个体助人行为的形成与发展——基于扎根理论的探究

许丹 李亦欣

心理科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5) : 1243-1249.

PDF(679 KB)
中文  |  English
PDF(679 KB)
心理科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5) : 1243-1249.
社会、人格与管理

个体助人行为的形成与发展——基于扎根理论的探究

  • 许丹1,李亦欣2
作者信息 +

The Formation and Development of Individual’s Prosocial Behavior: Evidence from the Grounded Theory

  • Dan XU1,Yi-Xin LI2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为了解个体助人行为的发生、发展和变化,本研究采用质性研究方法,围绕日常生活中助人行为深度访谈了10名始成年期的高助人者,运用扎根理论对访谈资料进行分析和理论建构。发现个体助人行为的发展可分成三个阶段:形成期、冲击期及稳固期,各发展阶段以对助人行为的认知和主要动机为核心,呈现出稳定-外控、不稳定-外控、稳定-内控的特点,据此提出助人行为的发展历程,并讨论了研究的理论价值、现实意义及局限。

Abstract

To explore how does individuals’ helping behavior develop after puberty, whether it change or not, what are the changes, and what are the influential factors during the process. This paper reviewed evolutionary explanation for the psychological mechanisms of prosocial behavior, theories and studies on development of children and adolescents’ helping behavior and its motivation. Few knowledges about the development of helping behavior in adulthood have been investigated. This study bridges the gap in prosocial behavior between social psychology and developmental psychology. In practical, it benefits our society through building a more altruistic environment. The present study used qualitative research method to collect and analyze data. Ten accommodating individuals in emerging adulthood, 4 females and 6 males, were semi-structured interviewed around their helping behavior in daily life. All interviews were recorded and transcribed into text, then coded and analyzed in NVivo 11 based on grounded theory. This format included data reduction and theme generation through using open coding, axis coding and selective coding sequently. The process of development of helping behavior emerged from the data, which can be divided into three stage. The first stage is the beginning and formation of helping behavior, which characterized by stable and external locus of control. At this stage people’s helping behavior was driven by inherent nature and social norm, but not personal will. They help for complying with the nature or conforming to the norms. As their growth and maturation, as well as the complexity of social environment and development of one’s cognitive abilities, they come to the second, sway stage. Its character showed in the name, which is still external locus of control but unstable. Because they realize that helping is neither a norm that everyone should comply with, nor must get good rewards. They became vacillate and doubt. Their action of helping was depended on external reward, such as reciprocation, affirmation, and good relationship. And the third stage is stabilization, featured by stable and internal locus of control. Through re-identifying with other helper, strengthening their early believes, or fulfilling inner deep needs (e.g. growth and achievement), helpers can restore cognitive coordination. Beliefs on helping behavior and their motivation varied at each stage. And developing path differ from person. Most interviewees were in the third stage after passing by the former two, some went straightly from the first to third stage, another was in the second stage. Then, the process of helping behavior development proposed in this study was compared with theories and findings in social psychology and developmental psychology. Our finding extends the development of prosocial behavior in developmental psychology to emerging adulthood. Manifested the vibration and stabilization after formation of helping behavior. Some suggestions were given for education and public media. Different strategies should be taken for different person. For children and adolescents, benefit of helping for others should be emphasized as usual. But for adult, we should offer some cases to help them find how to benefit themselves in helping. Finally, the limitations and future directions are analyzed.

关键词

助人行为 / 质性研究 / 扎根理论

引用本文

导出引用
许丹 李亦欣. 个体助人行为的形成与发展——基于扎根理论的探究[J]. 心理科学. 2020, 43(5): 1243-1249
Dan XU Yi-Xin LI. The Formation and Development of Individual’s Prosocial Behavior: Evidence from the Grounded Theory[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2020, 43(5): 1243-1249

参考文献

Benson, P. L., Karabenick, S. A., & Lerner, R. M. (1976). Pretty pleases: The effects of physical attractiveness, race, and sex on receiving help. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(5), 409-415. Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological bulletin, 100(3), 283. Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., Shell, R., McNalley, S., & Shea, C. (1991). Prosocial development in adolescence: A longitudinal study. Developmental psychology, 27(5), 849. Eisenberg-Berg, N. (1979). Development of children's prosocial moral judgment. Developmental psychology, 15(2), 128. Freedman, J. L., Wallington, S. A., & Bless, E. (1967). Compliance without pressure: The effect of guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7(2p1), 117. Gentzler, A. L., Contreras‐Grau, J. M., Kerns, K. A., & Weimer, B. L. (2005). Parent–child emotional communication and children's coping in middle childhood. Social Development, 14(4), 591-612. Hamilton, W. D. (1963). The evolution of altruistic behavior. The American Naturalist, 97(896), 354-356. Hoffman, M. L. (1981). Is altruism part of human nature?. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 40(1), 121. Isen, A. M., & Levin, P. F. (1972). Effect of feeling good on helping: s and kindness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 21(3), 384. Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-development approach. Moral development and behavior: Theory research and social issues, 31-53. Krettenauer, T., Malti, T., & Sokol, B. W. (2008). The development of moral emotion expectancies and the happy victimizer phenomenon: A critical review of theory and application. International Journal of Developmental Science, 2(3), 221-235. Malti, T., Gummerum, M., Keller, M., & Buchmann, M. (2009). Children’s moral motivation, sympathy, and prosocial behavior. Child development, 80(2), 442-460. Perloff, L. S. (1983). Perceptions of vulnerability to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39(2), 41-61. Satow, K. L. (1975). Social approval and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(6), 501-509. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly review of biology, 46(1), 35-57. Weiner, B. (1980). May I borrow your class notes? An attributional analysis of judgments of help giving in an achievement-related context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(5), 676. West, S. A., Griffin, A. S., & Gardner, A. (2007). Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. Journal of evolutionary biology, 20(2), 415-432. Wilson, D. S. (2015). Does altruism exist?: culture, genes, and the welfare of others. Yale University Press. 陈向明. (1999). 扎根理论的思路和方法. 教育研究与实验(4), 58-63. 陈向明. (2000). 质的硏究方法与社会科学硏究. 敎育科学出版社. 郭玉霞, 刘世闵, 王为国, 等. (2009). 质性研究资料分析: Nvivo 8 活用宝典. 高等教育文化事业有限公司. 侯玉波. (2003). 社会心理学——北京大学心理学丛书. 北京大学出版社. 寇彧, 付艳, & 张庆鹏. (2007). 青少年认同的亲社会行为: 一项焦点群体访谈研究. 社会学研究, (3), 154-173. 凯西, & 卡麦兹. (2009). 建构扎根理论: 质性研究实践指南. 重庆大学出版社. 王美芳. (1996). 艾森伯格的亲社会道德理论简介. 心理科学进展, (2), 32-36. 伊凡希雅·莱昂斯, & 阿德里安·考利. (2010). 心理学质性资料的分析. 重庆大学出版社.

PDF(679 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/