儿童友谊质量与主观幸福感和孤独感的双向关系：一项纵向研究*

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240407

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于发展情境理论,对212名儿童进行为期三年的纵向研究,采用随机截距的交叉滞后模型考察友谊质量与主观幸福感和孤独感之间的双向关系。结果发现：(1)在个体间水平上,友谊质量分别与主观幸福感和孤独感之间存在显著相关;(2)在个体内水平上,T1的友谊质量显著预测T2的孤独感,T1的孤独感显著预测T2的友谊质量,T2的孤独感也显著预测T3的友谊质量;(3)在个体内水平上,T1的主观幸福感显著预测T2的友谊质量。综上,儿童的友谊质量与孤独感之间存在循环作用关系,而与主观幸福感之间仅存在T1主观幸福感预测T2友谊质量的单向关系。本研究拓展了友谊质量与心理健康相互作用关系的理论和干预思路。

关键词: 儿童, 友谊质量, 主观幸福感, 孤独感, 随机截距的交叉滞后模型

Abstract: The establishment of close friendships begins in childhood and is an important milestone in development. High-quality friendship is an essential force in promoting children's mental health development, which can improve children's subjective well-being and reduce loneliness. According to development contextualism, friendship is an important developmental context for children, which may have a bidirectional association with subjective well-being and loneliness. This bidirectional association has a long-term impact on children's development. To explore children's developmental trajectory, this study employed a longitudinal design spanning three years to examine the bidirectional relationship between children's friendship quality, subjective well-being, and loneliness.
A three-wave longitudinal study with one-year interval was conducted. A total of 212 third and fourth graders (M_age = 8.77 years, SD = .73; 59.4% male) in the central city completed questionnaires concerning friendship quality, subjective well-being, and loneliness. All the measures had good reliability and validity, and there was no serious common method bias. SPSS 25.0 was used to conduct descriptive statistics and correlation analysis. After completing item parceling, we constructed the random intercepts cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) in Mplus 8.3 and employed the full information maximum likelihood estimation (FIML) to deal with missing data. The RI-CLPM allows to separate between-person effects from within-person effects. It was used to investigate whether children with higher friendship quality might subsequently have higher subjective well-being and lower loneliness, and vice versa.
The results of the correlation analysis showed that children's friendship quality was positively associated with subjective well-being, and negatively associated with loneliness, both concurrently and longitudinally (ps < .001). The results of RI-CLPM indicated that, at the between-person level, the random-intercept factor for friendship quality was positively related to that for subjective well-being (r = .55, p < .05), but negatively related to that for loneliness (r = -.74, p < .01). After controlling for between-person stability, the within-person paths showed that the relationship between friendship quality and loneliness was reciprocal. More specifically, initial friendship quality significantly negatively predicted loneliness at Time 2 (β = -.24, 95%CI [-.422, -.053]), which in turn negatively predicted friendship quality at Time 3 (β = -.22, 95%CI [-.426, -.004]). Additionally, loneliness at Time 1 also negatively predicted friendship quality at Time 2 (β = -.26, 95%CI [-.498, -.015]). However, between friendship quality and subjective well-being, subjective well-being at Time 1 can significantly predict friendship quality at Time 2 (β = .34, 95%CI [.059, .620]), whereas cross-lagged paths of the reversed direction were not significant (ps > .05).
This study reveals the bidirectional associations between friendship quality and loneliness at the within-person level by adopting a longitudinal design and constructing the RI-CLPM. This contributes to methodological innovation for the circular effects research orientation emphasized by development contextualism. Furthermore, it suggests that we can simultaneously intervene in both friendship quality and loneliness to construct a positive cycle. Meanwhile, the different relationships between friendship quality, subjective well-being, and loneliness indicate the importance of time in understanding individual development. In general, this study broadens the understanding of the specific connections and dynamic changes between friendship and the development of children's mental health.

Key words: children, friendship, loneliness, subjective well-being, random intercept cross-lagged panel model

刘旭, 刘宇潇, 陈倩, 曹敏, 彭霁, 周宗奎. 儿童友谊质量与主观幸福感和孤独感的双向关系：一项纵向研究^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(4): 819-828.

Liu Xu, Liu Yuxiao, Chen Qian, Cao Min, Peng Ji, Zhou Zongkui. Bidirectional Associations Between Friendship Quality, Subjective Well-Being and Loneliness Among Children: A Longitudinal Study[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2024, 47(4): 819-828.

参考文献

[1] 郭海英, 陈丽华, 叶枝, 潘瑾, 林丹华. (2017). 流动儿童同伴侵害的特点及与内化问题的循环作用关系: 一项追踪研究. 心理学报, 49(3), 336-348.
[2] 牛凯宁, 李梅, 张向葵. (2021). 青少年友谊质量和主观幸福感的关系: 一项元分析. 心理发展与教育, 37(3), 407-418.
[3] 孙晓军, 周宗奎. (2007). 儿童同伴关系对孤独感的影响. 心理发展与教育, 23(1), 24-29.
[4] 万青. (2006). 儿童友谊质量研究. 绥化学院学报, 26(3), 167-168.
[5] 王鑫强, 张大均. (2011). 心理健康双因素模型述评及其研究展望. 中国特殊教育, 19(10), 68-73.
[6] 吴莉娟, 王佳宁, 齐晓栋. (2015). 友谊质量与孤独感关系的meta分析. 中国心理卫生杂志, 29(5), 372-377.
[7] 张文新, 陈光辉. (2009). 发展情境论——一种新的发展系统理论. 心理科学进展, 17(4), 736-744.
[8] 赵冬梅, 周宗奎. (2006). 童年中期同伴关系的变化对孤独感的影响. 心理科学, 29(1), 194-197.
[9] 周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[10] 周宗奎, 赵冬梅, 孙晓军, 定险峰. (2006). 儿童的同伴交往与孤独感: 一项2年纵向研究. 心理学报, 38(5), 743-750.
[11] 朱晓伟, 范翠英, 刘庆奇, 张冬静, 周宗奎. (2018). 校园受欺负对儿童幸福感的影响: 心理韧性的作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(2), 396-400.
[12] Anderson, A. R., & Fowers, B. J. (2020). An exploratory study of friendship characteristics and their relations with hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(1), 260-280.
[13] Asher S. R., Hymel S., & Renshaw P. D. (1984). Loneliness in children. Child Development, 55(4), 1456.
[14] Bagwell, C. L. (2020). Friendship in Childhood. In S. Hupp & J. Jewell (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development (pp. 1-14). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[15] Bateson P., Barker D., Clutton-Brock T., Deb D., D'Udine B., & Sultan S. E. (2004). Developmental plasticity and human health. Nature, 430(6998), 419-421.
[16] Burns R. A., Crisp D. A., & Burns R. B. (2020). Re-examining the reciprocal effects model of self-concept, self-efficacy, and academic achievement in a comparison of the Cross-Lagged Panel and Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel frameworks. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 77-91.
[17] Cacioppo S., Balogh S., & Cacioppo J. T. (2015). Implicit attention to negative social, in contrast to nonsocial, words in the Stroop task differs between individuals high and low in loneliness: Evidence from event-related brain microstates. Cortex, 70, 213-233.
[18] Calkins S. D.,& Mackler, J. S. (2011). Temperament, emotion regulation, and social development. In M. K. Underwood & L. H. Rosen (Eds.), Social development: Relationships in infancy, childhood, and adolescence (pp. 44-70). Guilford Press.
[19] Campbell, A. (1976). Subjective measures of well-being. The American Psychologist, 31(2), 117-124.
[20] Cantor, N., & Sanderson, C. A. (1999). Life task participation and well-being: The importance of taking part in daily life. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 230-243). Russell Sage Foundation.
[21] Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
[22] Demir, M. (2015). Friendship and happiness: Across the life-span and cultures. Springer.
[23] Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81-84.
[24] Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367-1377.
[25] Goswami, H. (2012). Social relationships and children' s subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 107(3), 575-588.
[26] Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549-576.
[27] Hamaker E. L., Kuiper R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102-116.
[28] Heinrich, L. M., & Gullone, E. (2006). The clinical significance of loneliness: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(6), 695-718.
[29] Holder, M. D., & Coleman, B. (2009). The contribution of social relationships to children's happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(3), 329-349.
[30] Jobe-Shields L., Cohen R., & Parra G. R. (2011). Patterns of change in children's loneliness: Trajectories from third through fifth grades. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 57(1), 25-47.
[31] Kansky, J., & Diener, E. (2017). Benefits of well-being: Health, social relationships, work, and resilience. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing, 1(2), 129-169.
[32] Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(3), 539-548.
[33] Lempinen L., Junttila N., & Sourander A. (2018). Loneliness and friendships among eight-year-old children: Time-trends over a 24-year period. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(2), 171-179.
[34] Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In R. M. Lerner, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 1-17). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[35] Little T. D., Cunningham W. A., Shahar G., & Widaman K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 151-173.
[36] Lodder G. M. A., Scholte R. H. J., Goossens L., & Verhagen M. (2017). Loneliness in early adolescence: Friendship quantity, friendship quality, and dyadic processes. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 46(5), 709-720.
[37] Luijten C. C., van de Bongardt D., Jongerling J., & Nieboer A. P. (2021). Longitudinal associations among adolescents' internalizing problems, well-being, and the quality of their relationships with their mothers, fathers, and close friends. Social Science and Medicine, 289, 114387.
[38] Mackinnon, S. P., & Sherry, S. B. (2012). Perfectionistic self-presentation mediates the relationship between perfectionistic concerns and subjective well-being: A three-wave longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 22-28.
[39] Marangoni, C., & Ickes, W. (1989). Loneliness: A theoretical review with implications for measurement. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6(1), 93-128.
[40] Orth U., Clark D. A., Donnellan M. B., & Robins R. W. (2021). Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 1013-1034.
[41] Parker J. G., Rubin K. H., Erath S. A., Wojslawowicz J. C., & Buskirk A. A. (2015). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology perspective. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (pp. 419-493). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[42] Rubin K. H., Bukowski W. M., & Bowker J. C. (2015). Children in peer groups. In M. H. Bornstein, T. Leventhal, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 1-48). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[43] Schwartz-Mette R. A., Shankman J., Dueweke A. R., Borowski S., & Rose A. J. (2020). Relations of friendship experiences with depressive symptoms and loneliness in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(8), 664-700.
[44] Singh R., Sidana U. R., & Saluja S. K. (1978). Integration theory applied to judgments of personal happiness by children. The Journal of Social Psychology, 105(1), 27-31.
[45] Spithoven A. W. M., Bijttebier P., & Goossens L. (2017). It is all in their mind: A review on information processing bias in lonely individuals. Clinical Psychology Review, 58, 97-114.
[46] Stephanou, G., & Balkamou, K. (2011). Children's attributions and emotions for their friendships with their best friend. Psychology Research, 1(6), 392-409.
[47] Strayer, J. (1980). A naturalistic study of empathic behaviors and their relation to affective states and perspective-taking skills in preschool children. Child Development, 51(3), 815-822.
[48] Weeks M. S.,& Asher, S. R. (2012). Loneliness in childhood: Toward the next generation of assessment and research. In J. B. Benson (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior ( pp. 1-39). Academic Press.

儿童友谊质量与主观幸福感和孤独感的双向关系：一项纵向研究^*

Bidirectional Associations Between Friendship Quality, Subjective Well-Being and Loneliness Among Children: A Longitudinal Study

PDF

评审附件

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	曹伟, 柏淑嫄. 威权领导行为通过降低下属亲近意愿引发领导孤独感^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(5): 1213-1223.
[2]	徐晓惠, 徐敏, 张耀华, 张明浩. 儿童程序公平的发展特点及其内在机制^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(4): 829-837.
[3]	李斌, 朱钦, 张凯迪, 严仁昊, 冯凯. 删繁就简：自愿简约及其前因、后果和理论解释^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(4): 918-925.
[4]	宋宜琪, 朱楚城, 梁丹丹. 汉语高功能自闭症儿童词汇语义加工中的空间象似效应——兼与图片知觉加工的比较^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(3): 554-561.
[5]	岳思怡, 王怀勇. 社会排斥对消费者品牌依恋的影响:孤独感和拒绝敏感性的作用^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(3): 680-687.
[6]	史滋福, 陈枭豪. 嵌套集合建模能力和数字表征对儿童贝叶斯推理的影响^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(2): 274-280.
[7]	辛聪, 刘国雄, 程黎. 儿童前瞻记忆：执行功能的作用 ^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(6): 1360-1367.
[8]	周迎楠, 王俊秀. 使用社交媒体发布动态的频率对青年群体主观幸福感的影响：基本心理需要满足的中介作用 ^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(6): 1454-1461.
[9]	鞠佳雯, 周欣然, 梁丽婵, 边玉芳. 父母参与的一致性与儿童主观幸福感的关系——基于多项式回归的响应面分析^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(6): 1478-1485.
[10]	吴岩, 陈启杨, 胡诗茜. 世界知识和词汇关联在10~12岁儿童句子加工中的作用：眼动研究 ^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(5): 1074-1080.
[11]	方浩宇, 祝孝亮, 赵鑫. 睡眠质量对10~12岁儿童学业成绩的影响：刷新能力的中介作用 ^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(5): 1090-1097.
[12]	孟可强, 李凤兰, 王丽, 陈敏. 童年社会经济地位与农村成年居民心理健康：希望感和主观幸福感的作用 ^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(5): 1148-1155.
[13]	李菲菲, 方海燕, 陈何, 刘宝根. 自闭症儿童的内隐学习假说：来自人工语法学习的证据^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(4): 809-816.
[14]	陈福美, 赵云燕, 罗芮, 何然, 罗玉晗. 父母-青少年对家庭亲密性的感知差异及其对青少年孤独感与攻击行为的影响：基于RSA模型的分析^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(4): 873-880.
[15]	陈永香朱莉琪. 两岁儿童利用身体部位信息快速识别动词[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(2): 355-362.