关键词: 政策执行偏差, 不公正感, 当局可责备性, 愤怒情绪, 集群行为

Abstract: Abstract: In current society, public collective behaviors triggered by local government policy executing deviations or improper administrative damages to the public interest have occurred from time to time, which has brought great harm to social stability and government reputation. In order to further explore the influence mechanism for public injustice on collective behavior under the context of policy executing deviations. A typical sampling method was used to select 1756 publics from 60 counties (cities) in Guizhou,Jiangxi,and Shandong provinces for questionnaire survey. The questionnaire contains five aspects: policy executing deviations, injustice, authority blameworthiness, angry feeling, and collective behavior intentions. In the process of the survey, questionnaire surveys were used for household surveys. Each household was a unit, and the participants completed the questionnaire independently under the guidance of the investigators. The research results show that: (1) In the context of policy executing deviations, the public injustice is significantly predicting the public collective behavior. Moreover, the authority blameworthiness has also mediated the relationship between public injustice perception and public collective behavior. In the context of policy executing deviations, due to negative outcomes are often closely connected to procedural injustices and unfair interactions, the public has a higher governmental authority blameworthiness and ultimately affect the public collective behavior. (2) In the context of policy executing deviations, the public angry feeling mediates the impact of public injustice on public collective behavior. The angry feeling is closely connected to the direct confrontation on aggressors, punishment behavior, reprisal and so on. When people experience anger, anger can drive people to correct injurious acts and prevent possible injustices in the future. Specific to this study, the more the public perceives injustice, the public will have more strong anger and generate collective behavior under the influence of angry feeling. This also shows that in the impact of unfair perception on collective behavior, there is also a same processing path: cognition→emotion→behavior. (3) In the context of policy executing deviations, the intermediary chain consisted of authority blameworthiness and angry feeling mediated the relationship between public injustice and collective behavior. The more the public perceives injustice, the public will have more strong authority blameworthiness, and generate angry feeling under the influence of authority blameworthiness, and further triggers collective behavior. In short, unfair perception will make the individual blame externally. When the individual thinks that the other person or entity should be blamed for the violation, the individual will experience the external negative emotions such as anger, and generate negative behavioral responses under the influence of external angry feeling. The results of this study have certain implications for local government authorities at all levels to respond to mass disturbances caused by the public interest under the damage of policy executing deviations. Firstly, local government authorities at all levels should pay attention to appease and eliminate the public angry feeling when dealing with mass disturbances caused by policy executing deviations, and alleviate the public anger in the context of policy executing deviations, which can decrease the motivation of the public to participate in collective behavior, so that achieve the possibility of decreasing public participation in collective behavior, especially destructive non-canonical collective behavior. Secondly, local governments at all levels should also pay attention to decreasing the authority blameworthiness in the context of policy executing deviations, especially paying attention to the fairness and justice of procedures and the scientific rationality of working methods, and to be patient and meticulous in the communication during work. To achieve decreasing the public angry and the possibility of participating in collective behavior by decreasing the authority blameworthiness of government.

Key words: policy executing deviation, injustice, authority blameworthiness, angry, collective behavior