亲子感知心理攻击与学龄儿童内外化问题的双向关系:一项个体内分析*

赵新宇, 胡夏, 陈烨, 邢晓沛

心理科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 1113-1124.

PDF(2199 KB)
中文  |  English
PDF(2199 KB)
心理科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 1113-1124. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240510
发展与教育

亲子感知心理攻击与学龄儿童内外化问题的双向关系:一项个体内分析*

  • 赵新宇, 胡夏, 陈烨, 邢晓沛**
作者信息 +

Reciprocal Relations between Parent - Child Perceived Psychological Aggression and School-Aged Children's Internalizing and Externalizing Problems: A Within-Person Analysis

  • Zhao Xinyu, Hu Xia, Chen Ye, Xing Xiaopei
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

研究以534名学龄儿童及其父母为被试,通过纵向设计和随机截距交叉滞后模型考察父母心理攻击与儿童内外化问题的个体内双向关系及其亲子感知和性别差异。结果发现:基于父母报告的数据,心理攻击与外化问题存在单向预测效应,即外化问题单向预测父亲心理攻击,母亲心理攻击单向预测外化问题;父亲心理攻击与内化问题相互预测。基于儿童报告的数据,父母心理攻击均单向预测外化问题;母亲心理攻击与内化问题相互预测。多群组分析没有发现关系中的儿童性别差异。结果表明,父母心理攻击与儿童行为问题在个体内层面存在相互预测关系,且这一关系模式根据报告者、行为问题类型和父母性别的不同而异。

Abstract

Understanding the relations between negative parenting and children's internalizing and externalizing problems is essential for improving children's mental health. From the middle to late elementary school period, as a form of controlling parenting, parental psychological aggression is likely to become increasingly salient in affecting children's behavioval development due to their heightened needs for pursuing autonomy and independence. The conceptual framework of the parent-child transaction posits that parents and children are reciprocally influenced. According to these theories, parental psychological aggression and children's internalizing and externalizing problems may reflect a reciprocal process of mutual influence. Importantly, the increasing needs of autonomy and advances of cognition allow children to question other's perspectives, which may lead to the divergence of parenting perspectives between parents and children. Especially, parents who grew up with traditional concepts on parenting are likely to view their own controlling parenting practices optimistically. In contrast, growing children are greatly influenced by Western views of parenting that emphasize individuality and autonomy, and they tend to view parental controlling behaviors in a much more negative light. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the differences between parent-child perceived psychological aggression to gain a more accurate understanding of how psychological aggression relates to children's behavioral problems. Moreover, developmental theory is typically concerned with within-person variability, and developmental processes are often assumed to occur within, rather than between, individuals. Between-person variance reflects differences in whether children who experience more parental psychological aggression tend to exhibit more behavioral problems compared to children who experience less. Within-person variance reflects whether changes in parental psychological aggression compared to their mean level at one time point could predict changes in children's behavioral problems compared to their mean level at the next time point, and vice versa. The cross-lagged panel model (CLPM), a traditional method for testing effect directions, fails to separate between-person variance from within-person variance. In this regard, the random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) can separate the variance of each variable into stable between-person variation and within-person variation. Therefore, the second aim of this study is to use the RI-CLPM to provide a robust test of within-person associations between psychological aggression and behavioral problems. Finally, the third aim of the study is to examine whether the relation between parental psychological aggression and children's internalizing and externalizing problems differs by parent and child gender based on the within-person analysis.
The current study conducted a four-wave (six months apart) longitudinal design based on 534 school-aged children (Mage = 9.84 years; Boys = 49.4%) and their parents. During four waves, parents and children respectively reported parental psychological aggression using the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales, and respectively reported child internalizing and externalizing problems using the Child Behavior Check List and the Youth Self-Report. RI-CLPM and multi-group analyses were used to examine whether the relations between parental psychological aggression and children's internalizing and externalizing problems are reciprocal at the within-person level and whether such within-person relations would vary across parent and child gender, and multi-informant data also allowed us to explore whether the above relations would differ for parent-child-perception.
The results of RI-CLPM showed that at the between-person level, the random intercepts of parental psychological aggression and children's internalizing and externalizing problems were significantly correlated. At the within-person level, for parental perception, only the child-driven effects were found for relations between paternal psychological aggression and externalizing problems, and only the parent-driven effects were found for relations between maternal psychological aggression and externalizing problems. Meanwhile, internalizing problems were reciprocally related with paternal rather than maternal psychological aggression. For children's perception, only the parent-driven effects were found for relations between externalizing problems and paternal and maternal psychological aggression, and internalizing problems were reciprocally related with maternal rather than paternal psychological aggression. Finally, no child gender differences were found in the above relations.
In conclusion, this study indicates that during the middle and late school-aged period, the reciprocal relations between parental psychological aggression and children's internalizing and externalizing problems differ between the between-person and within-person levels. Furthermore, the strength and direction of the within-person relations differ by reporter, types of behavioral problems and parent gender. In addition, the within-person relations between parental psychological aggression and children's behavioral problems do not vary by child gender.

关键词

心理攻击 / 行为问题 / 双向预测效应 / 感知差异 / 个体内

Key words

psychological aggression / behavioral problem / reciprocal effect / discrepant perceptions / within-person

引用本文

导出引用
赵新宇, 胡夏, 陈烨, 邢晓沛. 亲子感知心理攻击与学龄儿童内外化问题的双向关系:一项个体内分析*[J]. 心理科学. 2024, 47(5): 1113-1124 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240510
Zhao Xinyu, Hu Xia, Chen Ye, Xing Xiaopei. Reciprocal Relations between Parent - Child Perceived Psychological Aggression and School-Aged Children's Internalizing and Externalizing Problems: A Within-Person Analysis[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2024, 47(5): 1113-1124 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240510

参考文献

[1] 孙文喜, 董成龙, 袁颖, 何文君, 马毓, 方建群, 杜向东. (2018). Rutter儿童行为问卷调查的中国普通学龄儿童行为问题发生率meta分析. 中国心理卫生杂志, 32(9), 744-752.
[2] 王美芳, 刘宪琪, 刘莉, 马月. (2017). 初生至三岁婴幼儿父母严厉管教的基本特点. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(5), 949-954.
[3] 吴玉玲. (2023). 近三十年我国民众教养观念变迁趋势——基于年龄-时期-世代效应分析. 社会学评论, 11(1), 150-168.
[4] 邢晓沛, 焦梦涵, 肖宇苑, 胡夏. (2022). 父母心理攻击与小学中高年级儿童问题行为的关系: 儿童愤怒和悲伤管理的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 20(4), 479-486, 521.
[5] 张良, 柳霖, 纪林芹, 张文新. (2022). 儿童青少年内外化心理病理问题“共发”现象研究现状与展望. 心理科学, 45(1), 219-226.
[6] Achenbach, T. M. (1991a). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. University of Vermont.
[7] Achenbach, T. M. (1991b). Manual for the youth self-report and 1991 profile. University of Vermont.
[8] Achenbach T. M., McConaughy S. H., & Howell C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 213-232.
[9] Adambegan M., Wagner G., Nader I. W., Fernandez-Aranda F., Treasure J., & Karwautz A. (2012). Internalizing and externalizing behaviour problems in childhood contribute to the development of anorexia and bulimia nervosa—a study comparing sister pairs. European Eating Disorders Review, 20(2), 116-120.
[10] Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
[11] Bell, R. Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychological Review, 75(2), 81-95.
[12] Berry, D., & Willoughby, M. T. (2017). On the practical interpretability of cross-lagged panel models: Rethinking a developmental workhorse. Child Development, 88(4), 1186-1206.
[13] Bowen, M. (1994). Alcoholism as viewed through family systems theory and family psychotherapy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 233(1), 115-122.
[14] Chen, B.-B., & Volling, B. L. (2023). Paternal and maternal rejection and Chinese children' s internalizing and externalizing problems across the transition to siblinghood: A developmental cascade model of family influence. Child Development, 94(1), 288-302.
[15] Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1994). Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 387-411.
[16] De Los Reyes, A., & Kazdin, A. E. (2005). Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: A critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study. Psychological Bulletin, 131(4), 483-509.
[17] De Los Reyes, A., & Ohannessian, C. M. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: Discrepancies in adolescent-parent perceptions of the family and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(10), 1957-1972.
[18] Fanti, K. A., & Henrich, C. C. (2010). Trajectories of pure and co-occurring internalizing and externalizing problems from age 2 to age 12: Findings from the national institute of child health and human development study of early child care. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1159-1175.
[19] Frampton K. L., Jenkins J. M., & Dunn J. (2010). Within-family differences in internalizing behaviors: The role of children' s perspectives of the mother-child relationship. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(4), 557-568.
[20] Gershoff E. T., Grogan-Kaylor A., Lansford J. E., Chang L., Zelli A., Deater-Deckard K., Dodge K. A. (2010). Parent discipline practices in an international sample: Associations with child behaviors and moderation by perceived normativeness. Child Development, 81(2), 487-502.
[21] Hamaker E. L., Kuiper R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102-116.
[22] Hawley, K. M., & Weisz, J. R. (2003). Child, parent and therapist (dis) agreement on target problems in outpatient therapy: The therapist' s dilemma and its implications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(1), 62-70.
[23] Jones E. E.,& Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior In E E Jones, D E Kanouse, H H Kelley, R E Nisbett, S Valins, & B Weiner (Eds), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp 79-94) General Learning Press Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79-94). General Learning Press.
[24] Kakihara F., Tilton-Weaver L., Kerr M., & Stattin H. (2010). The relationship of parental control to youth adjustment: Do youths' feelings about their parents play a role? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(12), 1442-1456.
[25] Lansford J. E., Criss M. M., Laird R. D., Shaw D. S., Pettit G. S., Bates J. E., & Dodge K. A. (2011). Reciprocal relations between parents' physical discipline and children' s externalizing behavior during middle childhood and adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 23(1), 225-238.
[26] Leadbeater B. J., Kuperminc G. P., Blatt S. J., & Hertzog C. (1999). A multivariate model of gender differences in adolescents' internalizing and externalizing problems. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1268-1282.
[27] Liu, L., & Wang, M. F. (2018). Parental harsh discipline and adolescent problem behavior in China: Perceived normativeness as a moderator. Child Abuse and Neglect, 86, 1-9.
[28] Liu L., Wang Y. X., Zhao J. S., & Wang M. F. (2022). Parental reports of stress and anxiety in their migrant children in China: The mediating role of parental psychological aggression and corporal punishment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 131, Article 105695.
[29] Liu L., Zhai P. X., & Wang M. F. (2022). Parental harsh discipline and migrant children' s anxiety in China: The moderating role of parental warmth and gender. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(19-20), NP18761-NP18783.
[30] Ma J. L. C., Wong T. K. Y., Lau Y. K., & Lai L. Y. (2012). The effect of socioeconomic status and family structure on parental warmth and parental control in a Chinese context: Implications for social work practice. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 6(3), 265-281.
[31] Montag C., Fiebach C. J., Kirsch P., & Reuter M. (2011). Interaction of 5-HTTLPR and a variation on the oxytocin receptor gene influences negative emotionality. Biological Psychiatry, 69(6), 601-603.
[32] Paquette, D. (2004). Theorizing the father-child relationship: Mechanisms and developmental outcomes. Human Development, 47(4), 193-219.
[33] Patterson, G. R. (2002). The early development of coercive family process. In J. B. Reid, G. R. Patterson & J. J. Snyder (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A developmental analysis and model for intervention (pp. 25-44). American Psychological Association.
[34] Piotrowska P. J., Stride C. B., Croft S. E., & Rowe R. (2015). Socioeconomic status and antisocial behaviour among children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 35, 47-55.
[35] Sameroff, A. (2009). The transactional model. In A. Sameroff (Ed.), The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other.(pp. 3-21). American Psychological Association.
[36] Scalco M. D., Colder C. R., Hawk L. W., Read J. P., Wieczorek W. F., & Lengua L. J. (2014). Internalizing and externalizing problem behavior and early adolescent substance use: A test of a latent variable interaction and conditional indirect effects. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28(3), 828-840.
[37] Sheehan, M. J., & Watson, M. W. (2008). Reciprocal influences between maternal discipline techniques and aggression in children and adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 34(3), 245-255.
[38] Straus M. A., Hamby S. L., Finkelhor D., Moore D. W., & Runyan D. (1998). Identification of child maltreatment with the parent-child conflict tactics scales: Development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22(4), 249-270.
[39] van Lier, P. A. C., Vitaro F., Barker E. D., Brendgen M., Tremblay R. E., & Boivin M. (2012). Peer victimization, poor academic achievement, and the link between childhood externalizing and internalizing problems. Child Development, 83(5), 1775-1788.
[40] van Lissa C. J., Keizer R., van Lier, P. A. C., Meeus W. H. J., & Branje S. (2019). The role of fathers' versus mothers' parenting in emotion-regulation development from mid-late adolescence: Disentangling between-family differences from within-family effects. Developmental Psychology, 55(2), 377-389.
[41] Vrolijk P., van Lissa C. J., Branje S. J. T., Meeus W. H. J., & Keizer R. (2020). Longitudinal linkages between father and mother autonomy support and adolescent problem behaviors: Between-family differences and within-family effects. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(11), 2372-2387.
[42] Wang, M. T., & Kenny, S. (2014). Longitudinal links between fathers' and mothers' harsh verbal discipline and adolescents' conduct problems and depressive symptoms. Child Development, 85(3), 908-923.
[43] Wang, M. F., & Liu, L. (2014). Parental harsh discipline in mainland China: Prevalence, frequency, and coexistence. Child Abuse and Neglect, 38(6), 1128-1137.
[44] Wang, M. F., & Liu, L. (2018). Reciprocal relations between harsh discipline and children' s externalizing behavior in China: A 5-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 89(1), 174-187.
[45] Wiggins J. L., Mitchell C., Hyde L. W., & Monk C. S. (2015). Identifying early pathways of risk and resilience: The codevelopment of internalizing and externalizing symptoms and the role of harsh parenting. Development and Psychopathology, 27(4), 1295-1312

基金

* 本研究得到国家自然科学基金面上项目(32071074)、2022年度北京市属高校教师队伍建设支持计划优秀青年人才项目(BPHR-202203128)和首都师范大学“人才托举计划”项目——燕京人才培育项目的资助

PDF(2199 KB)

评审附件

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/