集体行动参与双路径模型再分析：来自现实与网络行动情境的检验

乐国安; 薛婷; 陈浩; 姚琦

PDF(847 KB)

心理科学 ›› 2013, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2) : 424-428.

社会﹑人格与管理

集体行动参与双路径模型再分析：来自现实与网络行动情境的检验

乐国安¹,薛婷²,陈浩²,姚琦²

作者信息 +

Reanalysis of the Dual-Pathway Model of Collective Action: Evidences from Offline and Online Circumstances

¹, ¹,Hao CHEN

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

为探明中国文化背景下，Simon等人(1998)提出的集体行动参与双路径模型的适用性，以及现实和网络情境下行动参与心理机制的异同，本研究以“中日撞船事件”为考察蓝本向天津市431名大学生被试进行调查研究，结果发现：国家认同和工具理性动机对集体行动倾向的影响独立且显著，但两路径在内部动机上有汇聚；现实和网络两种行动情境下的整合模型对行动倾向的解释率为37%和44%。结论：中国式集体行动表现为内部驱力作用下的集体主义理性特征。

Abstract

Collective action has been a renewed important issue in social psychology. There were many studies have found the basic roles of social identity and instrumental motives, on which included collective motive, social motive and reward motive, participating collective action(Tajfel & Turner, 1992; Klandermans, 1984, 1997), so Simon and his colleagues(1998) proposed the dual-pathway model of collective action, which tried to integrate those factors in the same model. A few scholars pointed out the two paths have correlativity somewhat, but no study has investigated the common mechanisms underlying the two paths. Moreover, former studies mainly focused on the collective actions occurring in the circumstances of western cultures, neglecting the horizontal one. Also, the target events of the past researches mostly were self’s interests related actual one. So the present study was aimed to explore the relationship between the dual-pathway model of collective action and the internal-external motives, which may be the underlying homogenous sources for the dual pathways, and the differences of the offline and online collective actions in the context of Chinese societal situation. In order to reach the aims, a questionnaire survey in the background of Diaoyu Island Event was carried out, before formal survey, a primary survey including 150 students from the target populate was made, and the result was used to modify the specific questions. In the formal survey, 431 undergraduates from different grades and majors took apart in the research in the unit of class (151 boys and 256 girls). A neutral background material of about 1000 words was edited on the news from Sep 7th to Oct 20th, the questionnaire included identity to nation, three types of the instrumental motives, and the internal-external motives, most of which were based on the former researches and were modified to the specific situation. The last part of the survey was some demographic data. The data collected was analyzed by SPSS13.0 and SEM. The result showed: firstly, the internal motive, national identity and collective motive as the main antecedent variables could have the direct and significant effects on both the offline and online collection action tendencies in the context of Chinese culture. And the two structural equation models accounted for the variances of 37 percents and 44 percents respectively. Secondly, the pathways of national identity and the pathway of the instrumental motives significantly influenced the action tendency simultaneously and relative independently, which verified the former researches and the theoretical hypotheses partly. And the dual pathways converged to the internal motive that revealed explicitly the essential properties of Chinese style collective action. Finally, the different roles and effects of external motives and the social motive reflected the differences of the offline and online collective actions circumstances, that extended the past theoretical models and research results concerning collective action. Those results proved that Chinese collective actions featured of characteristics of collectivism with the intrinsic motives.

导出引用

乐国安薛婷陈浩姚琦. 集体行动参与双路径模型再分析：来自现实与网络行动情境的检验[J]. 心理科学. 2013, 36(2): 424-428

Hao CHEN. Reanalysis of the Dual-Pathway Model of Collective Action: Evidences from Offline and Online Circumstances[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2013, 36(2): 424-428

参考文献

郭茂灿. (2004). 虚拟社区中的规则及其服从: 以天涯社区为例. 社会学研究, (2), 103–111.
侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. (2004). 结构方程模型及其应用. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
兰玉娟, 佐斌. (2009). 去个性化效应的社会认同模型. 心理科学进展, 17(2), 467–472.
石德生. (2010). 社会心理学视域中的“社会认同”. 攀登, 29(1), 72–77.
王俊霞. (2005). 美国的个人主义与中国的集体主义. 佳木斯大学社会科学学报, 23 (2), 75–76.
王俊秀. (2008). 虚拟与现实: 网络虚拟社区的构成. 青年研究, 1(1), 35–43.
翟学伟. (1998). 中国人社会行动的结构: 个人主义和集体主义的终结. 南京大学学报(哲学. 人文科学. 社会科学版), (1), 123–130.
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., & Heilbroner, R. L. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (3rd ed., pp. 278). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2000). You can’t always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 891–906.
Camacho, C. J., Higgins, E. T., & Luger, L. (2003). Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: What feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 498–510.
Chen, X. P., Arzu Wasti, S., & Triandis, H. C. (2007). When does group norm or group identity predict cooperation in a public goods dilemma? The moderating effects of idiocentrism and allocentrism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(2), 259–276.
De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. (1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(7), 871–893.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 617–626.
Feather, N. T. (1982). Expectancy-value approaches: Present status and future directions. In N. T. Feather (Ed.), Expectations and Actions: Expectancy-value Models in Psychology (pp. 395–420). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Feather, N. T. (1992). Values, valences, expectations, and actions. Journal of Social Issues, 48(2), 109–124.
Giguère, B., & Lalonde, R. N. (2010). Why do students strike? Direct and indirect determinants of collective action participation. Political Psychology, 31(2), 227–247.
Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175–213.
Kelly, C. (1993). Group identification, intergroup perceptions and collective action. In W. S. M. Hewstone (Ed.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 59–83). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-Psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583–600.
Klandermans, B. (1997). The Social Psychology of Protest. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
Louis, W. R., Taylor, D. M., & Douglas, R. L. (2005). Normative influence and rational conflict decisions: Group norms and cost-benefit analyses for intergroup behavior. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8(4), 355–374.
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602–616.
Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 229–245.
Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 811–832.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & De Groot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1243–1254.
Reicher, S., & Levine, M. (1994). Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(2), 145–163.
Reicher, S., Levine, M., & Gordijn, E. (1998). More on deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: Three studies on the effects of visibility to the in-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 15–40.
Reicher, S., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In M. H. M. Stroebe, W. Stroebe & M. (Ed.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 161–198). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., et al. (1998). Collective Identification and Social Movement Participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 646–658.
Smith, E. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In D. M. M. D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Affect, Cognition, and Stereotyping: Interactive Processes in Group Perception (pp. 297–315). San Diego: Academic Press.
Smith, E. R., & Henry, S. (1996). An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(6), 635–642.
Smith, E. R., Seger, C. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 431–446.
Stürmer, S., & Kampmeier, C. (2003). Active citizenship: The role of community identification in community volunteerism and local participation. Psychologica Belgica, 43(1–2), 103–122.
Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004a). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. In M. H. W. Stroebe (Ed.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 59–99). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004b). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(3), 263–277.
Stürmer, S., Simon, B., Loewy, M., & J?rger, H. (2003). The dual-pathway model of social movement participation: The case of the fat acceptance movement. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(1), 71–82.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1992). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. W. W. G. Austin (Ed.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: McGraw-Hill Humanities.
Taylor, V., & Whittier, N. (1992). Collective identity in social movement communities. In C. M. M. A. D. Morris (Ed.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (pp. 104–129). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Taylor, V., & Whittier, N. (1995). Analytical approaches to social movement culture: The culture of the women’s movement. In H. J. B. Klandermans (Ed.), Social Movements and Culture (Vol. 4, pp. 163–187). Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press/UCL Press.
Van Zomeren, M., & Spears, R. (2009). Metaphors of protest: A classification of motivations for collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 661–679.
Wright, S., Taylor, D., & Moghaddam, F. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994–1003.