本文基于相似吸引理论，考察了领导–下属心理资本一致性能否影响双方的工作关系(领导–下属交换，LMX)和私人关系(领导–下属关系，SSG)，继而塑造下属的周边绩效。采用多项式回归和响应面分析技术，对164份领导–下属配对数据进行分析，结果表明：领导–下属心理资本越一致，双方的LMX和SSG越高；在一致情形下，与“低–低一致”相比，”高–高一致”时的LMX和SSG更高。领导–下属心理资本一致性通过LMX、SSG影响下属的周边绩效。以上结果能为如何有效利用心理资本管理领导–下属的人际互动、下属周边绩效提供启发。
Abstract
With the movement of positive organizational scholarship, the research topic of psychological capital was proposed. Psychological capital is defined as “an individual’s positive psychological state of development that is characterized by self–efficacy, optimism, hope and resilience”. Given that psychological capital has an important role of the development of the organization, this topic increasingly attracts attention and interest from scholars and practitioners alike. Previous research posited that psychological capital played a crucial role in shaping followers’ contextual performance. However, previous studies took a “follower central perspective or leader central perspective” approach to investigate the effect of follower psychological capital or leader psychological capital (separately), while ignoring their combination effect. In view of this, the present study focuses on the combination of leader psychological capital and follower psychological capital and its effect on followers’ contextual performance. Drawing on similarity–attraction theory, we proposed that the different combination modes of leaders’ and followers’ psychological capital could shape the quality of their interaction (job–based relationship represented by leader–member exchange and personal relationship represented by supervisor–subordinate guanxi), which in turn exerts effect on the contextual performance of the follower.
Based on the two–wave data from 163 leader–follower dyads, this study used polynomial regression combined with response surface method to conduct analysis. The results showed that the more agreement (i.e., higher congruence) between a leader’s psychological capital and a follower’s psychological capital, the higher leader–member exchange (LMX) and supervisor–subordinate guanxi (SSG). In the cases of congruence, LMX and SSG were higher when leader psychological capital and follower psychological capital were both high instead of being both low. However, in the cases of incongruence, the level of LMX and SSG under the condition where leaders own higher psychological capital than followers were not significant different from those under the condition where followers own higher psychological capital than leaders. The combination of leaders’ psychological capital and followers’ psychological capital had a positive effect on follower contextual performance through LMX and SSG.
This study contributes to the literature in several aspects. First, by revealing the congruence effect of leader–follower psychological capital on LMX, SSG, and the subsequent contextual performance, our findings serve as empirical complements for previous studies regarding the relationship between psychological capital and contextual performance. Second, by revealing the mediating role of LMX and SSG in the relationship between leader–follower psychological capital and contextual performance, this study contributes to a detailed understanding of how the combination of leaders’ psychological capital and followers’ psychological capital influences follower contextual performance. Finally, our results provide some insights for practitioners on how to promote workplace follower contextual performance, such as promoting both leader psychological capital and follower psychological capital to a congruent high level.
关键词
心理资本 /
领导–下属契合 /
领导–成员交换 /
领导–下属关系 /
周边绩效
Key words
psychological capital /
leader–follower (in)congruence /
leader–member exchange /
supervisor–subordinate guanxi /
contextual performance.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
任皓, 温忠麟, 陈启山, 叶宝娟. (2013). 工作团队领导心理资本对成员组织公民行为的影响机制: 多层次模型.?心理学报,?45(1), 82–93.
王雁飞, 门晓会, 朱瑜. (2017). 领导心理资本对员工绩效的影响机制——变革型领导行为与组织承诺的作用研究.?华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), (6), 47–54.
仲理峰. (2007). 心理资本对员工的工作绩效、组织承诺及组织公民行为的影响.?心理学报,?39(2), 328–334.
Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2008). The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors.?Journal of Management,?36(2), 430–452.
Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity.?The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 713–715.
Carter, M. Z., & Mossholder, K. W. (2015). Are we on the same page? The performance effects of congruence between supervisor and group trust. Journal of Applied Psychology. 100(5), 1349–1363.
Cole, M. S., Carter, M. Z., & Zhang, Z. (2013). Leader–team congruence in power distance values and team effectiveness: The mediating role of procedural justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 962–973.
Chen, Y., Wen, Z., Peng, J., & Liu, X. (2016). Leader–follower congruence in loneliness, LMX and turnover intention.?Journal of Managerial Psychology,?31(4), 864–879.
Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136.
Conway, J. M. (1999). Distinguished contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 3–13.
Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research.?Academy of Management Journal,?36(6), 1577–1613.
Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing.?Research in Organizational Behavior,?9(4), 175–208.
Jawahar, I. M., & Carr, D. (2007). Conscientiousness and contextual performance: The compensatory effects of perceived organizational support and leader‐member exchange.?Journal of Managerial Psychology,?22(4), 330–349.
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human capital edge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Law, K. S., Wong, C., Wang, D., & Wang, L. (2000). Effect of supervisor–subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4), 751–765.
Matta, F. K., Scott, B. A., Koopman, J., & Conlon, D. E. (2015). Does seeing "eye to eye" affect work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior? A role theory perspective on LMX agreement.?Academy of Management Journal,?58(6), 1686–1708.
Oh, I., Guay, R. P., Kim, K., Harold, C. M., Lee, J., & Heo, C., et al. (2014). Fit happens globally: A meta‐analytic comparison of the relationships of person–environment fit dimensions with work attitudes and performance across East Asia, Europe, and North America.?Personnel Psychology,?67(1), 99–152.
Riggs, B. S., & Porter, C. O. (2017). Are there advantages to seeing leadership the same? A test of the mediating effects of LMX on the relationship between ILT congruence and employees' development. Leadership Quarterly, 28(2), 285–299.
Story, J. S. P., Youssef, C. M., Luthans, F., Barbuto, J. E., & Bovaird, J. (2013). Contagion effect of global leaders' positive psychological capital on followers: does distance and quality of relationship matter? ?International Journal of Human Resource Management,?24(13), 2534–2553.
Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention.?Journal of Applied Psychology,?69(3), 428–436.
Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance.?Journal of Applied Psychology,?81(5), 525–531.
Virga, D., Schaufeli, W., Sava, F. A., Dumitru, C. Z., Maricutoiu, L. P., & Sulea, C. (2012). Work engagement as mediator between job characteristics and positive and negative extra–role behaviors. Career Development International, 17(3), 188––207.
Zhang, Z., Wang, M., & Shi, J. (2012). Leader–follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader–member exchange.?Academy of Management Journal,?55(1), 111–130.
PDF(854 KB)
