Longitudinal Relations between Teachers' Regards and Students' Autonomous Motivation among Chinese Pupils: The Mediating Role of Students' Autonomy Frustration.

Liu Yi, Wang Guoxia, Jin Yimin

Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2) : 315-327.

PDF(1287 KB)
PDF(1287 KB)
Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2) : 315-327. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260206
Developmental & Educational Psychology

Longitudinal Relations between Teachers' Regards and Students' Autonomous Motivation among Chinese Pupils: The Mediating Role of Students' Autonomy Frustration.

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Teachers' regard refers to how teachers feel about their students during the teaching and learning process, including conditional negative regard, conditional positive regard, and unconditional regard. These three types of regard, arising from socialized agents and manifesting through controlling and relatedness-satisfying behaviors, have been shown to significantly impact students' academic performance and mental health. This encompasses, but is not limited to, academic achievement and bullying behavior. Several studies have shown that teachers' conditional negative regard undermines students' autonomous motivation and the unconditionality of teachers' regard is positively related to students' intrinsic motivation, which constitutes a component of autonomous motivation. However, first, most of these studies are cross-sectional, and few have explored longitudinal relations and mechanisms. Second, these related studies are separate, failing to compare the difference between these three kinds of regard in the same sample. Third, while previous studies have characterized teacher-student interactions as one-way and static, the actual teacher-student interactions are bi-directional and dynamic processes, which have not been adequately reflected in the existing research. It remains unclear whether these three types of teachers' regard are influenced by their students' traits and behaviors (e.g., autonomous motivation).

The objective of the study was to elucidate the interrelationship and longitudinal predictive effects between teachers' regard, pupils' autonomy frustration, and autonomous motivation. A total of 358 Chinese pupils completed measures of perceived teachers' conditional negative regard, conditional positive regard, and unconditional regard, students' autonomy frustration, and students' autonomous motivation at baseline (T1), followed by assessments at 3-month (T2) and 6-month (T3) intervals from each preceding time point. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS26.0 and Mplus8.3. Correlation analyses showed that teachers' conditional negative regard was positively correlated with autonomy frustration but negatively correlated with autonomous motivation; Teachers' conditional positive regard was positively correlated with autonomy frustration and autonomous motivation at certain timepoints; Teachers' unconditional regard was positively correlated with autonomous motivation but negatively correlated with autonomy frustration. The cross-lagged panel model showed that: (1) All autoregressive paths were significant. (2) T1/T2 teachers' conditional negative regard significantly and negatively predict T2/T3 autonomous motivation (β= -.09~-.10, p <.05), while T1/T2 teachers' unconditional regard significantly and positively predict T2/T3 autonomous motivation (β=.08~.09, p <.05), but the longitudinal predictive effect of teachers' conditional positive regard was not significant. (3) T1/T2 autonomous motivation significantly and positively predict teachers' unconditional regard (β=.14~.15, p<.05), but can't predict teachers' conditional negative regard and teachers' conditional positive regard. This means there is a reciprocal effect between teachers' unconditional regard and students' autonomous motivation, with the cross-lagged effect from students' autonomous motivation to teachers' unconditional regard being stronger. (4) The results indicate that T1 teachers' conditional negative regard reduces T3 students' autonomous motivation by increasing T2 autonomy frustration, while T1 teachers' unconditional regard alleviates the decline of T3 students' autonomous motivation by reducing T2 autonomy frustration. Before adding autonomy frustration as the mediator, the longitudinal predictive effects from T1 teachers' conditional negative regard and unconditional regard to T3 students' autonomous motivation are not significant. That is, T2 autonomy frustration fully mediated the effects of T1 teachers' conditional negative regard on T3 autonomous motivation (indirect effect = -.02, 95%CI = [-.03, -.004]), and similarly mediated the effects of T1 teachers' unconditional regard on T3 autonomous motivation (indirect effect =.02, 95%CI = [.002,.04]). (5) The paths from T1 autonomous motivation to T3 teachers' conditional negative regard (indirect effect = -.01, 95%CI = [-.02,.002]) and T3 teachers' unconditional regard are marginally significant (indirect effect =.01, 95%CI = [-.004,.02]).

The main theoretical contributions of this study are as follows. First, the study advances the understanding of the longitudinal mechanisms between teachers' regard and autonomous motivation. Second, the results provide empirical research evidence to support the model proposed by Kanat-Maymon et al. (2023) and substantiate the fundamental points of Self-determination Theory. Third, the study also shows how students can help to shape teachers' behavior. Teachers demonstrate more unconditional regard for students who evince more autonomous motivation. The findings have implications for educational practice. First, the results showed a pathway for ameliorating teachers' behavior to foster students' autonomous motivation. Second, cultivating students' autonomous motivation is also the key to breaking the detrimental cycle between teachers' conditional negative regard and the decline in students' autonomous motivation.

Key words

teachers' conditional regard / teachers' unconditional regard / autonomous motivation / autonomy frustration / longitudinal mediation model / self-determination theory

Cite this article

Download Citations
Liu Yi , Wang Guoxia , Jin Yimin. Longitudinal Relations between Teachers' Regards and Students' Autonomous Motivation among Chinese Pupils: The Mediating Role of Students' Autonomy Frustration.[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2026, 49(2): 315-327 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260206

References

[1]
艾慧玲, 赵建设, 邢晓沛. (2024). 执行功能与师生关系的变化轨迹对小学中高年级儿童学业自我效能感的独特效应和交互效应. 心理科学, 47(5), 1125-1135.
[2]
暴占光. (2006). 初中生外在学习动机内化的实验研究(博士学位论文). 东北师范大学, 长春.
[3]
王国霞, 赵扬. (2022). 教师自主支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析: 心理需要满足、动机及投入的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 38(3), 380-390.
[4]
余宾, 郭成, 缪华灵, 彭于珏. (2025). 师生关系与小学生攻击行为的关系: 自尊和亲子亲合的作用. 心理发展与教育, 41(1), 99-108.
[5]
朱芷滢, 王烨晖, 杜长宏, 王发明, 杨朝兮. (2024). 师生关系对学生数学成绩的影响: 行为参与和社会情感能力的链式中介作用. 心理科学, 47(1), 97-104.
[6]
Ahmadi A., Noetel M., Parker P., Ryan R. M., Ntoumanis N., Reeve J., Beauchamp M., Dicke T., Yeung A., Ahmadi M., Bartholomew K., Chiu, T. K. F., Curran T., Erturan G., Flunger B., Frederick C., Froiland J. M., González-Cutre D., Haerens L., & Lonsdale C. (2023). A classification system for teachers' motivational behaviors recommended in self-determination theory interventions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(8), 1158-1176.
[7]
Assor A., Roth G., & Deci E. L. (2004). The emotional costs of parents' conditional regard: A self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Personality, 72(1), 47-88.
Parents' use of conditional regard as a socializing practice was hypothesized to predict their children's introjected internalization (indexed by a sense of internal compulsion), resentment toward parents, and ill-being. In Study 1, involving three generations, mothers' reports of their parents' having used conditional regard to promote academic achievement predicted (a) the mothers' poor well-being and controlling parenting attitudes, and (b) their college-aged daughters' viewing them as having used conditional regard, thus showing both negative affective consequences from and intergenerational transmission of conditional regard. Study 2 expanded on the first by using four domains, including both genders, and examining mediating processes. College students' perceptions of their mothers' and fathers' having used conditional regard in four domains (emotion control, prosocial, academic, sport) were found to relate to introjected internalization, behavioral enactment, fluctuations in self-esteem, perceived parental disapproval, and resentment of parents. Introjection mediated the link from conditional regard to behavioral enactment. The results suggest that use of conditional regard as a socializing practice can promote enactment of the desired behaviors but does so with significant affective costs.
[8]
Assor A., & Tal K. (2012). When parents' affection depends on child's achievement: Parental conditional positive regard, self-aggrandizement, shame and coping in adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 35(2), 249-260.
We examined the idea that adolescents' perceptions of their mothers as using parental conditional positive regard (PCPR) to promote academic achievement are associated with maladaptive self feelings and coping. A study of 153 adolescents supported the hypothesis that PCPR predicts self-aggrandizement following success and self devaluation and shame following failure, which then predict compulsive over-investment. PCPR functioned as a unique predictor of maladaptive self feelings and coping also when the effects of perceived parental conditional negative regard or psychological control were controlled for. The findings suggest that the experience of one's mother as using conditional positive regard to promote achievement leads to a non-optimal self-esteem dynamics, in which people vacillate between feelings of grandiosity following success and self-derogation and shame following failure, which in turn promote a rigid and stressful mode of coping. Thus, the practice of PCPR, although seemingly benign, appears to carry significant emotional and coping costs for adolescents.Copyright © 2011 The Foundation for Professionals in Services for Adolescents. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[9]
Brummelman E., Thomaes S., Walton G. M., Poorthuis A. M. G., Overbeek G., Orobio de Castro B., & Bushman B. J. (2014). Unconditional regard buffers children's negative self-feelings. Pediatrics, 134(6), 1119-1126.
Unconditional regard refers to the feeling that one is accepted and valued by others without conditions. Psychological theory suggests that experiences of unconditional regard lead children to feel that they are valuable despite setbacks. We hypothesized that reflecting on experiences of unconditional regard would buffer children's negative self-feelings (eg, shame, insecurity, powerlessness) in the face of setbacks. To test this hypothesis, we randomized children to reflect on experiences of unconditional regard or other experiences, and examined their response to an academic setback 3 weeks later.Participants (11-15 years old) were randomly assigned to reflect for 15 minutes on experiences of unconditional regard (n = 91), conditional regard (n = 80), or other social experiences (n = 76). Research personnel, teachers, and classmates remained blind to condition assignment. Three weeks later, after receiving their course grades, children reported their self-feelings. Course grades were obtained from school records. Receiving low course grades represents a salient and painful real-world setback for children.Replicating previous research, children who received lower grades experienced more negative self-feelings (P <.001). As predicted, this well-established relationship was significantly attenuated among children who had reflected, 3 weeks previously, on experiences of unconditional regard (Ps <.03). Reflecting on unconditional regard specifically reduced negative self-feelings after low grades (P =.01), not after average or high grades (Ps >.17).Reflecting on unconditional regard buffered children's selves against the adverse impact of an academic setback over an extended period of time. Unconditional regard may thus be an important psychological lever to reduce negative self-feelings in youth.Copyright © 2014 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
[10]
Buzzai C., Filippello P., Caparello C., & Sorrenti L. (2022). Need-supportive and need-thwarting interpersonal behaviors by teachers and classmates in adolescence: The mediating role of basic psychological needs on school alienation and academic achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 25(4), 881-902.
[11]
Carriedo A., Cecchini J. A., Méndez-Giménez A., Sanabrias-Moreno D., & González C. (2023). Impact of teachers' autonomy support in students' basic psychological needs, intrinsic motivation and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Children, 10(3), 489.
[12]
Chen F., Curran P. J., Bollen K. A., Kirby J., & Paxton P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 36(4), 462-494.
[13]
Codina N., Valenzuela R., Pestana J. V., & Gonzalez-Conde J. (2018). Relations between student procrastination and teaching styles: Autonomy-supportive and controlling. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 809.
[14]
Cohen R., Moed A., Shoshani A., Roth G., & Kanat-Maymon Y. (2019). Teachers' conditional regard and students' need satisfaction and agentic engagement: A multilevel motivation mediation model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(4), 790-803.
[15]
Cohen R., Katz I., Aelterman N., & Vansteenkiste M. (2023). Understanding shifts in students' academic motivation across a school year: The role of teachers' motivating styles and need-based experiences. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(3), 963-988.
[16]
Deci E. L., & Ryan R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
[17]
Deci E. L., & Ryan R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
[18]
Eccles J. S., & Wigfield A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132.
[19]
Eriksson K., Lindvall J., Helenius O., & Ryve A. (2020). Cultural variation in the effectiveness of feedback on students' mistakes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 3053.
[20]
Flamant N., Haerens L., Loeys T., Vermote B., & Soenens B. (2023). 'Help, my teacher is pressuring me!' The role of students' coping with controlling teaching in motivation and engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 47(5), 739-760.
[21]
García-González L., Haerens L., Abós Á., Sevil-Serrano J., & Burgueño R. (2023). Is high teacher directiveness always negative? Associations with students' motivational outcomes in physical education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, Article 104216.
[22]
García-Moya I. (2020). The importance of connectedness in student-teacher relationships. Springer Nature.
[23]
Haerens L., Aelterman N., Vansteenkiste M., Soenens B., & Van Petegem S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students' motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26-36.
[24]
Haerens L., Vansteenkiste M., De Meester A., Delrue J., Tallir I., Vande B. G., Goris W.,& Aelterman N. (2017). Different combinations of perceived autonomy support and control: Identifying the most optimal motivating style. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(1), 16-36.
[25]
Hein V., Koka A., & Hagger M. S. (2015). Relationships between perceived teachers' controlling behaviour, psychological need thwarting, anger and bullying behaviour in high-school students. Journal of Adolescence, 42(1), 103-114.
[26]
Hofstede G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications.
[27]
Jang H., Kim E. J., & Reeve J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27-38.
[28]
Jang H. R., Basarkod G., Reeve J., Marsh H. W., Cheon S. H., & Guo J. (2023). Longitudinal reciprocal effects of agentic engagement and autonomy support: Between- and within-person perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(1), 20-35.
[29]
Jeno L. M., Nylehn J., Hole T. N., Raaheim A., Velle G., & Vandvik V. (2023). Motivational determinants of students' academic functioning: The role of autonomy-support, autonomous motivation, and perceived competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(2), 194-211.
[30]
Jiang Y., Li Y., & Zhang L. (2024). Distinct roles of autonomy satisfaction and frustration in predicting adolescent students' academic motivation and achievement. Educational Psychology, 44(3), 377-394.
[31]
Kanat-Maymon Y., Assor A., & Roth G. (2023). Conditional regard in development and relationships. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of self-determination theory (pp.548-570). Oxford University Press.
[32]
Kanat-Maymon Y., Shoshani A., & Roth G. (2021). Conditional regard in the classroom: A double-edged sword. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 621046.
[33]
Kaplan H. (2018). Teachers' autonomy support, autonomy suppression and conditional negative regard as predictors of optimal learning experience among high-achieving Bedouin students. Social Psychology of Education, 21(1), 223-255.
[34]
Koka A., & Sildala H. (2018). Gender differences in the relationships between perceived teachers' controlling behaviors and amotivation in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2), 197-208.
[35]
Koka A., Tilga H., Kalajas-Tilga H., Hein V., & Raudsepp L. (2020). Detrimental effect of perceived controlling behavior from physical education teachers on students' leisure-time physical activity intentions and behavior: An application of the trans-contextual model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), Article 5939.
[36]
Koçak A., & Alp Christ A. (2024). Understanding the relations between parental conditional regard, teacher autonomy support, and adolescent well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Psychology in the Schools, 61(8), 3142-3159.
[37]
Lavrijsen J., Soenens B., Vansteenkiste M., & Verschueren K. (2023). When insecure self-worth drains students' energy: Academic contingent self-esteem and parents' and teachers' perceived conditional regard as predictors of school burnout. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(4), 810-825.
Whereas both the family and school environment have been suggested to affect school burnout risks, the role of conditionally regarding parenting or teaching, in which affection is granted conditional on student achievement, in the development of school burnout has not yet been examined. This longitudinal study investigated students' academic contingent self-esteem and parental and teacher conditional regard as antecedents of school burnout. The study sample consisted of Flemish early adolescents (n = 3409; M = 12.4 years (SD = 0.49) at the first measurement occasion; 50.3% males), which were surveyed twice (start of Grade 7 and Grade 8). Using Latent Change Modeling, academic contingent self-esteem was found to predict school burnout. Parental and teacher conditional regard both contributed to school burnout, partly through academic contingent self-esteem. Whereas negative conditional regard had the strongest implications for school burnout, positive conditional regard contributed most strongly to contingent self-esteem. Associations were systematically found both at the between-student level (i.e., high levels of antecedents were related to high levels of school burnout) and at the within-student level (i.e., increases in antecedents over time were related to concomitant increases in school burnout). These findings emphasize that communicating conditional approval to adolescents may increase school burnout risks, thus jeopardizing their healthy academic development.© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
[38]
Leo F. M., López-Gajardo M. A., Rodríguez-González P., Pulido J. J., & Fernández-Río J. (2023). How class cohesion and teachers' relatedness supportive/thwarting style relate to students' relatedness, motivation, and positive and negative outcomes in physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 65, Article 102360.
[39]
Leo F. M., Mouratidis A., Pulido J. J., López-Gajardo M. A., & Sánchez-Oliva D. (2022). Perceived teachers' behavior and students' engagement in physical education: The mediating role of basic psychological needs and self-determined motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 27(1), 59-76.
[40]
Makri-Botsari E. (2015). Adolescents' unconditional acceptance by parents and teachers and educational outcomes: A structural model of gender differences. Journal of Adolescence, 43(1), 50-62.
The purpose of this study was to detect gender specific patterns in the network of relations between unconditionality of parental and teacher acceptance in the form of unconditional positive regard and a range of educational outcomes, as indexed by academic self‐perception, academic intrinsic motivation, and academic achievement. To test the role of gender as a moderator, a multi‐group analysis was employed within the framework of structural equation modelling with increasing restrictions placed on the structural paths across genders. The results on a sample of 427 adolescents in grades 7–9 showed that conditionality of acceptance undermined level of perceived acceptance for both social agents. Moreover, unconditionality of teacher acceptance exerted stronger influences on students' educational outcomes than unconditionality of parental acceptance, with effect sizes being larger for girls than for boys.
[41]
Michou A., Altan S., Mouratidis A., Reeve J., & Malmberg L. E. (2021). Week-to-week interplay between teachers' motivating style and students' engagement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 91(1), 166-185.
[42]
Moreno-Murcia J. A., Hernández E. H., Fin G., León J., & Núñez J. L. (2022). Controlling style, relatedness and cohesion in university students: A six countries comparison. Current Psychology, 41(11), 8062-8069.
[43]
Patall E. A., Cooper H., & Robinson J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270-300.
A meta-analysis of 41 studies examined the effect of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes in a variety of settings with both child and adult samples. Results indicated that providing choice enhanced intrinsic motivation, effort, task performance, and perceived competence, among other outcomes. Moderator tests revealed the effect of choice on intrinsic motivation was stronger (a) for instructionally irrelevant choices compared to choices made between activities, versions of a task, rewards, and instructionally relevant options, (b) when 2 to 4 successive choices were given, (c) when rewards were not given after the choice manipulation, (d) when participants given choice were compared to the most controlling forms of control groups, (e) for children compared to adults, (f) for designs that yoked choice and control conditions compared to matched designs in which choice was reduced or designs in which nonyoked, nonmatched controls were used, and (g) when the experiment was conducted in a laboratory embedded in a natural setting. Implications for future research and applications to real-world settings are discussed.(c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.
[44]
Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., & Podsakoff N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Interest in the problem of method biases has a long history in the behavioral sciences. Despite this, a comprehensive summary of the potential sources of method biases and how to control for them does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which method biases influence behavioral research results, identify potential sources of method biases, discuss the cognitive processes through which method biases influence responses to measures, evaluate the many different procedural and statistical techniques that can be used to control method biases, and provide recommendations for how to select appropriate procedural and statistical remedies for different types of research settings.
[45]
Reeve J., Vansteenkiste M., Assor A., Ahmad I., Cheon S. H., Jang H., Kaplan H., Moss J. D., Olaussen B. S., & Wang C. K. J. (2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 93-110.
[46]
Roth G., Assor A., Niemiec C. P., Ryan R. M., & Deci E. L. (2009). The emotional and academic consequences of parental conditional regard: Comparing conditional positive regard, conditional negative regard, and autonomy support as parenting practices. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 1119-1142.
The authors conducted 2 studies of 9th-grade Israeli adolescents (169 in Study 1, 156 in Study 2) to compare the parenting practices of conditional positive regard, conditional negative regard, and autonomy support using data from multiple reporters. Two socialization domains were studied: emotion control and academics. Results were consistent with the self-determination theory model of internalization, which posits that (a) conditional negative regard predicts feelings of resentment toward parents, which then predict dysregulation of negative emotions and academic disengagement; (b) conditional positive regard predicts feelings of internal compulsion, which then predict suppressive regulation of negative emotions and grade-focused academic engagement; and (c) autonomy support predicts sense of choice, which then predicts integrated regulation of negative emotions and interest-focused academic engagement. These findings suggest that even parents' use of conditional positive regard as a socialization practice has adverse emotional and academic consequences, relative to autonomy support.
[47]
Ryan R. M., & Connell J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761.
Theories of internalization typically suggest that self-perceptions of the "causes" of (i.e. reasons for) behavior are differentiated along a continuum of autonomy that contains identifiable gradations. A model of perceived locus of causality (PLOC) is developed, using children's self-reported reasons for acting. In Project 1, external, introjected, identified, and intrinsic types of reasons for achievement-related behaviors are shown to conform to a simplex-like (ordered correlation) structure in four samples. These reason categories are then related to existing measures of PLOC and to motivation. A second project examines 3 reason categories (external, introject, and identification) within the domain of prosocial behavior. Relations with measures of empathy, moral judgement and positive interpersonal relatedness are presented. Finally, the proposed model and conceptualization of PLOC are discussed with regard to intrapersonal versus interpersonal perception, internalization, cause-reason distinctions, and the significance of perceived autonomy in human behavior.
[48]
Ryan R. M.,& Deci E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
[49]
Selig, J. P., & Little T. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265-278). Guilford Press.
[50]
Shavelson R. J., & Bolus R. (1982). Self concept: The interplay of theory and methods. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 3-17.
[51]
Sheldon K. M., & Hilpert J. C. (2012). The balanced measure of psychological needs (BMPN) scale: An alternative domain general measure of need satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion, 36(4), 439-451.
[52]
Shu T. M., & Lam S. (2016). Is it always good to provide positive feedback to students? The moderating effects of culture and regulatory focus. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 171-177.
[53]
Soenens B., Sierens E., Vansteenkiste M., Dochy F., & Goossens L. (2012). Psychologically controlling teaching: Examining outcomes, antecedents, and mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 108-120.
[54]
Tilga H., Hein V., & Koka A. (2019). Effects of a web-based intervention for PE teachers on students' perceptions of teacher behaviors, psychological needs, and intrinsic motivation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 126, 559-580.
Interventions based on self-determination theory to help teachers support their students' autonomy have measured teachers' autonomy-supportive and controlling behaviors as unidimensional constructs. This study investigated whether a Web-Based Autonomy-Supportive Intervention Program (WB-ASIP) for physical education (PE) teachers would alter their students' perceptions of (a) the teachers' multidimensional autonomy-supportive and controlling behaviors, (b) their own psychological need satisfaction and frustration, and (c) perceived intrinsic motivation. We found that WB-ASIP significantly increased students' perceptions of all autonomy-supportive teacher behaviors and students' need satisfaction. At follow-up, we found that WB-ASIP led to a significant decrease in students' perception of teacher intimidation behaviors and students' autonomy frustration. These results suggest that a web-based intervention program to enhance PE teachers' autonomy-supportive behavior and minimize their controlling behavior was partially effective in positively changing their students' perceptions.
[55]
Tilga H., Kalajas-Tilga H., Hein V., & Koka A. (2021). Web-based and face-to-face autonomy-supportive intervention for physical education teachers and students' experiences. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 20, 672-683.
[56]
Tong K. K., Wu A. M. S., & Chen J. H. (2022). Satisfaction of basic psychological needs and adherence to responsible gambling practices: The mediating role of flourishing. Journal of Gambling Studies, 38(4), 1431-1446.
Responsible gambling (RG) is a practical approach to contain potential gambling-associated harms to an acceptable level. However, few studies have proposed a theoretical framework to account for significant individual differences in RG adherence, which hinders an effective RG promotion in public. To address this missing link, the current study aims to identify psychological need factors associated with adherence to RG practices. We applied the self-determination theory (SDT) to explore the association between the satisfaction of basic psychological needs (i.e., relatedness, competency, and autonomy) and RG adherence in a probability Chinese community adult sample (N = 1002; 55.7% women and M  = 44.28 years), acquired from a telephone survey conducted in the 2018 fall with a two-stage cluster random sampling method. We found that the three types of basic needs satisfaction were significantly and positively related to RG adherence via a full mediation of flourishing. The findings provide practical insights to understanding individual differences in RG adherence and designing corresponding SDT-based interventions for gambling communities globally.© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
[57]
Yang Y., & Du C. (2023). The predictive effect of perceived teacher support on college EFL learners' online learning engagement: Autonomous and controlled motivation as mediators. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 44(10), 1013-1027.
[58]
Zhou N., Lam S. F., & Chan K. C. (2012). The Chinese classroom paradox: A cross-cultural comparison of teacher controlling behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1162-1174.
[59]
Zyphur M. J., Allison P. D., Tay L., Voelkle M. C., Preacher K. J., Zhang Z., Hamaker E. L., Shamsollahi A., Pierides D. C., Koval P., & Diener E. (2020). From data to causes I: Building a general cross-lagged panel model (GCLM). Organizational Research Methods, 23(4), 651-687.
This is the first paper in a series of two that synthesizes, compares, and extends methods for causal inference with longitudinal panel data in a structural equation modeling (SEM) framework. Starting with a cross-lagged approach, this paper builds a general cross-lagged panel model (GCLM) with parameters to account for stable factors while increasing the range of dynamic processes that can be modeled. We illustrate the GCLM by examining the relationship between national income and subjective well-being (SWB), showing how to examine hypotheses about short-run (via Granger-Sims tests) versus long-run effects (via impulse responses). When controlling for stable factors, we find no short-run or long-run effects among these variables, showing national SWB to be relatively stable, whereas income is less so. Our second paper addresses the differences between the GCLM and other methods. Online Supplementary Materials offer an Excel file automating GCLM input for Mplus (with an example also for Lavaan in R) and analyses using additional data sets and all program input/output. We also offer an introductory GCLM presentation at https://youtu.be/tHnnaRNPbXs. We conclude with a discussion of issues surrounding causal inference.
PDF(1287 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/