The Dimensions of National Stereotype and its Activation

Wang Pei, Luo Xinming

Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2) : 504-511.

PDF(339 KB)
PDF(339 KB)
Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2) : 504-511. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260222
Theories & History of Psychology

The Dimensions of National Stereotype and its Activation

Author information +
History +

Abstract

National stereotype is an important aspect of stereotype, which involves the cognition of a particular social group about the political, economic, social, cultural, and traditional customs of a country. It also covers the immobilization, generalization, and evaluation of its citizens. The cognitive subject of national stereotype can be either this country or the citizen of this country. Its existence has certain psychological significance. The positive stereotype of a country may promote the willingness of outside groups to communicate with it and increase cultural identity, while the negative stereotype of a country may deepen the potential psychological distance between each other. Because of the particularity of the concept of the state, the content of the stereotype of the country is different. In particular, the national stereotype is not only associated with one impression, but also has various or even contradictory impressions on the image of a country or its national characteristics. The national stereotype represents a mixed impression, which can be recognized from the perspectives of affective and functional dimensions, collective and individual dimensions, enthusiasm and negative dimensions, and so on.

The activation of national stereotypes is often considered a controlled process of consciousness. In the face of situations that have not been previously purchased or lack of product attribute information, consumers will actively incorporate the existing national clues related to the product into their own evaluation criteria, thus forming an attitude towards the product. But current research also proves that the activation and use of national stereotypes can also be the result of unconsciousness and automation. When individuals identify products from a given country according to the clues in the situation, they are usually able to build various opinions and judgments on the quality and characteristics of the brand based on their own experience. The content or way of activation of national stereotypes will profoundly affect individual's subsequent emotional or behavioral tendencies. Because of the particularity of the cognitive subject of national stereotype, the factors influencing its activation are also various. When the existing clues are coordinated with the stereotyped cognition held by the individual, the activation of the relevant stereotype may be accelerated, but when the two are inconsistent, the activation performance is not necessarily inhibited or weakened, depending on the influence of multiple factors. Specifically, the activation of national stereotype is mainly affected by the specificity of the cognitive subject, the connection of cultural concepts, the compatibility of the occurrence situation and the adaptability of each other. These factors are indispensable for the initiation of the national stereotype, and can be used as a direction for further discussion.

As a collective schema, national stereotypes can quickly trigger an individual's cognitive and behavioral response to a country. Understanding the possible dimensions of an individual's stereotype of a country, and what factors affect the activation of this national stereotype can help the country to find more targeted solutions, reverse and shape a more suitable image of the country, it has important reference and practical significance for the future study of national stereotype.

Key words

stereotype / national stereotype / dimensions / activation

Cite this article

Download Citations
Wang Pei , Luo Xinming. The Dimensions of National Stereotype and its Activation[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2026, 49(2): 504-511 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260222

References

[1]
江红艳, 王海忠, 陈增祥. (2013). 心理加工模式对品牌原产国刻板印象逆转的影响——如何看待新兴国家的“新线索”. 中山大学学报(社会科学版), 53(4), 189-200.
[2]
徐大真, 张日升, 木村裕. (2008). 性别刻板印象之内隐与外显性别效应的中日跨文化研究. 心理科学, 31(5), 1226-1229.
[3]
王沛, 吴薇. (2017). 自我效能感和认知风格对刻板印象激活效应的影响. 心理科学, 40(1), 136-144.
[4]
杨亚平, 王沛, 尹志慧, 陈庆伟, 冯夏影.(2015). 刻板印象激活的无意图性及其大脑神经活动特征. 心理学报, 47(4),488-502.
[5]
Askegaard S., G. Ger.(1998). Product-country images: toward a contextualized approach. European Advances in Consumer Research, 3(1), 50-58.
[6]
Bloemer J., Brijs K., & Kasper H. (2009). The coO-ELM model: A theoretical framework for the cognitive processes underlying country of origin-effects. European Journal of Marketing, 43(1-2), 62-89.
The purpose of this paper is to present an extended version of the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM‐model) to explain and predict which of the four cognitive processes that are distinguished in the literature, with respect to Country of Origin (CoO), can be expected to occur: the halo‐effect, the summary construct‐effect, the product attribute‐effect or the default heuristic‐effect.
[7]
Brown R., & Hewstone M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37(5), 255-343.
[8]
Buhmann A., & Ingenhoff D. (2015). Advancing the country image construct from a public relations perspective. Journal of Communication Management, 19(1), 62-80.
[9]
Cai H., Wu L., Shi Y., Gu R., & Sedikides C. (2016). Self-enhancement among westerners and easterners: A cultural neuroscience approach. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(10), 1569-1578.
We adopted a cultural neuroscience approach to the investigation of self-enhancement. Western and Eastern participants made self-referent judgments on positive and negative traits while we recorded their electroencephalography signals. At the judgmental level, we assessed trait endorsement (judgments of traits self-descriptiveness) and reaction times (speed of such judgments). Participants endorsed more positive traits as self-descriptive and more negative traits as non-self-descriptive, although the magnitude of this effect (level of self-positivity) was higher in the Western than Eastern sample. Moreover, all participants responded faster to positive self-descriptive traits and to negative non-self-descriptive traits, indicating that the self-enhancement motive is equally potent across cultures. At the neurophysiological level, we assessed N170 and LPP. Negative traits elicited larger N170 among Easterners, indicating initial allocation of attentional resources to the processing of negative information. However, negative compared to positive self-descriptive traits elicited a larger LPP, whereas negative and positive non-self-descriptive traits did not differ in the LPP they elicited. This pattern generalized across samples, pointing to a pancultural physiological correlate of the self-enhancement motive.© The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
[10]
Cakici N. M., & Shukla P. (2017). Country-of-origin misclassification awareness and consumers' behavioral intentions: Moderating roles of consumer affinity, animosity, and product knowledge. International Marketing Review, 34(3), 354-376.
[11]
Casper C., Rothermund K., & Wentura D. (2010). Automatic stereotype activation is context dependent. Social Psychology, 41(3), 131-136.
[12]
Castano E., Bonacossa A., & Gries P. (2015). National images as integrated schemas: Subliminal primes of image attributes shape foreign policy preferences. Political Psychology, 37(3), 351-366.
[13]
Chattalas M., Kramer T., & Takada H. (2008). The impact of national stereotypes on the country of origin effect-a conceptual framework. International Marketing Review, 25(1), 54-74.
[14]
Cuddy A. J., Fiske S. T., & Glick P. (2007). The bias map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631-648.
In the present research, consisting of 2 correlational studies (N = 616) including a representative U.S. sample and 2 experiments (N = 350), the authors investigated how stereotypes and emotions shape behavioral tendencies toward groups, offering convergent support for the behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes (BIAS) map framework. Warmth stereotypes determine active behavioral tendencies, attenuating active harm (harassing) and eliciting active facilitation (helping). Competence stereotypes determine passive behavioral tendencies, attenuating passive harm (neglecting) and eliciting passive facilitation (associating). Admired groups (warm, competent) elicit both facilitation tendencies; hated groups (cold, incompetent) elicit both harm tendencies. Envied groups (competent, cold) elicit passive facilitation but active harm; pitied groups (warm, incompetent) elicit active facilitation but passive harm. Emotions predict behavioral tendencies more strongly than stereotypes do and usually mediate stereotype-to-behavioral-tendency links.
[15]
Cuddy A. J., Wolf E. B., Glick P., Crotty S., Chong J., & Norton M. I. (2015). Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(4), 622-635.
Four studies tested whether cultural values moderate the content of gender stereotypes, such that male stereotypes more closely align with core cultural values (specifically, individualism vs. collectivism) than do female stereotypes. In Studies 1 and 2, using different measures, Americans rated men as less collectivistic than women, whereas Koreans rated men as more collectivistic than women. In Study 3, bicultural Korean Americans who completed a survey in English about American targets rated men as less collectivistic than women, whereas those who completed the survey in Korean about Korean targets did not, demonstrating how cultural frames influence gender stereotype content. Study 4 established generalizability by reanalyzing Williams and Best's (1990) cross-national gender stereotype data across 26 nations. National individualism-collectivism scores predicted viewing collectivistic traits as more-and individualistic traits as less-stereotypically masculine. Taken together, these data offer support for the cultural moderation of gender stereotypes hypothesis, qualifying past conclusions about the universality of gender stereotype content.(c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
[16]
Dekhili S., & Achabou M A.(2015). The influence of the country-of-origin ecological image on ecolabelled product evaluation: An experimental approach to the case of the european ecolabel. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(1), 89-106.
[17]
Dragojevic M., Giles H., Goatley-Soan S., & Dayton Z. (2024). Americans' attitudes toward British accents: The role of social categorization, perceived group prototypicality, and processing fluency. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(2), 167-181.
[18]
Fan D. X., & Jia G. (2023). How do tourists respond to meta-stereotypes? Understanding their willingness to interact, self-presentation and the role of power. Tourism Management, 94, 104652.
[19]
Fiske S. T., Cuddy A. J. C., Glick P., & Xu J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902.
Stereotype research emphasizes systematic processes over seemingly arbitrary contents, but content also may prove systematic. On the basis of stereotypes' intergroup functions, the stereotype content model hypothesizes that (a) 2 primary dimensions are competence and warmth, (b) frequent mixed clusters combine high warmth with low competence (paternalistic) or high competence with low warmth (envious), and (c) distinct emotions (pity, envy, admiration, contempt) differentiate the 4 competence-warmth combinations. Stereotypically, (d) status predicts high competence, and competition predicts low warmth. Nine varied samples rated gender, ethnicity, race, class, age, and disability out-groups. Contrary to antipathy models, 2 dimensions mattered, and many stereotypes were mixed, either pitying (low competence, high warmth subordinates) or envying (high competence, low warmth competitors). Stereotypically, status predicted competence, and competition predicted low warmth.
[20]
Forbes C. E., Cox C. L., Schmader T., & Ryan L. (2012). Negative stereotype activation alters interaction between neural correlates of arousal, inhibition and cognitive control. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(7), 771-781.
Priming negative stereotypes of African Americans can bias perceptions toward novel Black targets, but less is known about how these perceptions ultimately arise. Examining how neural regions involved in arousal, inhibition and control covary when negative stereotypes are activated can provide insight into whether individuals attempt to downregulate biases. Using fMRI, White egalitarian-motivated participants were shown Black and White faces at fast (32 ms) or slow (525 ms) presentation speeds. To create a racially negative stereotypic context, participants listened to violent and misogynistic rap (VMR) in the background. No music (NM) and death metal (DM) were used as control conditions in separate blocks. Fast exposure of Black faces elicited amygdala activation in the NM and VMR conditions (but not DM), that also negatively covaried with activation in prefrontal regions. Only in VMR, however, did amygdala activation for Black faces persist during slow exposure and positively covary with activation in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex while negatively covarying with activation in orbitofrontal cortex. Findings suggest that contexts that prime negative racial stereotypes seem to hinder the downregulation of amygdala activation that typically occurs when egalitarian perceivers are exposed to Black faces.
[21]
Gaunt R. (2011). Effects of intergroup conflict and social contact on prejudice: The mediating role of stereotypes and evaluations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 1340-1355.
[22]
Halkias G., Davvetas V., & Diamantopoulos A. (2016). The interplay between country stereotypes and perceived brand globalness/localness as drivers of brand preference. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3621-3628.
[23]
Herz M. F., & Diamantopoulos A. (2013). Activation of country stereotypes: Automaticity, consonance, and impact. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(4), 400-417.
[24]
Hilton J. L., & von Hippel W. (1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(250), 237-271.
[25]
Hewstone M., & Hamberger J. (2000). Perceived variability and stereotype change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(2), 103-124.
[26]
Huntsinger J. (2013). Affective incoherence reduces reliance on activated stereotypes. Social Cognition, 31(3), 405-416
[27]
Hutchison J., Cunningham S. J., Slessor G., Urquhart J., Smith K., & Martin D. (2018). Context and perceptual salience influence the formation of novel stereotypes via cumulative cultural evolution. Cognitive Science, 42(1), 186-212.
[28]
Kim H. S., & Drolet A. (2003). Choice and self-expression: A Cultural analysis of variety-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 373-382.
Three studies examined whether the tendency to seek variety in choices depends in part on cultural assumptions of choice and uniqueness. Study 1 showed that people from different cultures where different assumptions of choice and uniqueness dominate show different levels of variety in their choice rule use. Study 2 primed participants with magazine ads highlighting different representations of uniqueness dominant in individualist versus collectivist cultures to show the influence of cultural meanings of uniqueness on the variety-seeking tendency. Study 3 manipulated the motivation to display variety to demonstrate that variety-seeking in the United States partly hinges on cultural meanings of choice as self-expression. Variety-seeking in choice rule use was eliminated when participants had the chance to self-express through choice listing. The research illustrates the role of cultural assumptions in the variety-seeking tendency.
[29]
Li F., & Ma J. (2023), The effectiveness of the destination logo: Congruity effect between logo typeface and destination stereotypes. Tourism Management, 98, 104772.
[30]
Liu S. S., & Johnson K. F. (2005). The automatic country-of origin effects on brand judgments. Journal of Advertising, 34 (1), 87-97.
[31]
Iyengar S. S., & Lepper M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349-366.
Conventional wisdom and decades of psychological research have linked the provision of choice to increased levels of intrinsic motivation, greater persistence, better performance, and higher satisfaction. This investigation examined the relevance and limitations of these findings for cultures in which individuals possess more interdependent models of the self. In 2 studies, personal choice generally enhanced motivation more for American independent selves than for Asian interdependent selves. In addition, Anglo American children showed less intrinsic motivation when choices were made for them by others than when they made their own choices, whether the others were authority figures or peers. In contrast, Asian American children proved most intrinsically motivated when choices were made for them by trusted authority figures or peers. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
[32]
Ma D. S., Correll J., & Wittenbrink B. (2018). The effects of category and physical features on stereotyping and evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 42-50.
[33]
Madon S., Guyll M., Aboufadel K., Montiel E., Smith A., & Palumbo P. (2001). Ethnic and national stereotypes: The princeton trilogy revisited and revised. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 996-1010.
Three studies assessed changes in the content, consensus, and favorableness of 10 ethnic and national stereotypes by replicating and extending the Princeton trilogy. Results indicated that throughout the past 60 years, almost all of the ethnic and national stereotypes that were examined had changed in content, and more than half had changed in consensus. Most changes in consensus reflected increases rather than decreases, suggesting that modern members of stereotyped groups may confront stereotypes more frequently than did previous members of stereotyped groups. However, the damaging effects that consensual stereotypes can have on members of these groups may be tempered by the finding that most of the stereotypes became more favorable. These results are discussed in terms of changing social roles, intergroup contact, and stereotype accuracy.
[34]
Maher A. A., & Carter L. L. (2013). The affective and cognitive components of country image. International Marketing Review, 28(6), 559-580.
The purpose of this paper is to utilize the BIAS map from the social psychology literature to operationalize and simultaneously examine the effects of the affective and cognitive components of country image.
[35]
Martin B. A. S., Lee M. S. W., & Lacey C. (2011). Countering negative country of origin effects using imagery processing. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(2), 80-92.
[36]
Mccrae R. R., Chan W., Jussim L., Fruyt F. D., Löckenhoff C. E., & De Bolle M. (2013). The inaccuracy of national character stereotypes. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 831-842.
[37]
Macrae C. N., & Bodenhausen G. V. (2001). Social cognition: Categorical person perception. British Journal of Psychology, 92(1), 239-255.
In attempting to make sense of others, perceivers regularly construct and use categorical representations (e.g. stereotypes) to streamline the person perception process. A debate that has dominated recent theorizing about the nature and function of these representations concerns the conditions under which they are activated in everyday life. The present article reviews this work and considers the automaticity of category activation in person perception.
[38]
Mercer J. (2018). Reputation and international politics. Cornell University Press.
[39]
Min B. K., Cho K., Sung J., & Cho E. (2014). Neurophysiological evidence for the country-of-origin effect: An event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 25(4), 274-278.
[40]
Richards Z., & Hewstone M. (2001). Subtyping and subgrouping: Processes for the prevention and promotion of stereotype change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1), 52-73.
Two processes of stereotyping, subtyping and subgrouping, are compared. Subtyping occurs when perceivers respond to members of a target group who disconfirm their stereotypes by seeing them as exceptions to the rule and placing them in a separate subcategory apart from members who confirm the stereotype. The more recently defined process of subgrouping refers to the perceiver's organization of information in terms of clusters of individuals based on their similarities and differences; subgroups can include confirmers and disconfirmers. We consider how subtypes and subgroups are defined, operationalized, and measured, their consequences for stereotype change, and the role of typicality. It is concluded that the clearest difference between subtyping and subgrouping is in terms of their consequences (subtyping leads to the preservation and subgrouping to differentiation of the stereotype). There are, however, some similarities between the processes, and attention is drawn to whatfuture research is required, both to deepen our knowledge of each process and clarify their distinction.
[41]
Rudman L. A., & Fairchild K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 157-176.
Social and economic sanctions for counterstereotypical behavior have been termed the backlash effect. The authors present a model of the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance from the standpoint of both perceivers and actors. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants lost a competition to either atypical or typical men or women and subsequently showed greater tendency to sabotage deviants. Moreover, undermining deviants was associated with increased self-esteem, suggesting that backlash rewards perceivers psychologically. Experiment 3 showed that gender deviants who feared backlash resorted to strategies designed to avoid it (e.g., hiding, deception, and gender conformity). Further, perceivers who sabotaged deviants (Experiment 2) or deviants who hid their atypicality (Experiment 3) estimated greater stereotyping on the part of future perceivers, in support of the model's presumed role for backlash in stereotype maintenance. The implications of the findings for cultural stereotypes are discussed.
[42]
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism:New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85-117). Sage.
[43]
Taylor S. E. (1981). A categorization approach to stereotyping. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp.83-114). Erlbaum.
[44]
Tse S., & Tung V. W. S. (2022). Understanding residents' attitudes towards tourists: connecting stereotypes, emotions and behaviours. Tourism Management, 89, 104435.
[45]
Verlegh P. W. J., & Steenkamp J. B. E. M. (1999). A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5), 521-546.
[46]
Visbal O., Herrera-Mendoza K., Orozco-Acosta E., & Herzberg M. (2017). The influence of country of origin cues on product evaluation: Evidence from Swiss and German consumers. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 12(2), 18-25.
[47]
Wan C., Chiu C., Tam K., Lee S., Lau I. Y., & Peng S. (2007). Perceived cultural importance and actual self-importance of values in cultural identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 337-354.
[48]
Yoo J., Swann W. B., & Kim K. (2014). The influence of identity fusion on patriotic consumption: A cross-cultural comparison of Korea and the U. S. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 25(5), 81-104.
PDF(339 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/