忙碌者的“远”见:消费者主观忙碌感对品牌延伸评价的影响研究*

李清, 牟碧茜, 郑锐

心理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4) : 960-976.

PDF(1045 KB)
中文  |  English
PDF(1045 KB)
心理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4) : 960-976. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260416
社会、人格与管理

忙碌者的“远”见:消费者主观忙碌感对品牌延伸评价的影响研究*

作者信息 +

Busy People's Vision: How Subjective Busyness Enhances Brand Extensions Evaluation

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

忙碌已成为消费者的生活常态且企业常常在延伸产品宣传广告中运用忙碌符号。通过3个预实验和5个主实验,探讨了主观忙碌感对品牌延伸评价的影响作用及其内在机制。实验结果发现,高(vs. 低)主观忙碌感会提高消费者对远距离品牌延伸的评价,对近距离品牌延伸评价没有显著影响。认知灵活性在其中发挥中介作用。具体而言,主观忙碌感通过增强认知灵活性进而提升个体对远距离品牌延伸的评价。此外,忙碌归因在上述效应中起调节作用。具体而言,当个体对忙碌进行积极归因时,高主观忙碌感通过增强个体的认知灵活性进而提升其对远距离品牌延伸的评价;而当个体对忙碌进行消极归因时,该效应会被削弱甚至消失。

Abstract

Although technological advances have substantially improved productivity, individuals report feeling busier than ever. Subjective busyness, the perception that most of one’s time is occupied by work-related tasks, has become a prevalent psychological state in contemporary society, profoundly shaping work habits and lifestyle choices. Many brands recognize consumers' busy mindset and incorporate “busyness” cues into advertisements to build emotional connections, foster resonance, and drive sales of new products. Brand extension, a strategy in which a company leverages an established brand to launch a new product, depends heavily on consumer perception. A key factor in this evaluation is the fit (or similarity), between the parent brand and the extension across functional, image-based, and value-related dimensions. A high fit (a close brand extension) facilitates the transfer of positive brand associations to the new products, increasing its likelihood of success. In contrast, a low fit (distant brand) presents significant differences between the brand and the product, making it difficult for consumers to transfer existing brand associations to the new product. This often triggers cognitive and psychological resistance, leading to lower evaluations. Notably, brands frequently employ busyness-themed appeals when promoting distant extensions. For example, DuPont, a leading industrial technology brand, expanded its high-performance engineering material Tyvek® into lightweight fashion backpacks and apparel, emphasizing “lightweight, efficient, and easy to travel with” to attract time-pressed urban commuters. Similarly, McDonald's has branched into fashion accessories, promoting its brand through ads that highlight “fast-paced” and “on-the-go” lifestyles, symbolically representing the busy urbanite. However, whether and how consumers' own sense of subjective busyness influences their evaluation of brand extension, particularly for distant extensions, remains underexplored. The related hypotheses were examined across three preliminary studies and five main experiments. Study 1a employed a 2 (subjective busyness: high vs. low) × 2 (extension distance: distant vs. close) between-subjects design to examine the effect of high (vs. low) subjective busyness on the evaluation of both distant and close brand extensions (i.e., Hypothesis 1). Study 1b replicated this effect using different busyness manipulations and product categories. Study 2a adopted a 2 (subjective busyness: high vs. low) × 2 (extension distance: distant vs. close) between-subjects experimental design using real brands, to verify the mediation of cognitive flexibility in the relationship between subjective busyness and brand extension evaluation (Hypothesis 2). To enhance the ecological validity of the findings, Study 2b employed a single-factor (subjective busyness: high vs. low) between-subjects design using a fictitious brand to further examine the mediating role of cognitive flexibility (Hypothesis 2) and to rule out other plausible alternative explanations. Study 3 employed a 2 (subjective busyness: high vs. low) × 2 (busyness attribution: positive vs. negative) between-subjects design to test the moderating effect of busyness attribution (i.e., Hypotheses 3a and 3b).

The findings indicate that (1) Subjective busyness influences individuals’ evaluation of brand extensions. Compared to individuals with low subjective busyness, those with high subjective busyness exhibit more favorable evaluations of distant brand extensions. In the context of close brand extensions, however, no significant difference in evaluation is observed between high- and low-subjective-busyness individuals. (2) Cognitive flexibility mediates this relationship. Specifically, a high level of subjective busyness enhances an individual’s cognitive flexibility, which in turn improves the evaluation of distant brand extensions. (3) Busyness attribution moderates the effect. When individuals attribute their busyness positively, subjective busyness boosts cognitive flexibility, thereby leading to higher evaluations of distant brand extensions. In contrast, when busyness is attributed negatively, the aforementioned effect weakens or even disappears. This research extends the brand-extension literature by introducing subjective busyness as a novel antecedent, clarifying its underlying mechanism, and identifying an important boundary condition. It also offers practical guidance for marketers in designing communication strategies for distant brand extensions.

关键词

主观忙碌感 / 品牌延伸 / 认知灵活性 / 忙碌归因

Key words

subjective busyness / brand extension / cognitive flexibility / busyness attribution

引用本文

导出引用
李清, 牟碧茜, 郑锐. 忙碌者的“远”见:消费者主观忙碌感对品牌延伸评价的影响研究*[J]. 心理科学. 2026, 49(4): 960-976 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260416
Li Qing, Mu Bixi, Zheng Rui. Busy People's Vision: How Subjective Busyness Enhances Brand Extensions Evaluation[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2026, 49(4): 960-976 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260416

参考文献

[1]
曹颖, 符国群. (2012). 使用者形象一致性及形象强度对品牌延伸的影响. 管理学报, 9(5), 723-728.
[2]
杜春晶. (2018). 消费者感知契合度与品牌延伸态度关系研究——基于消费者创新的调节作用. 商业经济研究, 24, 73-76.
[3]
胡矗明, 吴梓浩, 李欣倩, 黄赞. (2023). 消费者主观忙碌感对折中选项偏好的影响研究. 外国经济与管理, 45(1), 67-87.
[4]
雷莉, 马谋超. (2003a). 品牌延伸评价中的学习机制. 心理科学, 26(2), 360-361.
[5]
雷莉, 马谋超. (2003b). 品牌延伸中母品牌的作用机制. 心理科学进展, 11(3), 350-354.
[6]
李美华, 白学军. (2005). 不同认知灵活性大学生工作记忆和科技文阅读成绩的比较. 心理科学, 28(2), 329-331.
[7]
李美华, 白学军. (2008). 不同学业成绩类型学生执行功能发展. 心理科学, 31(4), 866-870.
[8]
李莹, 李琳, 潘家冰, 卢笑笑, 王悦. (2024). 执行控制训练对不同工作记忆刷新能力汉英双语者语言控制的影响. 心理科学, 47(5), 1088-1095.
[9]
李紫菲, 成磊, 朱雪丽, 王芳. (2023). 我们都是“打工人”:工作中的客体化. 心理科学, 46(1), 162-169.
[10]
林少龙, 骆少康, 纪婉萍. (2014). 延伸相似度对于品牌延伸的成功重要吗——消费者多样化寻觅与内在控制的调节角色. 南开管理评论, 17(6), 139-148.
[11]
马进军, 刁雅楠, 单娟. (2015). 互联网品牌感知契合度对延伸评价的影响——基于母品牌功能形象的调节作用. 企业经济, 8, 85-90.
[12]
吴川, 张黎, 郑毓煌, 杜晓梦. (2012). 调节聚焦对品牌延伸的影响: 母品牌类型, 母品牌与延伸产品匹配类型的调节作用. 南开管理评论, 15(6), 53-63.
[13]
熊继伟, 卫海英, 陈斯允, 余小敏. (2023). 由远及近:财务约束感对消费者品牌延伸评价的影响. 营销科学学报, 3(3), 63-81.
[14]
张慧, 江晓东. (2022a). 越忙碌越要面子?——忙碌感与消费者面子产品偏好关系研究. 营销科学学报, 2(3), 136-155.
[15]
张慧, 江晓东. (2022b). 忙碌感研究评述:概念、机制与展望. 外国经济与管理, 44(7), 126-137.
[16]
郑春东, 陈雅, 唐建生. (2016). 感知契合度及其对品牌延伸评价影响的研究——一个基于 E-PBE框架的综述. 管理评论, 28(1), 156-168.
[17]
朱翊敏, 梁嘉明, 吴继飞, 林培培. (2024). 资源丰富性对个体向抽象目标捐赠意愿的影响研究. 南开管理评论, 27(4), 16-26.
[18]
Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27-41.
[19]
Adam, B. (2013). Timewatch: The social analysis of time. John Wiley & Sons.
[20]
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice - Hall.
[21]
Barone, M. J., Miniard, P. W., & Romeo, J. B. (2000). The influence of positive mood on brand extension evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 386-400.
[22]
Bellezza, S., Paharia, N., & Keinan, A. (2017). Conspicuous consumption of time: When busyness and lack of leisure time become a status symbol. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 118-138.
[23]
Bullard, O., Penner, S., & Main, K. J. (2019). Can implicit theory influence construal level? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(4), 662-670.
Beliefs about stability and change are captured by individuals' implicit theories. Incremental-theorists believe that human traits and world-dispositions are malleable and can change through effort, whereas entity-theorists believe that human traits and world-dispositions are fixed. In this research we find that the implicit theory an individual holds influences an important aspect of the cognitive process, namely, the level of construal at which information is processed. In three studies we demonstrate that, compared to entity-theorists, incremental-theorists adopt a more abstract level of information construal, and the increased cognitive flexibility afforded by an incremental-theory mindset explains this effect.
[24]
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-83.
Researchers have suggested that general self-efficacy (GSE) can substantially contribute to organizational theory, research, and practice. Unfortunately, the limited construct validity work conducted on commonly used GSE measures has highlighted such potential problems as low content validity and multidimensionality. The authors developed a new GSE (NGSE) scale and compared its psychometric properties and validity to that of the Sherer et al. General Self-Efficacy Scale (SGSE). Studies in two countries found that the NGSE scale has higher construct validity than the SGSE scale. Although shorter than the SGSE scale, the NGSE scale demonstrated high reliability, predicted specific self-efficacy (SSE) for a variety of tasks in various contexts, and moderated the influence of previous performance on subsequent SSE formation. Implications, limitations, and directions for future organizational research are discussed.
[25]
Consiglio, I., De Angelis, M., & Costabile, M. (2018). The effect of social density on word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 511-528.
[26]
Cutright, K. M., Bettman, J. R., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2013). Putting brands in their place: How a lack of control keeps brands contained. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(3), 365-377.
[27]
Deng, Q. C., & Messinger, P. R. (2022). Dimensions of brand-extension fit. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(3), 764-787.
[28]
Dennis, J. P., & Vander Wal, J. S. (2010). The cognitive flexibility inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34(3), 241-253.
[29]
Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 343-353.
[30]
Du, J., Song, B., Wang, X., & Wu, Z. (2024). Busyness and diverse choice: How perceived busyness shapes consumer' s preference for variety seeking. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 81, Article 104003.
[31]
Festini, S. B., McDonough, I. M., & Park, D. C. (2016). The busier the better: Greater busyness is associated with better cognition. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 8, Article 98.
[32]
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2010). Implicit affective cues and attentional tuning: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 875-893.
A large and growing number of studies support the notion that arousing positive emotional states expand, and that arousing negative states constrict, the scope of attention on both the perceptual and conceptual levels. However, these studies have predominantly involved the manipulation or measurement of conscious emotional experiences (e.g., subjective feelings of happiness or anxiety). This raises the question: Do cues that are merely associated with benign versus threatening situations but do not elicit conscious feelings of positive or negative emotional arousal independently expand or contract attentional scope? Integrating theoretical advances in affective neuroscience, positive psychology, and social cognition, the authors propose that rudimentary intero- and exteroceptive stimuli may indeed become associated with the onset of arousing positive or negative emotional states and/or with appraisals that the environment is benign or threatening and thereby come to moderate the scope of attention in the absence of conscious emotional experience. Specifically, implicit "benign situation" cues are posited to broaden, and implicit "threatening situation" cues to narrow, the range of both perceptual and conceptual attentional selection. An extensive array of research findings involving a diverse set of such implicit affective cues (e.g., enactment of approach and avoidance behaviors, incidental exposure to colors signaling safety vs. danger) is marshaled in support of this proposition. Potential alternative explanations for and moderators of these attentional tuning effects, as well as their higher level neuropsychological underpinnings, are also discussed along with prospective extensions to a range of other situational cues and domains of social cognitive processing.
[33]
Gershuny, J. (2005). Busyness as the badge of honor for the new superordinate working class. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 72(2), 287-314.
[34]
Guo, X., Huang, J., & Wan, X. (2024). Influence of exposure to novel food packaging on consumers' adoption of innovative products. Food Quality and Preference, 119, Article 105230.
[35]
Hagtvedt, H., & Patrick, V. M. (2009). The broad embrace of luxury: Hedonic potential as a driver of brand extendibility. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(4), 608-618.
[36]
Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51(6), 358-374.
[37]
Hsee, C. K., Yang, A. X., & Wang, L. (2010). Idleness aversion and the need for justifiable busyness. Psychol Science, 21(7), 926-930.
[38]
Jhang, J. H., Grant, S. J., & Campbell, M. C. (2012). Get it? Got it. Good! Enhancing new product acceptance by facilitating resolution of extreme incongruity. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 247-259.
[39]
Kang, I. H., Wu, Y., & Ferraro, R. (2018). Are busy consumers more satisfied consumers? It depends! The effect of perceived busyness on satisfaction. European Advances in Consumer Research, 165-167.
[40]
Keinan, A., Bellezza, S., & Paharia, N. (2019). The symbolic value of time. Current Opinion in Psychology, 26, 58-61.
Research on symbolic consumption and status signaling has primarily examined how consumers spend money on possessions that display their identity and status. We review research suggesting that the way in which consumers spend their time can also serve as a form of conspicuous consumption. In particular, we examine status inferences based on how consumers allocate time between work and leisure, and how consumers choose to spend their discretionary leisure time. In the past, high-status individuals displayed wealth by wasting time on unproductive leisure activities; today, long hours of work and lack of leisure time have become a status symbol. Productivity orientation and the obsession with busyness also impacts consumers' choice of leisure activities and motivates consumers to seek collectible experiences in an attempt to build their experiential CV.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[41]
Kim, J. C., Wadhwa, M., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2019). When busy is less indulging: Impact of busy mindset on self-control behaviors. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 933-952.
[42]
Lee, H., & Cho, H. (2022). When do people rely more on unique versus common attributes? The effect of power distance belief on preference for alignable versus nonalignable attributes. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 21(4), 855-870.
[43]
Martin, M. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76(2), 623-626.
[44]
Mathur, P., Malika, M., Agrawal, N., & Maheswaran, D. (2023). The context (in) dependence of low-fit brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 87(1), 114-132.
[45]
Monga, A. B., & Gürhan-Canli, Z. (2012). The influence of mating mind-sets on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(4), 581-593.
[46]
Monga, A. B., & John, D. R. (2007). Cultural differences in brand extension evaluation: The influence of analytic versus holistic thinking. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 529-536.
[47]
Parker, J. R., Lehmann, D. R., Keller, K. L., & Schleicher, M. G. (2018). Building a multi-category brand: when should distant brand extensions be introduced? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(2), 300-316.
[48]
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
Hypotheses involving mediation are common in the behavioral sciences. Mediation exists when a predictor affects a dependent variable indirectly through at least one intervening variable, or mediator. Methods to assess mediation involving multiple simultaneous mediators have received little attention in the methodological literature despite a clear need. We provide an overview of simple and multiple mediation and explore three approaches that can be used to investigate indirect processes, as well as methods for contrasting two or more mediators within a single model. We present an illustrative example, assessing and contrasting potential mediators of the relationship between the helpfulness of socialization agents and job satisfaction. We also provide SAS and SPSS macros, as well as Mplus and LISREL syntax, to facilitate the use of these methods in applications.
[49]
Punyatoya, P. (2013). Consumer evaluation of brand extension for global and local brands: The moderating role of product similarity. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 25(3), 198-215.
[50]
Rodas, M. A., John, D. R., & Torelli, C. J. (2021). Building brands for the emerging bicultural market: The appeal of paradox brands. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(4), 633-650.
Bicultural consumers now represent a third of the US population and are the fastest growing demographic group in the United States. This shift in consumer markets presents a challenge for marketers as they try to design brand strategies to serve this important group. In this article, the authors show that certain types of brands, specifically paradox brands that incorporate contradictory brand meanings, are particularly appealing to bicultural consumers. Results from seven studies reveal that bicultural consumers evaluate paradox brands more favorably and choose paradox brands more than traditional brands without contradictions. Furthermore, bicultural consumers exhibit more favorable evaluations and greater choice of paradox brands than do monocultural consumers. These cultural differences are attributable to greater cognitive flexibility found among biculturals, particularly those who adopt an acculturation strategy of integrating their different cultural identities. Greater cognitive flexibility, in turn, prompts stronger engagement with a paradox brand, which contributes to more favorable brand evaluations and choice. Contributions of this research for understanding bicultural consumers, marketing to bicultural consumers, and directions for future research are discussed.
[51]
Roux, C., Goldsmith, K., & Bonezzi, A. (2015). On the psychology of scarcity: When reminders of resource scarcity promote selfish (and generous) behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(4), 615-631.
[52]
Schulte, B. (2014, March 11). Why being too busy makes us feel so good. The Washington Post.
[53]
Sengupta, J., & Johar, G. V. (2002). Effects of inconsistent attribute information on the predictive value of product attitudes: Toward a resolution of opposing perspectives. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 39-56.
[54]
Septianto, F., Pontes, N., & Tjiptono, F. (2022). The persuasiveness of metaphor in advertising. Psychology and Marketing, 39(5), 951-961.
[55]
Sood, S., & Keller, K. L. (2012). The effects of brand name structure on brand extension evaluations and parent brand dilution. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(3), 373-382.
[56]
Su, L., Monga, A. B., & Jiang, Y. (2021). How life-role transitions shape consumer responses to brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(3), 579-594.
[57]
Wang, H., & Liu, D. (2020). The differentiated impact of perceived brand competence type on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 400-410.
[58]
Wilcox, K., Laran, J., Stephen, A. T., & Zubcsek, P. P. (2016). How being busy can increase motivation and reduce task completion time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(3), 371-384.
This research tests the hypothesis that being busy increases motivation and reduces the time it takes to complete tasks for which people miss a deadline. This effect occurs because busy people tend to perceive that they are using their time effectively, which mitigates the sense of failure people have when they miss a task deadline. Studies 1 and 2 show that when people are busy, they are more motivated to complete a task after missing a deadline than those who are not busy, and that the perception that one is using time effectively mediates this effect. Studies 3 and 4 show that this process makes busy people more likely to complete real tasks than people who are not busy. Study 5 uses data from over half a million tasks submitted by thousands of users of a task management software application to show that busy people take less time to complete a task after they miss a deadline for completing it. The findings delineate the conditions under which being busy can mitigate the negative effects of missing a deadline and reduce the time it takes to complete tasks. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
[59]
Wu, Y., Cai, Y., Zhou, X., & Huang, X. (2024). Shaping extendibility: The influence of circular versus angular shapes on consumer brand extension evaluation. Journal of Business Research, 171, Article 114366.
[60]
Xin, B., Zhu, C., & Septianto, F. (2022). The effects of mixed emotional appeals in leveraging paradox brands. Journal of Business Research, 153, 266-275.
[61]
Yang, C., Tao, S., & Cai, Y. (2024). Do busy consumers prefer new products? A study on the effect of a busy mindset on the evaluation of new products. Current Psychology, 43(7), 6321-6337.
[62]
Zheng, C., Liu, X., & Liu, S. (2024). How to make busy individuals donate more? The matching effect of charitable appeals and busyness on willingness to donate. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79, Article 103803.
[63]
Zhong, K., Wang, Y., & Wang, H. (2021). Sense hardness: Effect of haptic perception on consumer attitudes towards brand extension. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(3), 535-549.

基金

* 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(23JNQMX38)
国家自然科学基金项目(71802093)
2024年度广东省本科高校教学质量与教学改革工程之高等教育教学改革项目的资助

PDF(1045 KB)

评审附件

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/