[1] 白晓宇, Mutusva, T. S., 祝卓宏. (2019). PEAK关系训练系统: 孤独症语言障碍康复的新方法. 心理科学进展, 27(11), 1896-1905. [2] 刘园芳, 白晓宇, 林凡裕, 祝卓宏, 李新影. (2021). BHP: 孤独症患者观点采择训练新方法. 中国特殊教育, 1, 44-50. [3] 毛晓翎, 王分分, 曹静, 祝卓宏. (2017). 多范例训练提升儿童隐喻理解能力的干预性研究. 心理与行为研究, 15(5), 675-682. [4] 王分分, 祝卓宏. (2017). 言语行为的关系框架理论视角: 孤独症谱系障碍的新探索. 心理科学进展, 25(8), 1321-1326. [5] 王淑娟, 张婍, 祝卓宏. (2012). 关系框架理论: 接纳与承诺治疗的理论基础(述评). 中国心理卫生杂志, 26(11), 877-880. [6] Barnes-Holmes D., Barnes-Holmes Y., Hussey I., & Luciano C. (2016). Relational frame theory: Finding its historical and intellectual roots and reflecting upon its future development. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [7] Barnes-Holmes D., Barnes-Holmes Y., Luciano C., & McEnteggart C. (2017). From the IRAP and REC model to a multi-dimensional multi-level framework for analyzing the dynamics of arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(4), 434-445. [8] Barnes-Holmes, D. & Harte, C. (2021). A primer on relational frame theory (RFT). In M. P. Twohig, M. E. Levin, & J. M. Peterson (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of acceptance and commitment therapy. Oxford University Press. [9] Barnes-Holmes, D., & Harte, C. (2022). Relational frame theory 20 years on: The Odysseus voyage and beyond. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 117(2), 240-266. [10] Barnes-Holmes D., O'Hora D., Roche B., Hayes S. C., Bissett R. T., & Lyddy F. (2001). Understanding and verbal regulation. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 103-117). Plenum Publishers. [11] Beck C., Garcia Y., Brothers L., Mahoney A., Rancourt R. C., & Andrews M. (2023). A systematic review of the impact of derived relational responding technology in raising intelligence scores. The Psychological Record, 73(3), 339-361. [12] Bordieri M. J., Kellum K. K., Wilson K. G., & Whiteman K. C. (2016). Basic properties of coherence: Testing a core assumption of relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 66(1), 83-98. [13] Chan S. C., Ormandy S., Stockwell A., & Rehfeldt R. A. (2023). The application of relational frame theory to teaching early piano skills to children on the autism spectrum. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 39(1), 1-29. [14] Edwards D. J. J., McEnteggart C., & Barnes-Holmes Y. (2022). A functional contextual account of background knowledge in categorization: Implications for artificial general intelligence and cognitive accounts of general knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 745306. [15] Gibbs A. R., Tullis C. A., Conine D. E., & Fulton A. A. (2024). A systematic review of derived relational responding beyond coordination in individuals with autism and intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 36(1), 1-36. [16] Gillespie, D., & Provost, S. (2023). Does it apply to me: Using relational frame theory to examine anaesthetists' approach to safety behaviour and human factors. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care, 12(1), 218-222. [17] Harte, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2022). The status of rule-governed behavior as pliance, tracking and augmenting within relational frame theory: Middle-level rather than technical terms. The Psychological Record, 72(1), 145-158. [18] Harte C., Barnes-Holmes D., de Rose J. C., Perez W. F., & de Almeida, J. H. (2023). Grappling with the complexity of behavioral processes in human psychological suffering: Some potential insights from relational frame theory. Perspectives on Behavioral Science, 46(1), 237-259. [19] Hayes, S. C., & Barnes, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68(2), 235-244. [20] Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1985). Verbal behavior, equivalence classes, and rules: New definitions, data, and directions. Invited Address Presented at the Meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Columbus, OH. [21] Hayes S. C., Brownstein A. J., Zettle R. D., Rosenfarb I., & Korn Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45(3), 237-256. [22] Hayes, S. C, Fox E, Gifford E. V, Wilson, K. G., Barnes-Holmes D., & Healy D. (2001). Derived relational responding as learned behavior. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of language and cognition (pp. 21-49). Kluwer Academic/Plenum. [23] Hayes S. C.,& Hayes, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition,, contingencies,, and instructional control (pp. 153-190). Plenum Press. [24] Hayes S. C.,& Hofmann, S. G. (2020). Beyond the DSM: Toward a process-based alternative for diagnosis and mental health treatment Context Press/New Harbinger Publications Toward a process-based alternative for diagnosis and mental health treatment. Context Press/New Harbinger Publications. [25] Hayes, S. C., & Sanford, B. T. (2014). Cooperation came first: Evolution and human cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101(1), 112-129. [26] Herc, H. C. (2022). Applying relational frame theory and increased sensory involvement with metaphors to the digital delivery of an ACT-based coping skill. Dissertation (Master thesis). The University of Toledo. [27] Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2015). Relational frame theory. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 115-128). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [28] Lipkens R., Hayes S. C., & Hayes L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56(2), 201-239. [29] Luciano C., Becerra I. G., & Valverde M. R. (2007). The role of multiple-exemplar training and naming in establishing derived equivalence in an infant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87(3), 349-365. [30] O'Hora, D., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). The referential nature of rules and instructions: A response to instructions, rules, and abstraction: A misconstrued relation by Emilio Ribes-Inesta. Behavior and Philosophy, 29, 21-25. [31] O'Hora D., Barnes-Holmes D., Roche B., & Smeets P. (2004). Derived relational networks and control by novel instructions: A possible model of generative verbal responding. The Psychological Record, 54(3), 437-460. [32] O'Hora D., Barnes-Holmes D., & Stewart I. (2014). Antecedent and consequential control of derived instruction-following. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 102(1), 66-85. [33] O'Toole, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2009). Three chronometric indices of relational responding as predictors of performance on a brief intelligence test: The importance of relational flexibility. The Psychological Record, 59(1), 119-132. [34] Rosenfarb I. S., Hayes S. C., & Linehan M. M. (1989). Instructions and experiential feedback in the treatment of social skills deficits in adults. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 26(2), 242-251. [35] Stewart I., Barnes-Holmes D., Hayes S. C., & Lipkens R. (2001). Relations among relations: Analogies, metaphors, and stories. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 73-86). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. [36] Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Relational frame theory and analogical reasoning: Empirical investigations. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4(2), 241-262. [37] Tagliabue M., Squatrito V., & Presti G. (2019). Models of cognition and their applications in behavioral economics: A conceptual framework for nudging derived from behavior analysis and relational frame theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2418. [38] Turner, J. I. (2021). Frame of politics: A thesis of relational frame theory and U.S. presidential debates (Master thesis). The Chicago School of Professional Psychology. [39] Tyrberg M. J., Parling T., & Lundgren T. (2021). Patterns of relational framing in executive function: An investigation of the Wisconsin card sorting test. The Psychological Record, 71(3), 411-422. [40] Wolgast, A., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2022). Flexible social perspective taking in higher education and the role of contextual cues. Frontline Learning Research, 10(1), 76-107. [41] Zettle R. D.,& Hayes, S. C. (1982). Rule-governed behavior: A potential theoretical framework for cognitive-behavior therapy. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.), Advances in cognitive behavioral research and therapy (pp. 73-118). Academic Press. |