协助类型对求助者过分自信的影响：思考的作用*

毕研玲; 李冀蒙; 卢雨媚; 肖昊宇; 陈泓薇

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20250315

PDF(576 KB)

心理科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3) : 663-672. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20250315

社会、人格与管理

协助类型对求助者过分自信的影响：思考的作用^*

毕研玲^**, 李冀蒙, 卢雨媚, 肖昊宇, 陈泓薇

作者信息 +

The Impact of Assistance Types on The Overconfidence of Help-Seekers: The Role of Thinking

Bi Yanling, Li Jimeng, Lu Yumei, Xiao Haoyu, Chen Hongwei

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

人们在获得外部协助完成任务后,会高估自身独立完成相似任务的能力。通过两个研究探讨了寻求人类协助与互联网协助导致求助者过分自信的差异,并探究了“思考提示”的作用。结果发现：（1）人们普遍高估自身能力,相较于寻求人类协助,寻求互联网协助的求助者因对问题较低的思考水平而对自身未来完成相似任务的能力产生更高程度的过分自信;（2）“思考提示”能显著降低因互联网协助导致的过分自信,而对人类协助导致的过分自信无显著缓解作用。以上结果说明思考程度是不同协助类型导致过分自信水平差异的重要原因,对人们认识协助与过分自信之间关系、影响机制及消除因互联网协助导致的过分自信有积极意义。

Abstract

Without outside assistance, people’s cognitive abilities are highly limited. However, accepting assistance can lead people to overestimate their ability to complete tasks independently. With the spread of the Internet, people have become increasingly dependent on Internet assistance to alleviate cognitive workload. No research has yet explored whether seeking human assistance after “asking for assistance” leads to the same level of overconfidence about future tasks as seeking assistance from the Internet. Additionally, methods suggested in previous studies to reduce overconfidence caused by external assistance tend to increase the time and cognitive cost of solving problems, making them less likely to be recognized and adopted by those assistance seekers. Therefore, we aim to address the following three questions: (1) whether proactively seeking assistance from the Internet leads to higher levels of overconfidence about future tasks than proactively seeking help from others; (2) whether a lack of reflection can lead to higher levels of overconfidence; and (3) whether a “thinking tip” can reduce the seekers’ overconfidence in their ability to complete tasks independently in the future after receiving assistance.
Study 1 used a single-factor between-subjects design to explore whether receiving human assistance leads to lower overconfidence than receiving Internet assistance after asking for assistance. One hundred and twenty-six college students were recruited online and randomly divided into three groups. In the first stage, participants were required to answer 10 general knowledge questions as correctly as possible. The Internet assistance group could use “Baidu search” for assistance, the human assistance group could ask the experimenter for answers, and the no-assistance group had to answer independently. In the second stage, participants estimated how many questions of similar difficulty to those in the first stage they could answer correctly on their own. In the third stage, participants in each group independently completed an additional 10 questions of similar difficulty to those in the first stage. Study 2 used a 2 (Internet assistance vs. human assistance) × 2 (thinking vs. no thinking) between-subjects design to explore the reasons for the difference in how various types of assistance lead to overconfidence in future tasks. It also tested whether a more feasible “thinking tip” could reduce the overconfidence caused by receiving assistance. One hundred and ninety-two college students were recruited online and randomly assigned to four groups. Participants in the no thinking groups sought help immediately after reading the questions, while participants in the thinking groups were asked to continue thinking about the question when they sought help. The other stages mirrored those in Study 1.
Study 1 showed that overconfidence in the Internet assistance group was significantly higher than in the human assistance and no-assistance groups. Study 2 showed that “thinking tip” could effectively reduce overconfidence in those who received Internet assistance, but had no effect on the overconfidence in those who received human assistance. In summary, (1) after seeking assistance from the Internet, people show higher confidence in their ability to complete tasks without assistance in the future, and are more overconfident than those who sought assistance from human. (2) The lack of thinking about problems during the process of “asking for help” by individuals who seek assistance from the Internet is an important reason why they have higher overconfidence after receiving Internet assistance than after receiving human assistance. (3) Providing individuals with the tip to think about problems before receiving assistance can reduce the overconfidence in those who receive Internet assistance in completing similar future tasks without assistance.

导出引用

毕研玲, 李冀蒙, 卢雨媚, 肖昊宇, 陈泓薇. 协助类型对求助者过分自信的影响：思考的作用^*[J]. 心理科学. 2025, 48(3): 663-672 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20250315

Bi Yanling, Li Jimeng, Lu Yumei, Xiao Haoyu, Chen Hongwei. The Impact of Assistance Types on The Overconfidence of Help-Seekers: The Role of Thinking[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2025, 48(3): 663-672 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20250315

参考文献

[1] 毕研玲. (2019). 过分自信的效益. 陕西师范大学出版总社..
[2] 陈其安, 方彩霞, 肖映红. (2010). 基于上市公司高管人员过度自信的股利分配决策模型研究. 中国管理科学, 18(3), 174-184.
[3] 耿晓伟, 张峰, 王艳净, 范琳琳, 姚艳. (2018). 健康目标启动降低高热量食物消费. 心理学报, 50(8), 840-847.
[4] 秦宗文. (2016). 刑事隐蔽性证据规则研究. 法学研究, 38(3), 174-192.
[5] 张钢, 熊立. (2007). 交互记忆系统研究回顾与展望. 心理科学进展, 15(5), 840-845.
[6] Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292.
[7] Bi Y. L., Liu P., Li S., & Zhang B. S. (2017). The enhancing effect of overconfidence on subsequent learning performance: Potential mediation effects of dissatisfaction and effort. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2), 555-568.
[8] Block, L. G., & Morwitz, V. G. (1999). Shopping lists as an external memory aid for grocery shopping: Influences on list writing and list fulfillment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(4), 343-375.
[9] Bohns, V. K., & Flynn, F. J. (2010). “Why didn’t you just ask?” Underestimating the discomfort of help-seeking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 402-409.
[10] Bushuven S., Bansbach J., Bentele M., Trifunovic-Koenig M., Bentele S., Gerber B., … Fischer M. R. (2023). Overconfidence effects and learning motivation refreshing BLS: An observational questionnaire study. Resuscitation Plus, 14, Article 100369.
[11] Canady, B. E., & Larzo, M. (2023). Overconfidence in managing health concerns: The Dunning-Kruger effect and health literacy. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 30(2), 460-468.
[12] Carrell, S., & Sacerdote, B. (2017). Why do college-going interventions work?. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(3), 124-151.
[13] Castleman, B., & Page, L. (2015). Beyond FAFSA completion. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(1), 28-35.
[14] Choi, E., & Shah, C. (2016). User motivations for asking questions in online Q & A services. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(5), 1182-1197.
[15] Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why?. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51-57.
[16] DeFeo D. J., Bonin D., & Ossiander-Gobeille M. (2017). Waiting and help-seeking in math tutoring exchanges. Journal of Developmental Education, 40(3), 14-22.
[17] Eliseev, E. D., & Marsh, E. J. (2023). Understanding why searching the internet inflates confidence in explanatory ability. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 37(4), 711-720.
[18] Fisher M., Goddu M. K., & Keil F. C. (2015). Searching for explanations: How the Internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 674-687.
[19] Fisher, M., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2021a). Harder than you think: How outside assistance leads to overconfidence. Psychological Science, 32(4), 598-610.
[20] Fisher, M., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2021b). Who knows what? Knowledge misattribution in the division of cognitive labor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(2), 292-306.
[21] Fisher M., Smiley A. H., & Grillo, T. L. H. (2022). Information without knowledge: The effects of Internet search on learning. Memory, 30(4), 375-387.
[22] Flanagin, A. J., & Lew, Z. (2023). Individual inferences in web-based information environments: How cognitive processing fluency, information access, active search behaviors, and task competency affect metacognitive and task judgments. Media Psychology, 26(1), 17-35.
[23] Flynn, F. J., & Lake, V. K. B. (2008). If you need help, just ask: Underestimating compliance with direct requests for help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 128-143.
[24] Greenberg, M. S., & Shapiro, S. P. (1971). Indebtedness: An adverse aspect of asking for and receiving help. Sociometry, 34(2), 290-301.
[25] Hainguerlot M., Gajdos T., Vergnaud J. C., & de Gardelle V. (2023). How overconfidence bias influences suboptimality in perceptual decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 49(4), 537-548.
[26] Hamilton K. A., Ward A. F., & Yao M. Z. (2024). Mind or machine? Conversational internet search moderates search-induced cognitive overconfidence. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications. Advance online publication.
[27] Hatano A., Ogulmus C., Shigemasu H., & Murayama K. (2022). Thinking about thinking: People underestimate how enjoyable and engaging just waiting is. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(12), 3213-3229.
[28] Hoffrage, U. (2004). Overconfidence. In R. F. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory (pp. 235-254). Psychology Press.
[29] Intons-Peterson, M. J., & Fournier, J. (1986). External and internal memory aids: When and how often do we use them?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(3), 267-280.
[30] Jackson L. A., Ervin K. S., Gardner P. D., & Schmitt N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44(5), 363-379.
[31] Jepsen, A. L. (2007). Factors affecting consumer use of the Internet for information search. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(3), 21-34.
[32] Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 34-53.
[33] Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134.
[34] Lee, F. (1997). When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help seeking and power motivation in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(3), 336-363.
[35] McKerlich R., Riis M., Anderson T., & Eastman B. (2011). Student perceptions of teaching presence, social presence, and cognitive presence in a virtual world. Merlot-Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 324-336.
[36] Meade M. L., Nokes T. J., & Morrow D. G. (2009). Expertise promotes facilitation on a collaborative memory task. Memory, 17(1), 39-48.
[37] Nurminen M., Heino P., & Ihantola P. (2017). Friends and gurus: Do students ask for help from those they know or those who would know. In Proceedings of the 17th Koli calling international conference on computing education research (pp. 80-87). ACM.
[38] Paulus, M., & Moore, C. (2011). Whom to ask for help? Children' s developing understanding of other people' s action capabilities. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 593-600.
[39] Peltokorpi, V. (2008). Transactive memory systems. Review of General Psychology, 12(4), 378-394.
[40] Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676-688.
[41] Sparrow B., Liu J., & Wegner D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776-778.
[42] Tokatlidis O., Kinna J., Rousseau F., Lulla R., & Wilson G. (2011). Introducing ask counselling: An online question and answer service for university students. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association, 38, 33-40.
[43] Trifunovic-Koenig M., Bushuven S., Gerber B., Otto B., Dettenkofer M., Salm F., & Fischer M. R. (2022). Correlation between overconfidence and learning motivation in postgraduate infection prevention and control training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), Article 5763.
[44] Umefjord G., Petersson G., & Hamberg K. (2003). Reasons for consulting a doctor on the Internet: Web survey of users of an Ask the Doctor service. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 5(4), Article e26.
[45] von Hoyer J. F., Kimmerle J., & Holtz P. (2022). Acquisition of false certainty: Learners increase their confidence in the correctness of incorrect answers after online information search. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(3), 833-844.
[46] Ward, A. F. (2013a). One with the Cloud: Why people mistake the Internet's knowledge for their own (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge.
[47] Ward, A. F. (2013b). Supernormal: How the Internet is changing our memories and our minds. Psychological Inquiry, 24(4), 341-348.
[48] Ward, A. F. (2021). People mistake the internet' s knowledge for their own. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(43), Article e2105061118.
[49] Ward A. F., Grillo T., & Fernbach P. (2022). Confidence without competence: Online financial search and consumer financial decision-making. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4131784
[50] Ward A. F., Zheng J., & Broniarczyk S. M. (2023). I share, therefore I know? Sharing online content-even without reading it-inflates subjective knowledge. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(3), 469-488.
[51] Wegner, D. M., & Ward, A. F. (2013). How Google is changing your brain. Scientific American, 309(6), 58-61.
[52] Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They' re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 267-301.