大学生逃避躺平倾向与网络成瘾的相互作用机制:基于三时点追踪的随机截距交叉滞后模型*

胡友松, 张惠, 陈奇锦, 肖雅馨, 徐新海

心理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 1134-1145.

PDF(1721 KB)
中文  |  English
PDF(1721 KB)
心理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 1134-1145. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260510
社会、人格与管理

大学生逃避躺平倾向与网络成瘾的相互作用机制:基于三时点追踪的随机截距交叉滞后模型*

作者信息 +

The Reciprocal Mechanism between Avoidant Lying-Flat Tendency and Internet Addiction in College Students: A Three-Wave Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为揭示大学生逃避躺平倾向与网络成瘾的动态关系及其机制,基于2024年3月(T1)、2024年9月(T2)与2025年3月(T3)对四川省某高校大学生开展三波追踪调查(样本量分别为739、685、656人)。采用随机截距交叉滞后模型并结合纵向中介分析,在控制性别、年龄、父母受教育程度、家庭收入及当期上网时长后,结果显示:在剔除稳定的个体间差异后,逃避躺平倾向与网络成瘾在个体内层面存在显著的双向跨期预测关系;自我效能感对两者均具有持续的抑制作用,并在“逃避躺平倾向→网络成瘾”与“网络成瘾→逃避躺平倾向”两条路径上呈现显著的纵向中介效应,其中以中期自我效能感路径更为稳健。在个体间层面,三变量的随机截距相关与理论预期一致。多组检验结果表明,抑郁水平对上述主要跨期路径的整体调节效应不显著。结果表明:逃避态度与网络依赖可能通过“态度—能力—行为”的耦合形成相互强化过程,提升自我效能感或为打破该循环的关键干预靶点。

Abstract

In recent years, “lying flat” (tang ping) has attracted growing scholarly attention as a passive coping orientation among some young adults, characterized by reduced striving and disengagement from demanding goals. Within this broader phenomenon, an avoidant lying-flat tendency—marked by withdrawal from challenges, low initiative, and preference for short-term relief over effortful coping—may be particularly relevant to university students’ adjustment and technology-related behaviors. In parallel, internet addiction (or problematic, uncontrolled internet use) remains prevalent in college settings and is linked to impaired functioning. Prior work has reported cross-sectional associations between avoidant coping styles and problematic internet use; however, most studies have not adopted longitudinal approaches capable of separating within-person fluctuations (i.e., changes around one’s own typical level over time) from stable between-person differences (i.e., trait-like tendencies). Moreover, potential psychological processes explaining these temporal links—such as self-efficacy as a mechanism and depressive symptoms as a contextual vulnerability—have received limited longitudinal testing within a framework that is sensitive to within-person dynamics.

Using a three-wave design and a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM), the study examined: (a) Whether avoidant lying-flat tendency and internet addiction show reciprocal, cross-lagged associations at the within-person level; (b) Whether self-efficacy functions as a time-varying mediator linking the two constructs across adjacent waves; and (c) Whether depressive symptoms moderate the hypothesized within-person pathways. RI-CLPM was selected because it explicitly decomposes observed variance into stable person-specific intercepts and wave-specific within-person deviations, thereby reducing the risk of conflating trait differences with temporal processes.

Participants were undergraduate students from a university in Sichuan Province, China. Data were collected at three time points: March 2024 (T1, n = 739), September 2024 (T2, n = 685), and March 2025 (T3, n = 656). Standardized self-report measures assessed avoidant lying-flat tendency, internet addiction, self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms. RI-CLPM analyses were estimated with robust maximum likelihood (MLR) and full information maximum likelihood (FIML) for missing data. Gender, age, parental education, family income, and concurrent time spent online were controlled to reduce confounding by key sociodemographic factors and internet exposure. Longitudinal indirect effects were tested using bias-corrected bootstrapping. To evaluate moderation, multi-group RI-CLPM analyses compared participants classified into low- versus high-depressive-symptom subgroups.

At the within-person level, cross-lagged paths indicated a significant reciprocal pattern across waves. Specifically, when a student reported higher-than-usual avoidant lying-flat tendency at one time point, the student tended to report increased internet addiction at the subsequent time point. Conversely, above-usual internet addiction also predicted subsequent increases in avoidant lying-flat tendency, suggesting a mutually reinforcing loop. These bidirectional cross-lagged associations remained significant after accounting for stable between-person differences via random intercepts and after controlling for covariates. At the between-person (intercept) level, the random intercepts of avoidant lying-flat tendency, internet addiction, and self-efficacy were correlated in theoretically coherent directions, consistent with the view that individuals with more persistent avoidance tendencies also tend to show more stable problematic internet use and lower enduring self-efficacy.

Mediation analyses further supported self-efficacy as a within-person mechanism. Higher-than-usual avoidant lying-flat tendency predicted subsequent reductions in self-efficacy, which in turn predicted later increases in internet addiction. A parallel indirect pathway was observed in the opposite direction: higher-than-usual internet addiction predicted subsequent decreases in self-efficacy, which then predicted later increases in avoidant lying-flat tendency. These findings suggest that self-efficacy may act as a time-varying psychological “hinge” through which avoidance and problematic internet use perpetuate one another over time. In contrast, multi-group analyses showed no robust evidence that depressive symptoms moderated the key within-person cross-lagged paths, indicating that the reciprocal within-person loop may operate relatively similarly across depression levels in this non-clinical student sample.

Overall, the results provide longitudinal, within-person evidence that avoidant lying-flat tendency and internet addiction are dynamically intertwined and may mutually amplify one another over time, with self-efficacy serving as a central mediating process. The findings align with social cognitive perspectives suggesting that diminished efficacy beliefs can increase reliance on maladaptive coping strategies and short-term relief behaviors. Practically, campus prevention and counseling programs may benefit from targeting self-efficacy enhancement (e.g., mastery experiences, adaptive goal setting, and cognitive-behavioral skill training) to disrupt the avoidance-internet addiction cycle. Future research should replicate these findings across more diverse university contexts, incorporate multi-method assessments (e.g., behavioral logs), and test intervention-based designs to further clarify temporal mechanisms.

关键词

逃避躺平倾向 / 网络成瘾 / 自我效能感 / 随机截距交叉滞后模型 / 纵向中介效应

Key words

avoidant lying-flat tendency / internet addiction / self-efficacy / random-intercept cross-lagged panel model / longitudinal mediation effect

引用本文

导出引用
胡友松, 张惠, 陈奇锦, 等. 大学生逃避躺平倾向与网络成瘾的相互作用机制:基于三时点追踪的随机截距交叉滞后模型*[J]. 心理科学. 2026, 49(5): 1134-1145 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260510
Hu Yousong, Zhang Hui, Chen Qijin, et al. The Reciprocal Mechanism between Avoidant Lying-Flat Tendency and Internet Addiction in College Students: A Three-Wave Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2026, 49(5): 1134-1145 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260510

参考文献

[1]
白羽, 樊富珉. (2005). 大学生网络依赖测量工具的修订与应用. 心理发展与教育, 21(4), 99-104.
[2]
方俊燕, 温忠麟, 黄国敏. (2023). 纵向关系的探究: 基于交叉滞后结构的追踪模型. 心理科学, 46(3), 734-741.
[3]
龚栩, 谢熹瑶, 徐蕊, 罗跃嘉. (2010). 抑郁-焦虑-压力量表简体中文版(DASS-21)在中国大学生中的测试报告. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(4), 443-446.
[4]
李帅, 赵伟, 龙沛欣, 董秋雅, 孙铃. (2022). 觉醒还是逃避: 躺平问卷编制及相关心理因素. 心理技术与应用, 10(10), 618-630.
[5]
刘奕蔓, 李丽, 马瑜, 梁忠环, 孙在福, 崔久岗, 付强强. (2021). 中国大学生网络成瘾发生率的Meta分析. 中国循证医学杂志, 21(1), 61-68.
[6]
王才康, 胡中锋, 刘勇. (2001). 一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究. 应用心理学, 7(1), 37-40.
[7]
王莹, 袁加锦. (2025). 短视频 APP 过度使用对目标维持的影响: 注意分散的中介作用. 心理科学, 48(3), 577-588.
[8]
曾子豪, 胡义秋, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华. (2022). 负性生活事件对大学生抑郁的影响: 网络成瘾的中介与5-HTR1A基因rs749098多态性的调节作用. 心理科学, 45(3), 599-606.
[9]
A, L. Y., Chen, M. Y., Jiang, Y. Y., Huang, H. T., Liu, S., Feng, Y., Zhang, X., L., Su, Z., Cheung, T., Ng, C. H., Xiao, Y. F., & Wang, G. (2025). Internet addiction and its association with quality of life in college students: A network perspective. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16, Article 1555372.
[10]
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
[11]
Brand, M., Young, K. S., Laier, C., Wölfling, K., & Potenza, M. N. (2016). Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 252-266.
[12]
Buzzai, C., Sorrenti, L., Costa, S., Toffle, M. E., & Filippello, P. (2021). The relationship between school-basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration, academic engagement and academic achievement. School Psychology International, 42(5), 497-519.
[13]
Chen, C. C., & Tu, H. Y. (2021). The effect of digital game-based learning on learning motivation and performance under social cognitive theory and entrepreneurial thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 750711.
[14]
Dagani, J., Buizza, C., Ferrari, C., Rainieri, G., & Ghilardi, A. (2025). Exploring the links among risky substance use, problematic internet use, and academic outcomes in university freshmen: The role of mediating factors. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 15(6), Article 105.
[15]
Duc, T. Q., Chi, V. T. Q., Huyen, N. T. H., Quang, P. N., Thuy, B. T., & Di, K. N. (2024). Growing propensity of internet addiction among Asian college students: Meta-analysis of pooled prevalence from 39 studies with over 50, 000 participants. Public Health, 227, 250-258.
[16]
Grossman, H. I., & Mendoza, J. (2003). Scarcity and appropriative competition. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(4), 747-758.
[17]
Haberlin, K. A., & Atkin, D. J. (2022). Mobile gaming and Internet addiction: When is playing no longer just fun and games? Computers in Human Behavior, 126, Article 106989.
[18]
Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102-116.
[19]
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
[20]
Jiang, M. M., Zhao, Y., Wang, J., Hua, L., Chen, Y., Yao, Y. S., & Jin, Y. L. (2022). Serial multiple mediation of the correlation between internet addiction and depression by social support and sleep quality of college students during the COVID-19 epidemic. Psychiatry Investigation, 19(1), 9-15.
[21]
Ju, H. J., Jun, H. S., & Park, M. K. (2019). The stress, self-efficacy, and self-control of university students impact on smartphone addiction. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(11), 395-407.
[22]
Karau, S. J., & Kelly, J. R. (1992). The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28(6), 542-571.
[23]
Kim, H. K., & Davis, K. E. (2009). Toward a comprehensive theory of problematic internet use: Evaluating the role of self-esteem, anxiety, flow, and the self-rated importance of internet activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 490-500.
[24]
Klassen, R. M., Krawchuk, L. L., & Rajani, S. (2008). Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 915-931.
[25]
Lu, H. H., Hou, J., Wang, J. L., & Kong, F. (2024). Antidote or poison: The relationship between “lying flat” tendency and mental health. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 16(4), 1757-1777.
[26]
Lucas, R. E. (2023). Why the cross-lagged panel model is almost never the right choice. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1), 1-22.
[27]
Odaci, H. (2011). Academic self-efficacy and academic procrastination as predictors of problematic internet use in university students. Computers and Education, 57(1), 1109-1113.
[28]
Pumptow, M., & Brahm, T. (2021). Students' digital media self-efficacy and its importance for higher education institutions: Development and validation of a survey instrument. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(3), 555-575.
[29]
Reed, P., & Reay, E. (2015). Relationship between levels of problematic internet usage and motivation to study in university students. Higher Education, 70(4), 711-723.
[30]
Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2012). Some consequences of having too little. Science, 338(6107), 682-685.
[31]
Trigo, M. (2021). Internet addiction disorder: When technology becomes a problem. European Psychiatry, 64(1), Article S641.
[32]
Xin, T., & Jian, L. (2024). “Lying flat”: Chinese youths' resistance to overwork and the practice of stratification. Youth and Globalization, 5(2), 231-251.
[33]
Young, K. S., & Rogers, R. C. (1998). The relationship between depression and Internet addiction. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1(1), 25-28.
[34]
Zhang, G. Y., Lin, Y., Jiang, Q. Y., Zhao, X., & Dai, B. B. (2024). The longitudinal relationship between depression, Internet addiction and self-control during the repeated COVID-19 pandemics: A cross-lagged study among Chinese college students. Current Psychology, 43(46), 35759-35771.
[35]
Zheng, X. G., Leng, J., Ma, H., & Hu, P. (2024). Physical “lying flat”: The negative effect of personal relative deprivation on health-promoting lifestyles. Journal of Affective Disorders, 349, 414-419.
[36]
Zhu, S. H., Wang, L. S., & Gan, Y. L. (2025). Lying flat to play on smartphone excessively: The role of self-esteem. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1516869.

基金

*大学生创新创业大赛项目“大学生低欲望相关研究”(S202414389134)
北京市科学技术协会2025区域均衡发展计划:打通“科研-科普”链条,服务区域均衡发展:顺义区乡村科普教育“联合体”实践及服务项目的资助

PDF(1721 KB)

评审附件

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉