Cognitive Assessment and Restructuring: A Collaborative Multi-Agent Reasoning Framework for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Chen Shihong, Li Yunong, Du Lanqing

Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4) : 797-808.

PDF(1869 KB)
PDF(1869 KB)
Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4) : 797-808. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260403

Cognitive Assessment and Restructuring: A Collaborative Multi-Agent Reasoning Framework for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Mental health issues not only affect individuals’ quality of life and social functioning, but also pose broader risks to social well-being. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), a widely used approach in mental healthcare, focuses on cognitive restructuring—modifying emotional and behavioral responses by identifying, challenging, and transforming negative or distorted automatic thoughts. Although CBT has demonstrated substantial effectiveness in clinical settings, its widespread implementation remains constrained by resource scarcity, high costs, and limited therapist availability. With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), AI-powered CBT-style support systems offer a promising wang to deliver scalable, low-cost psychological support.

This study proposes a novel CBT-CoT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with Chain-of-Thought reasoning) framework, which combines CBT’s structured psychological reasoning process with a multi-agent architecture driven by large language models (LLMs). The framework is organized into two key stages—cognitive assessment and cognitive restructuring—and implemented through four collaborative and functionally distinct specialized agents.

In the cognitive assessment stage, the Automatic Thought Extraction Agent structurally decomposes the user’s message into a standardized three-column record comprising the precipitating event, the associated automatic thoughts, and the resulting emotional and behavioral responses. The Automatic Thought Evaluation Agent then analyzes these automatic thoughts by examining whether they are facts or interpretations, their belief intensity, and the types of cognitive distortions, and determines whether the conversation should proceed to the next stage of structured reasoning.

If restructuring is required, the CoT Reasoning Agent matches appropriate cognitive restructuring techniques and generates alternative rational thoughts by employing reasoning pathways such as hypothesis verification and evidence analysis. This agent outputs a structured five-column record aligned with standard CBT practice. Finally, the Response Generation Agent integrates the five-column record and the selected restructuring strategy to produce a personalized, empathetic, and cognitively supportive response tailored to the user’s concern.

Building on the methodology of PsyQA, we constructed a new large-scale Chinese psychological question-answering dataset comprising over 20,000 question-answer pairs across nine key domains, including interpersonal relationships, emotional adjustment, academic stress, personal growth, and others. The CBT-CoT system adopts a modular architecture, in which the four agents cooperate to complete a full-cycle CBT process—from the extraction and evaluation of automatic thoughts to the generation of supportive language based on structured reasoning.

To identify the most suitable base model for CBT-CoT, we evaluated three state-of-the-art Chinese LLMs: DeepSeek-Chat, Qwen-Plus, and Doubao-1.5-pro. DeepSeek-Chat consistently outperformed the other models in both reasoning quality and response fluency, and was selected as the base model for all four agents in the CBT-CoT framework.

Evaluation was conducted using both automated and manual methods. An ensemble of three large language models served as automated evaluators, while trained annotators performed human evaluations on a stratified sample. The results showed that CBT-CoT significantly outperformed baseline methods across six dimensions of psychological support: empathy expression, cognitive restructuring effectiveness, depth of reasoning, appropriateness of strategy, logical coherence, and degree of personalization. The total scores of human evaluation and LLM-based automatic scoring across the six dimensions were 17.18 and 17.48, respectively, with an absolute difference of only 0.30 points. In comparison with human-written responses (total score: 7.97), the CBT-CoT system (total score: 17.48) consistently generated more structured, coherent, and therapeutically oriented replies.

In summary, the CBT-CoT framework operationalizes the core cognitive restructuring flow commonly emphasized in CBT practice through multi-agent collaboration. By dividing the process into cognitive assessment and restructuring stages, and by explicitly modeling the chain-of-thought reasoning path, the system provides structured, explainable, and supportive responses. The framework demonstrates robust generalizability across diverse psychological topics and user intents. Future research may further optimize the CBT-CoT framework to improve its accuracy and adaptability in addressing complex psychological issues, while ensuring the integration of ethical safeguards into real-world deployment scenarios.

Key words

cognitive behavioral therapy / multi-agent system / psychological counseling / chain of thought

Cite this article

Download Citations
Chen Shihong , Li Yunong , Du Lanqing. Cognitive Assessment and Restructuring: A Collaborative Multi-Agent Reasoning Framework for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2026, 49(4): 797-808 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20260403

References

[1]
陈启, 刘德喜, 张丽园, 万齐智, 刘喜平, 赵芸. (2025). 人工经验+LLMs智能: 基于支持策略规划的心理健康支持生成框架. 中文信息学报, 39(1), 153-166.
心理健康支持旨在帮助求助者应对心理健康问题。使用大语言模型(Large Language Models,LLMs)生成心理健康支持回复,有助于减轻心理咨询师的负担,提高心理健康支持的效率。尽管近期关于思维链(Chain-of-Thought, CoT) Prompting 的研究旨在指导LLMs自动规划活动,取得了一定的成功,但这些研究没有对以往的经验进行提炼,导致LLMs生成的内容缺乏针对性和共情性,在心理健康支持场景下,这一问题尤为突出。为解决这个问题,该文定义了一种基于支持策略规划的心理健康支持生成框架S2P-MSG。该框架利用小语言模型(Small Language Models,SLMs)学习心理咨询师回复中支持策略规划的“人工经验”,生成多条动态策略链;使用Prompting方法引导LLMs选择最恰当的动态策略链,激发LLMs“智能”;并基于选中的动态策略链引导LLMs生成心理健康支持回复。该文在广泛使用的PsyQA数据集上进行了丰富的实验。实验结果表明,与SLMs模型及常见的Prompting方法相比,S2P-MSG框架生成的回复具有更高的相关性、帮助性和共情性。实验还发现,在应对心理健康风险水平较高和自我披露程度较高的求助帖时,S2P-MSG框架展现出了更为优异的性能。
[2]
谭嘉莉, 何钰, 吴燕晶, 孙广中. (2018). 应用于校园心理咨询的对话匹配度预测模型. 中国科学技术大学学报, 48(9), 739-747.
[3]
Alhaj, F., Al-Haj, A., Sharieh, A., & Jabri, R. (2022). Improving Arabic cognitive distortion classification in twitter using BERTopic. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13(1), 854-860.
[4]
Andersson, G., & Cuijpers, P. (2009). Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: A meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(4), 196-205.
Computerized and, more recently, Internet-based treatments for depression have been developed and tested in controlled trials. The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize the effects of these treatments and investigate characteristics of studies that may be related to the effects. In particular, the authors were interested in the role of personal support when completing a computerized treatment. Following a literature search and coding, the authors included 12 studies, with a total of 2446 participants. Ten of the 12 studies were delivered via the Internet. The mean effect size of the 15 comparisons between Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments vs. control groups at posttest was d = 0.41 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.54). However, this estimate was moderated by a significant difference between supported (d = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.45-0.77) and unsupported (d = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.14-0.35) treatments. The authors conclude that although more studies are needed, Internet and other computerized treatments hold promise as potentially evidence-based treatments of depression.
[5]
Beatty, C., Malik, T., Meheli, S., & Sinha, C. (2022). Evaluating the therapeutic alliance with a free-text CBT conversational agent (Wysa): A mixed-methods study. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, Article 847991.
[6]
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders (pp.356). International Universities Press.
[7]
Chen, Q., & Liu, D. X. (2025). MADP: Multi-agent deductive planning for enhanced cognitive-behavioral mental health question answer. arXiv.
[8]
Clark, D., A. (2014). Cognitive restructuring. In S. G. Hofmann, D. J. A. Dozois, W. Rief, & J. A. J. Smits (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of cognitive behavioral therapy (pp.23-44). Wiley Blackwell.
[9]
Clark, G. I., & Egan, S. J. (2015). The Socratic method in cognitive behavioural therapy: A narrative review. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39(6), 863-879.
[10]
Gkotsis, G., Oellrich, A., Velupillai, S., Liakata, M., Hubbard, T., J. P., Dobson, R. J. B., & Dutta, R. (2017). Characterisation of mental health conditions in social media using Informed Deep Learning. Scientific Reports, 7(1), Article 45141.
[11]
Khare, S. K., Blanes-Vidal, V., Nadimi, E. S., & Acharya, U. R. (2024). Emotion recognition and artificial intelligence: A systematic review (2014-2023) and research recommendations. Information Fusion, 102, Article 102019.
[12]
Kozłowski, M., Gabor-Siatkowska, K., Stefaniak, I., Sowański, M., & Janicki, A. (2023). Enhanced emotion and sentiment recognition for empathetic dialogue system using big data and deep learning methods. In J. Mikyška, C. De Mulatier, M. Paszynski, V. V. Krzhizhanovskaya, J. J. Dongarra, & P. M. A. Sloot (Eds.), 23rd International conference computational science - ICCS 2023 (pp. 465-480). Springer.
[13]
Lee, Y., Park, S., Cho, K., & Bak, J. (2024). MentalAgora: A gateway to advanced personalized care in mental health through multi-agent debating and attribute control. arXiv.
[14]
Liu, S. Y., Zheng, C. J., Demasi, O., Sabour, S., Li, Y., Yu, Z., & Huang, M. L. (2021). Towards emotional support dialog systems. In Proceedings of the 59th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics and the 11th international joint conference on natural language processing (pp.3469-3483). Association for Computational Linguistics.
[15]
Na, H. B. (2024). CBT-LLM: A Chinese large language model for cognitive behavioral therapy-based mental health question answering. In Proceedings of the 2024 joint international conference on computational linguistics, language resources and evaluation (pp.2930-2940). ELRA and ICCL.
[16]
Park, J. S., O’Brien, J., Cai, C. J., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., & Bernstein, M. S. (2023). Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. In Proceedings of the 36th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (pp. 1-22). ACM.
[17]
Prochaska, J. J., Vogel, E. A., Chieng, A., Kendra, M., Baiocchi, M., Pajarito, S., & Robinson, A. (2021). A therapeutic relational agent for reducing problematic substance use (Woebot): Development and usability study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3), Article e24850.
[18]
Schwartz, H. A., Eichstaedt, J., Kern, M. L., Park, G., Sap, M., Stillwell, D., & Ungar, L. (2014). Towards assessing changes in degree of depression through Facebook. In Proceedings of the workshop on computational linguistics and clinical psychology: From linguistic signal to clinical reality (pp.118-125). Association for Computational Linguistics.
[19]
Selmi, P. M., Klein, M. H., Greist, J. H., Sorrell, S. P., & Erdman, H. P. (1990). Computer-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 147(1), 51-56.
[20]
Sharma, A., Rushton, K., Lin, I., Wadden, D., Lucas, K., Miner, A., & Althoff, T. (2023). Cognitive reframing of negative thoughts through human-language model interaction. In Proceedings of the 61st annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics(pp.9977-10000). Association for Computational Linguistics.
[21]
Spence, S. H., Donovan, C. L., March, S., Gamble, A., Anderson, R. E., Prosser, S., & Kenardy, J. (2011). A randomized controlled trial of online versus clinic-based CBT for adolescent anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(5), 629-642.
The study examined the relative efficacy of online (NET) versus clinic (CLIN) delivery of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) in the treatment of anxiety disorders in adolescents.Participants included 115 clinically anxious adolescents aged 12 to 18 years and their parent(s). Adolescents were randomly assigned to NET, CLIN, or wait list control (WLC) conditions. The treatment groups received equivalent CBT content. Clinical diagnostic interviews and questionnaire assessments were completed 12 weeks after baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups.Assessment at 12 weeks post-baseline showed significantly greater reductions in anxiety diagnoses and anxiety symptoms for both NET and CLIN conditions compared with the WLC. These improvements were maintained or further enhanced for both conditions, with minimal differences between them, at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Seventy-eight percent of adolescents in the NET group (completer sample) no longer met criteria for the principal anxiety diagnosis at 12-month follow-up compared with 80.6% in the CLIN group. Ratings of treatment credibility from both parents and adolescents were high for NET and equivalent to CLIN. Satisfaction ratings by adolescents were equivalent for NET and CLIN conditions, whereas parents indicated slightly higher satisfaction ratings for the CLIN format.Online delivery of CBT, with minimal therapist support, is equally efficacious as clinic-based, face-to-face therapy in the treatment of anxiety disorders among adolescents. This approach offers a credible alternative to clinic-based therapy, with benefits of reduced therapist time and greater accessibility for families who have difficulty accessing clinic-based CBT.
[22]
Sun, H., Lin, Z., Zheng, C., Liu, S., & Huang, M. (2021). PsyQA: A Chinese dataset for generating long counseling text for mental health support. Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021 (pp. 1489-1503). Association for Computational Linguistics.
[23]
Wei, J., Wang, X. Z., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., & Zhou, D. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. In Proceedings of the 36th International conference on neural information processing systems (pp.24824-24837). Curran Associates Inc.
[24]
Xi, Z. H., Chen, W. X., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y. W., Hong, B. Y., & Gui, T. (2023). The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey. arXiv.
[25]
Xiao, M. X., Xie, Q. Q., Kuang, Z. Y., Liu, Z. C., Yang, K. L., Peng, M., & Huang, J. M. (2024). HealMe: Harnessing cognitive reframing in large language models for psychotherapy. In Proceedings of the 62nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp.1707-1725). Association for Computational Linguistics.
[26]
Xu, A. C., Yang, D., Li, R. H., Zhu, J. W., Tan, M. H., Yang, M., & Xu, R. F. (2025). AutoCBT: An autonomous multi-agent framework for cognitive behavioral therapy in psychological counseling. arXiv.
[27]
Yang, K. L., Ji, S. X., Zhang, T. L., Xie, Q. Q., Kuang, Z. Y., & Ananiadou, S. (2023). Towards interpretable mental health analysis with large language models. In Proceedings of the 2023 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (pp.6056-6077). Association for Computational Linguistics.
[28]
Yang, Q. S., Wang, Z. K., Chen, H. H., Wang, S. Z., Pu, Y. F., Gao, X., & Huang, G. (2024). PsychoGAT: A novel psychological measurement paradigm through interactive fiction games with LLM agents. In Proceedings of the 62nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics(pp. 14470-14505). Association for Computational Linguistics.
[29]
Yao, B. W., Shi, C., Zou, L. K., Dai, L. F., Wu, M. Y., Chen, L., & Yu, K. (2022). D4:A Chinese dialogue dataset for depression-diagnosis-oriented chat. In Proceedings of the 2022 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (pp. 2438-2459). Association for Computational Linguistics.
[30]
Yip, W. L. T., Yang, Y., Wang, Z. L., & Stuckler, D. (2025). Effectiveness of AI-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy interventions for anxiety and depressive symptoms: A systematic review. Research Square Preprint.
[31]
Zhang, H., W., Chen, Y., Wang, M., & Feng, S. (2024a). FEEL: A framework for evaluating emotional support capability with large language models. In D.-S. Huang, W. Chen, & Q. H. Zhang (Eds.), 20th international conference on advanced intelligent computing technology and applications (pp. 96-107). Springer.
[32]
Zhang, T. G., Zhang, X. J., Zhao, J. M., Zhou, L., & Jin, Q. (2024b). ESCoT: Towards interpretable emotional support dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 62nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 13395-13412). Association for Computational Linguistics.
PDF(1869 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/