感知上级信任对员工资质过剩感的“过犹不及”效应及远端影响*

周冰艳, 王玮, 李永鑫

心理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 703-713.

PDF(1666 KB)
中文  |  English
PDF(1666 KB)
心理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 703-713. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260318
社会、人格与管理

感知上级信任对员工资质过剩感的“过犹不及”效应及远端影响*

作者信息 +

The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing and Distal Effect of Feeling Trusted from Supervisor on Employee Perceived Overqualification

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

基于自我评价理论,研究探讨感知上级信任对资质过剩感的“过犹不及”效应,分析其如何进一步影响员工偏离行为以及外在动机的调节作用。通过对情景实验的 170 份样本数据和3个时间点领导者—员工配对数据(N = 303)分析,结果表明:感知上级信任与资质过剩感之间存在显著的U型关系,并进一步影响员工偏离行为;外在动机在上述路径中起调节作用,即员工外在动机水平越低,感知上级信任通过资质过剩感影响员工偏离行为的间接作用越强。研究结果揭示了感知上级信任与员工偏离行为的复杂关系,为组织在信任管理和激励策略的设计提供实践建议。

Abstract

Trust in organizations has become a focus of researchers and practitioners, given its profound impact on employee behaviors and organizational outcomes. Feeling trusted from supervisor is generally perceived as a positive force that enhances employee motivation, job satisfaction, and performance. However, recent studies have suggested that the relationship between feeling trusted from supervisor and employee behaviors may not be linear. Instead, excessive trust can lead to unintended negative consequences. According to self-evaluation theory, individuals will adjust their self-evaluation of abilities and values based on external feedback. When employees perceive high levels of trust from their supervisor, they may develop an inflated sense of self-worth, leading to overqualification perceptions and subsequent negative behaviors. Conversely, low levels of perceived trust might also result in feelings of underutilization and overqualification, prompting employees to engage in deviant behaviors as a form of coping or resistance. To address this complex relationship, this study aims to investigate the U-shaped relationship between feeling trusted from supervisors and perceived overqualification, and its distal impact on employee deviant behavior and moderating effect of extrinsic motivation.

To test the hypothesized relationships and ensure both internal and external validity, we conducted an experimental study (study 1) and a survey study (study 2). In study 1, we utilized a single-factor, three-level between-subjects design, randomly assigning 170 participants to one of three conditions. Participants first provided demographic information. Then, all participants were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: "low feeling trusted from supervisor " (N = 57), "medium feeling trusted from supervisor " (N = 57), and "high feeling trusted from supervisor " (N = 56). After reading, they completed the measurement of manipulation test, perceived overqualification, and deviant behavior based on their recalled true feelings. In study 2, a multi-time-point survey was conducted involving 303 leader-employee dyads from various organizations. The study design included three distinct phases to mitigate common method bias. At Time 1, employees were asked to complete a survey measuring their perceived trusted from their supervisor and their extrinsic motivation. At Time 2, employees reported on their perceived overqualification, reflecting their self-assessment of whether their skills and qualifications exceeded job requirements. Finally, at Time 3, employee’s supervisor provided an independent rating of employees deviant behavior.

The statistical analyses provided robust evidence supporting the hypothesized relationships. First, the results confirmed a significant U-shaped relationship between feeling trusted from supervisor and perceived overqualification. Specifically, employees who perceived moderate levels of trust from their supervisor reported lower levels of perceived overqualification, suggesting that a balanced level of trust helps align employees' self-assessment with their actual job requirements. In contrast, both low and high levels of perceived trust were associated with higher perceived overqualification. Employees with higher perceived overqualification were more likely to engage in deviant behaviors, such as wasting time, gossiping, or sabotaging work, as a way to cope with their feelings of overqualification and underutilization. There is a significant U-shaped relationship between feeling trusted from supervisors and perceived overqualification, which indirectly affects employee deviant behavior. Furthermore, extrinsic motivation was found to moderate the U-shaped relationship between feeling trusted from supervisor and perceived overqualification. For employees with lower extrinsic motivation, the relationship was more pronounced, indicating that these individuals are more susceptible to the effects of perceived trust on their self-evaluation and subsequent behaviors. In contrast, employees with higher extrinsic motivation, who are more focused on external rewards and less influenced by internal psychological states, exhibited a weaker U-shaped relationship.

The findings of this study offer valuable insights into the complex interplay between feeling trusted from supervisor, perceived overqualification, and employee deviant behaviors. They highlight the importance of managing trust effectively within organizations, as both under- and over-trust can lead to negative outcomes. The findings suggest that feeling trusted from supervisor can have a "too much of a good thing" effect, influencing employee deviant behavior through perceived overqualification. The study extends the self-evaluation theory by demonstrating how external feedback, such as perceived trust, can lead to complex self-assessments and subsequent behaviors.

关键词

感知上级信任 / 外在动机 / 资质过剩感 / 员工偏离行为

Key words

feeling trusted from supervisor / extrinsic motivation / perceived overqualification / employee deviant behavior

引用本文

导出引用
周冰艳, 王玮, 李永鑫. 感知上级信任对员工资质过剩感的“过犹不及”效应及远端影响*[J]. 心理科学. 2026, 49(3): 703-713 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260318
Zhou Bingyan, Wang Wei, Li Yongxin. The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing and Distal Effect of Feeling Trusted from Supervisor on Employee Perceived Overqualification[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2026, 49(3): 703-713 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260318

参考文献

[1]
陈晨, 张昕, 孙利平, 秦昕, 邓惠如. (2020). 信任以稀为贵?下属感知被信任如何以及何时导致反生产行为. 心理学报, 52(3), 329-344.
[2]
褚福磊, 王蕊. (2019). 资质过剩感与亲组织不道德行为:心理特权与谦卑型领导的作用. 心理科学, 42(2), 365-371.
[3]
韩志伟, 习怡衡, 秦嘉, 任志帅, 呼枫. (2024). 员工诚实-谦逊与工作越轨行为:基于特质激发理论的视角. 心理科学, 47(1),178-186.
[4]
贾冀南, 张琦. (2016). 心理契约违背对新生代科技人才偏离行为的影响机理:一个被调节的中介作用模型. 科技进步与对策, 33(21), 143-150.
[5]
刘敏, 余江龙, 黄勇. (2018). 感知被上级信任如何促进员工建言行为:心理安全感、自我效能感和权力距离的作用. 中国人力资源开发, 35(12), 18-27.
[6]
卢海陵, 杨洋, 王永丽, 张昕, 谭玲. (2021). “激将法”会激发还是打击员工?感知能力不被领导信任的“双刃剑”效应. 心理学报, 53(12), 1376-1392.
[7]
马华维, 董晓茹, 姚琦. (2021). 员工感知被信任影响工作投入的心理机制:维度差异及理论比较. 心理科学, 44(6), 1476-1482.
[8]
苏宗伟, 李欢, 杜娟. (2022). 仁慈型领导对员工工作偏离行为的双刃剑效应研究. 管理学报, 19(3), 362-372.
[9]
孙利平, 龙立荣, 李梓一. (2018). 被信任感对员工绩效的影响及其作用机制研究述评. 管理学报, 15(1), 144-150.
[10]
王红丽. (2018). 被信任的后遗症:感知上级信任的双路径研究. 经济管理, 40(6), 69-85.
[11]
王楠, 陈详详, 陈劲. (2019). 物质奖励对知识共享的作用研究:争论与整合. 科技进步与对策, 36(2), 135-143.
[12]
王瑞永, 邱天郁, 吴华. (2022). 资质过剩感对员工反生产行为的影响研究——经济剥夺感和社会剥夺感的中介作用. 财经理论研究, 6, 64-75.
[13]
向常春, 陈晓梅, 王旭. (2023). 对高材生“另眼相待”有效吗?——资质过剩感与时间侵占行为的关系研究. 管理现代化, 43(3), 92-99.
[14]
张剑, 宋亚辉, 刘肖. (2016). 削弱效应是否存在:工作场所中内外动机的关系. 心理学报, 48(1), 73-83.
[15]
周颖. (2022). 能力不被领导信任对员工越轨创新行为的影响(硕士学位论). 对外经济贸易大学, 北京.
[16]
Azeem, M. U., De Clercq, D., & Haq, I. U. (2021). Suffering doubly: How victims of coworker incivility risk poor performance ratings by responding with organizational deviance, unless they leverage ingratiation skills. The Journal of Social Psychology, 161(1), 86-102.
[17]
Baer, M. D., Dhensa-Kahlon, R. K., Colquitt, J. A., Rodell, J. B., Outlaw, R., & Long, D. M. (2015). Uneasy lies the head that bears the trust: The effects of feeling trusted on emotional exhaustion. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1637-1657.
[18]
Cheng, B., Zhou, X., Guo, G., & Yang, K. (2020). Perceived overqualification and cyberloafing: A moderated-mediation model based on equity theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 565-577.
[19]
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
[20]
Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2021). Overqualification at work: A review and synthesis of the literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 259-283.
[21]
Fan, J., Wei, X., & Ko, I. (2021). How do hotel employees' feeling trusted and its differentiation shape service performance: The role of relational energy. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, 102700.
[22]
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3. 1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
[23]
Fehr, R., Yam, K. C., He, W., Chiang, J. T. J., & Wei, W. (2017). Polluted work: A self-control perspective on air pollution appraisals, organizational citizenship, and counterproductive work behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 143, 98-110.
[24]
Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2010). Quantifying and testing indirect effects in simple mediation models when the constituent paths are nonlinear. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(4), 627-660.
[25]
Johnson, G. J., & Johnson, W. R. (1996). Perceived overqualification and psychological well-being. Journal of Social Psychology, 136(4), 435-445.
[26]
Kluemper, D. H., Mossholder, K. W., Ispas, D., Bing, M. N., Iliescu, D., & Ilie, A. (2019). When core self-evaluations influence employees' deviant reactions to abusive supervision: The moderating role of cognitive ability. Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 435-453.
[27]
Körner, B., Debus, M. E., Wu, C. H., & Kleinmann, M. (2025). How and when do frequent daily work interruptions contribute to or undermine daily job satisfaction? A stress appraisal perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 46(1), 1-23.
[28]
Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Weibel, A., Dysvik, A., & Nerstad, C. G. (2017). Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 244-258.
[29]
Lau, D. C., Lam, L. W., & Wen, S. S. (2014). Examining the effects of feeling trusted by supervisors in the workplace: A self-evaluative perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 112-127.
[30]
Liu, J., Wei, W., Pu, Y., Ying, T., Xue, C., & Yi, Q. (2024). Support a better work-family balance in the hotel sector. Current Issues in Tourism, 28(11), 1819-1836.
[31]
Ma, C., Shang, S., Zhao, H., Zhong, J., & Chan, X. W. (2023). Speaking for organization or self? Investigating the effects of perceived overqualification on pro-organizational and self-interested voice. Journal of Business Research, 168, 114215.
[32]
Mackey, J. D. (2022). The effect of cultural values on the strength of the relationship between interpersonal and organizational workplace deviance. Journal of Business Research, 149, 760-771.
[33]
Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.
[34]
Mignonac, K., Boujendar, S., & Bergon, G. (2023). How organizational cynicism can promote customer-directed deviance via employee resource depletion and how experiencing supervisory support may help overcome this effect. Group and Organization Management, 10596011231208232.
[35]
Nikolova, I., Caniëls, M. C., & Sverke, M. (2023). Qualitative job insecurity and extra-role behaviours: The moderating role of work motivation and perceived investment in employee development. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 44(2), 547-572.
[36]
Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209.
[37]
Qin, X., Chen, C., Yam, K. C., Huang, M., & Ju, D. (2020). The double-edged sword of leader humility: Investigating when and why leader humility promotes versus inhibits subordinate deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(7), 693.
[38]
She, Z., & Li, Q. (2023). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between cyberloafing and task performance in public organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(4), 1141-1158.
[39]
Sun, Y., & Qiu, Z. (2022). Perceived overqualification and Innovative behavior: High-order moderating effects of length of service. Sustainability, 14(6), 3493.
[40]
Van Vianen, A. E. (2018). Person-environment fit: A review of its basic tenets. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 75-101.
[41]
Wayment, H. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1995). Self-evaluation processes: Motives, information use, and self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 63(4), 729-757.
[42]
Yoon, H. J., Sung, S. Y., Choi, J. N., Lee, K., & Kim, S. (2015). Tangible and intangible rewards and employee creativity: The mediating role of situational extrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 383-393
[43]
Zhao, S., & Ma, C. (2023). Too smart to work hard? Investigating why overqualified employees engage in time theft behaviors. Human Resource Management, 62(6), 971-987.
[44]
Zheng, J., Zhang, Z., Wu, G., Yang, Y., Xia, N., & Liu, B. (2021). Daily self-efficacy, work engagement, and deviance behavior among construction professionals and workers: Cross-level moderating role of job control. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(4), 04021018.
[45]
Zhuang, W. L., Chen, K. Y., Chang, C. L., Guan, X., & Huan, T. C. (2020). Effect of hotel employees' workplace friendship on workplace deviance behaviour: Moderating role of organisational identification. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, 102531.

基金

*国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(72101083)

PDF(1666 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/