拨开情绪迷雾:领导情绪不可预测性的下行影响机制和效应*

毛江华, 洪贝尔, 陈文文

心理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 1157-1170.

PDF(2032 KB)
中文  |  English
PDF(2032 KB)
心理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 1157-1170. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260512
社会、人格与管理

拨开情绪迷雾:领导情绪不可预测性的下行影响机制和效应*

作者信息 +

Lifting the Emotional Fog: Mechanisms and Top-Down Effects of Leader Emotional Unpredictability

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

组织沟通中的信息不对称常使领导的情绪表达缺乏明确的情境线索,使下属难以预测领导的情绪表达。现有研究多关注领导可预测的情绪表达对下属的影响,对不可预测的情绪表达关注较少。基于情绪社会信息理论,研究揭示了领导情绪不可预测性影响下属的两条路径:领导情绪不可预测性会增加下属的认知困惑和焦虑情绪,进而影响其对领导的回避行为与任务绩效;当领导和下属处于关系建立初期时,认知路径的间接效应增强。关键事件法、情境实验和两阶段问卷调查的数据基本支持上述结果。结果表明,领导情绪信息与情境信息的不一致性会产生负面影响,可为组织的情绪管理提供实践启示。

Abstract

The complexity of the external environment exposes leaders and subordinates to situational disparities and information asymmetries, increasing the likelihood of emotional conflicts and unpredictable leader expressions. However, existing research has primarily focused on the effects of leaders’ predictable emotional expressions on subordinates, assuming that emotional cues align with situational information. In reality, emotional expressions do not always correspond with situational logic, making them appear unpredictable to observers. This study explores how leader emotional unpredictability shapes subordinates’ reactions. Grounded in the emotion-as-social-information (EASI) theory, we propose that leader emotional unpredictability heightens subordinates’ cognitive confusion and anxiety, subsequently influencing their interpersonal behavior and task performance. Furthermore, we expect these effects to be more pronounced in newer leader-subordinate relationships.

To test our hypotheses, we conducted three studies. A priori power analysis using G*Power indicated that a minimum sample size of 85 was required for the proposed model. Study 1 employed the critical incident method, collecting 427 valid responses. Participants were asked to recall and describe incidents in which they directly perceived leaders’ unpredictable emotional expressions, including the cause, process, and outcome of the event, before completing relevant questionnaires. Study 2 adopted a 2 (leader emotional predictability: predictable vs. unpredictable) × 2 (leader-subordinate relationship type: new vs. old) between-subjects experimental design. We obtained 248 valid samples via a professional online platform. Study 3 involved a two-wave field survey conducted one month apart among 386 leader-subordinate dyads from companies in the pharmaceutical, chemical, and food service industries. At Time 1, subordinates reported leaders’ emotional unpredictability, team procedural fairness, relationship length, and demographics. At Time 2, subordinates reported their anxiety, cognitive confusion, and interpersonal withdrawal, while leaders evaluated subordinates’ task performance.

Linear regression analyses and independent-samples t-tests were conducted to test Hypotheses 1 and 3, while the bootstrap method was employed to examine the mediating effects proposed in Hypotheses 2 and 4. In addition, simple slope analyses and ANOVA were used to assess the moderating role of relationship type in testing Hypotheses 5 and 6. The findings indicated that: (a) Leader emotional unpredictability was positively associated with subordinates’ cognitive confusion and anxiety; (b) Both cognitive confusion and anxiety mediated the relationship between leader emotional unpredictability and subordinates’ interpersonal withdrawal, whereas the indirect effect on task performance through anxiety was only supported in Studies 1 and 3; and (c) The type of leader-subordinate relationship moderated the indirect effects of leader emotional unpredictability via cognitive confusion on both withdrawal behavior and task performance. Specifically, in newer leader-subordinate relationships, the negative impact of leader emotional unpredictability on subordinates was most pronounced.

Our research makes several theoretical contributions. First, it extends the boundaries of the EASI framework by demonstrating how leader emotional unpredictability affects subordinates, providing a foundation for future studies that jointly consider emotional cues and situational information. Second, by uncovering the underlying dimensions of emotional unpredictability, the study enriches the theoretical understanding of complex leader emotional expressions and offers new insights into how such expressions relate to subordinate behavior in ambiguous contexts. Third, by introducing the mechanism of emotional complementarity, this research highlights how leaders’ unpredictable emotions can elicit complementary anxiety in subordinates, thereby expanding the conceptual scope of emotional complementarity within EASI. Finally, by examining the moderating role of leader-subordinate relationship type, our research takes a broader perspective on the interpersonal effects of leaders’ episodic emotional expressions, underscoring the critical role of relationship stage in emotion interpretation.

关键词

情绪表达 / 情绪不可预测性 / 认知困惑 / 关系阶段

Key words

emotional expression / emotional unpredictability / cognitive confusion / relationship length types

引用本文

导出引用
毛江华, 洪贝尔, 陈文文. 拨开情绪迷雾:领导情绪不可预测性的下行影响机制和效应*[J]. 心理科学. 2026, 49(5): 1157-1170 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260512
Mao Jianghua, Hong Beier, Chen Wenwen. Lifting the Emotional Fog: Mechanisms and Top-Down Effects of Leader Emotional Unpredictability[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2026, 49(5): 1157-1170 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260512

参考文献

[1]
侯楠, 彭坚, 尹奎, 杨皎平. (2019). 领导者恩威并施的阴暗面及其治理机制--基于不确定性管理的视角. 南开管理评论, 22(6), 77-87.
[2]
李爱梅, 谢健飞, 孙海龙. (2020). 愤怒有度: 领导表达愤怒情绪对领导绩效的影响. 心理科学, 43(2), 402-408.
[3]
李树文, 罗瑾琏, 梁阜. (2020). 领导与下属性别匹配视角下权力距离一致与内部人身份认知对员工建言的影响. 管理学报, 17(3), 365-373.
[4]
毛江华, 陈熔芯. (2023). 组织中的虚拟情绪表达研究述评与展望. 外国经济与管理, 45(5), 117-133.
[5]
孙琳, 段涛, 陈宁. (2020). 情绪预测偏差的成因及干预. 心理科学进展, 28(12), 2018-2026.
[6]
赵富强, 祝含秋, 陈耘, 王龙栋. (2023). 上司创意拒绝、知识型员工离散情绪与趋避行为--基于情绪认知评价理论视角. 南开管理评论, 26(6), 128-139.
[7]
邹艳春, 陈启瑶, 彭坚, 曾晓晴. (2024). 问题导向领导人际情绪管理的收益与代价: 基于员工与领导的差异化视角. 心理科学, 47(3), 630-638.
[8]
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Nathan DeWall, C., & Zhang, L. N. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 167-203.
[9]
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Perugini, M. (1993). The “Big Five Questionnaire”: A new questionnaire to assess the five factor model. Personality and individual Differences, 15(3), 281-288.
[10]
Cole, M. S., Bernerth, J. B., Walter, F., & Holt, D. T. (2010). Organizational justice and individuals’ withdrawal: Unlocking the influence of emotional exhaustion. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 367-390.
[11]
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400.
[12]
D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 153-170.
[13]
Elfenbein, H. A. (2014). The many faces of emotional contagion: An affective process theory of affective linkage. Organizational Psychology Review, 4(4), 326-362.
[14]
Graen, G., & Scandura, T. (1987) Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208.
[15]
Garaus, M., & Wagner, U. (2016). Retail shopper confusion: Conceptualization, scale development, and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3459-3467.
[16]
Greer, L. L., De Hoogh, A. H., Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2013). Effects of leader unpredictability on team power struggles and performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013(1), Article 12875.
[17]
Gross, C., Debus, M. E., Liu, Y. H., Wang, M., & Kleinmann, M. (2021). I am nice and capable! How and when newcomers' self-presentation to their supervisors affects socialization outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(7), 1067-1079.
[18]
Hong, B. E., Mao, J. H., & Liu, W. X. (2025). It is OK to express guilt: The prosocial interpersonal effects of leader guilt display. Journal of Business Ethics, 201(1), 93-110.
[19]
Hu, J., He, W., & Zhou, K. (2020). The mind, the heart, and the leader in times of crisis: How and when COVID-19-triggered mortality salience relates to state anxiety, job engagement, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(11), 1218-1233.
[20]
Katz-Navon, T., Kark, R., & Delegach, M. (2020). Trapped in the middle: Challenging the linear approach to the relationship between leadership and safety. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(1), 81-106.
[21]
Klebe, L., Klug, K., & Felfe, J. (2022). When your boss is under pressure: On the relationships between leadership inconsistency, leader and follower strain. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 816258.
[22]
Kouchaki, M., & Desai, S. D. (2015). Anxious, threatened, and also unethical: How anxiety makes individuals feel threatened and commit unethical acts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 360-375.
[23]
Lee, S. H., & Johnson, M. D. (2025). Emotional signaling: How helpers' emotional expressions affect attributions of motives, relationship quality, and reciprocation. Academy of Management Journal, 68(6), 1266-1299.
[24]
Lelieveld, G. J., van Dijk, E., van Beest, I., & van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Why anger and disappointment affect other' s bargaining behavior differently: The moderating role of power and the mediating role of reciprocal and complementary emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(9), 1209-1221.
[25]
Levin, D. Z., Whitener, E. M., & Cross, R. (2006). Perceived trustworthiness of knowledge sources: The moderating impact of relationship length. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1163-1171.
[26]
Lim, J. H., Tai, K., & Kouchaki, M. (2021). Ambivalent bosses: An examination of supervisor expressed emotional ambivalence on subordinate task engagement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 165, 139-152.
[27]
Lind, E. A., & van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 181-223.
[28]
Liu, W., Song, Z. L., Li, X., & Liao, Z. Y. (2017). Why and when leaders' affective states influence employee upward voice. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 238-263.
[29]
Matta, F. K., Scott, B. A., Guo, Z., & Matusik, J. G. (2020). Exchanging one uncertainty for another: Justice variability negates the benefits of justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(1), 97-110.
[30]
McDermott, R. (2020). Leadership and the strategic emotional manipulation of political identity: An evolutionary perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(2), Article 101275.
[31]
Morelli, S. A., Lee, I. A., Arnn, M. E., & Zaki, J. (2015). Emotional and instrumental support provision interact to predict well-being. Emotion, 15(4), 484-493.
[32]
Moss, S. E., Valenzi, E. R., & Taggart, W. (2003). Are you hiding from your boss?: The development of a taxonomy and instrument to assess the feedback management behaviors of good and bad performers. Journal of Management, 29(4), 487-510.
[33]
Nienaber, A. M. I., Holtgrave, M., Biron, M., Baumeister, V. M., Nayir, D. Z., & Schewe, G. (2023). Trickle-down effect of organizational trust on co-worker trust: The moderating role of cultural dissimilarity and relationship length. European Management Review, 20(1), 97-112.
[34]
Nifadkar, S. S., & Wu, W. (2022). Newcomers as unwitting victims?Examining department leaders' denial of information support and team leaders' resentment during organizational socialization. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(1), 52-68.
[35]
Ritzenhöfer, L., Brosi, P., Spörrle, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2019). Satisfied with the job, but not with the boss: Leaders' expressions of gratitude and pride differentially signal leader selfishness, resulting in differing levels of followers' satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(4), 1185-1202.
[36]
Rothman, N. B., & Melwani, S. (2017). Feeling mixed, ambivalent, and in flux: The social functions of emotional complexity for leaders. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 259-282.
[37]
Sherman, K. E., Kennedy, D. M., Woodard, M. S., & McComb, S. A. (2012). Examining the "exchange" in leader-member exchange. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 19(4), 407-423.
[38]
Shields, S. A. (2005). The politics of emotion in everyday life: "Appropriate"emotion and claims on identity. Review of General Psychology, 9(1), 3-15.
[39]
Stollberger, J., Guillaume, Y., & van Knippenberg, D. (2024). Inspiring, yet tiring: How leader emotional complexity shapes follower creativity. Organization Science, 35(3), 1015-1041.
[40]
Stollberger, J., José Bosch, M., Las Heras, M., Rofcanin, Y., & Daher, P. (2020). The tone at the top: A trickle-down model of how manager anger relates to employee moral behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(6), 907-921.
[41]
van Kleef, G. A. (2016). The interpersonal dynamics of emotion. Cambridge University Press.
[42]
van Kleef, G. A., & Côté S. (2022). The social effects of emotions. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 629-658.
[43]
van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Beersma, B., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., & Damen, F. (2009). Searing sentiment or cold calculation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 562-580.
[44]
van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., & Cheshin, A. (2012). Emotional influence at work: Take it EASI. Organizational Psychology Review, 2(4), 311-339.
[45]
Walsh, G., Hennig-Thurau, T., & Mitchell, V. W. (2007). Consumer confusion proneness: Scale development, validation, and application. Journal of Marketing Management, 23(7-8), 697-721.
[46]
Wang, J., Zhang, Z., & Jia, M. (2023). Redemption from SRHRM underCOVID-19: How business threat due to COVID-19 affects employee insomnia via hope and workplace anxiety. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 96(2), 429-456.
[47]
Wang, L., Restubog, S., Shao, B., Lu, V., & van Kleef, G. A. (2018). Does anger expression help or harm leader effectiveness? The role of competence-based versus integrity-based violations and abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 1050-1072.
[48]
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.
[49]
Zheng, Y. Y., Zheng, X. T., Wu, C. H., Yao, X., & Wang, Y. (2021). Newcomers' relationship-building behavior, mentor information sharing and newcomer adjustment: The moderating effects of perceived mentor and newcomer deep similarity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 125, Article 103519.

基金

*到国家自然科学基金项目(72372159)
教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目(22YJC630104)

PDF(2032 KB)

评审附件

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉