网络社会排斥对大学生网络攻击行为的影响：道德推脱的纵向调节作用*

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240609

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨网络社会排斥、大学生网络攻击行为及道德推脱之间的关系,采用网络社会排斥问卷、道德推脱问卷和网络攻击行为量表对2000名大学生进行4次追踪测量。结果发现：（1）网络社会排斥、道德推脱及大学生网络攻击行为在4次追踪测量中两两均呈正相关;（2）道德推脱初始水平与网络社会排斥初始水平的交互项可以显著预测大学生网络攻击行为的初始水平;（3）道德推脱发展速度与网络社会排斥发展速度的交互项可以显著预测大学生网络攻击行为的发展速度。结论道德推脱在网络社会排斥与大学生网络攻击行为之间起纵向调节作用。

关键词: 网络社会排斥, 道德推脱, 网络攻击行为, 大学生

Abstract: With the development of Internet, college students’ online aggressive behavior has become a serious problem in recent years. According to the previous researches, the average rate of online aggressive behavior of college students is 59.5% in China. Exposed to online aggression may change personal emotions, behavior and cognition and finally make individual aggressive. It is thus necessary to find out which factors influence online aggressive behavior of college students. In particular, cyber ostracism and moral disengagement were believed to be strong predictors, so the purposes of the present study are to explore the moderating role of moral disengagement between cyber ostracism and online aggressive behavior with longitudinal study.
We surveyed 2000 college students four times with the Cyber Ostracism Questionnaire (COQ), the Moral Disengagement Questionnaire (MDQ), and the Online Aggressive Behavior Scale (OABS). Data were collected and analyzed with SPSS 25.0 and Mplus 8.3, and the correlation analysis, parallel process latent growth curve model, latent growth models of change rate interaction and latent moderated structural equations were used to analyze the relations among key variables.
The results showed that: (1) Cyber ostracism, moral disengagement, and online aggressive behavior were significantly positively correlated with each other at the time point T1, T2, T3 and T4. (2) The total effect model revealed that the data fit the theoretical model well (χ²/df = 4.39, TLI = .95, CFI = .94, RMSEA = .06, SRMR = .06); The slope of cyber ostracism had a significant effect on the slope of online aggressive behavior (β = .29, p < .001); and the intercept of cyber ostracism had a significant effect on the intercept of online aggressive behavior (β = .24, p < .001). (3) The latent moderated structural equations model fit (AIC = 24789.84, BIC = 24974.46, -2LL = -12359.92) better than the baseline model (AIC = 31293.04, BIC = 31641.19, -2LL = -15580.51); The interaction slope and intercept of cyber ostracism and moral disengagement had a significant effect on the slope of online aggressive behavior (β = -.42, p < .001; β = -.21, p < .05). The slope of cyber ostracism and moral disengagement had a significant effect on the slope of online aggressive behavior (β = .62, p < .001; β = -.88, p < .001); The intercept of cyber ostracism had a significant effect on intercept of online aggressive behavior (β = .35, p < .001). Overall, the development parameters of moral disengagement played moderating roles between the development parameters of cyber ostracism and online aggressive behavior among college students.
In summary, our findings provide evidence that moral disengagement moderates the relation between cyber ostracism and online aggressive behavior. That is, cyber ostracism is the core factor inducing online aggression of college students, and moral disengagement is a key moderating role.

Key words: cyber ostracism, moral disengagement, online aggressive behavior, college students

金童林, 乌云特娜, 张璐, 贾彦茹. 网络社会排斥对大学生网络攻击行为的影响：道德推脱的纵向调节作用^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(6): 1373-1380.

Jin Tonglin, Wu Yuntena, Zhang Lu, Jia Yanru. Cyber Ostracism and Online Aggressive Behavior among College Students: The Longitudinal Moderating Role of Moral Disengagement[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2024, 47(6): 1373-1380.

参考文献

[1] 程苏, 刘璐, 郑涌. (2011). 社会排斥的研究范式与理论模型. 心理科学进展, 19(6), 905-915.
[2] 杜利梅, 李根强, 孟勇. (2019). 道德推脱视角下网民主观规范与网络集群行为的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 27(2), 261-264.
[3] 方杰, 王兴超. (2020). 冷酷无情特质与大学生网络欺负行为的关系: 道德推脱的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(2), 281-284.
[4] 方杰, 温忠麟. (2018). 基于结构方程模型的有调节的中介效应分析. 心理科学, 41(2), 453-458.
[5] 金童林. (2018). 暴力暴露对大学生网络攻击行为的影响: 反刍思维与网络道德的作用 (硕士学位论文). 哈尔滨师范大学.
[6] 金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 金祥忠, 王晓雨. (2017). 特质愤怒对大学生网络攻击行为的影响: 道德推脱的作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(5), 605-613.
[7] 金童林, 乌云特娜, 张璐, 李鑫, 黄明明, 刘振会, 姜永志. (2019). 网络社会排斥对大学生网络攻击行为和传统攻击行为的影响: 疏离感的中介作用. 心理科学, 42(5), 1106-1112.
[8] 彭苏浩, 陶丹, 冷玥, 邓慧华. (2019). 社会排斥的心理行为特征及其脑机制. 心理科学进展, 27(9), 1656-1666.
[9] 孙晓军, 童媛添, 范翠英. (2017). 现实及网络社会排斥与大学生抑郁的关系: 自我控制的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 15(2), 169-174.
[10] 王孟成. (2014). 潜变量建模与Mplus应用: 基础篇. 重庆大学出版社.
[11] 王兴超, 杨继平. (2010). 中文版道德推脱问卷的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(2), 177-179.
[12] 王兴超, 杨继平, 杨力. (2014). 道德推脱与攻击行为关系的元分析. 心理科学进展, 22(7), 1092-1102.
[13] 温忠麟, 黄彬彬, 汤丹丹. (2018). 问卷数据建模前传. 心理科学, 41(1), 204-210.
[14] 吴明隆. (2013). 结构方程模型: AMOS的操作与应用. 重庆大学出版社.
[15] 杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲. (2010). 道德推脱的概念、测量及相关变量. 心理科学进展, 18(4), 671-678.
[16] 赵锋, 高文斌. (2012). 少年网络攻击行为评定量表的编制及信效度检验. 中国心理卫生杂志, 26(6), 439-444.
[17] Bandura A., Barbaranelli C., Caprara G. V., & Pastorelli C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364-374.
[18] Camerini A. L., Marciano L., Carrara A., & Schulz P. J. (2020). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among children and adolescents: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Telematics and Informatics, 49, 101362.
[19] Gini G., Pozzoli T., & Bussey K. (2015). Moral disengagement moderates the link between psychopathic traits and aggressive behavior among early adolescents. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 61(1), 51-67.
[20] Heeren A., Peschard V., & Philippot P. (2012). The causal role of attentional bias for threat cues in social anxiety: A test on a cyber-ostracism task. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 512-521.
[21] Li J. B., Nie Y. G., Boardley I. D., Situ Q. M., & Dou K. (2014). Moral disengagement moderates the predicted effect of trait self-control on self-reported aggression. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(4), 312-318.
[22] Moore, C. (2015). Moral disengagement. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 199-204.
[23] Poon, K. T., & Chen, Z. S. (2016). Assuring a sense of growth: A cognitive strategy to weaken the effect of cyber-ostracism on aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 31-37.
[24] Schneider F. M., Zwillich B., Bindl M. J., Hopp F. R., Reich S., & Vorderer P. (2017). Social media ostracism: The effects of being excluded online. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 385-393.
[25] Tanrikulu, I., & Erdur-Baker, O. (2021). Motives behind cyberbullying perpetration: A test of uses and gratifications theory. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13-14), NP6699-NP6724.
[26] Thummanond, C., & Maneesri, K. (2020). How self-control influences Thai women’s aggression: The moderating role of moral disengagement. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(3), 527-532.
[27] Wang X. C., Lei L., Yang J. P., Gao L., & Zhao F. Q. (2017). Moral disengagement as mediator and moderator of the relation between empathy and aggression among Chinese male juvenile delinquents. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 48(2), 316-326.
[28] Wen Z. L., Marsh, H W., Hau K. T., Wu Y., Liu H. Y., & Morin, A. J. S. (2014). Interaction effects in latent growth models: Evaluation of alternative estimation approaches. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(3), 361-374.
[29] Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 425-452.
[30] Williams K. D.(2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 279-314). Academic Press.
[31] Yang J. P., Li W. Q., Wang W., Gao L., & Wang X. C. (2021). Anger rumination and adolescents' cyberbullying perpetration: Moral disengagement and callous-unemotional traits as moderators. Journal of Affective Disorders, 278, 397-404.

网络社会排斥对大学生网络攻击行为的影响：道德推脱的纵向调节作用^*

Cyber Ostracism and Online Aggressive Behavior among College Students: The Longitudinal Moderating Role of Moral Disengagement

PDF

评审附件

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	郎敏, 叶子青, 叶一舵. 在线性客体化经历与女大学生身体羞耻感：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(5): 1145-1152.
[2]	陈戈, 梁永奕, 范燕, 洪尔浼, 王桐谣. 心理特权与亲领导不道德行为——有调节的中介模型^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(4): 887-894.
[3]	金童林, 乌云特娜, 张璐, 刘振会, 李鑫, 姜永志. 社会性创伤对大学生自杀意念的影响：心理痛苦和乐观的作用^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(4): 1008-1015.
[4]	金童林, 乌云特娜, 张璐, 雷泽宇, 贾彦茹. 大学生网络攻击行为的类别转变:一项潜在转变分析^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(3): 614-621.
[5]	徐子纯, 依拉木江·阿布都艾尼, 孙睿, 周宵. 大学生复杂性创伤后应激障碍的网络结构及其性别差异研究^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(4): 1008-1016.
[6]	王浩俞国良. 恋爱中大学生依恋焦虑与心理健康的关系：恋爱关系质量的中介和调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(5): 1092-1098.
[7]	王琼亓伊静胡伟陈慧玲. 社会拒绝与大学生抑郁情绪的关系：情绪觉察的中介作用和微信亲子沟通的调节作用 [J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(5): 1159-1165.
[8]	郝娜崔佳蕾吴琴邹何辉崔丽莹. 想象性群际接触对合作行为的影响：内隐性别偏见的中介作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(4): 918-925.
[9]	李永占. 暴力视频游戏接触对大学生网络攻击行为的影响：一个有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(4): 888-895.
[10]	曾子豪胡义秋彭丽仪詹林刘双金欧阳晓优丁道群黎志华. 负性生活事件对大学生抑郁的影响：网络成瘾的中介与5-HTR1A基因rs749098多态性的调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(3): 599-606.
[11]	朱芬梁钧华麻彦坤. 现实利他行为与网络利他行为对大学生主观幸福感的影响：多重中介模型[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(3): 628-634.
[12]	叶子青马建平叶一舵. 大学生在线音乐感知价值的作用机制：基于结构方程混合模型[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(2): 372-378.
[13]	兰泽波林梅宋子明孟珠姜琨闫国利. 听障大学生阅读中的语音激活：来自绕口令效应的证据[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(2): 491-497.
[14]	王伊萌王振东汪凤炎. 正念与大学生智慧推理的关系：个人成长主动性的部分中介作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(1): 54-60.
[15]	赵芳芳赵辉李平秦金亮. 父母生涯相关行为和学前教育专业大学生专业满意度的关系：生涯适应力和生涯规划的中介作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(1): 68-74.