Dependence or Separation: The Relationship between Ingroup Favoritism and Outgroup Derogation

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240223

Abstract

Abstract: Intergroup relation has always been the cornerstone of social psychology research. Some studies have found that the existence of ingroup favoritism depends on outgroup derogation, while the others have found that ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation are separated, and the vagueness of the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation has led to a constant debate among researchers. Based on the psychological needs of group members and the intergroup factors of group interaction, this paper attempts to find the important factors that influence the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation. This paper summarizes the essence, relationship and factors of ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation, which mainly includes the following three aspects.
First of all, the research shows that ingroup favoritism is widespread, and the researchers mainly explain the psychological mechanism of ingroup favoritism according to social identity theory, social projection theory and the theory of bounded generalized reciprocity. These three theories respectively focus on group identity, self and group similarity perception, and the value of group cooperation to explain ingroup favoritism. As for outgroup derogation, the researchers mainly explain its psychological mechanism from the perspective of the realistic group conflict and the integrated threat theory. According to the theory of realistic group conflict, hostility among groups occurs more due to the competition for resources, which leads to prejudice against opposing outgroup. The integrated threat theory focuses on conflicts caused by perceived symbolic threats.
Secondly, this paper expounds the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation from two aspects of dependence and separation. On the one hand, some evidence has shown that ingroup favoritism depends on outgroup derogation, that is, ingroup favoritism can be driven by outgroup derogation. The essence of ingroup favoritism depending on outgroup derogation might improve individual self-esteem and maintain advantage. On the other hand, the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation may be separated. Pure ingroup favoritism (without outgroup derogation) does not involve injustice towards outgroup members, whereas pure outgroup derogation is rarer. Pure outgroup derogation may exist in people who have experienced social isolation or negative experiences both in their ingroup and outgroup, and therefore has difficulty developing ingroup favoritism but holds significant hostility to outgroup.
Finally, from the perspective of the psychological needs of group members and intergroup factors of group interaction, this paper sorts out the important factors that influence the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation. The relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation is influenced by different degrees of group identity. Specifically, when the group identity is slight and no other influencing factors are involved, an individual only shows ingroup favoritism; However, when the group identity is highlighted, the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation increases. Besides, the motivations of outgroup derogation and ingroup favoritism are different. The motivation of ingroup favoritism is to help ingroup members, which is related to the degree of closeness and importance of group members, while the motivation of outgroup derogation may be to harm outgroup members. The main situational conditions to increase the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation are group threat and resource competition.
In conclusion, future research can adopt empirical study to find out the role of influencing factors in the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation, and it is also suggested to clarify the boundary between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation by combining social cognitive paradigms and strategy manipulation.

Key words: intergroup relation, ingroup favoritism, outgroup derogation, group identity, group threat

摘要： 内群体偏爱表现为将积极态度和更多资源分配给内群体成员,外群体贬损表现为对外群体成员的敌意、歧视和不公平态度。研究发现,内群体偏爱和外群体贬损存在依赖或分离这两种关系。从群体成员的心理需求和群体互动的群际因素出发,找到影响两者关系的重要因素：群体认同、动机意图、群际威胁和资源竞争。进行实证研究更精准地找出这些影响因素在二者关系上的作用,采用多样社会认知范式和策略操纵结合的方法厘清二者关系,是未来研究的重要方向。

关键词: 群际关系, 内群体偏爱, 外群体贬损, 群体认同, 群体威胁

Qiao Yalan, Wen Fangfang, Zuo Bin, Ke Wenlin, Song Shijie, Wang Jing. Dependence or Separation: The Relationship between Ingroup Favoritism and Outgroup Derogation[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2024, 47(2): 450-457.

乔亚兰, 温芳芳, 佐斌, 柯文琳, 宋仕婕, 王晶. 依赖或分离：内群体偏爱和外群体贬损的关系^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(2): 450-457.

References

[1] 陈世平, 崔鑫. (2015). 从社会认同理论视角看内外群体偏爱的发展. 心理与行为研究, 13(3), 422-427.
[2] 刘璐, 肖雪, 刘丽莎, 徐良苑, 张旭然, 李燕芳. (2019). 儿童在不同卷入情境下基于资源价值的分配行为特点:内群体偏爱的作用. 心理学报, 51(5), 62-75.
[3] 温芳芳, 柯文琳, 佐斌, 戴月娥, 聂思源, 姚奕, 韩施. (2021). 内隐关系评估程序(IRAP): 测量原理及应用. 心理科学进展, 29(11), 1936-1947.
[4] 严义娟, 佐斌. (2008). 外群体偏爱研究进展. 心理科学, 31(3), 671-674.
[5] 张莹瑞, 佐斌. (2006). 社会认同理论及其发展. 心理科学进展, 14(3), 475-480.
[6] 张振, 齐春辉, 王洋, 赵辉, 王小新, 高晓雷. (2020). 内群体偏爱或黑羊效应? 经济博弈中公平规范执行的群体偏见. 心理科学进展, 28(2), 329-339.
[7] Abbink, K., & Harris, D. (2019). In-group favouritism and out-group discrimination in naturally occurring groups. PLoS ONE, 14(9), e0221616.
[8] Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429-444.
[9] Brewer, M. B. (2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62(8), 728-738.
[10] Brewer M. B.(2017). Intergroup discrimination: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? In C. G. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 90-110). Cambridge University Press.
[11] Buttelmann, D., & Böhm, R. (2014). The ontogeny of the motivation that Böhm underlies in-group bias. Psychological Science, 25(4), 921-927.
[12] Bilancini E., Boncinelli L., Capraro V., Celadin T., & Paolo R. D. (2020). "Do the right thing" for whom? An experiment on ingroup favouritism, group assorting and moral suasion. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(2), 182-192.
[13] Brewer, M. B., & Silver, M. (1978). Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8(3), 393-400.
[14] Baumgartner T., Schiller B., Rieskamp J., Gianotti L. R., & Knoch D. (2014). Diminishing parochialism in intergroup conflict by disrupting the right temporo-parietal junction. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(5), 653-660.
[15] Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(6), 641-657.
[16] Balliet D., Wu J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1556-1581.
[17] Chae B. G., Dahl D. W., & Zhu R. J. (2017). "Our" brand's failure leads to "their" product derogation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 466-472.
[18] Cosmides L., Tooby J., & Kurzban R. (2003). Perceptions of race. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 173-179.
[19] Dambrun M., Guimond S., & Taylor, D. M. (2006). The counter-intuitive effect of relative gratification on intergroup attitudes: Ecological validity, moderators and mediators. In S. Guimond (Ed.), Social comparison and social psychology: Understanding cognition, intergroup relations, and culture (pp. 206-227). Cambridge University Press.
[20] Dreu C., Balliet D., & Halevy N. (2014). Parochial cooperation in humans: Forms and functions of self-sacrifice in intergroup conflict. Advances in Motivation Science, 1, 1-47.
[21] De Dreu, C. K. W., Greer L. L., Handgraaf M. J. J., Shalvi S., Van Kleef G. A., Baas M., Ten Velden F. S., Van Dijk E., & Feith, S. W. W. (2010). The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science, 328(5984), 1408-1411.
[22] Delton, A. W., & Krasnow, M. M. (2017). The psychology of deterrence explains why group membership matters for third-party punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(6), 734-743.
[23] Dang J., Liu L., Li C., & Zhang Q. (2019). Leaving an attacked group: Authoritative criticism decreases ingroup favoritism. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 13(2), 1-9.
[24] Drake C. E., Seymour K. H., & Habib R. (2016). Testing the IRAP: Exploring the reliability and fakability of an idiographic approach to interpersonal attitudes. The Psychological Record, 66(1), 153-163.
[25] Esses V. M., Jackson L. M., Dovidio J. F., & Hodson, G. (2005). Instrumental relations among groups: Group competition, conflict, and prejudice. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 227-243). Blackwell Publishing.
[26] Everett J. A., Faber N. S., Crockett M. J., & de Dreu, C. K. (2015). Economic games and social neuroscience methods can help elucidate the psychology of parochial altruism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 861.
[27] Everett J. A. C., Faber N. S., & Molly C. (2015). Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 1-21.
[28] Fahey K. H., Hunter J., Scarf D., & Ruffman T. (2019). Ingroup favouring evaluations in response to belonging threats in public and private contexts. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 48(1), 95-102.
[29] Golec de Zavala A., Federico C. M., Sedikides C., Guerra R., Lantos D., Mroziński B., Cypryańska M., & Baran T. (2019). Low self-esteem predicts out-group derogation via collective narcissism, but this relationship is obscured by in-group satisfaction. Journal of personality and social psychology, 119(3), 741-764.
[30] Gonzalez-Gadea M. L., Santamaría-García H., Aragón I., Santamaría-García J., & Sigman M. (2020). Transgression of cooperative helping norms outweighs children's intergroup bias. Cognitive Development, 54, 100878.
[31] Grigoryan L., Cohrs J. C., Boehnke K., van de Vijver F. (A. J. R.), & Easterbrook, M. J. (2020). Multiple categorization and intergroup bias: Examining the generalizability of three theories of intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication.
[32] Grueter C. C., Westlake G., & Coall D. (2020). Absence of intergroup discrimination in a naturalistic helping task. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 82-88.
[33] Halevy N., Bornstein G., & Sagiv L. (2008). "In-group love" and "out-group hate" as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict: A new game paradigm. Psychological Science, 19(4), 405-411.
[34] Hughes S., Barnes-Holmes D., & Smyth S. (2017). Implicit cross-community biases revisited: Evidence for ingroup favoritism in the absence of outgroup derogation in Northern Ireland. The Psychological Record, 67(1), 97-107.
[35] Hughes S., Hussey I., Corrigan B., Jolie K., Murphy C., & Barnes Holmes D. (2016). Faking revisited: Exerting strategic control over performance on the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(5), 632-648.
[36] Hamley L., Houkamau C. A., Osborne D., Barlow F. K., & Sibley C. G. (2019). Ingroup love or outgroup hate (or both)? Mapping distinct bias profiles in the population. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(2), 1-18.
[37] Houkamau C. A., Stronge S., & Sibley C. G. (2017). The prevalence and impact of racism toward indigenous Māori in New Zealand. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 6(2), 61-80.
[38] Halevy N., Weisel O., andBornstein G. (2012). "In-group love" and "out-group hate" in repeated interaction between groups. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(2), 188-195.
[39] Jungkunz S., Helbling M., & Schwemmer C. (2018). Xenophobia before and after the paris 2015 attacks: Evidence from a natural experiment. Ethnicities. Ethnicities, 19(2), 271-291.
[40] Jordan J. J., McAulodfe K., & Warneken F. (2014). Development of in-group favoritism in children's third-party punishment of selfishness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(35), 12710-12715.
[41] Kaiser C. R., Eccleston C. P., & Hagiwara N. (2008). Post-Hurricane Katrina racialized explanations as a system threat: Implications for whites' and blacks' racial attitudes. Social Justice Research, 21(2), 192-203.
[42] Lewis, G. J., & Bates, T. C. (2014). Common heritable effects underpin concerns over norm maintenance and ingroup favoritism: Evidence from genetic analyses of right-wing authoritarianism and traditionalism. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 297-309.
[43] Michael, A. H., & Kipling, D. W. (2000). From I to we: Social identity and the collective self. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1), 81-97.
[44] Moscatelli, S., & Rubini, M. (2011). The impact of group entitativity on linguistic discrimination: Ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation in the explanation of negative outcome allocations. Social Psychology, 42(4), 292-299.
[45] Mei D., Zhang W., & Yin L. (2020). Neural responses of in-group "favoritism" and out-group "discrimination" toward moral behaviors. Neuropsychologia, 139, 107375.
[46] Nesdale, D. (2007). The development of ethnic prejudice in early childhood: Theories and research. In O. N. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on socialization and social development in early childhood education (pp. 213-240). IAP Information Age Publishing.
[47] Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2017). Identifying "types" of ideologies and intergroup biases: Advancing a person-centred approach to social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology, 28(1), 288-332.
[48] Rhodes M., Leslie S. J., Saunders K., Dunham Y., & Cimpian A. (2018). How does social essentialism affect the development of inter-group relations? Developmental Science, 21(1), e12509.
[49] Schiller B., Baumgartner T., Knoch D.(2014). Intergroup bias in third-party punishment stems from both ingroup favoritism and outgroup discrimination. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(3), 169-175.
[50] Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2016). Ideology and post-colonial society. Advances in Political Psychology, 37, 115-161.
[51] Stephan W. G., Boniecki K. A., Ybarra O., Bettencourt A., Ervin K. S., Jackson L. A., Mcnatt P. S., & Renfro C. L. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1242-1254.
[52] Tajfel H., Billig M., Bundy R., & Flament C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149-178.
[53] Tam T., Hewstone M., Kenworthy J. B., Cairns E., Marinetti C., Geddes L., & Parkinson B. (2008). Postconflict reconciliation: Intergroup forgiveness and implicit biases in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 64(2), 303-320.
[54] Van Bavel, J. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012). A social identity approach to person memory: Group membership,collective identidication, and social role shape attention and memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1566-1578.
[55] Waytz A., Young L. L., & Ginges J. (2014). Motive attribution asymmetry for love vs. hate drives intractable conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(44), 15687-15692.
[56] Wilson J. P., Hugenberg K., & Rule N. O. (2017). Racial bias in judgments of physical size and formidability: From size to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 59-80.
[57] Yamagishi T., Jin N., & Kiyonari T. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 161-197.
[58] Zhang W., Mei D., & Yin L. (2020). Neural responses of in-group "favoritism" and out-group "discrimination" toward moral behaviors. Neuropsychologia, 139, 107375.