Perception and Responses to Ageism among the Elderly in the Context of Traditional Chinese Filial Piety Culture

Liu Yun, Yang Liping, Shu Mei

Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2) : 451-462.

PDF(1271 KB)
PDF(1271 KB)
Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2) : 451-462. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260217
Research on Social Psychological Service in the New Era

Perception and Responses to Ageism among the Elderly in the Context of Traditional Chinese Filial Piety Culture

Author information +
History +

Abstract

As the global population ages, the mental health of the elderly has emerged as a critical concern in recent years. Ageism, the third major form of social prejudice following gender and racial bias, has become one of the considerable barriers to active and healthy aging. Previous studies focused on reducing prejudice from an outsider's perspective. This study aims to investigate the ageism as perceived by older adults, with a focus on the connotation and structure of perceived ageism within the context of traditional Chinese filial piety culture.

This study employed a qualitative research paradigm using the Grounded Theory method. The sampling criteria were formulated based on the purpose-oriented and intensity sampling principles, and sampling was halted upon reaching theoretical saturation. The sample included nine participants (four males and five females) with a mean age of 70 ± 7.6 years. In-depth interviews were conducted with each participant on the topic of age-related differential treatment. All interviews were recorded, transcribed into text, and then coded and analyzed using NVivo11.0 Plus and Excel software. This program included data reduction and theme generation through initial coding, focused coding, axial coding, and theoretical coding. The four stages were cyclical and iterative. In this study, a total of 155,000 words of transcripts were obtained, with 325 initial codes extracted and 909 reference points identified. These were further condensed into 71 focused codes, resulting in five core categories. The findings can be summarized into two research topics: "perceived ageism" and "responses to perceived ageism". A grounded theoretical model of perceived ageism and its responses among the elderly was then established from the bottom up. The research shows that:

(1) Perceived Ageism: This refers to age-related stereotypes and the differential treatment of the elderly in Chinese culture. Perceived ageism includes two dimensions: hostile ageism and benevolent ageism. Hostile ageism mainly includes emotional neglect, a negation of the value, affective aversion, speaking insolently, behavioral rejection, and negative labeling. Benevolent ageism mainly includes restriction of movement, exceeding one's duties, meddling in others' affairs, and overprotection for the elderly. Together, these two aspects constitute the ambivalent ageism perceived by the elderly.

(2) Responses to Perceived Ageism: This includes three dimensions: behavioral responses, cognitive responses, and emotional reactions. Older adults react differently when they experience ageism. Initially, the elderly may have emotional reaction. Confronted with hostile ageism, older adults may feel sad and guilty, while benevolent ageism tends to evoke feelings of gratitude and appreciation, albeit with potential discomfort or concern. These affective states influence the cognitive processes and behavioral responses of older adults towards aging. For instance, in a positive emotional state, the elderly may reconstruct the concept of "aging" and "ageism", leading to proactive actions, such as resistance or self-empowerment. Conversely, negative emotions may lead to a focus on negative aging information, resulting in passive behaviors such as social withdrawal. These negative cognitions and behaviors can further deteriorate the emotional experiences of the elderly, leading to a decline in self-esteem and a sense of lost value. These three elements form a virtuous or vicious cycle in coping with ageism.

(3) Implications for Filial Piety and Active Aging: From the perspective of the connotation of benevolent ageism, keeping "calm" or "rational" in filial piety may help to unlock the potential of older adults and support long-term social development. In traditional Chinese culture, both the elderly and the young should be vigilant against benevolent ageism. Society should provide older adults with the opportunity to reach their full potential. The elderly must take control of their aging process and recognize that aging is not an immutable natural law. They can achieve active aging by fostering optimistic predictions and employing positive affirmations.

The findings of this study could provide theoretical support for promoting active aging in an aging society and offer insights for younger generations on how to practice filial piety in a way that supports the well-being of older adults.

Key words

perceived ageism / benevolent ageism / hostile ageism / active aging / filial piety / grounded theory

Cite this article

Download Citations
Liu Yun , Yang Liping , Shu Mei. Perception and Responses to Ageism among the Elderly in the Context of Traditional Chinese Filial Piety Culture[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2026, 49(2): 451-462 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260217

References

[1]
埃伦·兰格. (2012). 专念:积极心理学的力量(王佳艺译). 浙江人民出版社.
[2]
包诗钺, 张靖, 冀月欣, 胡小勇. (2023). 社会本质主义对偏见的影响及其机制. 心理科学进展, 31(6), 1068-1077.
社会本质主义是关于社会类别的直觉理论, 是对社会类别差异的一种生物性归因。大量研究显示社会本质主义助长了种族、性别与阶层偏见, 但也可以减少对肥胖、同性恋与罪犯的偏见。在种族、性别与阶层等被强加的社会类别中, 稳定性线索强, 社会本质主义导致人们认为该社会类别下的群体之间的差异难以改变, 折扣环境解释, 进而促进偏见; 在肥胖、同性恋与罪犯等个体选择的社会类别中, 可控性线索强, 社会本质主义导致人们认为该社会类别下的一些群体成员的污名身份是不可控的, 折扣个体选择的解释, 进而减少偏见。未来研究应关注导致不同后果的社会本质主义信念产生和发展的过程, 在此基础上开发出系统、持续、有效的干预措施, 为消除偏见, 减少群际冲突, 推进和谐社会建设提供科学心理学方案。
[3]
陈佩璋. (1987). 对老年的社会偏见或成见. 中国社会医学, 2, 20-22.
[4]
陈向明. (2000). 质的研究方法与社会科学研究. 教育科学出版社.
[5]
陈尹. (2020). 经典扎根理论方法及其在失独心理研究中的应用(博士学位论文). 南京师范大学.
[6]
高夏丽. (2020). 老年旅游的发生机制及旅游体验的意义建构——基于活动理论的视角. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 37(3), 116-123.
[7]
戈登·奥尔波特. (2021). 偏见的本质(徐健吾译). 人民大学出版社.
[8]
姜兆萍, 周宗奎. (2012). 老年歧视的特点、机制与干预. 心理科学进展, 20(10), 1642-1650.
目前在全球范围内普遍存在老年歧视和消极的老化态度。2~3岁的幼儿就已经具有了老化的消极刻板印象, 家庭、社会、媒体和图书资料是为人们提供消极老化态度的主要来源, 而缺少代际接触、缺乏对老化知识的了解是人们形成老年歧视的主要原因。老年歧视会影响个体的行为、自我老化接受度、心理健康状况、生活方式以及择业。了解老化知识信息、讨论老龄化问题, 以及与老年人直接接触等方法可以帮助人们改变老化消极刻板印象, 并且代际接触的质量比数量更重要。目前, 老年歧视的研究横向研究多, 纵向研究少; 特点描述、干预研究多, 机制研究较少; 研究方法多样, 测量工具不同, 导致研究结果不同, 各研究间难以进行比较, 如直接测量主观态度的老年歧视调查, 人们表现出更多的积极态度, 而采用间接方法测量时, 人们则表现出更多的消极态度。我国对老年歧视的研究有待进一步深入和扩展。
[9]
卡麦兹·凯西. (2009). 建构扎根理论: 质性研究实践指南(边国英译). 重庆大学出版社.
[10]
乐章, 秦习岗. (2020). 农村老年人老化态度变动轨迹:基于积极老龄化框架的实证考察. 南方人口, 35(4), 68-80.
[11]
连昆. (2019). 人口老龄化背景下社会孝德建设困境与保障机制. 湖南行政学院学报, 5, 47-51.
[12]
娄宇, 谢晓非. (2024). 双向视角下受助者心理困境及其化解路径. 心理科学, 47(2), 502-511.
[13]
亓立东, 杨莉萍, 陈家敏, 张登攀, 舒梅, 李兮何. (2023). 质性研究的编码者间一致性. 心理科学, 46(3), 760-767.
[14]
孙金明. (2017). 子女代际支持行为对老年人自我老化态度的影响——基于2014年中国老年社会追踪调查数据的分析. 人口与发展, 23(4), 86-95.
[15]
王西鸽, 曹琴琴, 李慧敏, 李峰. (2021). 老年人老化态度及对健康影响的研究进展. 中国老年学杂志, 41(10), 2237-2240.
[16]
吴帆. (2008). 认知、态度和社会环境:老年歧视的多维解构. 人口研究, 32(4), 57-65.
随着我国老年人口规模的增长与老年人口比重的提高,老年群体的整体特征更为突出,代际利益冲突、老年歧视等相关问题也比以往更加凸现。在老年人无法得到公正的资源与机会分配的背后,往往存在针对老年人的偏见、观念性歧视和制度性歧视。老年歧视不仅是中国亟待解决的问题,也是一个世界性问题。文章根据问卷调查数据测量我国目前不同社会群体所存在的老年歧视在认知、情感和行为层面上的表征程度,以及对老年人生存状态、制度和社会环境的客观评价,分析我国老年歧视的现状与代际和谐程度,为合理地分配代际利益、建立行之有效的应对人口老龄化趋势的社会机制安排措施提供有价值的参考。
[17]
吴继霞, 何雯静.(2019). 扎根理论的方法论意涵、建构与融合. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 7(1), 35-49.
[18]
伍威·弗里克. (2011). 质性研究导引(孙进译). 重庆大学出版社.
[19]
肖雪, 李燕芳. (2024). 群体竞争对儿童公平分配行为的影响:群体偏见动机的作用. 心理发展与教育, 40(6), 792-807.
[20]
徐凯. (2022). 疫情防控常态化时期新型冠状病毒认知对老年人抑郁的影响:歧视知觉和风险感知的链式中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 30(10), 1496-1501.
[21]
杨莉萍, 陈家敏, 谭梦鸽, 亓立东, 张慧会. (2024). 心理学中质性研究的方法自洽. 心理科学, 47(3), 760-767.
[22]
杨莉萍, 亓立东, 张博. (2022). 质性研究中的资料饱和及其判定. 心理科学进展, 30(3), 511-521.
在质性研究中, 资料饱和通常被用以评估研究资料的充足性。但在研究实践中, 资料饱和却存在概念模糊及操作性问题。作为某项质性研究所抽取的样本量已满足研究需要的标志, 按照在研究过程中判定时点的先后顺序, 资料饱和可划分为数据饱和、编码或主题饱和、意义饱和及理论饱和4种主要形式。4种形式的资料饱和各有其特定的内涵、评估方式和判定标准。研究认为, 达到资料饱和的样本量标准不应统一设定, 其检验需嵌入具体的研究过程; 资料饱和存在逻辑上的不确定性, 适度追加抽样有助于进一步确认; 资料饱和作为考察研究质量的一项重要指标, 并不适用于所有质性研究。
[23]
杨泽垠, 胡月. (2024). 善意性别偏见经历量表在中国女大学生中的信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 32(1), 107-111.
[24]
叶浩生. (2009). 社会建构论与心理学理论的未来发展. 心理学报, 41(6), 557-564.
[25]
易勇, 风少杭. (2005). 老年歧视与老年社会工作. 中国老年学杂志, 4, 471-473.
[26]
俞国良, 姜兆萍. (2013). 社会心理学视野下的终身化老年教育. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2, 103-108.
[27]
郑大华, 廖慧贞. (2022). 东西方文明冲突下的中国近代孝道文化变迁. 学术探索, 1, 116-122.
[28]
Blumer H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.
[29]
Bugental D. B., & Hehman J. A. (2007). Ageism: A review of research and policy implications. Social Issues and Policy Review, 1(1), 173-216.
[30]
Butler R. N. (1969). Age-ism: Another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist, 9, 243-246.
[31]
Cary L. A., Chasteen A. L., & Remedios J. (2017). The ambivalent ageism scale: Developing and validating a scale to measure benevolent and hostile ageism. The Gerontologist, 57(2), 27-36.
[32]
Charmaz K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. SAGE.
[33]
Cuddy A. J., Norton M. I., & Fiske S. T. (2005). This old stereotype: The pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 267-285.
[34]
Hennink M. M., Kaiser B. N., & Marconi V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591-608.
Saturation is a core guiding principle to determine sample sizes in qualitative research, yet little methodological research exists on parameters that influence saturation. Our study compared two approaches to assessing saturation: code saturation and meaning saturation. We examined sample sizes needed to reach saturation in each approach, what saturation meant, and how to assess saturation. Examining 25 in-depth interviews, we found that code saturation was reached at nine interviews, whereby the range of thematic issues was identified. However, 16 to 24 interviews were needed to reach meaning saturation where we developed a richly textured understanding of issues. Thus, code saturation may indicate when researchers have "heard it all," but meaning saturation is needed to "understand it all." We used our results to develop parameters that influence saturation, which may be used to estimate sample sizes for qualitative research proposals or to document in publications the grounds on which saturation was achieved.
[35]
Henry J. D., Coundouris S. P., & Nangle M. R. (2024). Breaking the links between ageism and health: An integrated perspective. Ageing Research Reviews, 95, 102212.
[36]
Levy B. R., Slade M. D., Kunkel S. R., & Kasl S. V. (2002). Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 261.
[37]
Merton R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8(2), 193-210.
[38]
Meyer M., Roberts S. O., Jayaratne T. E., & Gelman S. A. (2020). Children' s beliefs about causes of human characteristics: Genes, environment, or choice? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(10), 1935-1949.
[39]
North M. S., & Fiske S. T. (2015). Modern attitudes toward older adults in the aging world: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 993.
[40]
Pauker K., Tai C., & Ansari S. (2020). Contextualizing the development of social essentialism. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 59, 65-94.
[41]
Rhodes M., & Moty K. (2020). What is social essentialism and how does it develop? Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 59, 1-30.
Social essentialism consists of the commonly held belief that certain ways of categorizing people (e.g., gender and race) reflect meaningful, fundamental distinctions found in nature-that some kind of category "essence" (e.g., something in their blood or their DNA) explains why groups of people (such as boys and girls) are different from one another. Yet as common as they are, essentialist beliefs can give rise to adverse consequences, including stereotyping and social prejudice. In this chapter, we examine the development of social essentialism. To begin, we briefly address the evidence that these beliefs are the result of developmental processes that unfold beginning in early childhood (and not something innate that children are born with). Then, we consider the nature of those processes; specifically, how basic processes underlying conceptual development give rise to different components of essentialist beliefs. We then address how different essentialist beliefs might be integrated into a coherent essentialist view of a category, and finally into a coherent essentialist view of a domain.© 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[42]
Tasdemir N. (2020). Young group identification and motives as predictors of ageism, aging anxiety, and life satisfaction. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 181(5), 375-390.
The present study examined young group identification and young group motives (i.e., self-esteem, distinctiveness, belonging, meaning, efficacy, and continuity) as predictors of ambivalent ageism, stereotyping of older people, aging anxiety, and life satisfaction among Turkish university students. Participants (N = 226) completed scales measuring age group identification, social identity motives, ambivalent ageism, stereotyping of older people, aging anxiety, and life satisfaction. Multiple hierarchical regression analyses showed that belonging to a young group was a significant predictor for ambivalent ageism. Young group identification and meaning were significant predictors for negative stereotyping of older people. Young group self-esteem was a significant predictor for aging anxiety. Young group identification, self-esteem, and meaning were significant predictors for life satisfaction. None of the independent variables was a significant predictor for positive stereotyping of older people.
[43]
Tornstam L. (2006). The complexity of ageism: A proposed typology. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 1(1), 43-68.
[44]
Wirth J. H., & Williams K. D. (2009). "They don' t like our kind": Consequences of being ostracized while possessing a group membership. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12(1), 111-127.
[45]
Wurm S., Tomasik M. J., & Tesch-Romer C. (2010). On the importance of a positive view on aging for physical exercise among middle-aged and older adults: Cross-sectional and longitudinal findings. Psychology and Health, 25(1), 25-42.
PDF(1271 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/