心理科学

心理科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 384-390.

• 发展与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

4-8年级学生社交淡漠与同伴接纳的交叉滞后回归分析

刘俊升,丁雪辰   

  1. 上海师范大学
  • 收稿日期:2011-04-01 修回日期:2011-12-21 出版日期:2012-03-20 发布日期:2012-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘俊升
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金“十一五”规划教育学青年课题;上海市教育发展基金会晨光计划;上海市重点学科建设项目

Relation between social disinterest and peer preference among grade 4-8 students: a cross-lagged analysis

2   

  • Received:2011-04-01 Revised:2011-12-21 Online:2012-03-20 Published:2012-03-20

摘要： 摘要：用同伴提名和班级戏剧对小学4年级至初中二年级787名儿童进行一年的追踪研究，采用交叉滞后设计，考察了社交淡漠与同伴接纳的相互预测关系。结果发现：（1）同伴接纳与社交淡漠呈显著负相关；（2）社交淡漠在一年时间内呈现出高度的稳定性。测试时间与性别、年级的交互作用显著，在一年时间里，小学男生社交淡漠水平有所减少、女生社交淡漠水平有所增加，而初中男生社交淡漠水平有所增加、女生社交淡漠水平有所减少；（3）二元交叉滞后回归分析结果表明，社交淡漠与同伴接纳的关系模式存在显著的性别差异。对于男生，前测的社交淡漠可以显著预测后测的同伴接纳，而前测的同伴接纳不能显著预测后测的社交淡漠。女生则呈现完全相反的模式。

关键词: 社会退缩, 社交淡漠, 同伴接纳, 交叉滞后

Abstract: Abstract: Social withdrawal is a broad construct with meaningful concrete indexes that featuring with shyness, behavioral inhibition, isolation, rejection, social reticence, passivity and peer neglect.. There are many subtypes under this big umbrella of social withdrawal. Social disinterest is a special subtype which refers to no particular interest in social interaction and expected to spend more time alone. They refrain from social interaction just because no strong motivation to join in the group and no strong motivation to averse to peer activities. The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between social disinterest and peer preference through a one year longitudinal study and to explore the possible causality by using cross-lagged analysis. The data was collected in September 2009 (Time1) and May 2010 (Time2). The procedure was the same at 2 times. 787 students in grade 4~8 were investigated by peer nomination and Revised Class Play (RCP). The results indicated that: (1) peer preference was negatively associated with social disinterest (r=-.43 at Time 1 and -.46 at Time 2, ps<.01); (2) both peer preference and social disinterest were highly stable within one year (r=.67 and .66 on peer preference and social disinterest, ps<.01). Repeated measure revealed that there was a significant three-way interaction between time, gender and grade (F（2, 782）=4.77, p<.01). Within 1 year, boys’ level of social disinterest in primary school was declined and girls’ was increased while boys’ level of social disinterest in junior high school was increased and girls’ was declined. (3) Cross-lagged analysis indicated that relation between social disinterest and peer preference was reciprocal on the whole. But gender differences were also found. For boys, Time1 social disinterest could predicted Time2 peer preference(β= -.14，p<.01) after controlling Time1 peer preference. However, Time1 peer preference could not predicted Time2 social disinterest (β= -.02, p>.05) after controlling Time1 social disinterest. For girls, an opposite pattern was found. Time1 social disinterest could not predicted Time2 peer preference (β=.05, p>.05) but Time1 peer preference could predicted Time2 social disinterest (β= -.23, p<.01) after controlling the Time1 stability. Therefore, the possible causality was different for boys and girls. The results may help us understand developmental relation of children’s social disinterest and peer preference in Chinese culture and some reasons for this gender-specific pattern were discussed.

Key words: social withdrawal, social disinterest, peer preference, cross-lagged