摘 要 本研究使用多元概化理论分析2007-2010年心理学专业基础综合考试。结果表明：1.从考查的学科内容看，心理统计与测量、普通心理学的测量精度较高，而发展与教育心理学、实验心理学的测量精度偏低；2.从设置的题型看，多选题的测量精度偏低，其他题型的测量精度较高；减少单选题数量、增加多选题数量可在保障全卷测量精度的基础上大幅提高多选题的测量精度；3.全卷测量精度很高，不同年度的试卷在学科内容和题型结构上可看成是“平行”试卷。

Abstract 　The study applied the Multivariate GT to each of the four administration（from 2007 to 2010）of the psychology entrance test which consisted of 4 sub-disciplines and 4 item types. The results showed that 1. From the content tested view, development and education psychology and experiment psychology showed the poorer reliability than others; 2. From the item type designed view, multiple choice with multi-correct answers showed the poorer reliability than others; its reliability will be improved with increasing the number of itself and decreasing the number of multiple choice with single-correct answers; 3. The reliability of the total psychology entrance test is very good, and four forms constructed based on the table of specifications are quite “parallel” to each other.