共情在社会互动提取中的作用：第二人称的视角 *

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230528

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 共情是人们进行社会互动的基本能力。为了探究共情在社会互动提取中的作用,本研究采用“第二人称”视角,在双脑水平上考察共情对社会互动提取的影响。结果显示,在互动提取范式下,互动双方右侧颞顶联合区表现出脑间活动同步性的增强,且这种脑间活动同步性的增强在双方共情能力对记忆准确性的影响中起到了完全中介的作用。以上结果为理解共情影响社会互动提取的群体脑机制提供了实证依据。

关键词: 共情, 互动提取, 第二人称视角, 脑间活动同步性

Abstract: People usually retrieve and share past experience or knowledge with others, which promotes the formation of collective memory shared within group members. As a fundamental ability to collaborate with others, the effect of empathy on collaborative remembering has attracted widespread interest. Evidence based on behavioral studies has speculated that during the collaborative remembering process of two or more people, the speaker's selective retrieval practice of target items could induce the listener's synchronous “covert retrieval”. Neuroscience studies at the single-brain level revealed that the listener's brain activity during listening to the speaker's selective retrieval practice was similar to that of speaker in the process of remembering. In daily life, however, remembering takes place in a real-time two-way social interaction. Therefore, this study adopted a second-person perspective, and investigated the brain mechanisms of memory retrieval in social interaction and the effect of empathy in this process.
We used the retrieval practice paradigm of two-person interaction in the current study. All the participants were randomly paired into speaker-listener dyads. The neural activities in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and right temporal parietal junction (rTPJ) of both the speaker and the listener in each dyad were simultaneously recorded, using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)-based hyperscanning while they performed the interactive retrieval task. After the final retrieval test, the proportion of correct retrieval of related items was assessed. In order to measure the empathy index, all the participants were asked to complete the scale of “the Empathy Quotient, (EQ)” before the experiment.
Behavioral analysis showed that the dyads' empathy was positively correlated with their retrieval accuracy of related items under the retrieval practice paradigm of two-person interaction. The functional imaging results showed that compared to resting state, the interpersonal neural synchronization (INS) in right the temporal parietal junction (rTPJ) was significantly increased during collaborative remembering. Combining the behavioral results with the imaging results, we found that the increased INS in rTPJ was positively correlated with empathy and the retrieval accuracy of related items respectively. Finally, such increased INS mediated the relationship between empathy and the retrieval accuracy of related items in speaker-listener dyads.
To sum up, this study demonstrated that empathy had an effect on the outcome of collaborative remembering. In the process of this real-time social interaction, the INS in rTPJ was significantly increased compared to resting state, and such increased INS mediated the contribution of empathy to the retrieval accuracy of related items in speaker-listener dyads. Our results further support that the INS plays an important role in the study of social interaction as a reliable neuro-marker for measuring the relationship between two interactive brains.

Key words: empathy, collaborative remembering, second-person perspective, interpersonal neural synchronization (INS)

张环, 李婧文, 王海曼, 沙玛丽·阿哈提, 何云凤, 卢春明. 共情在社会互动提取中的作用：第二人称的视角 ^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(5): 1254-1261.

Zhang Huan, Li Jingwen, Wang Haiman, Ahati Shamali, He Yunfeng, Lu Chunming. The Effect of Empathy on Collaborative Remembering from A Second-Person Perspective[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2023, 46(5): 1254-1261.

参考文献

[1] 郭欢, 申荷永, 昝艺, 张道华, 蔡婷婷, 朱绘霖. (2016). 基于功能性近红外光谱技术的双人同步交互测量研究. 激光生物学报, 25(6), 523-530.
[2] 韩丽颖. (2005). 特质移情和状态移情及其对助人行为的影响研究 (硕士学位论文). 东北师范大学, 长春.
[3] 刘旭. (2013). 提取诱发遗忘的发展及其机制研究 (博士学位论文). 天津师范大学.
[4] 孟景, 沈林. (2017). 自闭症谱系障碍个体的共情及其理论与神经机制. 心理科学进展, 25(1), 59-66.
[5] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
[6] 殷庆. (2020). 不同类型情绪记忆传递的神经同步性 (硕士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
[7] 岳童, 黄希庭, 刘光远. (2018). 催产素对共情反应的影响及其作用机制. 心理科学进展, 26(3), 442-453.
[8] 张环, 侯双, 王海曼, 廉宇煊, 杨海波. (2020). 他人在场条件下的社会分享型提取诱发遗忘. 心理学报, 52(6), 716-729.
[9] 张环, 王欣, 刘一贝, 曹贤才, 吴捷. (2021). 成员关系对协作提取成绩的影响. 心理学报, 53(5), 481-493.
[10] 赵俊茹, 李幼穗. (2003). 交流方式对儿童青少年合作行为影响的发展研究. 心理科学, 26(3), 545-546.
[11] Anderson M. C., Bjork R. A., & Bjork E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063-1087.
[12] Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(21), 163-175.
[13] Barrett, L. F., & Simmons, W. K. (2015). Interoceptive predictions in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(7), 419-429.
[14] Clark, S. S., & Giacomantonio, S. G. (2015). Toward predicting prosocial behavior: Music preference and empathy differences between adolescents and adults. Empirical Musicology Review, 10(1-2), 50-65.
[15] Coman, A., & Hirst, W. (2015). Social identity and socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting: The effects of group membership. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), 717-722.
[16] Cuc A., Koppel J., & Hirst W. (2007). Silence is not golden: A case for socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 18(8), 727-733.
[17] Cui X., Bryant D. M., & Reiss A. L. (2012). NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals increased interpersonal coherence in superior frontal cortex during cooperation. NeuroImage, 59(3), 2430-2437.
[18] Fachner J. C., Maidhof C., Grocke D., Pedersen I. N., Trondalen G., Tucek G., & Bonde L. O. (2019). “Telling me not to worry..” Hyperscanning and neural dynamics of emotion processing during guided imagery and music. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1561.
[19] Ford, R. M., & Aberdein, B. (2015). Exploring social influences on the joint Simon task: Empathy and friendship. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 962.
[20] Geana A., Duker A., & Coman A. (2019). An experimental study of the formation of collective memories in social networks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, Article 103813.
[21] Gervain J., Mehler J., Werker J. F., Nelson C. A., Csibra G., Lloyd-Fox S., & Aslin R. N. (2011). Near-infrared spectroscopy: A report from the McDonnell infant methodology consortium. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(1), 22-46.
[22] Goldstein P., Weissman-Fogel I., Dumas G., & Shamay-Tsoory S. G. (2018). Brain-to-brain coupling during handholding is associated with pain reduction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), E2528-E2537.
[23] Hoshi, Y. (2007). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: Current status and future prospects. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 12(6), Article 062106.
[24] Jiang J., Dai B. H., Peng D. L., Zhu C. Z., Liu L., & Lu C. M. (2012). Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(45), 16064-16069.
[25] Koster-Hale, J., & Saxe, R. (2013). Theory of mind: A neural prediction problem. Neuron, 79(5), 836-848.
[26] Liu J. Q., Zhang R. Q., Geng B. B., Zhang T. Y., Yuan D., Otani S., & Li X. C. (2019). Interplay between prior knowledge and communication mode on teaching effectiveness: Interpersonal neural synchronization as a neural marker. NeuroImage, 193, 93-102.
[27] Long Y. H., Zheng L. F., Zhan H., Zhou S. Y., Zhai Y., & Lu C. M. (2021). Interpersonal neural synchronization during interpersonal touch underlies affiliative pair bonding between romantic couples. Cerebral Cortex, 31(3), 1647-1659.
[28] Lu C. M., Zhang Y. J., Biswal B. B., Zang Y. F., Peng D. L., & Zhu C. Z. (2010). Use of fNIRS to assess resting state functional connectivity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 186(2), 242-249.
[29] Mao W. B., An S., Ji F. F., & Li Z. Y. (2021). Who will influence memories of listeners: Evidence from socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(3), 458-466.
[30] Miller, F., & Wallis, J. (2011). Social interaction and the role of empathy in information and knowledge management: A literature review. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 52(2), 122-132.
[31] Molavi, B., & Dumont, G. A. (2012). Wavelet-based motion artifact removal for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Physiological Measurement, 33(2), 259-270.
[32] Pan Y. F., Dikker S., Goldstein P., Zhu Y., Yang C. R., & Hu Y. (2020). Instructor-learner brain coupling discriminates between instructional approaches and predicts learning. NeuroImage, 211, Article 116657.
[33] Schilbach L., Timmermans B., Reddy V., Costall A., Bente G., Schlicht T., & Vogeley K. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 393-414.
[34] Singh A. K., Okamoto M., Dan H., Jurcak V., & Dan I. (2005). Spatial registration of multichannel multi-subject fNIRS data to MNI space without MRI. NeuroImage, 27(4), 842-851.
[35] Stephens G. J., Silbert L. J., & Hasson U. (2010). Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(32), 14425-14430.
[36] Virtanen K. A., Lidell M. E., Orava J., Heglind M., Westergren R., Niemi T., & Nuutila P. (2009). Functional brown adipose tissue in healthy adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(15), 1518-1525.
[37] Zadbood A., Chen J., Leong Y. C., Norman K. A., & Hasson U. (2017). How we transmit memories to other brains: Constructing shared neural representations via communication. Cerebral Cortex, 27(10), 4988-5000.
[38] Zajonc, R. B., & Cross, D. V. (1965). Stimulus generalization as a function of drive shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(4), 363-368.
[39] Zheng L. F., Chen C. S., Liu W. D., Long Y. H., Zhao H., Bai X. L., & Lu C. M. (2018). Enhancement of teaching outcome through neural prediction of the students' knowledge state. Human Brain Mapping, 39(7), 3046-3057.
[40] Zheng L. F., Liu W. D., Long Y. H., Zhai Y., Zhao H., Bai X. L., & Lu C. M. (2020). Affiliative bonding between teachers and students through interpersonal synchronisation in brain activity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(1), 97-109.

共情在社会互动提取中的作用：第二人称的视角 ^*

The Effect of Empathy on Collaborative Remembering from A Second-Person Perspective

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	江语童, 李红, 孟现鑫. “关怀的代价”——共情疲劳的评估及干预^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(3): 752-759.
[2]	吴奇, 谭惠中. 我看不到你的疼痛：隐性自恋特质与疼痛共情的关系 ^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(5): 1212-1219.
[3]	韩书, 陈亚勤, 郑本汇源, 王雅欣, 尹彬. 啮齿动物帮助行为动机的实证研究 ^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(5): 1036-1045.
[4]	孙炳海岳腾宇李伟健邵雨婷. 耳听为“实”，眼见为“虚”：推断任务对共情准确性视听通道效应的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(2): 299-306.
[5]	徐雅诗赵海玲刘洁崔芳. 高共情，更公平：共情特质调节可识别受害者效应引起的资源分配不公[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(2): 427-434.
[6]	贾磊郑峥汪俊. 医学生疼痛共情的认知过程特征：来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(6): 1508-1516.
[7]	邵瑾樊富珉. 团体成员共情的影响因素及作用模型——基于扎根理论[J]. 心理科学, 2021, 44(4): 997-1003.
[8]	岳童黄希庭傅安国薛黎明. 特质积极共情：一种高利他性的人格品质[J]. 心理科学, 2021, 44(3): 754-760.
[9]	钱国英杜媛许晓晖. 同胞共情：特点、影响因素及理论机制[J]. 心理科学, 2021, 44(3): 605-611.
[10]	吴鹏王杨春子刘华山. 初中生网络欺负的发展趋势：道德推脱、观点采择与共情关注的作用[J]. , 2019, 42(5): 1098-1105.
[11]	颜志强王福兴苏彦捷. 疼痛面孔注意加工中共情的作用——来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理科学, 2016, 39(3): 573-579.
[12]	孙炳海张雯雯苗德露李伟健. 观点采择对共情性尴尬的影响：共情反应与尴尬类型的不同作用[J]. 心理科学, 2014, 37(6): 1444-1449.
[13]	陈雪吟官漱尘栾静滢李先春. 记者痛感共情能力初步研究[J]. 心理科学, 2014, 37(2): 283-288.
[14]	袁加锦杨洁敏汪宇李红. 从个体关系的角度看文化对社会脑功能的塑造[J]. 心理科学, 2013, 36(4): 1014-1022.
[15]	程真波黄宇霞. 疼痛共情的神经机制[J]. 心理科学, 2012, 35(2): 436-440.