效力的时间维度调节奖赏对冲突抑制的影响*

刘颖; 张琪涵; 卢柳柳; 吕佳; 蒋家丽; 白学军

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260507

PDF(1118 KB)

心理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 1098-1108. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260507

基础、实验与工效

效力的时间维度调节奖赏对冲突抑制的影响^*

刘颖 ¹^,² ,
张琪涵 ¹^,²^,³^,^** ,
卢柳柳 ¹^,² ,
吕佳 ¹^,² ,
蒋家丽 ¹^,² ,
白学军 ¹^,²^,³^,^**

作者信息 +

The Temporal Dimension of Efficacy Modulates the Effect of Reward on Interference Inhibition

Liu Ying ¹^,² ,
Zhang Qihan ¹^,²^,³^,^** ,
Lu Liuliu ¹^,² ,
Lyu Jia ¹^,² ,
Jiang Jiali ¹^,² ,
Bai Xuejun ¹^,²^,³^,^**

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

论文探讨了效力的时间维度（即时vs.累积）在奖赏影响冲突抑制中的作用。效力是指奖赏与任务表现之间的关联强度。研究1，采用2（即时奖赏：高、低）×2（即时效力：高、低）×3（一致性：不一致、一致、中性）的被试内实验设计，发现高效力条件下奖赏对反应速度的提升更为显著；但奖赏和效力未影响冲突抑制。研究2采用2（即时奖赏：高、低）×2（累积效力：高、低）×3（一致性：不一致、一致、中性）的被试内实验设计，发现效力不仅调节奖赏对整体认知表现的影响，还调节奖赏对冲突抑制的影响：高效力条件下，高奖赏提高了冲突抑制；低效力条件下，高奖赏降低了冲突抑制。结果表明，效力的时间维度会影响奖赏对认知控制的作用层次。

Abstract

Interference inhibition is a core component of cognitive control, referring to the ability to complete goal-directed tasks by suppressing distracting or competing cognitive processes. Previous research on the effects of reward on interference inhibition has yielded inconsistent findings (facilitative vs. null effects). The expected value of control (EVC) theory provides an integrative framework. It proposes that the allocation of cognitive control resources depends on a cost-benefit trade-off, with efficacy playing a key moderating role. Efficacy refers to the degree to which task performance predicts reward. However, existing research generally treats efficacy as a static property and overlooks its distinct temporal forms. Efficacy is fundamentally an expectation formed through accumulated feedback and may comprise both a short-term, trial-level component and a more stable, cross-trial component. To date, no study has systematically examined whether the temporal dimension of efficacy determines the depth at which reward influences different levels of cognitive control. Accordingly, the present study aimed to investigate how immediate efficacy and cumulative efficacy, as two temporal forms of efficacy, modulated the impact of reward on overall cognitive performance and on interference inhibition as a higher-level control process.

The present study employed the classic color-word Stroop task and rigorously controlled relative task difficulty using individualized reaction-time thresholds to eliminate confounds arising from differences in expected cost. Across two experiments, we separately manipulated immediate efficacy and cumulative efficacy in order to systematically examine how the temporal dimension of efficacy shaped the level at which reward influenced cognitive control. Reward levels were set as high (￥1) and low (￥0.1). In the high-efficacy condition, rewards were contingent on task performance, whereas in the low-efficacy condition, rewards were randomly assigned. Experiment 1 (n= 39) used a 2 (immediate reward: high, low) × 2 (immediate efficacy: high, low) × 3 (congruency: incongruent, congruent, neutral) within-subject design. Reward and efficacy cues were presented before each trial to investigate the effects of immediate reward and immediate efficacy on interference inhibition. Results indicated that immediate efficacy moderated the effect of immediate reward on overall cognitive performance, with reward producing greater improvements in reaction speed under high efficacy conditions (F(1, 38) = 22.25, p <.001, η_p² =.37). However, neither factor significantly influenced interference inhibition (Stroop effect).

Previous research suggests that efficacy exhibits cumulative learning characteristics, requiring multiple interactions with the environment to integrate task feedback and prediction errors. Psychological momentum theory further supports this view, proposing that repeated positive feedback enhances an individual’s psychological energy, thereby improving behavioral performance. Based on these considerations, experiment 2 (n= 33) employed a 2 (immediate reward: high, low) × 2 (cumulative efficacy: high, low) × 3 (congruency: incongruent, congruent, neutral) within-subject design. Efficacy cues were presented at the beginning of each block, and reward cues were presented before each trial, to examine the effects of immediate reward and cumulative efficacy on interference inhibition. Results demonstrated that cumulative efficacy moderated the effects of immediate reward on both overall cognitive performance (F(1, 32) = 4.57, p <.05, η_p² =.13) and interference inhibition (F(1, 32) = 10.46, p <.01, η_p² =.25). Under high efficacy conditions, high reward enhanced interference inhibition, whereas under low efficacy conditions, high reward reduced interference inhibition.

The present study introduced the temporal dimension of efficacy for the first time and demonstrated that this dimension modulated the level at which reward influenced cognitive control. Immediate efficacy modulated only the effect of reward on overall cognitive performance, whereas cumulative efficacy allowed the influence of reward to extend to the level of interference inhibition. This work provides more fine-grained and explanatory behavioral evidence for the EVC framework and deepens our understanding of how motivation shapes cognitive control.

导出引用

刘颖, 张琪涵, 卢柳柳, 等. 效力的时间维度调节奖赏对冲突抑制的影响^*[J]. 心理科学. 2026, 49(5): 1098-1108 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260507

Liu Ying, Zhang Qihan, Lu Liuliu, et al. The Temporal Dimension of Efficacy Modulates the Effect of Reward on Interference Inhibition[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2026, 49(5): 1098-1108 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260507

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	曹思琪, 汤晨晨, 伍海燕, 刘勋. (2022). 价值计算决定何时与如何努力. 心理科学进展, 30(4), 877-887. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	史康音, 费泊尧, 郭鸣谦. (2025). 基于强化学习理论的认知控制计算模型. 心理科学, 48(5), 1076-1088. 本文引用 [2]

[3]	司双庆, 周思宏, 袁加锦, 杨倩. (2024). 认知控制过程的影响因素:回报与代价. 心理科学, 47(2), 258-266. 本文引用 [2]

[4]	唐丹丹, 刘培朵, 陈安涛. (2012). 色-词Stroop任务中的冲突类型述评. 心理科学进展, 20(12), 1962-1970. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	王斌强, 张银燕, 杨玲. (2019). 金钱惩罚促进Stroop任务中的行为表现. 心理科学, 42(6), 1389-1395. 本文引用 [1]

[6]	Bräutigam, L. C., Leuthold, H., Mackenzie, I. G., & Mittelstädt, V. (2024). Proactive reward in conflict tasks: Does it only enhance general performance or also modulate conflict effects? Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 86(6), 2153-2168. 本文引用 [2]

[7]	Bundt, C., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S., Brass, M., & Notebaert, W. (2016). Reward anticipation modulates primary motor cortex excitability during task preparation. NeuroImage, 142, 483-488. 本文引用 [1]

[8]	Bundt, C., Boehler, C. N., Verbruggen, F., Brass, M., & Notebaert, W. (2021). Reward does not modulate corticospinal excitability in anticipation of a Stroop trial. European Journal of Neuroscience, 53(4), 1019-1028. 本文引用 [1]

[9]	Bustamante, L., Lieder, F., Musslick, S., Shenhav, A., & Cohen, J. (2021). Learning to overexert cognitive control in a Stroop task. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 21(3), 453-471. 本文引用 [1]

[10]	Cao, S. Q., Liu, X., & Wu, H. Y. (2022). The neural mechanisms underlying effort process modulated by efficacy. Neuropsychologia, 173, Article 108314. 本文引用 [1]

[11]	Carsten, T., Hoofs, V., Boehler, C. N., & Krebs, R. M. (2019). Are losses more effective than rewards in improving performance in a cognitive task? Motivation Science, 5(3), 257-268. 本文引用 [2]

[12]	Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. 本文引用 [1]

[13]	Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135-168. 本文引用 [1]

[14]	Erb, C. D., Germine, L., & Hartshorne, J. K. (2023). Cognitive control across the lifespan: Congruency effects reveal divergent developmental trajectories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(11), 3285-3291. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). GPower 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods*, 39(2), 175-191. 本文引用 [1]

[16]	Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2014). The differential influences of positive affect, random reward, and performance-contingent reward on cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 530-547. 本文引用 [2]

[17]	Frömer, R., Lin, H., Dean Wolf, C. K., Inzlicht, M., & Shenhav, A. (2021). Expectations of reward and efficacy guide cognitive control allocation. Nature Communications, 12(1), Article 1030. 本文引用 [10]

[18]	Grahek, I., Frömer, R., Prater Fahey, M., & Shenhav, A. (2023). Learning when effort matters: Neural dynamics underlying updating and adaptation to changes in performance efficacy. Cerebral Cortex, 33(5), 2395-2411. 本文引用 [7]

[19]	Hofmans, L., van den Bosch, R., Määttä J. I., Verkes, R. J., Aarts, E., & Cools, R. (2020). The cognitive effects of a promised bonus do not depend on dopamine synthesis capacity. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article 16473. 本文引用 [1]

[20]	Hung, Y., Gaillard, S. L., Yarmak, P., & Arsalidou, M. (2018). Dissociations of cognitive inhibition, response inhibition, and emotional interference: Voxelwise ALE meta-analyses of fMRI studies. Human Brain Mapping, 39(10), 4065-4082. 本文引用 [1]

[21]

Hsieh,

M. T.

, Lu,

, Chen,

L. F.

, Liu,

C. Y.

, Hsu,

S. C.

, & Cheng,

C. H.

(2022). Cancellation but not restraint ability is modulated by trait anxiety: An event-related potential and oscillation study using Go-Nogo and stop-signal tasks. Journal of Affective Disorders, 299(15), 188-195.

本文引用 [1]

[22]	Hsieh, M. T., Lu, H., Lin, C. I., Sun, T. H., Chen, Y. R., & Cheng, C. H. (2021). Effects of trait anxiety on error processing and post-error adjustments: An event-related potential study with stop-signal task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, Article 650838. 本文引用 [1]

[23]	Iso-Ahola, S. E., & Dotson, C. O. (2014). Psychological momentum: Why success breeds success. Review of General Psychology, 18(1), 19-33. 本文引用 [4]

[24]	Kostandyan, M., Park, H. R. P., Bundt, C., González-García, C., Wisniewski, D., Krebs, R. M., & Boehler, C. N. (2020). Are all behavioral reward benefits created equally? An EEG-fMRI study. NeuroImage, 215, Article 116829. 本文引用 [1]

[25]	Krebs, R. M., Boehler, C. N., Appelbaum, L. G., & Woldorff, M. G. (2013). Reward associations reduce behavioral interference by changing the temporal dynamics of conflict processing. PLoS ONE, 8(1), Article e53894. 本文引用 [1]

[26]	Krebs, R. M., Boehler, C. N., Egner, T., & Woldorff, M. G. (2011). The neural underpinnings of how reward associations can both guide and misguide attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(26), 9752-9759. 本文引用 [1]

[27]	Krebs, R. M., Boehler, C. N., & Woldorff, M. G. (2010). The influence of reward associations on conflict processing in the stroop task. Cognition, 117(3), 341-347. 本文引用 [1]

[28]	Kucina, T., Wells, L., Lewis, I., de Salas, K., Kohl, A., Palmer, M. A., Sauer, J. D., Matzke, D., Aidman, E., & Heathcote, A. (2023). Calibration of cognitive tests to address the reliability paradox for decision-conflict tasks. Nature Communications, 14(1), Article 2234. 本文引用 [1]

[29]

Kukkonen,

, Braem,

, Allaert,

, Eayrs,

J. O.

, Prutean,

, Steendam,

S. T.

, Boehler,

C. N.

, Wiersema,

J. R.

, Notebaert,

, & Krebs,

R. M.

(2025). The cost of regulating effort: Reward and difficulty cues with longer prediction horizons have a stronger impact on performance. Journal of Cognition, 8(1), 1-22.

本文引用 [1]

[30]	Ma, I., van Holstein, M., Mies, G. W., Mennes, M., Buitelaar, J., Cools, R., Cillessen, A. H., Krebs, R. M., & Scheres, A. (2016). Ventral striatal hyperconnectivity during rewarded interference control in adolescents with ADHD. Cortex, 82, 225-236. 本文引用 [2]

[31]	Manohar, S. G., Finzi, R. D., Drew, D., & Husain, M. (2017). Distinct motivational effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards. Psychological Science, 28(7), 1016-1026. 本文引用 [1]

[32]	Mittelstädt, V., Ulrich, R., König, J., Hofbauer, K., & Mackenzie, I. G. (2023). The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 85(3), 949-959. 本文引用 [1]

[33]	Musslick, S., Cohen, J. D., & Shenhav, A. (2018). Estimating the costs of cognitive control from task performance: Theoretical validation and potential pitfalls. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 40, 798-803. 本文引用 [1]

[34]	Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 220-246. 本文引用 [1]

[35]	Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2011). Reward reduces conflict by enhancing attentional control and biasing visual cortical processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3419-3432. 本文引用 [1]

[36]	Rosell-Negre, P., Bustamante, J. C., Fuentes-Claramonte, P., Costumero, V., Benabarre, S., & Barrós-Loscertales, A. (2017). Monetary reward magnitude effects on behavior and brain function during goal-directed behavior. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 11(4), 1037-1049. 本文引用 [1]

[37]	Schwabe, L., Höffken, O., Tegenthoff, M., & Wolf, O. T. (2013). Stress-induced enhancement of response inhibition depends on mineralocorticoid receptor activation. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(10), 2319-2326. 本文引用 [1]

[38]	Shenhav, A., Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (2013). The expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron, 79(2), 217-240. 本文引用 [3]

[39]	Shenhav, A., Fahey, M. F., Grahek, I. (2021). Decomposing the motivation to exert mental effort. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(4), 307-314. 本文引用 [6]

[40]	Shields, G. S., Sazma, M. A., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2016). The effects of acute stress on core executive functions: A meta-analysis and comparison with cortisol. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 651-668. 本文引用 [1]

[41]	Soutschek, A., Stelzel, C., Paschke, L., Walter, H., & Schubert, T. (2015). Dissociable effects of motivation and expectancy on conflict processing: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(2), 409-423. 本文引用 [1]

[42]	Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643-662. 本文引用 [1]

[43]	van den Berg, B., Krebs, R. M., Lorist, M. M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2014). Utilization of reward-prospect enhances preparatory attention and reduces stimulus conflict. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 561-577. 本文引用 [2]

[44]	Veling, H., & Aarts, H. (2010). Cueing task goals and earning money: Relatively high monetary rewards reduce failures to act on goals in a Stroop task. Motivation and Emotion, 34(2), 184-190. 本文引用 [4]

[45]	Westbrook, A., & Braver, T. S. (2016). Dopamine does double duty in motivating cognitive effort. Neuron, 89(4), 695-710. 本文引用 [1]

[46]	Yamaguchi, M., & Nishimura, A. (2019). Modulating proactive cognitive control by reward: Differential anticipatory effects of performance-contingent and non-contingent rewards. Psychological Research, 83(2), 258-274. 本文引用 [1]

[47]	Yee, D. M., & Braver, T. S. (2018). Interactions of motivation and cognitive control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 83-90. 本文引用 [2]

[48]	Zhang, J., Bürkner, P. C., Kiesel, A., & Dignath, D. (2023). How emotional stimuli modulate cognitive control: A meta-analytic review of studies with conflict tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 149(1-2), 25-66. 本文引用 [1]