疫情感知严重性与抑郁情绪的关系：一个有联合调节的中介模型*

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240429

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 重大突发公共卫生事件会增加人们的抑郁情绪。本研究基于应激和应对的交互理论探究疫情感知严重性对抑郁情绪的预测作用,以及网络疑病、反刍思维和性别在其中的作用。在疫情爆发后采用问卷法通过网络收集了503名被试的数据。结果发现,（1）疫情感知严重性越强,个体的抑郁情绪水平越高;（2）网络疑病在疫情感知严重性与抑郁情绪的关系中起中介作用;（3）反刍思维调节了网络疑病与抑郁情绪的关系,反刍思维和性别联合调节了疫情感知严重性与抑郁情绪的关系。本研究拓展了应激与抑郁关系的理论,并且对于降低疫情对个体抑郁情绪的消极影响具有一定的启示。

关键词: 疫情感知严重性, 抑郁情绪, 网络疑病, 反刍思维, 性别

Abstract: Major public health emergencies pose significant threats to the public's physical and mental health, such as depression. However, little is known about the underlying mechanism in the relationship between the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic and depression. According to the transactional theory of stress and coping, it is necessary to explore the influencing factors and mechanism of the relationship between cognition of stress events (perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic) and depression. The level of cyberchondria in people during the COVID-19 epidemic was higher than that during the nonepidemic period. Individuals with cyberchondria have a negative cognitive bias, and negative cognition can positively predict depression. In addition, according to the stress-cognitive vulnerability model of response styles, rumination may interact with stressful events or daily disturbances to exacerbate depression, and there are significant gender differences in rumination. The reason women have higher levels of depression than men may be that women tend to ruminate as a way of coping than men. Therefore, this study attempted to explore the relationship between the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic and depression, the mediating role of cyberchondria, and the joint moderating role of rumination and gender.
In this study, the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic (predictor variable), cyberchondria (mediator variable), rumination (moderator variable), gender (moderator variable), and depression (outcome variable) were used to develop a joint moderated mediation model. The convenience sampling method was adopted, and questionnaires were distributed via the Wenjuanxing platform, which provides functions equivalent to the Amazon Mechanical Turk. The Data were collected from 503 participants during the severe epidemic period in China (January 24 to February 22, 2020). The participants' average age of 22.94 ± 5.68 years. The evaluation tools used included the Perceived Severity of the COVID-19 Epidemic Questionnaire, the depression subscale of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, the Cyberchondria Scale, and the Ruminative Responses Scale.
The path analysis results showed that the higher the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic was, the higher the individual's depression level. Cyberchondria mediated the relationship between the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic and depression. Individuals with higher perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic were more likely to develop cyberchondria, thus increasing their depression level. Rumination moderated the relationship between the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic and depression and moderated the relationship between cyberchondria and depression. A high level of rumination increased the predictive effects of the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic on depression and cyberchondria on depression. However, when the rumination level was low, the predictive effect of the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic on depression was weakened, and cyberchondria had no significant effect on depression prediction. Rumination and gender jointly moderated the relationship between the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic and depression. There was no significant difference in the predictive effect of the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic on depression in women with high rumination compared with that in women with low rumination. The predictive effect of the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic on depression in men with high rumination was greater than that in men with low rumination.
The results showed that the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic affected depression through cyberchondria, and rumination and gender played a joint moderating role. This study reveals the influencing mechanism of the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic on depression and provides a research basis and insight for reducing the impact of the epidemic on individuals' depression.

Key words: perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic, depression, cyberchondria, rumination, gender

高峰强, 韩婷, 桑墨涵, 展艳茹, 韩磊. 疫情感知严重性与抑郁情绪的关系：一个有联合调节的中介模型^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(4): 998-1007.

Gao Fengqiang, Han Ting, Sang Mohan, Zhan Yanru, Han Lei. Perceived Severity of the Epidemic and Depression: A Joint Moderated Mediation Model[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2024, 47(4): 998-1007.

参考文献

[1] 丁佳丽. (2016). 网络疑病的特点及影响因素研究 (硕士学位论文). 北京林业大学.
[2] 龚栩, 谢熹瑶, 徐蕊, 罗跃嘉. (2010). 抑郁-焦虑-压力量表简体中文版(DASS-21)在中国大学生中的测试报告. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(4), 443-446.
[3] 韩秀, 杨宏飞. (2009). Nolen-Hoeksema反刍思维量表在中国的试用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(5), 550-551, 549.
[4] 徐伟, 李朝旭, 韩仁生. (2006). 友谊的结构研究——一项对大学生友谊内隐观的调查研究. 心理科学, 29(5), 1096-1100, 1080.
[5] Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58(1), 5-14.
[6] Bessière K., Pressman S., Kiesler S., & Kraut R. (2010). Effects of Internet use on health and depression: A longitudinal study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(1), Article e6.
[7] Cénat J. M., McIntee S. E., & Blais-Rochette C. (2020). Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety and other mental health problems following the 2010 earthquake in Haiti: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 273, 55-85.
[8] Daly A., Dekker T., & Hess S. (2016). Dummy coding vs effects coding for categorical variables: Clarifications and extensions. Journal of Choice Modelling, 21, 36-41.
[9] Fergus, T. A. (2015). Anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty as potential risk factors for cyberchondria: A replication and extension examining dimensions of each construct. Journal of Affective Disorders, 184, 305-309.
[10] Fischer, E. H., & Turner, J. I. (1970). Orientations to seeking professional help: Development and research utility of an attitude scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35(1, Pt.1), 79-90.
[11] Folkman S., Lazarus R. S., Dunkel-Schetter C., DeLongis A., & Gruen R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 992-1003.
[12] Folkman S., Lazarus R. S., Gruen R. J., & Delongis A. (1986). Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 571-579.
[13] Garfin D. R., Silver R. C., & Holman E. A. (2020). The novel coronavirus (COVID-2019) outbreak: Amplification of public health consequences by media exposure. Health Psychology, 39(5), 355-357.
[14] Gomez-Baya D., Mendoza R., Paino S., Sanchez A., & Romero N. (2017). Latent growth curve analysis of gender differences in response styles and depressive symptoms during mid-adolescence. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 41(2), 289-303.
[15] Huang, Y., & Zhao, N. (2020). Generalized anxiety disorder, depressive symptoms and sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak in China: A web-based cross-sectional survey. Psychiatry Research, 288, Article 112954.
[16] Jemilohun, V. G. (2021). The effects of omitted variable on multicollinearity in hierarchical linear modelling. Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 14(4), 1-13.
[17] Jungmann, S. M., & Witthöft, M. (2020). Health anxiety, cyberchondria, and coping in the current COVID-19 pandemic: Which factors are related to coronavirus anxiety? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 73, Article 102239.
[18] Kathiravan S., Singhania N., & Pannu A. K. (2021). Perceived susceptibility, severity, and reinfection of COVID-19 may influence vaccine acceptance. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 14(5), 238.
[19] Klaiber P., Wen J. H., DeLongis A., & Sin N. L. (2021). The ups and downs of daily life during COVID-19: Age differences in affect, stress, and positive events. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 76(2), e30-e37.
[20] Komiya N., Good G. E., & Sherrod N. B. (2000). Emotional openness as a predictor of college students' attitudes toward seeking psychological help. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 138-143.
[21] Li J. B., Yang A., Dou K., Wang L. X., Zhang M. C., & Lin X. Q. (2020). Chinese public' s knowledge, perceived severity, and perceived controllability of COVID-19 and their associations with emotional and behavioural reactions, social participation, and precautionary behaviour: A national survey. BMC Public Health, 20, Article 1589.
[22] McLean, C. P., & Anderson, E. R. (2009). Brave men and timid women? A review of the gender differences in fear and anxiety. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(6), 496-505.
[23] Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(4), 569-582.
[24] Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1994). The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 424-443.
[25] Pössel, P., & Smith, E. (2019). Integrating beck' s cognitive theory of depression and the hopelessness model in an adolescent sample. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 48(3), 435-451.
[26] Radloff, L. S., & Rae, D. S. (1979). Susceptibility and precipitating factors in depression: Sex differences and similarities. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88(2), 174-181.
[27] Schimmenti A., Billieux J., & Starcevic V. (2020). The four horsemen of fear: An integrated model of understanding fear experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Neuropsychiatry: Journal of Treatment Evaluation, 17(2), 41-45.
[28] Siemer M., Mauss I., & Gross J. J. (2007). Same situation--different emotions: How appraisals shape our emotions. Emotion, 7(3), 592-600.
[29] Starcevic, V., & Berle, D. (2013). Cyberchondria: Towards a better understanding of excessive health-related Internet use. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 13(2), 205-213.
[30] Wang C. Y., Pan R. Y., Wan X. Y., Tan Y. L., Xu L. K., McIntyre R. S., & Ho C. (2020). A longitudinal study on the mental health of general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 87, 40-48.
[31] White, R. W., & Horvitz, E. (2009). Cyberchondria: Studies of the escalation of medical concerns in web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 27(4), Article 23.
[32] Williams J. M. G., Watts F. N., MacLeod C., & Mathews A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Wiley.
[33] Zangoulechi Z., Yousefi Z., & Keshavarz N. (2018). The role of anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in the prediction of cyberchondria. Advances in Bioscience and Clinical Medicine, 6(4), 1-6.
[34] Zhou S. J., Zhang L. G., Wang L. L., Guo Z. C., Wang J. Q., Chen J. C., & Chen J. X. (2020). Prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of psychological health problems in Chinese adolescents during the outbreak of COVID-19. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29(6), 749-758.

疫情感知严重性与抑郁情绪的关系：一个有联合调节的中介模型^*

Perceived Severity of the Epidemic and Depression: A Joint Moderated Mediation Model

PDF

评审附件

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	黄量杰成, 闫艳, 胡寅凤, 孙鸿莉, 焦岚, 尹军. 低年段小学生的学业能力性别刻板印象及其对兴趣选择的影响：自我肯定的作用^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(4): 855-862.
[2]	周莉, 王宏霞, 耿靖宇, 雷雳. 大学生网络受欺负与抑郁的关系：心理资本和同伴支持的调节作用^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(4): 981-989.
[3]	廖友国, 张本钰. 成年中期抑郁情绪的变化轨迹：基于增长混合模型^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(2): 300-307.
[4]	鞠佳雯, 周欣然, 梁丽婵, 边玉芳. 父母参与的一致性与儿童主观幸福感的关系——基于多项式回归的响应面分析^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(6): 1478-1485.
[5]	王子豪, 杨海波. 不同性别大学生网络游戏成瘾、焦虑与抑郁的症状网络差异^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(4): 999-1007.
[6]	徐子纯, 依拉木江·阿布都艾尼, 孙睿, 周宵. 大学生复杂性创伤后应激障碍的网络结构及其性别差异研究^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(4): 1008-1016.
[7]	杨艳宇李其容李春萱. 常见抑郁症状高风险群体在职业转换后的抑郁症状变化[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(3): 652-659.
[8]	邓小惠向燕辉. 婚姻是幸福的坟墓吗？ ——基于中国家庭追踪调查的双重差分倾向得分匹配法的估计[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(3): 635-643.
[9]	李文辉姜枫. 小学生学业成绩对学业自我效能感的影响：学习压力、自尊的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(2): 347-354.
[10]	万雨霞焦丹阳张莉刘春雨王言胡晓倩王美萍. 父母教养行为与青少年早期抑郁的关系：多基因与负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(1): 203-211.
[11]	王琼亓伊静胡伟陈慧玲. 社会拒绝与大学生抑郁情绪的关系：情绪觉察的中介作用和微信亲子沟通的调节作用 [J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(5): 1159-1165.
[12]	廖友国连榕张妍陈建文. 青少年与父母抑郁情绪的关系：交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(4): 973-979.
[13]	郝娜崔佳蕾吴琴邹何辉崔丽莹. 想象性群际接触对合作行为的影响：内隐性别偏见的中介作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(4): 918-925.
[14]	苏镜安李岩张敏强梁正妍. 老年人抑郁情绪发展轨迹及社会参与的作用：空巢与非空巢老人的对比研究[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(3): 740-746.
[15]	张野张珊珊孙冰如申婷. 初中生校园排斥对抑郁的影响：反刍思维与特质正念的作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(3): 584-590.