[1] 陈加州, 凌文辁, 方俐洛. (2003). 企业员工心理契约的结构维度. 心理学报, 35(3), 404-410. [2] 崔智淞, 王弘钰. (2019). 上下级关系对员工建设性越轨行为的激活机制研究: 一个被中介的调节模型. 预测, 38(1), 8-14. [3] 代毓芳, 张向前, 郑文智. (2022). 上下级之间应该存在何种关系? 上下级关系图式. 心理科学进展, 30(1), 216-229. [4] 邓玉林, 吴洁, 达庆利. (2021). 基于制度逻辑的不同上下级关系对员工创新行为的差异化影响机制研究. 中国管理科学, 29(9), 236-248. [5] 郭晓薇, 范伟. (2018). 基于整合构念的中国情境下员工上下级关系量表开发与检验. 管理学报, 15(1), 20-29. [6] 郭晓薇, 李成彦. (2015). 中国人的上下级关系: 整合构念的建立与初步检验. 管理学报, 12(2), 167-177. [7] 江宇晖, 尚玉钒, 李瑜佳. (2019). 时间压力是扼杀还是激发个体创造力? 领导语言框架的调节作用. 科学学与科学技术管理, 40(7), 121-135. [8] 尚玉钒, 李磊. (2015). 领导调节聚焦行为: 构念的开发与验证. 管理评论, 27(8), 102-116. [9] 田晓明, 李锐. (2015). 自我牺牲型领导能促进员工的前瞻行为吗?——责任感知的中介效应及其边界条件. 心理学报, 47(12), 1472-1485. [10] 万鹏宇, 王弘钰, 汲海锋. (2020). 产业技术创新战略联盟中的突破式创新研究. 经济纵横, 1, 96-105. [11] 万鹏宇, 邹国庆, 汲海锋. (2019). 精神型领导对知识型员工创新绩效的影响——知识分享和领导认同的作用. 技术经济, 38(5), 29-37, 66. [12] 王弘钰, 万鹏宇. (2020). 效能视角下共享型领导、越轨创新对创新绩效的影响. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 40(1), 84-97. [13] 王弘钰, 邹纯龙. (2019). 上下级关系对员工越轨创新的影响机制研究. 华东经济管理, 33(4), 37-43. [14] 汪曲, 李燕萍. (2017). 团队内关系格局能影响员工沉默行为吗: 基于社会认知理论的解释框架. 管理工程学报, 31(4), 34-44. [15] 颜静, 樊耘, 张旭. (2016). 员工心理依附对其行为的影响——基于中国中小企业的实证研究. 管理评论, 28(4), 109-122. [16] 张永军, 李亚, 邓传军, 刘智强. (2021). 团队间竞争对员工创造力和亲团队非伦理行为的影响: 基于调节焦点理论的情境作用研究. 珞珈管理评论, 1, 47-63. [17] 朱苏丽, 龙立荣, 贺伟, 王忠军. (2015). 超越工具性交换: 中国企业员工—组织类亲情交换关系的理论建构与实证研究. 管理世界, 11, 119-134. [18] Bastons, M. (2008). The role of virtues in the framing of decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 389-400. [19] Chen, C. C., & Chen, X. P. (2009). Negative externalities of close guanxi within organizations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1), 37-53. [20] Chen Y., Friedman R., Yu E. H., Fang W. H., & Lu X. P. (2009). Supervisor-subordinate Guanxi: Developing a three-dimensional model and scale. Management and Organization Review, 5(3), 375-399. [21] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. [22] Gao, Y., & Liu, H. Y. (2021). How supervisor-subordinate Guanxi influence employee innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 2001-2014. [23] Lee K. Y., Duffy M. K., Scott K. L., & Schippers M. C. (2018). The experience of being envied at work: How being envied shapes employee feelings and motivation. Personnel Psychology, 71(2), 181-200. [24] Li Z., Duverger P., & Yu L. (2018). Employee creativity trumps supervisor-subordinate guanxi: Predicting prequitting behaviors in China's hotel industry. Tourism Management, 69, 23-37. [25] Luo, J., & Zheng, J. B. (2018). The impact of servant leadership on proactive behaviors: A study based on cognitive evaluation theory. Psychology, 9(5), 1228-1244. [26] Madjar N., Greenberg E., & Chen Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 730-743. [27] Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2015). Felt obligations to reciprocate to an employer, preferences for mobility across employers, and gender: Three-way interaction effects on subsequent voice behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 36-45. [28] Ren, S., & Chadee, D. (2017). Is guanxi always good for employee self-development in China? Examining non-linear and moderated relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 108-117. [29] Riketta, M., & van Dick, R. (2005). Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(3), 490-510. [30] Schmidt, G. B. (2016). How adult attachment styles relate to perceived psychological contract breach and affective organizational commitment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 28(3), 147-170. [31] Wang H. H., Wu W., Liu Y. P., Hao S. Y., & Wu S. X. (2019). In what ways do Chinese employees speak up? An exchange approach to supervisor-subordinate Guanxi and voice behavior. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(3), 479-501. [32] Yip J., Ehrhardt K., Black H., & Walker D. O. (2018). Attachment theory at work: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 185-198. |