研究探讨了情绪调节策略在情绪自旋对大学生攻击行为影响中的调节作用。采用分阶段跟踪测试的方法,首先在被试招募阶段使用情绪调节量表测量个体的认知重评和表达抑制策略,招募完成一周后启动为期14天、每天3次的当下核心情绪状态测评来获取个体的情绪自旋值,动态测评结束一周后使用“攻击行为量表”测量个体的攻击行为。对139名被试的有效跟踪数据进行分析,结果表明：认知重评在情绪自旋对攻击行为的影响中起到调节作用。在低认知重评组,情绪自旋对攻击行为有正向预测作用;但在高认知重评组,情绪自旋对攻击行为的影响不显著。
Abstract
Affect has been widely recognized as a primary cause of aggressive behavior. However, our understandings of affective variability on aggression remains incomplete. Although many studies have examined how aggressive behavior is linked to affective instability, such research has largely focused on between-individual differences in affect and not on the within-individual fluctuations in affective states. In recent years, empirical studies on affect variability have found substantive individual differences in the extent to which people's affective experiences vary over time. Consequently, the fluctuation of affect variability has a significant influence on individuals' mental health. From this developing line research, the concept of affect spin has emerged. It is defined as the circular standard deviation of responses and represents how much a person moves between different trajectory constructs within the core affect space. Hence, affect spin reflects purely qualitative changes of the affect state. However, the directionality of the relationship between affect spin and aggressive behavior is unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the impact of affect spin on aggressive behavior, and the moderating role of emotion regulation strategies.
A phased tracking test methodology was adopted in our study. First, we used the emotion regulation scale to measure the participants' cognitive reappraisal and expression suppression strategies. The sample consisted of 189 Chinese undergraduates, who completed the emotion regulation scale during the recruitment stage. One week later, we used experience sampling method (ESM) to collect individuals' affective experience by utilizing 12 affective terms that were scheduled to be assessed three times a day for 14 consecutive days, following which we computed individual affect variability, namely affect spin. The following week participants completed the aggressive behavior scale to assess their aggressive behaviors. By the end of the study, a total of 139 participants completed all the assessments. All procedures were conducted online via a free App.
The results showed that affect spin did not have significant impact on aggressive behavior, However the relation between affect spin and aggressive behavior showed a positive correlation trend. Meanwhile, cognitive reappraisal had a negative predictive effect on aggressive behavior, while the effect of expression suppression was not significant. The most important result was that cognitive reappraisal played a moderating role in the effect of affect spin on aggressive behavior. Specifically, for individuals with low cognitive reappraisal, the higher their affect spin, the more their aggressive behavior revealed itself. As for individuals with high cognitive reappraisal, the effect was not significant.
This study provides evidence for the superiority of cognitive reappraisal in alleviating aggressive behavior, and the impact of affect spin on aggressive behavior. It reveals that adaptive emotion regulation strategies that enhance individuals' understanding or change their cognition of affective stimuli may be an effective way to reduce external aggressive behavior. At the same time, the finding regarding the moderating effect of cognitive reappraisal also provides practical guidance for the aggressive behavior intervention of high affect spin. For example, individuals with low cognitive reappraisal can reduce their aggressive behavior by participating in intervention programs that help them cope with negative affective experience.
关键词
情绪自旋 /
攻击行为 /
认知重评 /
表达抑制
Key words
affect spin /
aggressive behavior /
cognitive reappraisal /
expression suppression
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 陈步青, 郭艳丽, 刘文达, 牛旭峰. (2018). 道德敏感性与攻击: 自我控制和情绪调节的多重中介. 中国健康心理学杂志, 26(1), 93-98.
[2] 郭梅英, 魏广东, 张玉英. (2010). 大学生攻击行为倾向与原生家庭特质焦虑及心理健康的关系. 中国学校卫生, 31(3), 289-290.
[3] 侯璐璐, 江琦, 王焕贞, 李长燃. (2017). 特质愤怒对攻击行为的影响: 基于综合认知模型的视角. 心理学报, 49(12), 1548-1558.
[4] 金童林, 乌云特娜, 张璐, 李鑫, 黄明明, 刘振会, 姜永志. (2019). 网络社会排斥对大学生网络攻击行为和传统攻击行为的影响: 疏离感的中介作用. 心理科学, 42(5), 1106-1112.
[5] 王力, 柳恒超, 李中权, 杜卫. (2007). 情绪调节量表的信度和效度研究. 中国行为医学科学, 16(9), 846-848.
[6] 张珊珊, 王婧怡, 李昱汝. (2021). 情绪自旋及其心理健康功能. 心理科学进展, 29(8), 1430-1437.
[7] Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.
[8] Beal D. J., Trougakos J. P., Weiss H. M., & Dalal R. S. (2013). Affect spin and the emotion regulation process at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 593-605.
[9] Berking M., Orth U., Wupperman P., Meier L. L., & Caspar F. (2008). Prospective effects of emotion-regulation skills on emotional adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(4), 485-494.
[10] Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452-459.
[11] Chen J., Zhang C. Y., Wang Y., & Xu W. (2020). A longitudinal study of inferiority impacting on aggression among college students: The mediation role of cognitive reappraisal and expression suppression. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, Article 109839.
[12] Chester, D. S., & Dewall, C. N. (2017). Combating the sting of rejection with the pleasure of revenge: A new look at how emotion shapes aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 413-430.
[13] Chester D. S., Clark M. A., & DeWall C. N. (2021). The flux, pulse, and spin of aggression-related affect. Emotion, 21(3), 513-525.
[14] Clark M. A., Robertson M. M., & Carter N. T. (2018). You spin me right round: A within-person examination of affect spin and voluntary work behavior. Journal of Management, 44(8), 3176-3199.
[15] Gómez-Leal R., Megías-Robles A., Gutiérrez-Cobo M. J., Cabello R., & Fernández-Berrocal P. (2022). Personal risk and protective factors involved in aggressive behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(3-4), 1489-1515.
[16] Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281-291.
[17] Hayes A. F.(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
[18] Kuppens P., Oravecz Z., & Tuerlinckx F. (2010). Feelings change: Accounting for individual differences in the temporal dynamics of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 1042-1060.
[19] Kuppens P., van Mechelen I., Nezlek J. B., Dossche D., & Timmermans T. (2007). Individual differences in core affect variability and their relationship to personality and psychological adjustment. Emotion, 7(2), 262-274.
[20] Larsen, R. J., & Kasimatis, M. (1990). Individual differences in entrainment of mood to the weekly calendar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 164-171.
[21] Ohly, S., & Schmitt, A. (2015). What makes us enthusiastic, angry, feeling at rest or worried? Development and validation of an affective work events taxonomy using concept mapping methodology. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(1), 15-35.
[22] Ram N., Gerstorf D., Lindenberger U., & Smith J. (2011). Developmental change and intraindividual variability: Relating cognitive aging to cognitive plasticity, cardiovascular lability, and emotional diversity. Psychology and Aging, 26(2), 363-371.
[23] Ramírez, J. M., & Andreu, J. M. (2006). Aggression, and some related psychological constructs (anger, hostility, and impulsivity) some comments from a research project. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(3), 276-291.
[24] Richels K. A., Day E. A., Jorgensen A. G., & Huck J. T. (2020). Keeping calm and carrying on: Relating affect spin and pulse to complex skill acquisition and adaptive performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 377.
[25] Schmeichel, B. J. (2007). Attention control, memory updating, and emotion regulation temporarily reduce the capacity for executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 241-255.
[26] Scott L. N., Stepp S. D., & Pilkonis P. A. (2014). Prospective associations between features of borderline personality disorder, emotion dysregulation, and aggression. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5(3), 278-288.
[27] Scott L. N., Wright A. G. C., Beeney J. E., Lazarus S. A., Pilkonis P. A., & Stepp S. D. (2017). Borderline personality disorder symptoms and aggression: A within-person process model. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 429-440.
[28] Shorey R. C., McNulty J. K., Moore T. M., & Stuart G. L. (2015). Emotion regulation moderates the association between proximal negative affect and intimate partner violence perpetration. Prevention Science, 16(6), 873-880.
[29] Sun J. Q., Wayne S. J., & Liu Y. (2017). Perceived leader affect and employee work engagement: The moderating role of affect spin. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2017(1), Article 14611.
[30] Uy M. A., Sun S. H., & Foo M. D. (2017). Affect spin, entrepreneurs' well-being, and venture goal progress: The moderating role of goal orientation. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(4), 443-460.
[31] Vansteelandt K., Probst M., & Pieters G. (2013). Assessing affective variability in eating disorders: Affect spins less in anorexia nervosa of the restrictive type. Eating Behaviors, 14(3), 263-268.
[32] Wright A. G. C., Stepp S. D., Scott L. N., Hallquist M. N., Beeney J. E., Lazarus S. A., & Pilkonis P. A. (2017). The effect of pathological narcissism on interpersonal and affective processes in social interactions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(7), 898-910.
基金
*本研究得到教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目 (21YJCZH221) 的资助
PDF(734 KB)
