心理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1114-1122.DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230511

• 社会、人格与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

魅力领导的两面性对下属公民疲劳的影响机制研究 *

刘小禹**1, 付静宇1, 刘军2,3   

  1. 1对外经济贸易大学国际商学院,北京,100029;
    2武汉理工大学管理学院,武汉,430070;
    3武汉理工大学数字治理与管理决策创新研究院,武汉,430070
  • 出版日期:2023-09-20 发布日期:2023-11-07
  • 通讯作者: **刘小禹,E-mail: liuxy@uibe.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    *本研究得到国家自然科学基金(72272035, 71672036, 72132009)、教育部人文社会科学规划基金(22YJA630056)、北京市自然科学基金面上项目(9232018)和对外经济贸易大学杰出青年学者项目(19JQ03)的资助

How the Two Faces of Charismatic Leadership Affect Subordinates ' Citizenship Fatigue: Exploring the Mechanisms

Liu Xiaoyu1, Fu Jingyu1, Liu Jun2,3   

  1. 1Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, 100029;
    2School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070;
    3Research Institute of Digital Governance and Management Decision Innovation, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070
  • Online:2023-09-20 Published:2023-11-07

摘要: 基于自我决定理论,探索了公/私权魅力领导对下属公民疲劳的影响机制。结果发现:(1)公/私权魅力领导负向(正向)影响下属公民疲劳;(2)公权魅力领导促进下属亲社会价值观动机和印象管理动机;(3)公民压力调节亲社会价值观动机和印象管理动机对公民疲劳的影响;(4)公民压力会增强公权魅力领导通过亲社会价值观动机对下属公民疲劳的间接影响,也会减弱公/私权魅力领导通过印象管理动机对下属公民疲劳的间接影响。以上发现拓展了魅力领导与公民疲劳的研究,为企业减少员工的公民疲劳提供了启示。

关键词: 魅力领导, 亲社会价值观动机, 印象管理动机, 公民疲劳, 公民压力

Abstract: Because organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs) contribute substantially to organizational progress, managers encourage employees to engage in OCBs. However, an overemphasis on OCBs can potentially lead to a state known as ‘citizenship fatigue' among employees. This condition, characterized by feelings of exhaustion, edginess, or fatigue directly linked to OCB engagement, may ultimately result in diminished work engagement and reduced job performance. Citizenship fatigue has received a great deal of attention from scholars and practitioners. Despite that theoretical perspectives have proposed predictors of citizenship fatigue, there remains a noticeable gap in the literature regarding the effect of leadership style on subordinates' citizenship fatigue.
Over the past three decades, charismatic leadership has been hailed as one of the most efficacious leadership styles, attracting considerable scholarly attention. Yet, it's a misconception to equate charismatic leadership directly with ‘effective leadership'. Unfortunately, current understanding of its potential downsides remains limited. As recent investigations have started probing into the negative effects of charismatic leadership, the present study aims to delve deeper, exploring how charismatic leadership affects employees' citizenship fatigue. Based on Howell's framework of the two faces of charismatic leadership, this study distinguishes between socialized and personalized charismatic leadership from different power motivations.
The Self-determination Theory (SDT) offers a comprehensive paradigm for deciphering the factors that either foster or hamper intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, as well as the innate psychological needs that propagate these mechanisms. As a theory that scrutinizes individual motivation, the SDT is inherently well-suited to elucidate how the two faces of charismatic leadership affect employees' work motivation and behavior. Furthermore, the SDT underlines the profound influence of environmental factors on the genesis of individual motivation. Within an organizational context, citizenship pressure is a significant environmental determinant that shapes employee motivation. Therefore, drawing on Howell's framework of the two faces of charismatic leadership and the SDT, this study investigated the influential mechanism of socialized charismatic leadership and personalized charismatic leadership on subordinates' citizenship fatigue through the mediating mechanism of the OCB motivation and the moderating effect of citizenship pressure based on the three-wave data from 320 employees.
The results indicated that: (1) Socialized charismatic leadership diminished subordinates' citizenship fatigue, while personalized charismatic leadership amplified it. (2) Socialized charismatic leadership heightened subordinates' prosocial value motives and impression management motives. (3) Citizenship pressure moderated the relationship between prosocial value motives/impression management motives and citizenship fatigue. As citizenship pressure escalated, the mitigating effect of prosocial value motives on citizenship fatigue intensified, while the exacerbating effect of impression management motives on citizenship fatigue attenuated. (4) Citizenship pressure strengthened the indirect relationship between socialized charismatic leadership and subordinates' citizenship fatigue through prosocial value motives. Conversely, citizenship pressure mitigated the indirect relationship between both socialized and personalized charismatic leadership and subordinates' citizenship fatigue through impression management motives.
This study provides several significant theoretical contributions. First, the exploration of the effects of socialized and personalized charismatic leadership on citizenship fatigue deepens our understanding of this phenomenon and enriches the antecedents of OCB motives. Second, this study extends the research on the effectiveness of charismatic leadership by revealing the “black box” between charismatic leadership and citizenship fatigue. This aids in a more profound comprehension of ‘how' and ‘under what circumstances' charismatic leadership influences citizenship fatigue. Finally, this study extends the application of SDT in the workplace context through its exploration of both socialized and personalized charismatic leadership. Simultaneously, this study offers several managerial implications. First, organizations should adopt a dialectical approach to charismatic leadership, to discern the concealed socialized or personalized motives behind a leader's charisma. Second, leaders ought to judiciously advocate for OCBs to avert excessive citizenship pressure and citizenship fatigue among subordinates. Finally, organizations should also focus on nurturing and preserving employees' prosocial value motives, as these are the most advantageous to both the organizations and the employees themselves.

Key words: charismatic leadership, prosocial values motives, impression management motives, citizenship fatigue, citizenship pressure