社会价值取向和反馈方式对公共物品困境中决策行为的影响

何力舟; 卞冉; 车宏生

PDF(609 KB)

心理科学 ›› 2013, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2) : 446-452.

社会﹑人格与管理

社会价值取向和反馈方式对公共物品困境中决策行为的影响

何力舟¹,²,卞冉¹,车宏生¹

作者信息 +

The Effects of the Social Value Orientation and Feedback Formats on Decision Behavior in the Dynamic Public Goods Dilemma

Li-Zhou HE¹,²,Ran BIANHong-Sheng CHE⁴

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

本研究通过模拟投资实验和问卷来探讨重复型公共物品困境中社会价值取向（SVO）与信息反馈方式对决策行为的影响。结果表明：(1)合作型SVO的个体比非合作型个体表现出更多的合作行为；(2)SVO与信息反馈方式的交互作用岁实验轮次越来越显著，非合作型的个体会受信息反馈方式的影响，而合作型个体则不易受反馈方式的影响；(3)与无反馈的条件相比，集体反馈倾向于促进个体的合作行为，个体反馈倾向于抑制合作行为，但反馈所造成的适应性改变使情况更为复杂。

Abstract

A public good (PG) is a commodity or service made available to all members of a group, and its provision depends on the voluntary contribution of its members. Once provided, all members in the group can enjoy the benefits of the PG, regardless of whether they contributed or not. Hence, there is a temptation to “free-ride” in the hope that others will contribute. Considered the influence of both individual factors and situational factors, this study focuses on social value orientation and feedback formats. Specifically, we hypothesized that the social value orientation and feedback formats both had significantly influence on participants’ cooperative behavior and that there would be significant interaction between the two variables. In this study, a public good dilemma (PGD) experiment consisted of 20 rounds of PGD games was conducted to test the hypotheses with a 3 (feedback formats)×2(social value orientation) between-subjects design, where participants needed to make decisions about whether to put their “money” in the group account or their individual accounts each round. The results show: (1) The main effect of social value orientation is significant on the decision behavior of the decision maker in repeated public goods dilemma games. Compared with non-cooperative people, cooperative people are much more inclined to cooperate. (2) The main effect of feedback formats is not significant. (3) The interaction between social value orientation and feedback formats is significant. The cooperation behavior of non-cooperative people is significantly affected by feedback formats, but cooperative people behave consistently no matter what format of feedback they receive. (4) Compared with the non-feedback condition, participants under group feedback condition are more likely to cooperate, while participants under individual feedback condition are inclined to cooperate less. The dynamic adaptive changes resulted from feedback, however, make the relationship of the factors in the experiments more complicated.

导出引用

何力舟卞冉车宏生. 社会价值取向和反馈方式对公共物品困境中决策行为的影响[J]. 心理科学. 2013, 36(2): 446-452

Li-Zhou HE Ran BIAN Hong-Sheng CHE. The Effects of the Social Value Orientation and Feedback Formats on Decision Behavior in the Dynamic Public Goods Dilemma[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2013, 36(2): 446-452

中图分类号： B849

参考文献

陈欣, 叶浩生. (2007). 两难中合作行为研究的回顾和展望. 心理科学进展, 15 (5), 743–748.
何贵兵. (2004). 动态两难对策中信息反馈方式对合作行为的影响. 心理科学, 27 (4), 876–880.
胡卫鹏, 区永东, 时勘. (2005). 连续性公共物品困境中信息结构对决策行为的影响. 心理科学, 28(3), 580–583.
霍荣棉, 马剑虹, 刘谞. (2009). 公共物品两难中相互依赖关系对合作行为的影响. 应用心理学, 15(1), 37–44.
汲慧丽. (2007). 社会价值取向、反馈以及惩罚对两难决策的影响. 兰州: 西北师范大学硕士学位论文.
刘长江, 李岩梅, 李纾. (2007). 实验社会心理学中的社会困境. 心理科学进展, 15(2), 379–384.
刘长江, 郝芳. (2011). 不对称社会困境中社会价值取向对合作的影响. 心理学报, 43(4), 432–441.
宋源. (2009). 团队合作行为影响因素研究. 理论界, (6), 197–199.
王沛, 陈莉. (2011). 惩罚和社会价值取向对公共物品两难中人际信任与合作行为的影响. 心理学报, 43(1), 52–64.
王沛, 汲慧丽. (2009). 社会价值取向与反馈对动态社会两难决策的影响：以水资源两难决策为例. 心理与行为研究, 7(2), 93–97.
严进, 王重鸣. (2000). 两难对策中个体价值取向对群体合作行为的影响. 心理学报, 32(3), 332–336.
严进, 王重鸣. (2002). 两难情景下任务结构与价值取向的效用特征转换. 心理学报, 34(5), 529–533.
Archer, K. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Individual versus group feedback in cooperative groups. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 681–689.
Au, W. T., Chen, X. P., & Komorita, S. S. (1998). A probabilistic model of criticality in a sequential public good dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 75(3), 274–293．
Balliet, D., Parks, C. D., & Joireman, J. (2009). Social value orientation and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 533–547.
Baron, R. S., Kerr, N. L., & Miller, N. (1992). Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action. Buckingham : Open University Press.
Biel A, & G?rling T. (1995). The role of uncertainty in resource dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 221–233.
Bogaert, S., Boone, C., & Declerck, C. (2008). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A review and conceptual model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 453–480.
Boone, C., Brabander, B. D., & Witteloostuijn, A. (1999). The impact of personality on behavior in Prisoner’s Dilemma games. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20, 343–377.
Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & McCusker, C. (1997). Gain-loss frames and cooperation in two person social dilemmas: a transformation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1093–1106.
Kollock, P. (1998). Social Dilemmas: The Anatomy of Cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214.
Kuhlman, D. M.,& Marshello, A. F. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 922–931.
Liebrand, W. B. G., & Van Run, G. J. (1985). The effects of social motives across two cultures on behavior in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 86–102.
Liebrand, W. B. G., Jansen, R. W. T. L., Rijken, V. M., & Suhre, C. J. M. (1986). Might over morality: Social values and the perception of other players in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(3), 203–215.
Pillutla, M. M., & Chen, X. P. (1999). Social Norms and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: The Effects of Context and Feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 81–103.
Probst, T.M., Carnevale, P. J., & Triandis, H. C. (1999). Cultural values in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process,77(3), 171–191.
Steg, L. (2003). Motives and behaviour in social dilemmas relevant to the environment. In: L. Hendrickx, W. Jager & L. Steg (Eds.). Human Decision Making and Environmental Perception: Understanding and Assisting Human Decision Making in Real-Life Settings (this volume). Groningen: University of Groningen. 83–102.
Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337–349.
Van Lange, P. A. M., De Bruin, E. M .N., Otten, W., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of Prosocial, Individualistic, and Competitive Orientations: Theory and Preliminary Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 733–746.
Van Lange, P. A. M., Agnew C. R., Harinck F., & Steemers G. E. M. (1997) . From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 73 (6), 1330-1344.
Weber, J. M., Kopelman, S., & Messick, D. M. (2004). A Conceptual Review of Decision Making in Social Dilemmas: Applying a Logic of Appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 281–307.
Yu, C. C., Au, W. T., & Chan, K. K. (2009). Efficacy = Endowment × Efficiency: Revisiting Efficacy and Endowment Effects in a Public Goods Dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), 155–169.