The Influence of Moral Standards on Self-Deception in Deceptive Behavior

Fan Wei, Yang Ying, Xiya Guo

Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2025, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3) : 707-723.

PDF(1497 KB)
PDF(1497 KB)
Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2025, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3) : 707-723. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20250319
Social, Personality & Organizational Psychology

The Influence of Moral Standards on Self-Deception in Deceptive Behavior

  • Fan Wei1,2,3, Yang Ying1,2, Xiya Guo1,2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Unethical behavior pervades nearly every aspect of society, and moral disengagement may explain why otherwise ordinary individuals engage in unethical actions without apparent guilt or self-condemnation. When moral disengagement fails, individuals may decide to engage in unethical behavior. Moral disengagement refers to the diminishment or elimination of guilt and moral responsibility through cognitive strategies such as neglect or moral rationalization, allowing individuals to avoid moral remorse for unethical behavior. Self-deception is considered the central psychological mechanism underlying moral disengagement, enabling individuals to rationalize immoral behaviors while maintaining their moral self-image. Self-deception occurs when an individual deliberately distorts facts to uphold a belief, even when that belief is inconsistent with reality. Self-deception can facilitate the rationalization of unethical behavior, with potentially negative consequences at both the individual and societal levels.
This study included three experiments aimed at investigating the impact of unethical behavior on self-deception and the inhibitory effect of moral standards on self-deception. This study integrates paradigms of unethical behavior and self-deception to induce self-deception through participants' voluntary unethical actions and exposure to external information that may enhance their moral self-image. The results indicate a successful induction of self-deception. Experiment 1 explored the influence of active unethical behavior on self-deception. Participants engaged in a sender-receiver task in which they first made a decision to behave honestly or deceptively. When prizes were distributed based on the chosen scheme, the recipients' prizes were transformed into a lottery with unknown random probabilities. Participants were then asked to predict the probability values after each decision. Subsequently, a lottery task assessed participants' true beliefs about these random probability values. The results indicated that the predicted belief in the cheating condition was significantly lower than in the honest condition and also lower than the actual belief, suggesting the presence of false beliefs during unethical behavior. Regression analysis revealed that the individual deception rate significantly and negatively predicted the discrepancy between predicted and actual beliefs in the deception condition. Experiment 2 assessed the impact of passive unethical behavior on self-deception. The results indicated that no false beliefs were generated when participants passively deceived at the request and command of the host. Experiment 3 examined the influence of ethical concern on self-deception in the context of active unethical behavior. The results indicated that there was no significant difference between predicted and true beliefs in the deception condition, suggesting that no false beliefs were formed. In contrast, the control group showed a significant discrepancy between predicted and true beliefs, leading to false beliefs.
The results revealed that participants' beliefs about the values of random probability significantly deviated from their true beliefs when they engaged in immoral behavior, and they adopted more pessimistic beliefs in these contexts. This suggests that individuals developed false beliefs that contradicted reality in the context of unethical behavior, resulting in a psychological process of self-deception. The observed phenomenon of individuals predicting lower probabilities of unethical behavior was likely attributed to self-justification, exemplified by rationalizations such as “I cheated not because I am immoral, but because I believed you had a low probability of receiving a bonus” . By adopting more pessimistic beliefs about random probabilities, individuals rationalized their behavior and preserved their moral self-image, suggesting that individuals tended to obscure the attribution of their unethical behavior and actively rationalize it retrospectively. These findings suggest that in passive unethical behavior, in which individuals were instructed or ordered to act immorally, the alleviation of moral responsibility alleviated guilt and self-blame, diminishing the motivation to uphold their moral self-image. Conversely, those who engage in active unethical behavior are more likely to exhibit stronger motivations for self-deception, whereas heightened awareness of moral standards could inhibit self-deception in such behavior.

Key words

self-deception / unethical behavior / moral standards / beliefs

Cite this article

Download Citations
Fan Wei, Yang Ying, Xiya Guo. The Influence of Moral Standards on Self-Deception in Deceptive Behavior[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2025, 48(3): 707-723 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20250319

References

[1] 范伟, 杨博, 刘娟, 傅小兰. (2017). 自我欺骗: 为了调节个体心理状态. 心理科学进展, 25(8), 1349-1359.
[2] 李谷, 周晖, 丁如一. (2013). 道德自我调节对亲社会行为和违规行为的影响. 心理学报, 45(6), 672-679.
[3] 陆慧菁. (2012). 自我欺骗: 通过欺骗自己更好地欺骗他人. 心理学报, 44(9), 1265-1278.
[4] 王祥坤, 辛自强, 侯友. (2024). 我国大中学生道德推脱水平的变迁及宏观成因. 心理学报, 56(7), 859-875.
[5] 钟罗金, 莫雷. (2019). 自我欺骗实证研究述评. 心理科学, 42(3), 709-714.
[6] Andreoni, J., & Sanchez, A. (2020). Fooling myself or fooling observers? Avoiding social pressures by manipulating perceptions of deservingness of others. Economic Inquiry, 58(1), 12-33.
[7] Ayal, S., & Gino, F. (2012). Honest rationales for dishonest behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 149-166). American Psychological Association.
[8] Bandura A., Barbaranelli C., Caprara G. V., & Pastorelli C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364-374.
[9] Barkan R., Ayal S., Gino F., & Ariely D. (2012). The pot calling the kettle black: Distancing response to ethical dissonance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 757-773.
[10] Batson C. D., Thompson E. R., Seuferling G., Whitney H., & Strongman J. A. (1999). Moral hypocrisy: appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 525-537.
[11] Bazerman, M. H., & Gino, F. (2012). Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8(1), 85-104.
[12] Ding X. P., Sai L., Fu G. Y., Liu J. G., & Lee K. (2014). Neural correlates of second-order verbal deception: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. NeuroImage, 87, 505-514.
[13] Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 568-584.
[14] Effron D. A., Bryan C. J., & Murnighan J. K. (2015). Cheating at the end to avoid regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 395-414.
[15] Erez A., Johnson D. E., & Judge T. A. (1995). Self-deception as a mediator of the relationship between dispositions and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(5), 597-612.
[16] Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A. G., & Buchner A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
[17] Feldman, Y. (2017). Using behavioral ethics to curb corruption. Behavioral Science and Policy, 3(2), 87-99.
[18] Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press..
[19] Fingarette, H. (1998). Self-deception needs no explaining. The Philosophical Quarterly, 48(192), 289-301.
[20] Freedman, J. L. (1965). Long-term behavioral effects of cognitive dissonance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1(2), 145-155.
[21] Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others' unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 708-719.
[22] Gur, R. C., & Sackeim, H. A. (1979). Self-deception: A concept in search of a phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(2), 147-169.
[23] Kaufmann J. B., West T., Ravenscroft S. P., & Shrader C. B. (2005). Ethical distancing: Rationalizing violations of organizational norms. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 24(3), 101-134.
[24] Kirkland, K. (2011). Self-deception and the pursuit of ethical practice: challenges faced by large law firm general counsel. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 9(2), 593-618.
[25] Kunda, Z. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 636-647.
[26] Lee T. M. C., Au R. K. C., Liu H. L., Ting K. H., Huang C. M., & Chan, C. C. H. (2009). Are errors differentiable from deceptive responses when feigning memory impairment? An fMRI study. Brain and Cognition, 69(2), 406-412.
[27] Levy, N. (2004). Self-deception and moral responsibility. Ratio, 17(3), 294-311.
[28] Lu, H. J., & Chang, L. (2014). Deceiving yourself to better deceive high-status compared to equal-status others. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(3), 635-654.
[29] Martin M. W.(1986). Self-deception and morality. University Press of Kansas..
[30] Mazar N., Amir O., & Ariely D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633-644.
[31] Mele, A. R. (1997). Real self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(1), 91-102.
[32] Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to autority. Haper and Row.
[33] Moore, C. (2016). Always the hero to ourselves: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. In J.-W. van Prooijen & P. A. M. van Lange (Eds.), Cheating, corruption, and concealment: The roots of dishonesty (pp. 98-119). Cambridge University Press.
[34] Moore C., Detert J. R., Treviño L. K., Baker V. L., & Mayer D. M. (2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 1-48.
[35] Panasiti M. S., Pavone E. F., Merla A., & Aglioti S. M. (2011). Situational and dispositional determinants of intentional deceiving. PLoS ONE, 6(4), Article e19465.
[36] Pinker, S. (2011). Representations and decision rules in the theory of self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(1), 35-37.
[37] Rick S., Loewenstein G., Monterosso J. R., Langleben D. D., Mazar N., Amir O., & Ariely D. (2008). Commentaries and rejoinder to "The Dishonesty of Honest People". Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 645-653.
[38] Roeser K., McGregor V. E., Stegmaier S., Mathew J., K, Kübler A., & Meule A. (2016). The Dark Triad of personality and unethical behavior at different times of day. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 73-77.
[39] Rotella, A., & Barclay, P. (2020). Failure to replicate moral licensing and moral cleansing in an online experiment. Personality and Individual Differences, 161, Article 109967.
[40] Ruedy N. E., Moore C., Gino F., & Schweitzer M. E. (2013). The cheater' s high: The unexpected affective benefits of unethical behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(4), 531-548.
[41] Sachdeva S., Iliev R., & Medin D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20(4), 523-528.
[42] Sai L., Wu H. Y., Hu X. Q., & Fu G. Y. (2018). Telling a truth to deceive: examining executive control and reward-related processes underlying interpersonal deception. Brain and Cognition, 125, 149-156.
[43] Samad, Z. (2021). Self-deception: Adopting false beliefs for a favorable self-view. SSRN.
[44] Schotter, A., & Trevino, I. (2014). Belief elicitation in the laboratory. Annual Review of Economics, 6(1), 103-128.
[45] Schweitzer, M. E., & Hsee, C. K. (2002). Stretching the truth: Elastic justification and motivated communication of uncertain information. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25(2), 185-201.
[46] Shalvi S., Gino F., Barkan R., & Ayal S. (2015). Self-serving justifications: Doing wrong and feeling moral. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 125-130.
[47] Shu, L. L., & Gino, F. (2012). Sweeping dishonesty under the rug: How unethical actions lead to forgetting of moral rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1164-1177.
[48] Shu L. L., Gino F., & Bazerman M. H. (2011). Dishonest deed, clear conscience: When cheating leads to moral disengagement and motivated forgetting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 330-349.
[49] Shuster, A., & Levy, D. J. (2020). Contribution of self- and other-regarding motives to (dis)honesty. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article 15844.
[50] Statman, D. (1997). Hypocrisy and self-deception. Philosophical Psychology, 10(1), 57-75.
[51] Tang H. H., Wang S., Liang Z. L., Sinnott-Armstrong W., Su S., & Liu C. (2018). Are proselfs more deceptive and hypocritical? Social image concerns in appearing fair. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2268.
[52] Tasimi, A., & Young, L. (2016). Memories of good deeds past: The reinforcing power of prosocial behavior in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 147, 159-166.
[53] Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 223-236.
[54] Tenbrunsel A. E., Diekmann K. A., Wade-Benzoni K. A., & Bazerman M. H. (2010). The ethical mirage: A temporal explanation as to why we are not as ethical as we think we are. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 153-173.
[55] Thau S., Derfler-Rozin R., Pitesa M., Mitchell M. S., & Pillutla M. M. (2015). Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 98-113.
[56] Trivers, R. (2000). The elements of a scientific theory of self-deception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 907(1), 114-131.
[57] van der Leer, L., & McKay, R. (2017). The optimist within? Selective sampling and self-deception. Consciousness and Cognition, 50, 23-29.
[58] van Zant, A. B. (2022). Strategically overconfident (to a fault): How self-promotion motivates advisor confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(1), 109-129.
[59] Xu Z. X., Ma H. K., Wang Y., & Li J. (2019). Maybe I am not as moral as I thought: Calibrating moral identity after immoral action. Current Psychology, 38(5), 1347-1354.
[60] Zhang M. M., Liu T., Pelowski M., & Yu D. C. (2017). Gender difference in spontaneous deception: A hyperscanning study using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Scientific Reports, 7(1), Article 7508.
[61] Zheltyakova M., Kireev M., Korotkov A., & Medvedev S. (2020). Neural mechanisms of deception in a social context: An fMRI replication study. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article 10713.
[62] Zhen, S. S., & Yu, R. J. (2022). Spontaneous dishonesty does not specifically engage the perigenual anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(27), Article e2201445119.
[63] Zimbardo, P. G. (1995). The psychology of evil: A situationist perspective on recruiting good people to engage in anti-social acts. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 11(2), 125-133.
PDF(1497 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/