心理科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 1262-1270.DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240525

• 临床与咨询 • 上一篇    下一篇

关系框架理论模型的最新发展:从MDML到HDML*

王淑娟1, 陈晶1,2, 祝卓宏**1,2   

  1. 1中国科学院心理研究所,中国科学院心理健康重点实验室,北京,100101;
    2中国科学院大学心理学系,北京,100049
  • 出版日期:2024-09-20 发布日期:2024-10-21
  • 通讯作者: ** 祝卓宏,E-mail: zhzh@psych.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    * 本研究得到首都卫生发展科研专项项目(首发 2022-1G-2112)的资助

The Latest Model Developments of the Relational Frame Theory: From MDML to HDML

Wang Shujuan1, Chen Jing1,2, Zhu Zhuohong1,2   

  1. 1CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101;
    2Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049
  • Online:2024-09-20 Published:2024-10-21

摘要: 关系框架理论是美国心理学家Hayes等人于1985年提出的基于行为分析的当代语言与认知理论。关系框架理论将一类由语境控制并明确规定了刺激之间关系的反应称为任意适用的关系反应,并将其作为关系框架理论的基本过程。文章系统梳理了关系框架理论的最新发展,包括研究者对早期关系框架理论研究的反思、最近几年发展出来的多维度多水平模型和超维度多水平模型,并对理论的发展进行了总结和评价,提出了未来的研究方向,以期为该理论在中国的实证研究和发展提供参考。

关键词: 关系框架理论, 行为分析, AARR, MDML, HDML

Abstract: The Relational Frame Theory (RFT) is a contemporary theory of language and cognition based on behavioral analysis, proposed by American psychologists Hayes and colleagues in 1985. RFT refers to a class of responses that involve relationships between stimuli that are clearly defined and controlled within a context as Arbitrary Applicable Relational Responses (AARR), which is the fundamental process of RFT. This article reviews early RFT research and systematically discusses the latest developments in RFT theory, including the multidimensional multilevel model (MDML) and the hyper-dimensional multilevel model (HDML) developed in recent years.
Early RFT research often focused on the"demonstration research". That is, the early RFT research involved demonstrations of predicted entailment and transformation effects. Frameworks are either demonstrated or they are not. However, the key to RFT lies in the functional response units that involve associations rather than individual stimuli. In other words, once a relational frame is established as an operant response, operant contingencies will influence the associated response units.
To further develop the demonstration research stage discussed earlier, Researchers developed the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP). The IRAP is a computer-based task that combines the Implicit Association Test (IAT) with the Relational Evaluation Procedure (REP). Its purpose is to measure the strength or occurrence probability of natural language relations by eliciting responses from participants under time pressure . However, due to its close connection with the IAT, subsequent research quickly focused on implicit attitudes and cognition, thereby reducing attention to the RFT or AARR itself. Therefore, researchers advocate returning to the initial focus of RFT research and striving to analyze the formation of relational frames. This led to the development of the MDML and HDML.
The MDML framework identifies four dimensions of RFT analysis and five levels of relational development. The four dimensions are relational consistency, relational complexity, derived relations, and flexibility. The five levels of relational development are mutual entailing relational framing, relational networking, relating relations, and relating relational networking. MDML conceptualizes and studies the 20 intersections between the four dimensions of relational analysis and the five levels of development to understand and study the dynamics of AARR in laboratory and natural environments. HDML shifts the focus from individual frames to relational interactive networks and establishes a new concept analysis unit called ROE-M, representing relationship, orientation, evocation, and motivation aspects within RFT. Orientation in HDML refers to the extent to which a stimulus event is noticed or "stands out" in a broader context. Evocation refers to whether the noticed stimulus or event is liked, disliked, or relatively neutral, and the degree to which the stimulus event is considered approachable or avoidable. Motivation represents the intensity of motivational factors that interact with orientation and/or evocation and is dynamically related. ROE-M emphasizes the functional features of contexts and provides a concise and precise analysis of the impact of language skills on any contextual variable of human behavior, while always emphasizing the highly dynamic and complex nature of human psychological events. Explanations of behavior based on the inseparable characteristics of ROE-M extends beyond the reinforcement process and even beyond traditional RFT explanations.
The RFT and its subsequent developments in the MDML and HDML frameworks aim to provide an accurate, concise, and functional analysis framework for describing verbal behavior and to provide a unified analytic framework for psychological events or issues. The Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), based on the development of the RFT, has been empirically validated in international and domestic clinical psychological interventions. However, there is still limited introduction and exploration of the RFT and its latest developments among Chinese scholars. We hope that Chinese scholars can systematically validate this theory within the Chinese cultural context and explore the cultural adaptability of the RFT in different settings and populations, thus fully realizing its practical value.

Key words: relational frame theory (RFT), behavior analysis, AARR, MDML, HDML