认知控制过程的影响因素：回报与代价&#x0002A;

司双庆; 周思宏; 袁加锦; 杨倩

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240201

PDF(1015 KB)

心理科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2) : 258-266. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240201

基础、实验与工效

认知控制过程的影响因素：回报与代价^*

司双庆, 周思宏, 袁加锦, 杨倩^**

作者信息 +

Influencing Factors in the Allocation of Cognitive Control: Rewards and Costs

Si Shuangqing, Zhou Sihong, Yuan Jiajin, Yang Qian

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

根据控制的预期价值（expected value of control, EVC）模型,回报与代价通过调节动机共同影响认知控制的实施与分配（即回报-代价权衡）。在EVC模型外,还有许多探究动机相关因素如何影响认知控制的研究。文章首先总结梳理了可被视为回报或代价的因素及相关的实证证据;其次,基于回报-代价权衡简要讨论二者如何共同影响认知控制;最后提出未来研究可以从客观（优化权衡的计算模型）与主观（个体差异）两个方面更全面地解析回报-代价的权衡过程,以实现对认知控制的有效调控与精准干预。

Abstract

Cognitive control refers to people’s ability to adaptively employ cognitive resources and adjust cognitive processes in pursuit of goal-directed behavior. Since naturally occurring behavioral situations are constantly changing, people would mobilize their control adaptively. According to the Expected Value of Control (EVC) model, the dynamic adjustment of control can be thought of as value-based decision making, centered on the integration of rewards and costs that can be expected from a control-demanding task. Hence, reward and cost are two key factors jointly modulating people’s motivation and determining the allocation of control. Following this framework but going beyond the EVC model, the current review elucidated the role of various motivation-related factors that can act as rewards or costs in the implementation of cognitive control, and discussed how they collectively adjust cognitive control.
More specifically, money, juice, or emotional/social stimuli are extrinsic rewards that can drive cognitive control and improve task performance, albeit with a few exceptions. Considering this complexity, other factors can further modulate the beneficial effects (e.g., reward-poor vs. reward-rich task conditions, the congruity of reward and task performance, and individual reward sensitivity). Besides, in contrast to extrinsic rewards that are manipulated externally, intrinsic rewards are highly integrated into control-related tasks. It can be reflected in people’s autonomic engagement with certain tasks and the positive emotions they generated. In this sense, the investigation of the influence of intrinsic rewards on cognitive control is relatively indirect, which can be achieved by adjusting effort levels and positive emotions. Relatedly, individual differences in intrinsic motivation, as reflected by the need for cognition (NFC), are also closely tied to intrinsic rewards in driving control. That is, individuals high in need for cognition are more inclined to be involved in control demanding tasks and to persist in difficult or unprofitable cognitive tasks.
Meanwhile, due to the presence of cognitive costs associated with exerting cognitive control, individuals typically show a bias toward opting for “low-effort” tasks, while decreasing the subjective value of the expected value. When discussing the impact of costs on cognitive control, it is necessary to consider the trade-off between rewards and costs. Previous studies have demonstrated that this trade-off process may vary among individuals based on their willingness to invest effort and their capacity to exert effort, depending on whether they place a higher value on rewards or costs. Consequently, we have further delineated the control signal intensity to effort levels and introduced the concept of “Subjective Expected Value of Control”, which is determined by the difference between the Subjective Value of Reward and the Subjective Value of Cost. Furthermore, the reward-cost trade-off is inherently dynamic, with individuals adapting their cognitive control with the automaticity of task performance in a given task, or in response to feature transfer across different task situations.
Nonetheless, some unanswered questions need to be further investigated. Firstly, the mechanism underlying the reward-cost trade-off requires refinement. As individuals persistently allocate control, their instantaneous subjective evaluation of the rewards and costs expected from the current task may change dynamically. Although several theories have introduced dynamic elements to the EVC model in various ways, a fully dynamic representation of the reward-costs trade-off remains a topic of ongoing exploration. Secondly, the subjective trade-off between rewards and costs can be further modulated by additional individual factors closely related to external and internal motivations. Consequently, it is intriguing to explore how individual differences in reward sensitivity, cognitive need, intrinsic motivation, and opportunity costs may dynamically impact subjective evaluation of the rewards and costs of investing cognitive effort.

导出引用

司双庆, 周思宏, 袁加锦, 杨倩. 认知控制过程的影响因素：回报与代价^*[J]. 心理科学. 2024, 47(2): 258-266 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240201

Si Shuangqing, Zhou Sihong, Yuan Jiajin, Yang Qian. Influencing Factors in the Allocation of Cognitive Control: Rewards and Costs[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2024, 47(2): 258-266 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240201

参考文献

[1] 曹思琪, 汤晨晨, 伍海燕, 刘勋. (2022). 价值计算决定何时与如何努力. 心理科学进展, 30(4), 877-887.
[2] 杨倩. (2022). 负性情绪在冲突适应中的作用机制: 分离与整合视角. 心理科学进展, 30(8), 1844-1855.
[3] 易伟, 梅淑婷, 郑亚. (2019). 努力: 成本还是奖赏? 心理科学进展, 27(8), 1439-1450.
[4] 张孟可, 李晴, 尹首航, 陈安涛. (2021). 冲突水平的变化诱发冲突适应. 心理学报, 53(2), 128-138.
[5] Aarts E., Wallace D. L., Dang L. C., Jagust W. J., Cools R., & D’Esposito M. (2014). Dopamine and the cognitive downside of a promised bonus. Psychological Science, 25(4), 1003-1009.
[6] André N., Audiffren M., & Baumeister R. F. (2019). An integrative model of effortful control. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 13, Article 79.
[7] Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15(9), 610-615.
[8] Bahlmann J., Aarts E., & D’Esposito M. (2015). Influence of motivation on control hierarchy in the human frontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(7), 3207-3217.
[9] Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Curiosity and exploration: Animals spend much of their time seeking stimuli whose significance raises problems for psychology. Science, 153(3731), 25-33.
[10] Boehler C. N., Hopf J. M., Stoppel C. M., & Krebs R. M. (2012). Motivating inhibition - reward prospect speeds up response cancellation. Cognition, 125(3), 498-503.
[11] Botvinick, M., & Braver, T. (2015). Motivation and cognitive control: From behavior to neural mechanism. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 83-113.
[12] Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 356-366.
[13] Botvinick M. M., Braver T. S., Barch D. M., Carter C. S., & Cohen J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624-652.
[14] Bustamante L., Lieder F., Musslick S., Shenhav A., & Cohen J. (2021). Learning to overexert cognitive control in a Stroop task. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 21(3), 453-471.
[15] Bustamante, L. A. (2022). Quantifying individual differences in the cost of cognitive and physical effort in humans (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Princeton University.
[16] Bialaszek, W., & Winkielman, P. (2023). Modeling the Effort Paradox: Effort can have positive and negative impact on outcome value within an individual, across individuals, and across choice contexts (preprint)
[17] Cacioppo J. T., Petty R. E., Feinstein J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197-253.
[18] Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1), 7-42.
[19] Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319-333.
[20] Charpentier C. J., Bromberg-Martin E. S., & Sharot T. (2018). Valuation of knowledge and ignorance in mesolimbic reward circuitry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(31), E7255-E7264.
[21] Chew B., Blain B., Dolan R. J., & Rutledge R. B. (2021). A neurocomputational model for intrinsic reward. The Journal of Neuroscience, 41(43), 8963-8971.
[22] Chiew, K. S. (2021). Revisiting positive affect and reward influences on cognitive control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 39, 27-33.
[23] Cromwell H. C., Abe N., Barrett K. C., Caldwell-Harris C., Gendolla G. H. E., Koncz R., & Sachdev P. S. (2020). Mapping the interconnected neural systems underlying motivation and emotion: A key step toward understanding the human affectome. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 113, 204-226.
[24] Cubillo A., Makwana A. B., & Hare T. A. (2019). Differential modulation of cognitive control networks by monetary reward and punishment. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 14(3), 305-317.
[25] Davis C., Levitan R. D., Kaplan A. S., Carter J., Reid C., Curtis C., & Kennedy J. L. (2008). Reward sensitivity and the D2 dopamine receptor gene: A case-control study of binge eating disorder. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 32(3), 620-628.
[26] Devine S., Vassena E., & Otto A. R. (2023). More than a feeling: Physiological measures of affect index the integration of effort costs and rewards during anticipatory effort evaluation. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 23(4), 1129-1140.
[27] Dignath D., Eder A. B., Steinhauser M., & Kiesel A. (2020). Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis—An integrative review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 27(2), 193-216.
[28] Dixon, M. L., & Christoff, K. (2012). The decision to engage cognitive control is driven by expected reward-value: Neural and behavioral evidence. PLoS ONE, 7(12), Article e51637.
[29] Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2012). Conflicts as aversive signals. Brain and Cognition, 78(2), 94-98.
[30] Engelmann J. B., Damaraju E., Padmala S., & Pessoa L. (2009). Combined effects of attention and motivation on visual task performance: Transient and sustained motivational effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, Article 4.
[31] Fleischhauer M., Enge S., Brocke B., Ullrich J., Strobel A., & Strobel A. (2010). Same or different? Clarifying the relationship of need for cognition to personality and intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(1), 82-96.
[32] Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2016). How sequential changes in reward magnitude modulate cognitive flexibility: Evidence from voluntary task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(2), 285-295.
[33] Froböse M. I., Westbrook A., Bloemendaal M., Aarts E., & Cools R. (2020). Catecholaminergic modulation of the cost of cognitive control in healthy older adults. PLoS ONE, 15(2), Article e0229294.
[34] Grahek I., Leng X., Musslick S., & Shenhav A. (2023). The cost of adjusting cognitive control: A dynamical systems approach. Paper presented at the 2023 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience.
[35] Grahek I., Musslick S., & Shenhav A. (2020). A computational perspective on the roles of affect in cognitive control. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 151, 25-34.
[36] Hassall C. D., Hunt L. T., & Holroyd C. B. (2022). Task-level value affects trial-level reward processing. NeuroImage, 260, Article 119456.
[37] Huskey R., Craighead B., Miller M. B., & Weber R. (2018). Does intrinsic reward motivate cognitive control? A naturalistic-fMRI study based on the synchronization theory of flow. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(5), 902-924.
[38] Inzlicht, M., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 450-463.
[39] Inzlicht M., Shenhav A., & Olivola C. Y. (2018). The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(4), 337-349.
[40] Kool, W., & Botvinick, M. (2018). Mental labour. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(12), 899-908.
[41] Kool W., McGuire J. T., Rosen Z. B., & Botvinick M. M. (2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 665-682.
[42] Kool W., Shenhav A., & Botvinick M. M. (2017). Cognitive control as cost-benefit decision making. In T. Egner (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of cognitive control (pp. 167-189). Wiley Blackwell.
[43] Kruglanski A. W., Fishbach A., Woolley K., Bélanger J. J., Chernikova M., Molinario E., & Pierro A. (2018). A structural model of intrinsic motivation: On the psychology of means-ends fusion. Psychological Review, 125(2), 165-182.
[44] Kurzban, R. (2016). The sense of effort. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 67-70.
[45] Kurzban R., Duckworth A., Kable J. W., & Myers J. (2013). An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(6), 661-679.
[46] Leng X. M., Yee D., Ritz H., & Shenhav A. (2021). Dissociable influences of reward and punishment on adaptive cognitive control. PLoS Computational Biology, 17(12), Article e1009737.
[47] Li Q., Hu N., Li Y. L., Long Q. S., Gu Y., Tang Y. C., & Chen A. T. (2021). Error-induced adaptability: Behavioral and neural dynamics of response-stimulus interval modulations on posterror slowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(5), 851-863.
[48] Lieder F., Shenhav A., Musslick S., & Griffiths T. L. (2018). Rational metareasoning and the plasticity of cognitive control. PLoS Computational Biology, 14(4), Article e1006043.
[49] Locke, H. S., & Braver, T. S. (2008). Motivational influences on cognitive control: Behavior, brain activation, and individual differences. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(1), 99-112.
[50] Marcowski P., Winkielman P., & Białaszek W. (2023). Effort can have positive and negative impact on outcome value within an individual, across individuals, and across choice contexts. PsyArXiv (preprint).
[51] Masís J. A., Musslick S., & Cohen J. D. (2021). The value of learning and cognitive control allocation. Paper presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Animal Minds, Virtual, Online, Austria.
[52] Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 167-202.
[53] Morris L. S., Grehl M. M., Rutter S. B., Mehta M., & Westwater M. L. (2022). On what motivates us: A detailed review of intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation. Psychological Medicine, 52(10), 1801-1816.
[54] Notebaert, W., & Braem, S. (2015). Parsing the effects of reward on cognitive control. In T. S. Braver (Ed.), Motivation and cognitive control (pp. 105-122). Routledge.
[55] Otto A. R., Braem S., Silvetti M., & Vassena E. (2022). Is the juice worth the squeeze? Learning the marginal value of mental effort over time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(10), 2324-2341.
[56] Otto, A. R., & Vassena, E. (2021). It' s all relative: Reward-induced cognitive control modulation depends on context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(2), 306-313.
[57] Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2011). Reward reduces conflict by enhancing attentional control and biasing visual cortical processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3419-3432.
[58] Prével A., Hoofs V., & Krebs R. M. (2021). Effect of non-instructed instrumental contingency of monetary reward and positive affect in a cognitive control task. Royal Society Open Science, 8(8), Article 202002.
[59] Sandra, D. A., & Otto, A. R. (2018). Cognitive capacity limitations and Need for Cognition differentially predict reward-induced cognitive effort expenditure. Cognition, 172, 101-106.
[60] Saunders B., Lin H., Milyavskaya M., & Inzlicht M. (2017). The emotive nature of conflict monitoring in the medial prefrontal cortex. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 119, 31-40.
[61] Sayalı, C., & Badre, D. (2019). Neural systems of cognitive demand avoidance. Neuropsychologia, 123, 41-54.
[62] Sayalı, C., & Badre, D. (2021). Neural systems underlying the learning of cognitive effort costs. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 21(4), 698-716.
[63] Schouppe N., Braem S., De Houwer J., Silvetti M., Verguts T., Ridderinkhof K. R., & Notebaert W. (2015). No pain, no gain: The affective valence of congruency conditions changes following a successful response. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(1), 251-261.
[64] Schouppe N., Demanet J., Boehler C. N., Ridderinkhof K. R., & Notebaert W. (2014). The role of the striatum in effort-based decision-making in the absence of reward. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(6), 2148-2154.
[65] Sharp P. B., Do K. T., Lindquist K. A., Prinstein M. J., & Telzer E. H. (2022). Cognitive control deployment is flexibly modulated by social value in early adolescence. Developmental Science, 25(1), Article e13140.
[66] Shenhav A., Botvinick M. M., & Cohen J. D. (2013). The expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron, 79(2), 217-240.
[67] Shenhav A., Musslick S., Lieder F., Kool W., Griffiths T. L., Cohen J. D., & Botvinick M. M. (2017). Toward a rational and mechanistic account of mental effort. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 40, 99-124.
[68] Stürmer, B. (2011). Reward and punishment effects on error processing and conflict control. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 335.
[69] van Steenbergen H., Band G. P. H., & Hommel B. (2012). Reward valence modulates conflict-driven attentional adaptation: Electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology, 90(3), 234-241.
[70] Vermeylen L., Braem S., Notebaert W., & Ruitenberg, M. F. L. (2022). The subjective evaluation of task switch cues is related to voluntary task switching. Cognition, 224, Article 105063.
[71] Wang, K. S., & Delgado, M. R. (2019). Corticostriatal circuits encode the subjective value of perceived control. Cerebral Cortex, 29(12), 5049-5060.
[72] Westbrook, A., & Braver, T. S. (2015). Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 395-415.
[73] Westbrook A., Frank M. J., & Cools R. (2021). A mosaic of cost-benefit control over cortico-striatal circuitry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(8), 710-721.
[74] Westbrook A., Kester D., & Braver T. S. (2013). What is the subjective cost of cognitive effort? Load, trait, and aging effects revealed by economic preference. PLoS ONE, 8(7), Article e68210.
[75] Westbrook A., Van Den Bosch R., Määttä J. I., Hofmans L., Papadopetraki D., Cools R., & Frank M. J. (2020). Dopamine promotes cognitive effort by biasing the benefits versus costs of cognitive work. Science, 367(6484), 1362-1366.
[76] Yee D. M., Krug M. K., Allen A. Z., & Braver T. S. (2016). Humans integrate monetary and liquid incentives to motivate cognitive task performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 2037.
[77] Zhang M., Palmer C. V., Pratt S. R., McNeil M. R., & Siegle G. J. (2022). Need for cognition is associated with the interaction of reward and task-load on effort: A verification and extension study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 180, 60-67.