大学生文化倾向性与姓名知觉反应时的关系

于全磊; 陈建文; 张秋颖; 辛鹏

PDF(528 KB)

心理科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1) : 191-196.

社会﹑人格与管理

大学生文化倾向性与姓名知觉反应时的关系

于全磊¹,陈建文²,张秋颖³,辛鹏³

作者信息 +

The Preliminary Study on the Relationship between Cultural Tendency of College Students and the Reaction Time of Perceiving Name

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

摘要本文采用问卷调查和字词辨别反应时任务的方法，考察了大学生对个体姓名信息反应时与文化倾向性之间的关系。结果表明：（1）自陈式《垂直、水平个人-集体主义问卷》的集体主义维度上具有较低的区分效度，有待改善；（2）在视觉通路中，个体对自我的姓名、姓、名的加工时均具有一定的优先性，并发现个体对自我姓名的知觉模式为整体知觉；（3）姓名信息所蕴含的文化信息与文化倾向问卷中所测量的信息具有一定的相关，支持并验证了文化倾向问卷的内容效度；同时研究发现姓、名作为自我结构的标识物比姓名更佳。

Abstract

Abstract We investigated the relationship between college students’ reaction time to individual’s name and cultural tendency with discriminative reaction time of the words and questionnaire survey. The results indicate that (1) the Vertical and Horizontal Collectivism-Individualism Questionnaire has a lower discriminative validity in the dimension of Collectivism, which needs to be improved; (2) in the visual pathway, individual has a priority on processing his or her full name, given name and surname, and the perceptual pattern of individual’s perceiving his or her name is overall perception; (3)the cultural information that the name contains correlates with the information that gets from the Cultural Tendency Questionnaire ,which supports and verifies the validity of the Cultural Tendency Questionnaire; we also have found that surname and given name as the markers of ego structure are better than the full name.

导出引用

于全磊陈建文张秋颖辛鹏. 大学生文化倾向性与姓名知觉反应时的关系[J]. 心理科学. 2012, 35(1): 191-196

The Preliminary Study on the Relationship between Cultural Tendency of College Students and the Reaction Time of Perceiving Name[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2012, 35(1): 191-196

参考文献

参考文献付国伟.（2006）.英汉姓名比较极其文化内涵.山西农业大学学报，5（2）：183-185. 郭建中. （2000）.文化与翻译[M] . 北京: 中国对外翻译出版社.33-37. 黄任之.（2008）.青少年个人主义-集体主义外部特点和内隐特征研究.中南大学博士论文. 王永丽，时勘，黄旭.（2003）.个人主义与集体主义结构的验证性研究.心理科学，26（6）：996-999. 杨红升，黄希庭.（2007）.自我信息加工的独特性：来自人名识别研究的证据.心理科学，30（5）：1127-1129. 周丽清，孙山.（2009）.大学生文化取向内隐效应的实验研究.心理发展与教育，2：55-59. Gronau, N., Cohen, A., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2003). Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention: A combined behavioral and psychophysiological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 132: 512-529. Harris C, Pashler H, & Coburn N. (2004). Moray revisited: High-priority affective stimuli and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A (1): 1- 31. Hazel Rose Markus , & Shinobu Kitayama. (1991), Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2): 224-253. Jyh-shen Chiou. (2001), Horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism among college students in United States, Taiwan, and Argentina. The journal of social psychology, 141(5): 667-678. Mack A & Rock I. (1998). International blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Santanu Sarkar. (2009), Individualism-collectivism as predictors of BPO employee attitudes toward union membership in India. Asia Pac J Manag, 26: 93-118. Triandis, H.C. (2001).Individualism-collectivism and personality, Journal of personality, 69: 97-924. Waler, G.J., & Wang, X. (2005). Further considerations on culture, self-construal, and leisure theory and practice. Book of abstracts: Eleventh Canadian Congress on Leisure Research; 2005 May 18-20[CD]. Nanaimo, BC: Canadian Assoc. For leisure studies.