PDF(1322 KB)
青少年生命敬畏感、自尊与受欺凌的关系:一项交叉滞后分析*
林荣茂, 叶玉珊, 郑婉卿, 胡添祥, 陈小燕, 解徐超, 詹鋆
心理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 1232-1242.
PDF(1322 KB)
PDF(1322 KB)
青少年生命敬畏感、自尊与受欺凌的关系:一项交叉滞后分析*
Life Awe, Self-Esteem, and Bullying Victimization in Adolescents: A Cross-Lagged Analysis
作为对生命和自我价值认同的核心要素,生命敬畏感与自尊能通过构建以意义为导向的主动保护机制以有效预防受欺凌。本研究对3911名青少年进行两次追踪调查(间隔6个月),通过交叉滞后分析探究生命敬畏感、自尊与受欺凌之间的纵向关系。结果表明:(1) T1生命敬畏感和T1自尊均显著负向预测T2受欺凌 (β = -.11、-.12),T1受欺凌显著负向预测T2自尊 (β = -.04); (2) 生命敬畏感与自尊存在双向预测,相较于生命敬畏感对自尊的预测,自尊对生命敬畏感的预测作用显著更强 (.22 VS..10); (3) 进一步分析发现,自尊对受欺凌的负向预测作用存在学段差异,生命敬畏感在自尊与受欺凌之间起部分中介作用。研究揭示了生命敬畏感与自尊能有效预防受欺凌,为校园欺凌防治提供建议与启示。
School bullying remains a prevalent global concern, posing significant risks to the positive development of adolescents. The vulnerability of adolescents’ internal meaning systems is closely linked to the risk of bullying victimization. When individuals lack a sense of life value and a clear self-concept, they are less likely to develop self-protective awareness or proactive coping, increasing their likelihood of being bullied. Strengthening adolescents’ internal meaning resources plays a pivotal role in the prevention of school bullying.
Life awe and self-esteem represent two such resources. According to meaning-making theory, when individuals encounter negative events, their global meaning system, which encompasses core beliefs about life and self-worth, interacts dynamically with the situational meaning of the event. A stable meaning system provides a coherent framework for integrating stressors and adapting positively. Building on this foundation, life awe fosters a profound appreciation of the value of life, which strengthens individuals’ valuation of their own lives and enhances self-protective awareness. Self-esteem reflects a global evaluation of one’ s worth. High self-esteem reinforces positive self-beliefs, leading to greater confidence and resistance in dealing with bullying. Together, they help adolescents maintain meaning-system stability under threat, foster confidence and proactivity in self-protection, and thereby reduce the risk of victimization. However, bullying victimization, as a peer-interpersonal stressor characterized by aggression and social exclusion, may challenge the global meaning system, thereby potentially undermining life awe and self-esteem.
Life awe and self-esteem may have a mutually reinforcing relationship. Life awe can enhance self-esteem by promoting positive cognitive restructuring. In turn, self-esteem helps individuals better understand appreciate the finiteness of life, fosters more positive life experiences, and thereby enhances life awe. Accordingly, this study employed the cross-lagged panel analysis to examine the dynamic relationships among life awe, self-esteem, and bullying victimization.
A longitudinal design was adopted, with 3,911 adolescents (Mage = 14.7 years, 55.7% boys) surveyed twice over a six-month interval in April 2024 (T1) and October 2024 (T2). This study used the Life Awe Scale for Chinese Adolescents, the Self-Esteem Scale, and the Chinese version of the Delaware Bullying Victimization Scale-Student. Descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and common method bias tests were conducted using SPSS 26.0, while longitudinal measurement invariance testing and latent cross-lagged modeling were performed using Mplus 8.3. The results revealed that: (1) Cross-lagged paths indicated that both T1 self-esteem and T1 life awe significantly and negatively predicted T2 bullying victimization (β = -.11, -.12), and T1 bullying victimization negatively predicted T2 self-esteem (β = -.04); (2) A bidirectional predictive relationship existed between life awe and self-esteem, with the effect of self-esteem on life awe being stronger (β =.22 vs..10); (3) Multi-group analyses showed that the associations among life awe, self-esteem, and bullying victimization were consistent across gender, whereas the negative predictive effect of self-esteem on bullying victimization differed across grade levels. Specifically, the negative predictive effect was significant in junior secondary students only; (4) Longitudinal mediation analysis showed that, after controlling for T1 life awe and T1 bullying victimization. T2 life awe partially mediated the relationship between T1 self-esteem and T2 bullying victimization, with an indirect effect of -.04 (95% CI= [-.051, -.021]), accounting for 30.8% of the total effect.
This study suggests that life awe and self-esteem function as key internal meaning resources that protect adolescents against bullying victimization. Beyond their direct protective effects, self-esteem may also exert an indirect effect by facilitating the development of life awe. More importantly, self-esteem and life awe may jointly contribute to an integrated psychological defense mechanism through a meaning-development process that extends from self-worth to the value of life, thereby enhancing adolescents’ capacity to cope with the risk of bullying. The interaction between these two resources may contribute to the formation of a meaning-oriented self-protection system, helping adolescents shift from passive defense to more proactive prevention.
These findings highlight important practical implications for bullying prevention. Effective intervention requires not only external support, but also the cultivation of stable and enduring internal motivation. Educators and practitioners should emphasize the development of adolescents’ internal meaning systems, especially through life education and the promotion of healthy self-concept. Strengthening adolescents’ recognition of life value and fostering a stable sense of self-worth can activate intrinsic motivation for self-protection and provide more sustainable psychological and social resources to support their adaptation.
生命敬畏感 / 自尊 / 受欺凌 / 交叉滞后分析 / 纵向中介
life awe / self-esteem / bullying victimization / cross-lagged panel analysis / longitudinal mediating analysis
| [1] |
何嘉杰, 钟沛枝, 毛建, 韦俊锋, 陈庭芳, 肖禾, 陈佳榕, 聂衍刚. (2026). 儿童青少年校园欺凌与自我攻击及幸福感的关系: 一项基于网络分析的研究. 心理科学, 49(1), 191-206.
|
| [2] |
纪林芹. (2024). 学生欺凌问题的发生及其防治: 基于心理学视角的分析. 教育发展研究, 44(10), 70-76.
|
| [3] |
廖友国, 陈建文, 张妍, 彭聪. (2022). 儿童青少年同伴侵害与内化问题的双向关系: 纵向研究的元分析. 心理学报, 54(7), 828-849.
|
| [4] |
林荣茂, 沈逸琳, 林可心, 陈艳萍, 谢涵颖, 何晓雁, 熊夏昕. (2024). 青少年生命敬畏感问卷的编制及信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 32(3), 575-581.
|
| [5] |
林荣茂, 余巧华, 胡添祥, 张九妹, 叶玉珊, 连榕. (2025). 敬畏感与亲社会行为关系的三水平和结构方程模型元分析. 心理学报, 57(4), 631-651.
|
| [6] |
柳之啸, 吴任钢. (2018). 自尊对生命意义感的预测机制--心理控制源和积极情绪的中介作用. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 54(6), 1339-1345.
|
| [7] |
田录梅. (2006). Rosenberg(1965)自尊量表中文版的美中不足. 心理学探新, 26(2), 88-91.
|
| [8] |
吴艳, 温忠麟. (2011). 结构方程建模中的题目打包策略. 心理科学进展, 19(12), 1859-1867.
|
| [9] |
谢家树, 魏宇民,
|
| [10] |
杨宜音, 张志学. (1998). 性格与社会心理测量总览. 远流出版社.
|
| [11] |
周莉, 王宏霞, 耿靖宇, 雷雳. (2024). 大学生网络受欺负与抑郁的关系: 心理资本和同伴支持的调节作用. 心理科学, 47(4), 981-989.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
UNESCO. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. UNESCO.
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |