当下经济,未来健康:环境不确定感对经济-健康跨期决策的影响*

乔骊珠, 纪婷婷, 郭永玉

心理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 683-692.

PDF(1062 KB)
中文  |  English
PDF(1062 KB)
心理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 683-692. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260316
社会、人格与管理

当下经济,未来健康:环境不确定感对经济-健康跨期决策的影响*

作者信息 +

Current Economy and Future Health: The Impact of Environmental Uncertainty on Economic-Health Intertemporal Decision-Making

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

以往研究多聚焦单一经济或健康领域跨期决策。该研究首次从跨领域视角出发,探讨环境不确定感对经济-健康跨期决策的影响。研究1发现,在单一领域跨期决策中,环境不确定感显著增强个体的即时偏好;且相较于未来经济,个体更容易忽视未来健康。研究2发现,在跨领域经济-健康跨期决策中,环境不确定促使个体更倾向于选择当前的经济利益而非未来的健康利益。研究3引入损益框架发现,在“当前经济获益-未来健康受损”与“当前经济受损-未来健康获益”两种情境下,环境不确定感均削弱了个体对未来健康的关注,但前者情境中该效应相对较弱。该研究不仅在理论上拓展了跨期决策的边界,并对不确定环境下的公众健康决策行为具有重要的现实启示。

Abstract

Is it better to sacrifice future health for immediate economic gain, or to invest current economic resources to secure long-term health? Such decisions, which involve different temporal dimensions and domains, are essentially intertemporal decision-making, a process in which individuals weigh costs and benefits at various points in time. Traditional research on intertemporal decision-making predominantly has adopted a single-domain perspective, which fails to fully capture the dynamic and complex interaction between economic and health outcomes in real-world settings. Moreover, intense social competition compels individuals to prioritize immediate economic gains, while increasing rates of chronic diseases and aging populations amplify future health risks. Under these dual pressures, overcoming the lure of short-term economic gains to optimize long-term health decisions represents a critical scientific challenge.

In response, the present study proposes an innovative theoretical framework of “economic-health intertemporal decision-making”. This framework aims to explore the trade-off mechanisms between current economic benefits and future health outcomes. A key factor in this process may be environmental uncertainty, defined as individuals’ perception of rapid and dramatic environmental changes that are difficult to accurately assess and predict. Currently, the escalation of global geopolitical conflicts, financial market turbulence, and the frequent occurrence of extreme climate events collectively heighten individuals’ sense of environmental uncertainty, thereby significantly increasing the complexity of decisions involving current economic benefits and future health outcomes. Investigating how individuals balance current economic benefits and future health outcomes under conditions of environmental uncertainty is of great theoretical and practical significance for understanding economic-health intertemporal decision-making and devising targeted intervention strategies.

Three experiments were designed to explore these issues in depth. Study 1 examined the effect of environmental uncertainty on intertemporal decision-making within a single domain and compared economic discount rates with health discount rates. A total of 140 participants were randomly assigned to either an environmental uncertainty manipulation group or a control group. Participants underwent environmental uncertainty manipulation and verification, followed by economic intertemporal decision-making and health intertemporal decision-making tasks. The results indicated that, in both domains, environmental uncertainty significantly increased individuals’ preference for immediate rewards; furthermore, participants were more likely to disregard future health outcomes than future economic benefits.

Study 2 extended the investigation from a single-domain focus to a cross-domain perspective of economic-health intertemporal decision-making, aiming to determine whether participants in the environmental uncertainty group were more inclined to choose immediate economic benefits over future health benefits. A total of 220 participants were randomly assigned to either the environmental uncertainty group or the control group. During the experiment, participants completed the environmental uncertainty manipulation and verification, followed by a cross-domain economic-health intertemporal decision-making task. The results showed that under conditions of environmental uncertainty, individuals were more likely to opt for current economic benefits rather than future health benefits.

Study 3 employed a dual-scenario experimental paradigm based on a gain-loss framework to investigate the effects of environmental uncertainty, gain-loss framing, and changes in low back pain levels on cross-domain economic-health decision-making. A total of 272 participants were randomly assigned to the environmental uncertainty group or the control group. After undergoing environmental uncertainty manipulation and verification, participants completed a cross-domain economic-health intertemporal decision-making task framed in terms of gains and losses. The results revealed that in both the “current economic gain-future health loss” and “current economic loss-future health gain” scenarios, environmental uncertainty diminished the attention paid to future health. However, in the former scenario, the emphasis on future health was relatively higher.

In summary, this study found that environmental uncertainty generally reinforces the prioritization of immediate economic benefits while weakening long-term considerations for health. These findings provide theoretical support for improving public health decision-making models and enhancing individuals’ awareness and prevention of future health risks.

关键词

环境不确定感 / 损益框架 / 跨期决策 / 经济-健康跨期决策

Key words

environmental uncertainty / gain-loss framework / intertemporal decision-making / economic-health intertemporal decision-making

引用本文

导出引用
乔骊珠, 纪婷婷, 郭永玉. 当下经济,未来健康:环境不确定感对经济-健康跨期决策的影响*[J]. 心理科学. 2026, 49(3): 683-692 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260316
Qiao Lizhu, Ji Tingting, Guo Yongyu. Current Economy and Future Health: The Impact of Environmental Uncertainty on Economic-Health Intertemporal Decision-Making[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2026, 49(3): 683-692 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260316

参考文献

[1]
陈思柳. (2021). 不同决策情境下的损失厌恶效应差异. 心理学进展, 11(1), 222-231.
[2]
刘霆宇. (2013). 群体决策方式下金钱结果和环境结果的跨期选择研究 (硕士学位论文). 浙江大学, 杭州.
[3]
吴小菊, 陈俊芳, 符佳慧, 李纾, 梁竹苑. (2020). 健康领域的跨期决策与健康行为. 心理科学进展, 28(11), 1926-1938.
[4]
张彦驰, 童丹丹, 陈晨, 郭永玉. (2023). 贫困心态对跨期决策的影响: 分析思维与损益框架的作用. 心理科学, 46(2), 419-426.
[5]
Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586-592.
[6]
Attema, A. E. (2011). Developments in time preference and their implications for medical decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63(10), 1388-1399.
[7]
Barro, R. J. (2013). Health and economic growth. Annals of Economics and Finance, 14(2), 329-366.
[8]
Bleichrodt, H., & Johannesson, M. (2001). Time preference for health: A test of stationarity versus decreasing timing aversion. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45(2), 265-282.
[9]
Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(3), 771-791.
[10]
Chapman, G. B. (2002). Your money or your health: Time preferences and trading money for health. Medical Decision Making, 22(5), 410-416.
[11]
Chapman, G. B., & Elstein, A. S. (1995). Valuing the future: Temporal discounting of health and money. Medical Decision Making, 15(4), 373-386.
[12]
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
[13]
Duan, J., Wu, S. J., & Sun, L. (2017). Do the powerful discount the future less? The effects of power on temporal discounting. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1007.
[14]
Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313-327.
[15]
Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1997). Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71(3), 355-373.
[16]
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
[17]
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351-401.
[18]
Geng, X., Li, M., Zhang, F., Li, W., & Liu, D. (2022). Incremental theory of personality attenuates the effect of environmental uncertainty on intertemporal choices. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 16, 18344909221139325.
[19]
Geng, X., Xu, J., Li, Y., Zhang, F., Sun, X., & Yu, H. (2022). The impact of childhood socioeconomic status on adolescents' risk behaviors: The role of physiological and psychological threats. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 15254.
[20]
Ghatge, M. S. K., & Parasar, A. (2023). Impact of modern lifestyle on health. PriMera Scientific Surgical Research and Practice, 2, 16-19.
[21]
Grant, F., & Hogg, M. A. (2012). Self-uncertainty, social identity prominence and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 538-542.
[22]
Hirsh, J. B., Mar, R. A., & Peterson, J. B. (2012). Psychological entropy: A framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety. Psychological Review, 119(2), 304-320.
[23]
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
[24]
Kaplan, B. A., Amlung, M., Reed, D. D., Jarmolowicz, D. P., McKerchar, T. L., & Lemley, S. M. (2016). Automating scoring of delay discounting for the 21-and 27-item monetary choice questionnaires. The Behavior Analyst, 39, 293-304.
[25]
Ke, Y., & Chai, X. (2021). The life course health development model: A new approach to understanding human health. Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical Sciences, 50(4), 411-419.
[26]
Kirby, K. N., & Maraković N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 100-104.
[27]
Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 78-87.
[28]
Knobloch, L. K. (2008). Uncertainty reduction theory. Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication, 133-144.
[29]
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”. Psychological Review, 103(2), 263-283.
[30]
Li, X., & Song, J. (2024). The association between uncertainty intolerance, perceived environmental uncertainty, and ego depletion in early adulthood: The mediating role of negative coping styles. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1228966.
[31]
Liu, D., Zhang, Y., & Geng, X. (2023). The effect of chronic regulatory focus and social comparison on undergraduates' intertemporal choices under gain-loss frame. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1076304.
[32]
Mittal, C., & Griskevicius, V. (2014). Sense of control under uncertainty depends on people' s childhood environment: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 621-637.
[33]
National Institutes of Health. (2023). Our biggest health challenges. https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/nih-turning-discovery-into-health/our-biggest-health-challenges
[34]
Pepper, G. V., & Nettle, D. (2014). Perceived extrinsic mortality risk and reported effort in looking after health. Human Nature, 25(3), 378-392.
[35]
Wang, D., Nie, X., Zhou, Y., Ye, J., Yu, P., Hu, Y., & Jin, X. (2024). The influence of COVID-19 on intertemporal choices in the health and economy domains. Heliyon, 10(11), e31801.
[36]
Wang, X. T., & Dvorak, R. D. (2010). Sweet future: Fluctuating blood glucose levels affect future discounting. Psychological Science, 21(2), 183-188.
[37]
Wu, X., Li, J., & Li, Y. (2022). The impact of uncertainty induced by the COVID-19 pandemic on intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 103, 104397.
[38]
Zhou, M., & Shen, H. (2024). Forecasting the global burden of disease to 2050. The Lancet, 403(10440), 1961-1963.

基金

*国家社会科学基金青年项目(24CSH117)
江苏省自然科学基金青年项目(BK20230382)
江苏省社会科学基金青年项目(23SHC012)

PDF(1062 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/