信念-愿望推理中的抑制加工

王雯; 刘希平; 朱莉琪

PDF(374 KB)

心理科学 ›› 2013, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3) : 659-662.

发展与教育

信念-愿望推理中的抑制加工

王雯¹,刘希平²,朱莉琪¹

作者信息 +

Inhibition in the Belief-desire Reasoning

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

在Leslie的心理理论机制选择加工模型(ToMM-SP)理论的基础上，本研究探讨信念-愿望推理任务中抑制是如何加工的，并验证Leslie提出的两个抑制模型。采用三地点双重抑制任务，对216名4~6岁儿童实施两个实验。分别考察心理定势及三个地点公平性这两个因素对儿童选择偏好的影响。结果表明，两种因素都对儿童的表现有影响。消除了这两个因素的影响后，儿童的表现符合返回抑制模型的假说，即儿童在回避愿望的错误信念任务中的抑制加工是系列的。

Abstract

The current study investigated how inhibition is processed in belief-desire reasoning and tested two models of inhibition proposed by Leslie based on the Theory of Mind Mechanism and Selection Procession. Two experiments were conducted using three location double-inhibitive task and their variant versions, with 216 children aged 4 to 6 year old, to investigate respectively how the mental set and equality of the three locations would influence children’s preference. Results showed that both factors play a role in influencing children’s behaviors. Removing the effects of the two factors, children's behaviors could be explained by Leslie’s Inhibition of Return model, that is, children’s processing of inhibition is serial in double-inhibition task.

导出引用

王雯刘希平朱莉琪. 信念-愿望推理中的抑制加工[J]. 心理科学. 2013, 36(3): 659-662

Inhibition in the Belief-desire Reasoning[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2013, 36(3): 659-662

参考文献

[1]邓赐平, 桑标, 缪小春. (2002). 幼儿心理理论发展的一般认知基础——不同心理理论任务表现的特异性与一致性. 心理科学, 25(5): 531-534 [2]贾红桃, 郑红蓝. (2006). 从回避型错误信念任务看大学生心理理论的发展. 高校保健医学研究与实践, 3(2): 21-23 [3]Apperly, I. A., Samson, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2009). Studies of Adults Can Inform Accounts of Theory of Mind Development. Developmental Psychology, 45(1):190-201 [4]Aslan, A., Zellner, M., & B?uml, K. H. T. (2010). Working memory capacity predicts listwise directed forgetting in adults and children. Memory, 18(4): 442-450 [5]Back, E., & Apperly, I. A..Two sources of evidence on the non-automaticity of true and falsebelief ascription[J].Cognition,2010,115:54-70 [6]Callejas, A., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2011) False Belief vs. False Photographs: A Test of Theory of Mind or Working Memory? Frontiers in Psychology. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.0031 [7]Carey, S. The origin of concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.[J].,2009,:- [8]Cassidy, K. W. .Three- and four-1998-old children's ability to use desire- and belief- based reasoning[J].Cognition,1998,66(1):1-11- [9]Ensink, K., & Mayes, L. C. (2010). The Development of Mentalisation in Children From a Theory of Mind Perspective. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 30:301–337 [10]Friedman, O., Leslie, A. M. (2004). Mechanisms of belief-desire reasoning--Inhibition and bias. Psychological Science, 15(8): 547-552 [11]Friedman, O., & Leslie, A. M. (2005). Processing demands in belief-desire reasoning inhibition or general difficulty. Developmental Science, 8(3): 218–225 [12]Fry, A. F., & Hale, S. (2000). Relationships among processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children. Biological Psychology, 54(1-3):1-34 [13]German, T.P., & Leslie, A. M..Children’s inferences from ‘knowing’ to ‘pretending’ and ‘believing’[J].British Journal of Developmental Psychology,2001,19:59-83 [14]German, T. P., & Leslie, A. M..A developmental shift in processes underlying successful belief-desire reasoning[J].Cognitive Science,2004,28:963-977 [15]Hughes, C., Jaffee, S. R., Happé, F., Taylor, A., Caspi, A& Moffitt, T. E. (2005). Origins of individual differences in theory of mind: from nature to nurture? Child Development, 76(2):356-370 [16]Leslie, A. M., Friedman, O., & German, T. P. (2004). Core mechanisms in ‘theory of mind’. Cognitive Sciences, 8 (12): 528-533 [17]Leslie, A. M., German, T. P., & Polizzi, P..Belief-desire reasoning as a process of selection[J].Cognitive Sciences,2005,50:45-85 [18]Leslie, A. M., & Polizzi, P. (1998). Inhibitory processing in the false belief task-Two conjectures. Developmental Science, 1(2): 247-253 [19]McCabe, D. P., Roediger, H. L., McDaniel, M. A., Balota, D. A., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2010). The Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity and Executive Functioning: Evidence for a Common Executive Attention Construct. Neuropsychology, 24(2): 222-243 [20]Sameoff, A. (2010). A Unified Theory of Development: A Dialectic Integration of Nature and Nurture. Child Development, 81(1): 6-22 [21]Sodian, B. (2011). Theory of Mind in Infants. Child Development Perspectives. 5(1), 39-43 [22]Sodian, B., & Kristen, S. (2010). Theory of Mind. In Glatzeder B.M., Goel, V., & Muller, A. (eds.), Towards a Theory of Thinking, On Thinking. pp.189-201. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-03129-8_1 [23]Song, H., Onishi, K. H., Baillargeon, R., & Fisher, C..Can an agent’s false belief be corrected by an appropriate communication[J].Psychological reasoning in 18-month-old infants. Cognition,2008,109:295-315 [24]van der Meer, L., Groenewold, N. A., Nolen, W. A., Pijnenborg, M., & Aleman, A. (2011) Inhibit yourself and understand the other: Neural basis of distinct processes underlying Theory of Mind. NeuroImage, 56: 2364-2374 [25]Wellman, H. M. (2010) Developing a Theory of Mind, In Goswami, U. (Ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development, Second edition. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell [26]Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J..Meta-analysis of theory mind development: The truth about false-belief[J].Child Development,2001,72:655-684 [27]Wertz, A. E, & German, T. P. (2007). Belief-desire reasoning in the explanation of behavior：Do actions speak louder than words? Cognition, 105(1):184-194