男性吸烟者身份认同对拒烟效能感的预测：结果预期和主观规范的作用&#x0002A;

陈海德; 王逸文; 赵博强; 姚静静; 李伟健

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230629

PDF(867 KB)

心理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6) : 1504-1510. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230629

临床与咨询

男性吸烟者身份认同对拒烟效能感的预测：结果预期和主观规范的作用^*

陈海德^1,2, 王逸文^1,2, 赵博强^1,2, 姚静静^**1,2, 李伟健^1,2

作者信息 +

Identity and Smoking Refusal Self-Efficacy in Chinese Male Smokers: The Mediating Role of Smoking Refusal Outcome Expectancies and the Moderating Role of Social Norms

Chen Haide^1,2, Wang Yiwen^1,2, Zhao Boqiang^1,2, Yao Jingjing^1,2, Li Weijian^1,2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

考察男性吸烟者身份认同对拒烟效能感的预测以及拒烟结果预期和主观吸烟规范的作用。对924名男性吸烟者进行问卷调查,结果表明：（1）男性吸烟者身份认同显著负向预测拒烟效能感;（2）拒烟结果预期在身份认同对拒烟效能感的预测中起中介作用;（3）指令性吸烟规范负向调节身份认同和拒烟效能感的关系。结果说明了男性吸烟者身份认同通过拒烟结果预期对拒烟效能感产生作用及受主观规范调节的机制。

Abstract

The smoking refusal self-efficacy, which refers to the ability and confidence of an individual to refuse a cigarette, may be one of the risk factors for initiating and maintaining smoking. The previous studies have showed that the smoking refusal self-efficacy would be predicted by identity. However, little is known about the influence of smoker's identity on smoking refusal self-efficacy as well as its potential psychosocial mechanisms. According to the Theories of Social Identity and Theories of Self-categorization, smoker self-identification effects on the smoking refusal outcome expectancies, then affecting the smoking refusal self-efficacy. Additionally, a large number of studies have shown that individual behavior is often affected by subjective norms. Researchers further distinguished subjective norms into descriptive norms and injunctive norms. They may have different effects on an individual's behavior. Given these, the present study aims at examining (a) the relation between smoker's identity and smoking refusal self-efficacy, (b) the mediating effect of smoking refusal outcome expectancies in the relation between smoker's identity and the smoking refusal self-efficacy, and (c) the moderating effects of descriptive norms and injunctive norms between smoker's identity and smoking refusal self-efficacy and in the relation between identity and smoking refusal outcome expectancies in Chinese smokers.

A sample of 924 Chinese current daily male smokers was recruited to complete several self-report questionnaires, including the Perceived Smoking Social Norms Scale, the Smokers Identity Scale, the Refusal Outcome Expectation Scale, the Refusal Skill Efficacy Scale, and the Demographic Characteristics Questionnaires. All analyses were conducted using SPSS 23.0. Partial correlation analyses (i.e., to control the following covariates: age, marital status, nicotine dependence, socioeconomic status and health status) were conducted to examine the relationsamong study variables. Then, the mediation model and moderated mediation models, which controlled for a forementioned covariates, were examined by using Model 4 and Model 10 in PROCESS macro for SPSS respectively.

The results showed that(1) The smoking refusal self-efficacy negatively related to norms, smokers’ identification, and smoking refusal outcome expectancies. (2) The relation between the smokers’ identification and smoking refusal self-efficacy was partially mediated by the smoking refusal outcome expectancies. (3) The moderated effect of injunctive norms on the relation between the smokers’ identification and smoking refusal self-efficacy was significant. (4) The moderated effect of descriptive norms was not supported.

This study provides a more comprehensive explanation for how the identity of smokers affects the smoking motivation of Chinese smokersand has a certain contribution to the theory of smoking cessation. The results are consistent with the hypothesis of cognitive dissonance theory and suggest that individuals should reduce the status of smokers in their multiple identities. It also adds the explanation of self-efficacy theory to the change of smokers'quitting motivation and the explanation of identity theory to the change of behavioral intention. The results of this study also have some implications for the practice of tobacco control in China. It is necessary to guide smokers to reduce the status of smokers in their multiple identities. Further studies should use multiple methods and construct diverse models to explore the underlying mechanisms.

导出引用

陈海德, 王逸文, 赵博强, 姚静静, 李伟健. 男性吸烟者身份认同对拒烟效能感的预测：结果预期和主观规范的作用^*[J]. 心理科学. 2023, 46(6): 1504-1510 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230629

Chen Haide, Wang Yiwen, Zhao Boqiang, Yao Jingjing, Li Weijian. Identity and Smoking Refusal Self-Efficacy in Chinese Male Smokers: The Mediating Role of Smoking Refusal Outcome Expectancies and the Moderating Role of Social Norms[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2023, 46(6): 1504-1510 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230629

参考文献

[1] 陈海德, 曹柠梦, 高崚峰, 李伟健, 李新宇. (2018). 吸烟利弊权衡对戒烟计划的预测作用: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理科学, 41(2), 423-429.
[2] 陈思静, 何铨, 马剑虹. (2015). 第三方惩罚对合作行为的影响: 基于社会规范激活的解释. 心理学报, 47(3), 389-405.
[3] 褚成静, 张岚, 杨彦春. (2010). 成年男性吸烟行为社会心理因素分析. 中国公共卫生, 26(7), 850-853.
[4] 范为桥, 张妙清, 张建新, 张树辉. (2011). 兼顾文化共通性与特殊性的人格研究: CPAI及其跨文化应用. 心理学报, 43(12), 1418-1429.
[5] 刘源, 黄蕴智. (2016). 从“想”到“做”——卢比孔模型的解释力和应用. 心理科学, 39(3), 754-760.
[6] 杨焱, 南奕, 屠梦吴, 王继江, 王立立, 姜垣. (2016). 《2015中国成人烟草调查报告》概要. 中华健康管理学杂志, 10(2), 85-87.
[7] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
[8] Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
[9] Blondé, J., & Falomir-Pichastor, J. M. (2020). Accounting for the consequences of tobacco dependence on cravings, self-efficacy, and motivation to quit: Consideration of identity concerns. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 23, Article e34.
[10] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 37-42). Elsevier.
[11] Chen H. D., Cao N. M., Gao L. F., Xie R. B., Li X. Y., & Li W. J. (2019). Comparing of the effects of perceived injunctive and descriptive norms on the willingness to quit smoking among Chinese low-rate and regular smokers. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 22(4), 401-406.
[12] Cheung F., Lai B. P. Y., Wu A. M. S., & Ku L. (2015). Academic and career expectations of ethnic minority youth in Hong Kong. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(8), 1092-1107.
[13] Cialdini R. B., Reno R. R., & Kallgren C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015-1026.
[14] Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press..
[15] Frings, D., & Albery, I. P. (2015). The social identity model of cessation maintenance: Formulation and initial evidence. Addictive Behaviors, 44, 35-42.
[16] Harmon-Jones E., Harmon-Jones C., & Levy N. (2015). An action-based model of cognitive-dissonance processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 184-189.
[17] Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1-22.
[18] Heatherton T. F., Kozlowski L. T., Frecker R. C., & Fagerström K. O. (1991). The Fagerström test for nicotine dependence: A revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. British Journal of Addiction, 86(9), 1119-1127.
[19] Hertel A. W., Baldwin S. A., Peterson K. P., & Lindgren K. P. (2021). Identification with drinking predicts increases in drinking behaviors (but not vice versa). Addictive Behaviors, 116, Article 106796.
[20] Høie M., Moan I. S., & Rise J. (2010). An extended version of the theory of planned behavour: Prediction of intentions to quit smoking using past behaviour as moderator. Addiction Research and Theory, 18(5), 572-585.
[21] Jacobson R. P., Mortensen C. R., & Cialdini R. B. (2011). Bodies obliged and unbound: Differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 433-448.
[22] Kassem N. O. F., Kassem N. O., Jackson S. R., Daffa R. M., Liles S., & Hovell M. F. (2015). Arab-American hookah smokers: Initiation, and pros and cons of hookah use. American Journal of Health Behavior, 39(5), 680-697.
[23] Lac, A., & Donaldson, C. D. (2018). Testing competing models of injunctive and descriptive norms for proximal and distal reference groups on alcohol attitudes and behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 78, 153-159.
[24] Langlois M. A., Petosa R. L., & Hallam J. S. (2006). Measuring self-efficacy and outcome expectations for resisting social pressures to smoke. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 15(2), 1-17.
[25] Li W. J., Gao L. F., Chen H. D., Cao N. M., & Sun B. H. (2018). Prediction of injunctive and descriptive norms for willingness to quit smoking: The mediating role of smoking risk perception. Journal of Substance Use, 23(3), 274-279.
[26] Meijer E., Gebhardt W. A., Dijkstra A., Willemsen M. C., & van Laar C. (2015). Quitting smoking: The importance of non-smoker identity in predicting smoking behaviour and responses to a smoking ban. Psychology and Health, 30(12), 1387-1409.
[27] Moan, I. S., & Rise, J. (2005). Quitting smoking: Applying an extended version of the theory of planned behavior to predict intention and behavior. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 10(1), 39-68.
[28] Mummendey A., Kessler T., Klink A., & Mielke R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 229-245.
[29] Oyserman, D. (2007). Social identity and self-regulation. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 432-453). The Guilford Press.
[30] Pagliaro S., Ellemers N., Barreto M., & Leach C. W. (2010). Strategies (individual vs. collective) of social identity management: The role of group norms and personal profit (original Italian). Psicologia Sociale, 3, 385-399.
[31] Parcel, T. L. (1981). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. H. Tajfel. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1193-1194.
[32] Perkins H. W., Haines M. P., & Rice R. (2005). Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: A nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms and student alcohol misuse. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66(4), 470-478.
[33] Phua, J. J. (2013). The reference group perspective for smoking cessation: An examination of the influence of social norms and social identification with reference groups on smoking cessation self-efficacy. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 102-112.
[34] Ríos-Bedoya C. F., Snedecor S. M., Pomerleau C. S., & Pomerleau O. F. (2008). Association of withdrawal features with nicotine dependence as measured by the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). Addictive Behaviors, 33(8), 1086-1089.
[35] Salem, S. F., & Salem, S. O. (2018). Self-identity and social identity as drivers of consumers'purchase intention towards luxury fashion goods and willingness to pay premium price. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 23(2), 161-184.
[36] Smith D. M., O'Connor R. J., Collins R. L., Hyland A. J., & Kozlowski L. T. (2019). Correlates of smoker identity among intermittent and light daily young adult smokers: Findings from wave 1 of the population assessment of tobacco and health (path) study. Addictive Behaviors, 98, Article 106034.
[37] Turner J. C., Hogg M. A., Oakes P. J., Reicher S. D., & Wetherell M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Contemporary Sociology, 94(4), 645-646.