文本界面因素对老年人数字阅读的影响研究 &#x0002A;

谭晓磊; 何灿群

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230604

PDF(1051 KB)

心理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6) : 1305-1312. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230604

基础、实验与工效

文本界面因素对老年人数字阅读的影响研究 ^*

谭晓磊, 何灿群^*

作者信息 +

Influence of Text Interface Factors on Digital Reading in Older Adults

Tan Xiaolei, He Canqun

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

通过正交实验探究文本界面因素中字号、字间距、行间距和页边距对老年人数字阅读的影响。结果显示,老年人的客观表现水平较低,但对数字阅读的主观评价更高;对老年人影响最大的因素是页边距和字号;字间距和行间距的影响较低,但存在显著的交互作用;老年人阅读表现随各因素水平的增加呈现非单调变化的趋势。老年人对于数字阅读有更高的接受度,合理的文本设计能让老年人从数字阅读中获益更多。

Abstract

Traditional media is gradually being replaced by new media with digital information technology, and digital reading has become a new choice for older adults to learn knowledge and information. However, the deteriorating vision and declining energy of the elderly lead to higher requirements for the readability and legibility of the text interface. Compared to traditional reading media, digital reading adds carriers (e.g., audio, video, and tactile feedback), improves the quality of picture information, and more importantly, provides flexible and variable text layouts to adapt to different types and sizes of display interfaces.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of font size, spacing (e.g., word spacing, line spacing), and margins in text interface factors on digital reading for the elderly. The study designed reading materials with different combinations of factor levels according to an orthogonal experimental protocol. Reading performance data were collected respectively from the older and younger subjects through an eye-tracking device and a post-measurement scale. The experiment was evaluated in two dimensions, including cognitive load and user experience. Cognitive load indicators included total gaze time, number of gaze points, and pupil diameter. The user experience indicators included subjective comfort and usability scores. Among the cognitive load indicators, the total gaze time and the number of gaze points reflect the subjects'effort, and the larger the value of these two indicators, the more easily people are fatigued, indicating that their cognitive load is higher. On the contrary, the larger the value of pupil diameter, the more relaxed people are, and the lower their cognitive load is. The usability score reflects the user's evaluation of the usability of the text interface, and a higher score indicates that the user approves of the product; while subjective comfort intuitively reflects the user's perception of their comfort and fatigue level.

Combining objective data records and subjective evaluations for data analysis, the analysis results showed that there was no significant difference between the digital reading performance levels of the elderly and the young, except for pupil diameter. The objective data showed that the performance level of the elderly was lower, but the subjective evaluation of digital reading was higher among the elderly. The factors that had the greatest effect on digital reading among older adults were margin and font size, both of which had higher performance on different indicators. Word spacing and line spacing had a smaller effect on older adults'reading performance, but there were significant interactions between the two and other factors. Older adults'reading performance showed a non-monotonic trend with increasing levels of each factor, i.e., there was an ideal range of factor levels that made users perform best on a particular indicator.

The study explored interface factors and their levels that affect older adults'digital reading. By comparing the differences in reading experience and performance between younger and older adults, it was found that although older adults do not perform as well as younger adults, they have a higher level of acceptance to digital reading. Previous studies have shown that font size affects the efficiency and experience of digital reading for older adults. Surprisingly, this study found that page margins also have a significant effect on digital reading for older adults, which had been rarely examined before. These findings suggest that different text interface factors have different effects on older adults'digital reading, and that seniors can benefit more from digital reading with a reasonable design of text interface.

导出引用

谭晓磊, 何灿群. 文本界面因素对老年人数字阅读的影响研究 ^*[J]. 心理科学. 2023, 46(6): 1305-1312 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230604

Tan Xiaolei, He Canqun. Influence of Text Interface Factors on Digital Reading in Older Adults[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2023, 46(6): 1305-1312 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230604

参考文献

[1] 侯冠华, 董华, 刘颖, 范光瑞. (2018). 导航结构与认知负荷对老年读者数字图书馆用户体验影响的实证研究——以国家数字图书馆为例. 图书情报工作, 62(13), 45-53.
[2] 侯冠华, 宁维宁, 董华. (2018). 字号、间距影响数字阅读体验的年龄差异研究. 图书馆, 8, 97-102.
[3] 侯冠华, 宁维宁, 董华. (2019). 认知负荷视角下的中老年人数字阅读界面体验设计研究. 信息系统学报, 1, 15-26.
[4] 胡笑羽, 刘海健, 刘丽萍, 臧传丽, 白学军. (2007). E—Z阅读者模型的新进展. 心理学探新, 27(1), 24-29.
[5] 梁少丽, 宋继华. (2009). 对外汉语教材等级词频统计模块构建——一种辅助对外汉语教材词汇难度评量的工具. 现代教育技术, 19(7), 86-89.
[6] 秦志超. (2018). 浅谈书籍版面设计中的版心与页边距. 大众文艺, 19, 129-130.
[7] 闫国利, 巫金根, 胡晏雯, 白学军. (2010). 当前阅读的眼动研究范式述评. 心理科学进展, 18(12), 1966-1976.
[8] 张仙峰, 叶文玲. (2006). 当前阅读研究中眼动指标述评. 心理与行为研究, 4(3), 236-240.
[9] Chen Y., Xie X., Ma W. Y., & Zhang H. J. (2005). Adapting Web pages for small-screen devices. IEEE internet computing, 9(1), 50-56.
[10] Darroch I., Goodman J., Brewster S., & Gray P. (2005). The effect of age and font size on reading text on handheld computers. Paper presented at the IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Rome, Italy.
[11] Gill K., Mao A., Powell A. M., & Sheidow T. (2013). Digital reader vs print media: The role of digital technology in reading accuracy in age-related macular degeneration. Eye, 27(5), 639-643.
[12] Kretzschmar F., Pleimling D., Hosemann J., Füssel S., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I., & Schlesewsky M. (2013). Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: Concurrent EEG-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media. PLoS ONE, 8(2), Article e56178.
[13] Laubrock J., Kliegl R., & Engbert R. (2006). SWIFT explorations of age differences in eye movements during reading. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 872-884.
[14] Morville P.,& Rosenfeld, L. (2003). Information architecture for the world wide web. Qinghua University Press..
[15] Murata, A., & Iwase, H. (1998). Evaluation of mental workload by fluctuation analysis of pupil area. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Hong Kong, China.
[16] Paas F., Renkl A., & Sweller J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
[17] Rayner, K. (1978). Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 85(3), 618-660.
[18] Rayner, K. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41(2), 211-236.
[19] Reichle E. D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D. L., & Rayner K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125-157.
[20] Rosenfield M., Jahan S., Nunez K., & Chan K. (2015). Cognitive demand, digital screens and blink rate. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 403-406.
[21] Shalev, L., & Tsal, Y. (2003). The wide attentional window: A major deficit of children with attention difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(6), 517-527.
[22] Stern, P., & Shalev, L. (2013). The role of sustained attention and display medium in reading comprehension among adolescents with ADHD and without it. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 431-439.
[23] Torrance M., Johansson R., Johansson V., & Wengelin Å. (2016). Reading during the composition of multi-sentence texts: An eye-movement study. Psychological Research, 80(5), 729-743.
[24] Wang L., Sato H., Rau P. L. P., Fujimura K., Gao Q., & Asano Y. (2008). Chinese text spacing on mobile phones for senior citizens. Educational Gerontology, 35(1), 77-90.