未来情景思维对戒烟行为意向的影响*

陈海德; 郑立煜; 卞涵琨; 高崚峰

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20250121

PDF(1214 KB)

心理科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1) : 220-230. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20250121

社会、人格与管理

未来情景思维对戒烟行为意向的影响^*

陈海德, 郑立煜, 卞涵琨, 高崚峰^**

作者信息 +

The Effect of Episodic Future Thinking on Behavioral Intention to Quit Smoking

Chen Haide, Zheng Liyu, Bian Hankun, Gao Lingfeng

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

不同类型的未来情景思维对行为改变可能有不同的作用。采用情景思维想象任务操纵吸烟者的未来情景思维类型,考察不同内容和不同形式的未来情景思维对戒烟行为意向的影响。实验1比较与戒烟目标无关和相关的两种未来情景思维,结果显示,相关组在戒烟意愿上的提高显著高于无关组,两组在戒烟行动计划上无显著差异。实验2比较与戒烟目标相关的未来情景思维的过程模拟和结果模拟,结果显示,过程模拟组在戒烟意愿和行动计划的提高均显著高于结果模拟组。这表明具有目标导向和过程模拟的未来情景思维更有助于提高吸烟者的戒烟行为意向。

Abstract

Tobacco use remains the largest preventable cause of disease and death. The current recommended method of tobacco control is to promote smoking cessation among smokers. Episodic future thinking (EFT), which refers to a projection of the self into the future to pre-experience an event, has been considered a promising approach to promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors. Prior studies have indicated that smokers exhibited lower cravings and less smoking behavior after receiving EFT training. According to the Transtheoretical Model, smoking cessation involves progressing through a series of stages that include increasing willingness to quit and developing a plan of quitting. However, little research has examined the effects of EFT on changes in willingness to quit and the formulation of action plans for quitting smoking among smokers. Additionally, both the Construal Level Theory and Self-Continuity Model suggest that EFT could effectively change the mindset about future thoughts. According to these theories, EFT might have general functions for human behavior change. In fact, EFT can be classified as universal EFT and context-specific EFT according to goal correlation, and it can be also classified as process simulation EFT and outcome simulation EFT according to the form of mindset. However, the different effects of various types of EFT on behavioral intention to quit smoking among smokers remain unknown. Therefore, the present study conducted two experiments to explore the effects of different types of EFT on smoking cessation intentions and smoking action plans.
Experiment 1 aimed to examine the differential influences of universal EFT and context-specific EFT on behavioral intention to quit smoking. 68 male smokers were recruited and randomly assigned to either the quit-goal-related EFT group or the quit-goal-unrelated EFT group. During the experiment, participants completed three rounds of imagery tasks, envisioning scenarios one month, one year, and ten years into the future. Participants in the quit-goal-related EFT group were instructed to imagine positive events following an attempt to quit smoking, while those in the quit-goal-unrelated EFT group imagined positive events unrelated to cigarettes. The results showed that the smokers in the quit-goal-related EFT group exhibited a greater increase in willingness to quit smoking after the EFT manipulation compared with quit-goal-unrelated EFT, and there were no significant differences in smoking action plans between the two groups.
Experiment 2 aimed to examine the differential influences of process simulation EFT and outcome simulation EFT on behavioral intention to quit smoking. 66 male smokers were recruited and randomly assigned to either the process simulation EFT group or the outcome simulation EFT group. The manipulation of the EFT types in Experiment 2 was similar to Experiment 1, except that the process simulation group also engaged in visualizing the strategies employed to achieve successful outcomes in smoking cessation. The results showed that the smokers in the process simulation EFT group exhibited a greater increase in willingness to quit smoking and intention to implement an action plan to quit smoking after EFT manipulation compared with the outcome simulation EFT group.
In conclusion, the present study indicated that smokers who engaged in the EFT manipulation by imagining the process of achieving smoking cessation-related goals would increase their willingness and plans to quit smoking compared to those who imagined the outcomes of goal achievement. In other words, the function of EFT is enhanced when specific situations are designed for certain behaviors. These findings suggest that the influence of different types of EFT should be considered when using the theories of Construal Level Theory and the Self-Continuity Model to explain the role of EFT in smoking cessation behavior. Additionally, participants’ goal pursuit for specific behaviors and the form of simulation should also be considered when designing EFT training programs.

导出引用

陈海德, 郑立煜, 卞涵琨, 高崚峰. 未来情景思维对戒烟行为意向的影响^*[J]. 心理科学. 2025, 48(1): 220-230 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20250121

Chen Haide, Zheng Liyu, Bian Hankun, Gao Lingfeng. The Effect of Episodic Future Thinking on Behavioral Intention to Quit Smoking[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2025, 48(1): 220-230 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20250121

参考文献

[1] 陈海德, 李新伟, 曹柠梦, 李新宇, 李伟健. (2019). 尼古丁依赖对男性吸烟者感知戒烟行为控制的预测: 社会支持与抱怨批评的作用. 心理科学, 42(6), 1499-1504.
[2] 陈海德, 张宇晗, 赵博强, 姚静静, 李伟健. (2024). 主观规范与吸烟者戒烟行动计划: 戒烟意向和关系导向特征的作用. 心理科学, 47(4), 973-980.
[3] 卢蕾安, 王春生, 任俊. (2021). 人们如何设想未来: 未来情景思维对个体心理和行为的影响. 心理科学进展, 29(6), 1086-1096.
[4] 热比古丽·白克力, 杨晓辉, 王振宏. (2023). 中学生时间洞察力特质与健康行为选择内隐偏好: 未来情景性思维的作用. 心理科学, 46(1), 82-89.
[5] 王彤, 杨庆, 黄希庭. (2017). 未来情景思考对目标达成的双刃作用及其机制. 心理科学进展, 25(5), 846-856.
[6] 谢莉, 代佳男, 肖琳, 熙子, 姜垣, 南奕, 杨焱. (2020). 全国成人吸烟者戒烟意愿及影响因素研究. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 28(5), 345-349.
[7] Ajzen, I., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2019). Reasoned action in the service of goal pursuit. Psychological Review, 126(5), 774-786.
[8] Atance, C. M., & O' Neill, D. K. (2001). Episodic future thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(12), 533-539.
[9] Athamneh L. N., Stein M. D., Lin E. H., Stein J. S., Mellis A. M., Gatchalian K. M., & Bickel W. K. (2021). Setting a goal could help you control: Comparing the effect of health goal versus general episodic future thinking on health behaviors among cigarette smokers and obese individuals. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 29(1), 59-72.
[10] Biener, L., & Abrams, D. B. (1991). The contemplation ladder: Validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 10(5), 360-365.
[11] Boyer, P. (2008). Evolutionary economics of mental time travel? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 219-224.
[12] Chang, Y. C., & Ladd, B. O. (2023). Effects of content and valence of episodic future thinking on delay discounting and alcohol demand. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 37(1), 177-189.
[13] Chen H. D., Zhao B. Q., Li X. W., Xie R. B., & Li W. J. (2021). Nicotine dependence, perceived behavioral control, descriptive quitting norms, and intentions to quit smoking among Chinese male regular smokers. Substance Use and Misuse, 56(1), 145-152.
[14] Chiou W. B., Wu W. H., & Chang M. H. (2013). Think abstractly, smoke less: A brief construal-level intervention can promote self-control, leading to reduced cigarette consumption among current smokers. Addiction, 108(5), 985-992.
[15] Cian L., Longoni C., & Krishna A. (2020). Advertising a desired change: When process simulation fosters (vs. hinders) credibility and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(3), 489-508.
[16] D' Argembeau, A., & van der Linden, M. (2012). Predicting the phenomenology of episodic future thoughts. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1198-1206.
[17] Dassen F. C. M., Jansen A., Nederkoorn C., & Houben K. (2016). Focus on the future: Episodic future thinking reduces discount rate and snacking. Appetite, 96(1), 327-332.
[18] de Hoog N., Bolman C., Berndt N., Kers E., Mudde A., de Vries H., & Lechner L. (2016). Smoking cessation in cardiac patients: The influence of action plans, coping plans and self-efficacy on quitting smoking. Health Education Research, 31(3), 350-362.
[19] Escalas, J. E., & Luce, M. F. (2004). Understanding the effects of process-focused versus outcome-focused thought in response to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 274-285.
[20] Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A. G., & Buchner A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
[21] Gerlach K. D., Spreng R. N., Madore K. P., & Schacter D. L. (2014). Future planning: Default network activity couples with frontoparietal control network and reward-processing regions during process and outcome simulations. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(12), 1942-1951.
[22] Hagger M. S., Lonsdale A., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2011). Effectiveness of a brief intervention using mental simulations in reducing alcohol consumption in corporate employees. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 16(4), 375-392.
[23] Haws K. L., Bearden W. O., & Nenkov G. Y. (2012). Consumer spending self-control effectiveness and outcome elaboration prompts. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(5), 695-710.
[24] Hershfield, H. E. (2011). Future self-continuity: How conceptions of the future self transform intertemporal choice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235(1), 30-43.
[25] Hollis-Hansen K., Seidman J., O'Donnell S., & Epstein L. H. (2019). Episodic future thinking and grocery shopping online. Appetite, 133, 1-9.
[26] Hollis-Hansen K., Seidman J., O' Donnell S., Wedderburn A., Stanar S., Brande S., & Epstein L. H. (2020). An ecological momentary episodic future thinking intervention on mother' s weekly food purchases. Health Psychology, 39(2), 159-167.
[27] Kappes, H. B., & Oettingen, G. (2011). Positive fantasies about idealized futures sap energy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(4), 719-729.
[28] Koka, A. (2017). Effectiveness of a brief intervention using process-based mental simulations in promoting muscular strength in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 23(4), 412-427.
[29] Lehner, E., & D' Argembeau, A. (2016). The role of personal goals in autonoetic experience when imagining future events. Consciousness and Cognition, 42, 267-276.
[30] Liu, Z. Y., & Feng, Y. H. (2024). Episodic future thinking increases quitting intention and reduces cigarette consumption: The role of anticipated regret. Substance Use and Misuse, 59(13), 1901-1910.
[31] Oettingen, G. (2012). Future thought and behaviour change. European Review of Social Psychology, 23(1), 1-63.
[32] Oyserman, D., & Horowitz, E. (2023). From possible selves and future selves to current action: An integrated review and identity-based motivation synthesis. Advances in Motivation Science, 10, 73-147.
[33] Pyky R., Koivumaa-Honkanen H., Leinonen A. M., Ahola R., Hirvonen N., Enwald H., & Korpelainen R. (2017). Effect of tailored, gamified, mobile physical activity intervention on life satisfaction and self-rated health in young adolescent men: A population-based, randomized controlled trial (MOPO study). Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 13-22.
[34] Rutchick A. M., Slepian M. L., Reyes M. O., Pleskus L. N., & Hershfield H. E. (2018). Future self-continuity is associated with improved health and increases exercise behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(1), 72-80.
[35] Schacter D. L., Benoit R. G., & Szpunar K. K. (2017). Episodic future thinking: mechanisms and functions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 41-50.
[36] Segovia M. S., Palma M. A., & Nayga, R. M. Jr. (2020). Can episodic future thinking affect food choices? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 177, 371-389.
[37] Sheffer C. E., Prashad N., Lunden S., Malhotra R., & O' Connor, R. J. (2019). To smoke or not to smoke: Does delay discounting affect the proximal choice to smoke? Substance Use and Misuse, 54(8), 1237-1246.
[38] Snider S. E., LaConte S. M., & Bickel W. K. (2016). Episodic future thinking: Expansion of the temporal window in individuals with alcohol dependence. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 40(7), 1558-1566.
[39] Stawarczyk, D., & D' Argembeau, A. (2015). Neural correlates of personal goal processing during episodic future thinking and mind-wandering: An ALE meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 36(8), 2928-2947.
[40] Stein J. S., Tegge A. N., Turner J. K., & Bickel W. K. (2018). Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and cigarette demand: An investigation of the good-subject effect. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 41(2), 269-276.
[41] Strathman A., Gleicher F., Boninger D. S., & Edwards C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742-752.
[42] Sun H. Y., Jiang Y. P., Wang X., Cui L. Y., & Sun H. M. (2023). The effect of episodic foresight on intertemporal decision-making: The role of future self-continuity and perceived control. Cognitive Processing, 24(2), 173-186.
[43] Trope Y., Liberman N., & Wakslak C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-95.
[44] Waytz A., Hershfield H. E., & Tamir D. I. (2015). Mental simulation and meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 336-355.
[45] West, R. (2009). The multiple facets of cigarette addiction and what they mean for encouraging and helping smokers to stop. COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 6(4), 277-283.
[46] Wiesenfeld B. M., Reyt J. N., Brockner J., & Trope Y. (2017). Construal level theory in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 367-400.
[47] Yang, B., & Nan, X. L. (2020). Self-affirmation moderates self-congruency effect in health messaging. Health Communication, 35(11), 1359-1367.
[48] Zhao, B. Q., & Chen, H. D. (2023). Effects of smoking social cues on inhibitory control in smokers: An event-related potential study. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 23(4), 100387.
[49] Zhao X., Dichtl F. F., & Foran H. M. (2022). Predicting smoking behavior: Intention and future self-continuity among Austrians. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 27(5), 1042-1051