大学生志愿服务动机、身份认同与持续性志愿服务的纵向互惠关系*

韦泉, 屈国梁, 张志欣, 陈煦海, 罗扬眉

心理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 692-703.

PDF(1327 KB)
中文  |  English
PDF(1327 KB)
心理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 692-703. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260317
社会、人格与管理

大学生志愿服务动机、身份认同与持续性志愿服务的纵向互惠关系*

作者信息 +

The Longitudinal Reciprocal Relations between Volunteer Motivation, Role Identity, and Sustained Volunteering among College Students

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

志愿服务是社会文明进步的重要标志,但很少研究考察在志愿服务中动机、认同和行为的动态作用。对442名大学生志愿者进行为期一年的三次追踪,采用交叉滞后模型考察志愿服务动机、身份认同与持续性志愿服务的纵向互惠关系。结果发现:(1)志愿服务动机和身份认同之间、身份认同与持续性志愿服务之间均存在积极的双向关系;(2)身份认同在志愿服务动机和持续性志愿服务的关系中发挥中介作用。研究表明,在较长的时间跨度上,志愿服务动机通过身份认同来影响持续性志愿服务,而持续性志愿服务也能通过巩固和发展身份认同,反过来维系和促进志愿服务动机,三者之间呈现动态的互惠关系。研究结果能为构建志愿服务长效化机制提供理论支持。

Abstract

Volunteering is an important symbol of social progress and plays a significant role in building a community for social governance. However, China currently faces challenges of low participation continuity and high volunteer attrition. Exploring the dynamics and mechanisms underlying sustained volunteering behavior is crucial for addressing these issues. Existing studies predominantly examine the one-way influence of volunteer motivation and role identity on sustained volunteering behavior from a static perspective, with limited focus on the dynamic relationships between variables over time. This static interpretation may be disconnected from real-life situations and fail to fully reflect the continuous nature of volunteering as a result of both individual factors and time. In fact, volunteer motivation and role identity evolve and change throughout the volunteering process. This change represents the cognitive construction and reconstruction that volunteers experience as they engage in sustained behaviors. Failing to consider this dynamic process can result in an incomplete understanding of the formation and continuity mechanisms of volunteer behavior, thereby limiting the effectiveness of strategies aimed at improving volunteer retention rates.

To explore the dynamic relationship between volunteer motivation, role identity, and sustained volunteering behaviors, this study employed a three-wave longitudinal design. The study followed 442 college student volunteers (Mage = 19.27 years, SD = 1.67 years, female 86.65%) three times over a one-year period (T1: March 2023, T2: September 2023, T3: March 2024). Data were analyzed using SPSS 27.0 and Mplus 8.3, and a cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) was constructed to test a reciprocal circular model between the three variables, with gender and age as covariates. Volunteer motivation was assessed using the Volunteer Functions Inventory, and role identity was measured with the Volunteer Role Identity 5-Item Scale. Sustained volunteering was measured by averaging the standardized scores for time spent on volunteering, volunteering frequency, and volunteers' intention to continue volunteering. All measurements had good reliability and validity, and there was no severe common method bias, ensuring the robustness of the study findings. The main variables involved exhibited a certain degree of stability over time, meeting the conditions required for establishing a cross-lagged model.

The study found that: (1) A reciprocal relationship existed between volunteer motivation and role identity. Volunteer motivation at T1 and T2 positively predicted role identity at T2 and T3 (βT1=.13, p<.01; βT2=.11, p<.05), and role identity at T1 and T2 positively predicted volunteer motivation at T2 and T3 (βT1=.10, p<.05; βT2=.12, p<.05). (2) Role identity and sustained volunteering also demonstrated a reciprocal relationship. Role identity at T1 and T2 positively predicted sustained volunteering at T2 and T3 (βT1=.24, p<.001; βT2=.17, p<.01), and sustained volunteering at T1 and T2 positively predicted role identity at T2 and T3 (βT1=.16, p<.001; βT2=.11, p<.05). (3) There was no significant direct effect between volunteer motivation and sustained volunteering; rather, their reciprocal relationship was established through role identity. Specifically, the mediating effect of T2 role identity between T1 volunteer motivation and T3 sustained volunteering was significant (β=.02, p<.05, 95%CI=[.00,.04]); Similarly, the mediating effect of T2 role identity between T1 sustained volunteering and T3 volunteer motivation was also significant (β=.02, p<.05, 95%CI=[.00,.04]).

Drawing upon the Triadic Reciprocal Determinism, Functionalism, and Motivated Identity Construction Theory, this study employs the CLPM to investigate the longitudinal reciprocal relationships among volunteer motivation, role identity, and sustained volunteering. The findings demonstrate that stimulating and fulfilling volunteer motivation serves as a critical starting point for promoting sustained participation in volunteer activities. Furthermore, role identity emerges as a pivotal factor in both maintaining and enhancing volunteer motivation and behavior, while also functioning as the core mechanism facilitating individuals' transition from short-term engagement to long-term commitment. These insights carry significant implications for developing effective strategies to foster sustained volunteer engagement and improve volunteer management practices.

关键词

志愿服务动机 / 身份认同 / 持续性志愿服务 / 交叉滞后

Key words

volunteer motivation / role identity / sustained volunteering / cross-lagged panel model

引用本文

导出引用
韦泉, 屈国梁, 张志欣, . 大学生志愿服务动机、身份认同与持续性志愿服务的纵向互惠关系*[J]. 心理科学. 2026, 49(3): 692-703 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260317
Wei Quan, Qu Guoliang, Zhang Zhixin, et al. The Longitudinal Reciprocal Relations between Volunteer Motivation, Role Identity, and Sustained Volunteering among College Students[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2026, 49(3): 692-703 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260317

参考文献

[1]
Ng, J. C. Y., 赵斯琪, 谭清美. (2019). 大学生志愿者志愿行为可持续性研究. 当代青年研究, 6, 33-39.
[2]
包寒吴霜, 蔡华俭, 罗宇. (2019). 身份认同动机:概念、测量与心理效应. 心理科学, 42(4), 971-977.
[3]
董宝林, 李鹤, 刘如强. (2024). 身份认同、内部动机、主观锻炼体验与青少年锻炼行为的关系研究. 天津体育学院学报, 39(2), 217-224.
[4]
黄飞, 李育辉, 张建新. (2008). 年级还是年龄?两种不同的效应来源——以青少年人格横断比较为例. 心理学报, 40(12), 1287.
[5]
李若璇, 曹仕涛, 朱文龙, 姚梅林. (2018). 父母规范和同伴规范对志愿投入的影响:身份认同的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, 6, 84-90.
[6]
刘旭, 刘宇潇, 陈倩, 曹敏, 彭霁, 周宗奎. (2024). 儿童友谊质量与主观幸福感和孤独感的双向关系:一项纵向研究. 心理科学, 47(4), 819-828.
[7]
罗婧. (2021). 志愿常态化:对“个体——环境”交互机制的探索. 管理世界, 37(8), 128-142, 206, 143.
[8]
屈国梁, 罗扬眉. (2023). 社区志愿服务可持续参与的心理机制. 社区心理学研究, 16(2), 76-91.
[9]
王焕, 魏娜, 张勇杰. (2023). 信息公开与志愿服务参与意愿:基于社会组织评估的实验研究. 公共行政评论, 16(5), 86-105, 198.
[10]
张宝生, 李鑫, 李新野, 张庆普. (2022). 主观规范对大学生志愿者志愿工作投入的影响机制研究——一个链式双重中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 38(5), 658-666.
[11]
郑爽, 张骊凡, 曹仕涛, 姚梅林. (2020). 志愿服务动机与志愿服务持续性的关系:亲社会人格的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(1), 157-162.
[12]
周林波. (2023). 结构方程模型下的青年志愿者参与动机与应对策略研究——基于重庆市1530名青年志愿者的调查. 中国软科学, 1, 186-194, 214.
[13]
Aydinli, A., Bender, M., Chasiotis, A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Cemalcilar, Z., Chong, A., & Yue, X. 2016). A cross-cultural study of explicit and implicit motivation for long-term volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(2), 375-396.
[14]
Bandura, A. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33(4), 344-358.
[15]
Benito-Ballesteros, Á., Chacón, F., & Osa-Subtil, I. (2024). How satisfaction lead to volunteer role identity? Revisiting identity salience applied to volunteer research. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 27, e19.
[16]
Bocsi, V., Fényes, H., & Markos, V. (2017). Motives of volunteering and values of work among higher education students. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 16(2), 117-131.
[17]
Chacón, F., Gutiérrez, G., Sauto, V., Vecina, M. L., & Pérez, A. (2017). Volunteer functions inventory: A systematic review. Psicothema, 29(3), 306-316.
[18]
Chacón, F., Vecina, M. L., & Dávila, M. C. (2007). The three-stage model of volunteers' duration of service. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(5), 627-642.
[19]
Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516-1530.
[20]
Compion, S., Meijs, L., Cnaan, R. A., Krasnopolskaya, I., von Schnurbein, G., & Abu-Rumman, S. (2022). Repeat and non-returning volunteers: The promise of episodic events for volunteer recruitment and retention. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33(3), 472-482.
[21]
Conner, M., & Norman, P. (2022). Understanding the intention-behavior gap: The role of intention strength. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 923464.
[22]
Davies, B., Abrams, D., Horsham, Z., & Lalot, F. (2024). The causal relationship between volunteering and social cohesion: A large scale analysis of secondary longitudinal data. Social Indicators Research, 171(3), 809-825.
[23]
Fang, Y., & Neufeld, D. (2009). Understanding sustained participation in open source software projects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(4), 9-50.
[24]
Finkelstein, M. A., Penner, L. A., & Brannick, M. T. (2005). Motive, role identity, and prosocial personality as predictors of volunteer activity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 33(4), 403-418.
[25]
Gerstein, L. H., Wilkeson, D. A., & Anderson, H. (2004). Differences in motivations of paid versus nonpaid volunteers. Psychological Reports, 94(1), 163-175.
[26]
Gray, D., & Stevenson, C. (2020). How can ‘we’ help? Exploring the role of shared social identity in the experiences and benefits of volunteering. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 30(4), 341-353.
[27]
Güntert, S. T., & Wehner, T. (2015). The impact of self-determined motivation on volunteer role identities: A cross-lagged panel study. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 14-18.
[28]
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022). Cognitive-motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(10), 560-576.
[29]
Kneale, D., Bangpan, M., Hartley, K., & Hou, M. (2023). Mobilising volunteer groups, communities and agencies during the pandemic: A rapid realist view of the evidence. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-13.
[30]
Lai, M. H. C., Ren, M. Y. W., Wu, A. M. S., & Hung, E. P. W. (2013). Motivation as mediator between national identity and intention to volunteer. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 23(2), 128-142.
[31]
Mackinnon, S. P., & Sherry, S. B. (2012). Perfectionistic self-presentation mediates the relationship between perfectionistic concerns and subjective well-being: A three-wave longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 22-28.
[32]
Marta, E., Manzi, C., Pozzi, M., & Vignoles, V. L. (2014). Identity and the theory of planned behavior: Predicting maintenance of volunteering after three years. The Journal of Social Psychology, 154(3), 198-207.
[33]
Mateiu-Vescan, R., Ionescu, T., & Opre, A. (2021). Reconsidering volunteering: Individual change as a result of doing good for others. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(6), 1213-1227.
[34]
Moshagen, M., & Bader, M. (2024). semPower: General power analysis for structural equation models. Behavior Research Methods, 56(4), 2901-2922.
[35]
Mullan, B., Liddelow, C., Charlesworth, J., Slabbert, A., Allom, V., Harris, C., Same, A., & Kothe, E. (2021). Investigating mechanisms for recruiting and retaining volunteers: The role of habit strength and planning in volunteering engagement. The Journal of Social Psychology, 161(3), 363-378.
[36]
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(4), 599-620.
[37]
Naqshbandi, K. Z., Jeon, Y. H., & Ahmadpour, N. (2023). Exploring volunteer motivation, identity and meaning-making in digital science-based research volunteering. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(20), 4090-4111.
[38]
Neely, A. R., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Evans, M. D. (2022). A process model of volunteer motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 32(4), 100879.
[39]
Nguyen, C., Faulkner, M., Yang, S., Williams, J., & Tong, L. (2022). Mind the gap: Understanding the gap between intentions and behaviour in the charity context. Journal of Business Research, 148, 216-224.
[40]
Omoto, A. M., & Snyder, M. (1995). Sustained helping without obligation: Motivation, longevity of service, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 671-686.
[41]
Ou, L., Ni, J., Qiu, X., & Li, D. (2023). Research on the relationship between rural volunteering and career expectations of college students: The mediating effect of role identity. Sage Open, 13(2), 21582440231180664.
[42]
Piliavin, J. A., Grube, J. A., & Callero, P. L. (2002). Role as resource for action in public service. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 469-485.
[43]
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
[44]
Pozzi, M., Marzana, D., Marta, E., Vecina, M. L., & Aresi, G. (2020). Relationship closeness, habit and perceived subjective norms as predictors of volunteer role identity in school-based mentoring programmes. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 10(1), 17-30.
[45]
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90.
[46]
Qu, G., Ju, E., Qin, G., Chen, X., & Luo, Y. (2024). Profiles of volunteers’ motivations and positive experiences relate to their sustained volunteering during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), e2748.
[47]
Selig, J., P., & Little, T. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp.265-278). The Guilford Press.
[48]
Serrano Velarde, K. (2020). Informal learning in formal organizations: The case of volunteer learning in the hospital. Current Sociology, 68(4), 572-591.
[49]
Stukas, A. A., Hoye, R., Nicholson, M., Brown, K. M., & Aisbett, L. (2016). Motivations to volunteer and their associations with volunteers' well-being. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 112-132.
[50]
Thoits, P. A. (2021). Motivations for peer-support volunteering: Social identities and role-identities as sources of motivation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(4), 797-815.
[51]
van Ingen, E., & Wilson, J. (2017). I volunteer, therefore I am? Factors affecting volunteer role identity. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(1), 29-46.
[52]
Veludo-de-Oliveira, T., Pallister, J. G., & Foxall, G. R. (2013). Accounting for sustained volunteering by young people: An expanded TPB. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(4), 1180-1198.
[53]
Wakefield, J. R. H., Bowe, M., & Kellezi, B. (2022). Who helps and why? A longitudinal exploration of volunteer role identity, between-group closeness, and community identification as predictors of coordinated helping during the COVID-19 pandemic. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(3), 907-923.
[54]
Wu, J., Wing Lo, T., & Liu, E. S. C. (2009). Psychometric properties of the volunteer functions inventory with Chinese students. Journal of Community Psychology, 37(6), 769-780.
[55]
Zhou, S., & Muscente, K. K. (2023). Meta-analysis of volunteer motives using the volunteer functions inventory to predict volunteer satisfaction, commitment, and behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(5), 1331-1356.

基金

*国家社会科学基金一般项目(21BSH146)

PDF(1327 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/