The Joint Effect of FOP Nutrition Labels and Social Class on Consumers' Healthy Food Purchase Intention

Tang Yifan, Fan Xiucheng, Li Han

Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 714-723.

PDF(1967 KB)
PDF(1967 KB)
Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 714-723. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260319
Social, Personality & Organizational Psychology

The Joint Effect of FOP Nutrition Labels and Social Class on Consumers' Healthy Food Purchase Intention

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Chronic health problems have gradually replaced hunger as the main obstacle to China's sustainable high-speed development, causing considerable economic and social losses. Therefore, the government has begun to adopt front of package (FOP) nutrition labels to promote healthy eating among Chinese residents. However, there are two types of FOP nutrition labels: evaluative and objective nutrition labels. And in some cases, consumers are more willing to purchase healthy foods labeled with evaluative nutrition labels, and in other cases, they prefer to purchase healthy foods with objective nutrition labels. It can be seen that the impact of FOP nutrition labels on consumers' healthy foods purchase intention may vary in different situations.

However, previous studies have not reached a consensus on how FOP nutrition labels affect consumers' purchases of healthy foods. Although most studies have found that consumers prefer healthy foods with evaluative nutrition labels to objective nutrition labels, some studies have come to the opposite conclusion, suggesting that objective nutrition labels are more effective in promoting consumers’ purchases of healthy foods. Some studies have also suggested that the impact of FOP nutrition labels on consumers' purchase of healthy food depends on other factors (e.g., processing context and relationship norm). However, the vast majority of these studies are based on the differences in the interpretability or ease of understanding of nutrition information between two types of FOP nutrition labels. Whether consumers are given the space to process nutrition information according to their own health needs is also an important difference between evaluative nutrition labels and objective nutrition labels. Yet, there are few studies exploring this research question from this perspective. Therefore, according to the utility theory, the current research introduces individual social class, explores the joint effect of FOP nutrition labels and social class on consumers' healthy food purchase intention, and reveals the underlying mechanism and theoretical boundary of this joint effect.

This study tested the research hypothesis through three experiments. Experiment 1 verified the joint effect of FOP nutrition labels and social class on the healthy food purchase intention by measuring social classes. That is, consumers from high (low) social classes are more willing to purchase healthy food labeled with objective (evaluative) nutrition labels. Experiment 2 again verified the joint effect of FOP nutrition labels and social class by manipulating individual social class, and examined the mediating role of nutrition information utility in this joint effect. Namely, the match between FOP nutrition labels and social class (high social class - objective nutrition label and low social class - subjective nutrition label) can lead to a higher nutrition information utility, which in turn will increase purchase intention of healthy food. Experiment 3 further examined the negative moderating effect of food health level on this joint effect. That is, as the level of food health increases, the joint effect of FOP nutrition labeling and social class on the healthy food purchase intention gradually weakens, suggesting that food health is also a boundary condition of the joint effect.

This study has several theoretical contributions and practical significance. First, this study introduces individual social class as a joint variable and proposes for the first time the joint effect of FOP nutrition labels and social class on consumers' healthy food purchase intention. This enriches and develops the literature on nutrition labels and health consumption. Second, this study further reveals the mediating and moderating effects of nutritional information utility and food health level on this combined effect, expanding the application scope of the utility theory. In practice, this study provides policy recommendations for the government to promote the development strategy of the Healthy China, as well as promotion strategies for health food producers and operators to sell their products.

Key words

front of package (FOP) nutrition labels / social class / healthy food / healthy consumption / nutrition information utility

Cite this article

Download Citations
Tang Yifan , Fan Xiucheng , Li Han. The Joint Effect of FOP Nutrition Labels and Social Class on Consumers' Healthy Food Purchase Intention[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2026, 49(3): 714-723 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260319

References

[1]
韩冰, 王良燕, 余明阳. (2018). 社会阶层与品牌危机类型对品牌评价及购买意愿的影响探究. 管理评论, 30(2), 212-221.
[2]
胡小勇, 李静, 芦学璋, 郭永玉. (2014). 社会阶层的心理学研究:社会认知视角. 心理科学, 37(6), 1509-1517.
[3]
黄帆, 柏忠虎, 裴梦媛, 青平. (2023). 食品拟人化包装与包装正面营养标签类型的交互对消费者购买意愿的影响. 珞珈管理评论, 6, 132-149.
[4]
李涵, 唐一凡, 青平. (2024). 营养标签标注对消费者健康食品购买意愿的影响——基于能力感知与温暖感知的中介作用. 南开管理评论, 27(4), 41-52.
[5]
全球食物经济与政策研究院. (2022). 中国与全球食物政策报告. 中国农业大学.
[6]
孙庆洲, 黄靖茹, 虞晓芬, 高倾德. (2023). 授人以鱼还是授人以渔?高、低社会阶层的捐助行为差异. 心理学报, 55(10), 1677-1699.
[7]
夏佳钰, 樊胜根, 丁心悦, 陈志钢, 冯晓龙, 孟婷, 张玉梅. (2023). 中国可持续健康膳食发展思考. 中国工程科学, 25(4), 120-127.
[8]
张仪, 王永贵. (2022). 服务机器人拟人化对消费者使用意愿的影响机理研究——社会阶层的调节作用. 外国经济与管理, 44(3), 3-18.
[9]
Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586-592.
[10]
Berry, C., Burton, S., Howlett, E., & Newman, C. L. (2019). Understanding the calorie labeling paradox in chain restaurants: Why menu calorie labeling alone may not affect average calories ordered. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 38(2), 192-213.
[11]
Blitstein, J. L., Guthrie, J. F., & Rains, C. (2020). Low-income parents' use of front-of-package nutrition labels in a virtual supermarket. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 52(9), 850-858.
[12]
Carey, R. M., & Markus, H. R. (2016). Understanding consumer psychology in working-class contexts. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 568-582.
[13]
Chen, J., Teng, L., & Liao, Y. (2018). Counterfeit luxuries: Does moral reasoning strategy influence consumers' pursuit of counterfeits? Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 249-264.
[14]
Deliza, R., de Alcantara, M., Pereira, R., & Ares, G. (2020). How do different warning signs compare with the guideline daily amount and traffic-light system? Food Quality and Preference, 80, 103821.
[15]
Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(3), 436-449.
[16]
Elshiewy, O., & Boztug, Y. (2018). When back of pack meets front of pack: How salient and simplified nutrition labels affect food sales in supermarkets. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 37(1), 55-67.
[17]
Eom, K., Kim, H. S., & Sherman, D. K. (2018). Social class, control, and action: Socioeconomic status differences in antecedents of support for pro-environmental action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 60-75.
[18]
Grossmann, I., & Huynh, A. C. (2013). Where is the culture in social class? Psychological Inquiry, 24(2), 112-119.
[19]
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
[20]
Hodges, B. T., & Chen, H. (2022). In the eye of the beholder: The interplay of numeracy and fluency in consumer response to 99-ending prices. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(6), 1050-1072.
[21]
Holtrop, N., Cleeren, K., Geyskens, K., & Verhoef, P. C. (2025). The impact of nutrition claims on purchase behavior for food products. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 42(3), 788-808.
[22]
Jiang, H., Wang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025). A well-visualized effect: How nutritional content-equivalent labels influence healthfulness perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 188, 115113.
[23]
Kim, H. Y., & Mcgill, A. L. (2018). Minions for the rich? Financial status changes how consumers see products with anthropomorphic features. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), 429-450.
[24]
Kim, J. W., Lim, C., & Falci, C. (2020). Subjective social class, perceived quality of social relationships, and happiness: A case of mediation and moderation across gender. International Sociology, 35(3), 312-335.
[25]
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Mendoza-Denton, R. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546-572.
[26]
Lim, J. H., Rishika, R., Janakiraman, R., & Kannan, P. K. (2020). Competitive effects of front-of-package nutrition labeling adoption on nutritional quality: Evidence from facts up front-style labels. Journal of Marketing, 84(6), 3-21.
[27]
Ma, Z., Yang, Z., & Mourali, M. (2014). Consumer adoption of new products: Independent versus interdependent self-perspectives. Journal of Marketing, 78(2), 101-117.
[28]
Maubach, N., Hoek, J., & Mather, D. (2014). Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations. Appetite, 82, 67-77.
[29]
Mazzù M. F., He, J., & Baccelloni, A. (2024). Unveiling the impact of front-of-pack nutritional labels in conflicting nutrition information: A congruity perspective on olive oil. Food Quality and Preference, 118, 105202.
[30]
Newman, C. L., Howlett, E., & Burton, S. (2016). Effects of objective and evaluative front-of-package cues on food evaluation and choice: The moderating influence of comparative and noncomparative processing contexts. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 749-766.
[31]
Phlips, L., & Pieraerts, P. (1979). Substitution vs. addiction in the true index of real wages. American Economic Review, 69(5), 977.
[32]
Roseman, M. G., Joung, H. W., & Littlejohn, E. I. (2018). Attitude and behavior factors associated with front-of-package label use with label users making accurate product nutrition assessments. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 118(5), 904-912.
[33]
Rramani, Q., Krajbich, I., Enax, L., Brustkern, L., & Weber, B. (2020). Salient nutrition labels shift peoples' attention to healthy foods and exert more influence on their choices. Nutrition Research, 80, 106-116.
[34]
Schruff-Lim, E. M., Van Loo, E. J., van der Lans, I. A., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2024). Impact of food swap recommendations on dietary choices in an online supermarket: A randomized controlled trial. Appetite, 194, 107158.
[35]
Scully, M., Morley, B., Wakefield, M., & Dixon, H. (2020). Can point-of-sale nutrition information and health warnings encourage reduced preference for sugary drinks? An experimental study. Appetite, 149, 104612.
[36]
Staples, A. J. (2025). Consumer perceptions of nutrition labeling on alcoholic beverages. Food Quality and Preference, 133, 105644.
[37]
Stephens, N. M., Cameron, J. S., & Townsend, S. S. M. (2014). Lower social class does not (always) mean greater interdependence: Women in poverty have fewer social resources than working-class women. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(7), 1061-1073.
[38]
Talati, Z., Pettigrew, S., Hughes, C., Dixon, H., Kelly, B., Ball, K., & Miller, C. (2016). The combined effect of front-of-pack nutrition labels and health claims on consumers' evaluation of food products. Food Quality and Preference, 53, 57-65.
[39]
Tórtora, G., Machín, L., & Ares, G. (2019). Influence of nutritional warnings and other label features on consumers' choice: Results from an eye-tracking study. Food Research International, 119, 605-611.
[40]
Trautmann, S. T., van de Kuilen, G., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2013). Social class and (un)ethical behavior: A framework, with evidence from a large population sample. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 487-497.
[41]
Van Doesum, N. J., Tybur, J. M., & Van, Lange, Van Lange, P. A. M. (2017). Class impressions: Higher social class elicits lower prosociality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 11-20.
[42]
Van Herpen, E., & Van Trijp, H. (2011). Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints. Appetite, 57, 148-160.
[43]
Yan, L., Keh, H. T., & Chen, J. (2021). Assimilating and differentiating: The curvilinear effect of social class on green consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(6), 914-936.
[44]
Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.
PDF(1967 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/