情绪调节自我效能感与主观幸福感:情绪调节方式的中介作用

窦凯 聂衍刚 王玉洁 刘毅 黎建斌

心理科学 ›› 2013, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) : 139-144.

PDF(530 KB)
中文  |  English
PDF(530 KB)
心理科学 ›› 2013, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) : 139-144.
发展与教育

情绪调节自我效能感与主观幸福感:情绪调节方式的中介作用

  • 窦凯,聂衍刚,王玉洁,刘毅,黎建斌
作者信息 +

Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy and Subjective Well-being:the Mediating Effect of Style of Emotional Regulation

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

本研究的目的在于探讨青少年情绪调节自我效能感与主观幸福感之间的关系及情绪调节方式在其中的中介作用。采用《情绪调节自我效能感量表》、《情绪调节方式量表》和《主观幸福感量表》对1128名中学生进行测查,结果表明:(1) 情绪调节自我效能感与情绪调节方式、生活满意度、积极情感、消极情感关系紧密;(2) 情绪调节自我效能感和情绪调节方式可显著预测主观幸福感;(3) 减弱调节在情绪调节自我效能感与主观幸福感间起部分中介作用。

Abstract

Regulatory emotional self-efficacy is a widely concerned issue in recent years. It is defined as the individuals’ confidence level of successfully managing their emotion. Regulatory emotional self-efficacy helps mitigate emotional tension, maintain self-control effective and improve one’s ability of self-control towards emotional impulsiveness. As an essential social competency, regulatory emotional self-efficacy has been demonstrated to impose various effects on the processes of attention, memory and motive. Failure in managing one’s emotion will easily result in affective dysfunctions and then decrease one’s subjective well-being. Previous research has found that there are large differences in the effect of emotional regulatory, which not only result from the ability or skill in regulating one’s emotion, but also from the perceived self-efficacy. On the ground of the above reasoning, the current study hypothesized that: (1) regulatory emotional self-efficacy will directly influence subjective well-being; (2) people with different regulatory emotional self-efficacy may choose different style of emotional regulation; (3) people using different emotional managing strategies will show different positive and negative expression, and further influence their subjective well-being. Regulatory Emotion Self-Efficacy Scale (Revised), Regulatory Emotional Style Questionnaire, Youth Life Satisfaction Scale and Happiness Scale were administered to 1128 middle school students. Pearson correlation, hierarchical regression and structural equation modeling statistical method were adopted to analyze the data. The results showed that: (1) regulatory emotion self-efficacy positively correlated with life satisfaction; (2) style of emotional regulatory was associated with subjective well-being; (3) SEM analysis showed that style of mitigating regulation could serve as the mediating variable between regulation emotion self-efficacy and subjective well-being, and the mediating effect between positive affect expression and subjective well-being as well as negative affect inhibition and subjective well-being were 0.017 and 0.046, respectively. On the basis of these findings, we may conclude that adolescent may experience more subjective well-being when they can effectively amplify their positive affects and manage negative their affects. More importantly, the mechanism of why regulatory emotional self-efficacy affects subjective well-being may be partly due to what regulatory styles people choose. The present study contributes to current literature and promotes our understanding on regulatory emotional self-efficacy and may be applied to improving adolescents’ mental health.

关键词

情绪调节自我效能感 / 主观幸福感 / 情绪调节方式 / 青少年

Key words

Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy / Subjective Well-being / Approach of Emotion Regulatory / Adolescent

引用本文

导出引用
窦凯 聂衍刚 王玉洁 刘毅 黎建斌. 情绪调节自我效能感与主观幸福感:情绪调节方式的中介作用[J]. 心理科学. 2013, 36(1): 139-144
Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy and Subjective Well-being:the Mediating Effect of Style of Emotional Regulation[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2013, 36(1): 139-144

参考文献

丁新华, 王极盛. (2004). 青少年主观幸福感研究述评. 心理科学进展, 12(1): 59-66. 黄敏儿, 郭德俊. (2001). 情绪调节方式及其发展趋势. 应用心理学, 7(2): 17-22. 黄敏儿, 郭德俊. (2002). 原因调节与反应调节的情绪变化过程. 心理学报, 3(4): 371-380. 侯瑞鹤, 俞国良. (2006). 情绪调节理论:心理健康角度的考察[J]. 心理科学进展, 14(3): 375-381. 李中权, 王力, 张厚粲, 柳恒超. (2010). 人格特质与主观幸福感:情绪调节的中介作用. 心理科学, 33(1): 165-167. 李琼. (2011). 情绪调节自我效能感问卷编制及其作用机制. 硕士毕业论文. 西南大学. 聂衍刚, 张卫, 彭以松, 丁莉. (2007). 青少年自我意识的功能结构及测评的研究. 心理科学, 30(2): 411-414.. 彭以松, 聂衍刚, 蒋佩. (2007). 中学生自我意识发展特点及与心理健康关系的研究. 内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版), 20(10): 93-97. 唐冬玲, 董妍, 俞国良, 文书锋. (2010). 情绪调节自我效能感:一个新的研究主题. 心理科学进展, 18(4): 598-604. 文书锋, 唐冬玲, 俞国良. (2009). 情绪调节自我效能感的应用研究. 心理科学, 32(3): 666-669 杨芳. (2007). 大学生情绪调节方式与主观幸福感的关系. 硕士学位论文. 华南师范大学. 俞国良, 赵军燕. (2009). 自我意识情绪: 聚焦于自我的道德情绪研究.心理发展与教育, (2):116-120. 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 刘红云. (2004). 中介效应检验程序及其应用. 心理学报, 36(5): 614-620 赵海涛. (2008). 中学生情绪调节策略与负性情绪的相关研究. 硕士学位论文. 山东师范大学. 张萍,张敏,卢家楣. (2010). 情绪调节自我效能感量表在中国大学生中的试用结果分析. 中国临床心理学杂志,18(5):568-570 张兴贵. (2004). 青少年学生生活满意度的结构和量表编制. 心理科学, 27(5): 1257-1260. 张庆华. (2011). 高中生情绪调节自我效能感与家庭功能、学校人际环境的关系研究. 硕士学位论文. 沈阳师范大学. Bandura, A.(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman Bandura A, Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, Gerbino M, Pastorelli C. (2003). Role of affective self-regulatory efficacy on diverse spheres of psychosocial functioning. Child Development. 74: 769-782. Caprara, GV.; Gerbino, M.(2001). Affective perceived self-efficacy: The capacity to regulate negative affect and to express positive affect. In: Caprara, GV., editor. Self-efficacy assessment. Trento, Italy: Edizioni Erickson., 35-50 Caprara GV, Pastorelli C, Regalia C, Scabini E, Bandura A. (2005). Impact of adolescents’ filial self-efficacy on quality of family functioning and satisfaction. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15: 71-97 Caprara GV, Steca P, Zelli A, Capanna C. (2005). A new scale for measuring adult prosocialness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21:77–89 Caprara, G.V., Steca, P., Gerbino, M. , Paciello, M., & Vecchio, G.(2006).Looking for adolescents’ well-being: Self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of positive thinking and happiness. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 15: 30-43. Caprara, G.V., Giunta, L.G, Eisenberg, N., Gerbino, M., Pastorelli, C.& Tramontano, C.(2008). Assessing Regulatory Emotional Self—Efficacy in Three Countries. Psychological Assessment, 20(3): 227-237. Collins, A. , & Steptoe, A. (2008). The role of life satisfaction and depressive symptoms in all-cause mortality. Psychology and Aging, 24(3): 696-702 Eisenberg N, Spinrad T. L. (2004). Emotion-related regulation: Sharpening the definition. Child Development, 75: 334-339. Gross J J, O P.(2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2): 348-362. Garnefski N, Teerds J, Kraaij V, Legerstee J, Van den Kommer T.(2004). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: Differences between males and females. Personality and Individual Differences. (36): 267-276. Huang M E, Guo D J.(2000). The nature of emotion regulation(in Chinese). Psychological Science, 23(1): 109-110. O. R. Lightsey Jr. , D. A. Maxwell, T. M. Nash, E. B. Rarey, & V. A. McKinney. (2011). Self-control and self-efficacy for affect regulation as moderators of the negative affect–life satisfaction relationship. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy:An International Quarterly, 25(2): 142-154. O. R. Lightsey Jr. , R. Mcghee, G. G. Gharghani, E. B. Rarey, et al. (2012). Self-Efficacy for Affect Regulation as a Predictor of Future Life Satisfaction and Moderator of the Negative Affect-Life Satisfaction Relationship. Journal of Happiness Studies, (7): 1-18. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, (3): 137–152. Waugh,C. E., Fredrickson, B. L., &Taylor, S. F.(2008). Adapting to life’s slings and arrows:Individual differences in resilience when recovering from an anticipated threat. Journal of Research in Personality, (42): 1031-1046.

基金

国家社科基金项目

PDF(530 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/