. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1561.
[19] Ford, R. M., & Aberdein, B. (2015). Exploring social influences on the joint Simon task: Empathy and friendship. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 962.
[20] Geana A., Duker A., & Coman A. (2019). An experimental study of the formation of collective memories in social networks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, Article 103813.
[21] Gervain J., Mehler J., Werker J. F., Nelson C. A., Csibra G., Lloyd-Fox S., & Aslin R. N. (2011). Near-infrared spectroscopy: A report from the McDonnell infant methodology consortium. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(1), 22-46.
[22] Goldstein P., Weissman-Fogel I., Dumas G., & Shamay-Tsoory S. G. (2018). Brain-to-brain coupling during handholding is associated with pain reduction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), E2528-E2537.
[23] Hoshi, Y. (2007). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: Current status and future prospects. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 12(6), Article 062106.
[24] Jiang J., Dai B. H., Peng D. L., Zhu C. Z., Liu L., & Lu C. M. (2012). Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(45), 16064-16069.
[25] Koster-Hale, J., & Saxe, R. (2013). Theory of mind: A neural prediction problem. Neuron, 79(5), 836-848.
[26] Liu J. Q., Zhang R. Q., Geng B. B., Zhang T. Y., Yuan D., Otani S., & Li X. C. (2019). Interplay between prior knowledge and communication mode on teaching effectiveness: Interpersonal neural synchronization as a neural marker. NeuroImage, 193, 93-102.
[27] Long Y. H., Zheng L. F., Zhan H., Zhou S. Y., Zhai Y., & Lu C. M. (2021). Interpersonal neural synchronization during interpersonal touch underlies affiliative pair bonding between romantic couples. Cerebral Cortex, 31(3), 1647-1659.
[28] Lu C. M., Zhang Y. J., Biswal B. B., Zang Y. F., Peng D. L., & Zhu C. Z. (2010). Use of fNIRS to assess resting state functional connectivity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 186(2), 242-249.
[29] Mao W. B., An S., Ji F. F., & Li Z. Y. (2021). Who will influence memories of listeners: Evidence from socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(3), 458-466.
[30] Miller, F., & Wallis, J. (2011). Social interaction and the role of empathy in information and knowledge management: A literature review. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 52(2), 122-132.
[31] Molavi, B., & Dumont, G. A. (2012). Wavelet-based motion artifact removal for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Physiological Measurement, 33(2), 259-270.
[32] Pan Y. F., Dikker S., Goldstein P., Zhu Y., Yang C. R., & Hu Y. (2020). Instructor-learner brain coupling discriminates between instructional approaches and predicts learning. NeuroImage, 211, Article 116657.
[33] Schilbach L., Timmermans B., Reddy V., Costall A., Bente G., Schlicht T., & Vogeley K. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 393-414.
[34] Singh A. K., Okamoto M., Dan H., Jurcak V., & Dan I. (2005). Spatial registration of multichannel multi-subject fNIRS data to MNI space without MRI. NeuroImage, 27(4), 842-851.
[35] Stephens G. J., Silbert L. J., & Hasson U. (2010). Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(32), 14425-14430.
[36] Virtanen K. A., Lidell M. E., Orava J., Heglind M., Westergren R., Niemi T., & Nuutila P. (2009). Functional brown adipose tissue in healthy adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(15), 1518-1525.
[37] Zadbood A., Chen J., Leong Y. C., Norman K. A., & Hasson U. (2017). How we transmit memories to other brains: Constructing shared neural representations via communication. Cerebral Cortex, 27(10), 4988-5000.
[38] Zajonc, R. B., & Cross, D. V. (1965). Stimulus generalization as a function of drive shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(4), 363-368.
[39] Zheng L. F., Chen C. S., Liu W. D., Long Y. H., Zhao H., Bai X. L., & Lu C. M. (2018). Enhancement of teaching outcome through neural prediction of the students' knowledge state. Human Brain Mapping, 39(7), 3046-3057.
[40] Zheng L. F., Liu W. D., Long Y. H., Zhai Y., Zhao H., Bai X. L., & Lu C. M. (2020). Affiliative bonding between teachers and students through interpersonal synchronisation in brain activity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(1), 97-109.