PDF(1171 KB)
The Effects of Consumer Self-Construal on China-Chic Consumption
Li Bin, Huo Yingxin, Wei Haiying
Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4) : 946-959.
PDF(1171 KB)
PDF(1171 KB)
The Effects of Consumer Self-Construal on China-Chic Consumption
Chinese consumers have demonstrated significant interest in China-chic consumption, a recent phenomenon that blends traditional Chinese culture with modern fashion trends. While this trend reflects cultural confidence and drives new consumption growth, the underlying psychological mechanisms remain underexplored. To promote the development of China-chic, it is necessary to explore which types of consumers are engaging in this consumption and the underlying psychological mechanism driving them. Although past research has suggested that cultural identity can impact consumer choices, it remains unclear whether consumer characteristics, which are known to be crucial factors influencing consumption choices, also affect consumers’ preferences for China-chic consumption.
China-chic represents a fusion of Chinese traditional culture and fashion trends, offering both utilitarian and symbolic value. Previous studies have shown that consumers are motivated to engage in symbolic consumption based on their self-construal and expression needs, and derive satisfaction from brands that offer different symbolic values. Self-construal, which refers to how individuals perceive themselves in relation to others, is a key consumer characteristic that influences their consumption behaviors. Based on the meaning transfer model, we propose that individuals with interdependent self-construal prefer China-chic consumption more than those with independent self-construal because the symbolic significance of China-chic satisfies their needs. Therefore, this study aims to uncover the psychological mechanisms that drive China-chic consumption by examining how self-construal influences consumers' preferences in four studies (N = 736), with a focus on the mediating role of psychological ownership and the moderating effect of identity threat.
Study 1 employed experimental manipulation of self-construal to investigate its impact on consumers' preference for China-chic consumption. Studies 1a (N = 140) and 1b (N = 218) utilized a single-factor (self-construal) between-subjects design. Self-construal was activated through story priming, with narratives featuring a tennis player’s competition and a warrior selecting soldiers. Participants were then asked to complete a product selection task. Study 2 (N = 140) utilized a single-factor (self-construal) between-subjects design to further examine the mediating role of psychological ownership. Participants were primed with self-construal and then completed the purchase intention scale and psychological ownership scale. Study 3 (N = 238) examined the moderating role of identity threat, utilizing a 2 (self-construal: independent vs. interdependent) × 2 (identity threat: high vs. low) between-subjects design. After the self-construal priming task, participants were asked to select the best picture three times and were then informed of a weak or strong association with coolness based on the level of identity threat.
The primary findings of this study include: (1) Consumers with interdependent self-construal show a greater preference for China-chic consumption than those with independent self-construal. (2) Psychological ownership mediates the relation between self-construal and China-chic consumption intention. Specifically, consumers with interdependent self-construal are more likely to generate psychological ownership than those with independent self-construal, which in turn drives their China-chic consumption intention. (3) Identity threat moderates the relation between self-construal and China-chic consumption intention. Specifically, when identity threat is high, the consumption tendency of interdependent self-construal consumers is significantly higher than that of independent self-construal consumers. When identity threat is low, there is no significant difference in the consumption tendency between interdependent and independent self-construal consumers.
This study contributes to the literature by shedding light on the expression preferences of individuals with interdependent self-construal and expanding the research scope of self-construal in the context of China-chic consumption. The findings also uncover the mediating role of psychological ownership and the moderating effect of identity threat, providing a deeper understanding of the psychological mechanisms underlying China-chic consumption behavior. From a practical perspective, the research offers valuable marketing insights to companies in the China-chic industry. It suggests that brands can tailor their strategies to target different self-construal types and leverage psychological ownership to enhance consumer preferences. Future research could explore additional boundary conditions and extend the findings to other cultural contexts or product categories.
China-chic / self-construal / psychological ownership / identity threat / meaning transfer model
| [1] |
金晓彤, 姚凤, 徐尉, 赵太阳. (2020). 自我威胁情境消费者地位消费行为研究——基于内隐人格的调节作用. 南开管理评论, 23(6), 111-123.
|
| [2] |
李斌, 林佳錡, 李爱梅. (2024). 年金宣传类型与目标框架对商业年金购买的影响: 基于双通道心理账户的视角. 心理科学, 47(6), 1400-1409.
|
| [3] |
李斌, 芮建禧, 俞炜楠, 李爱梅, 叶茂林. (2025). 当设计遇见AI: 人工智能设计产品对消费者响应模式的影响. 心理学报, 57(11), 1914-1932.
随着人工智能(Artificial Intelligence, AI)技术的迅速发展, 利用AI设计产品与创新是未来一大趋势。文章基于刻板印象内容模型, 通过6个递进实验(N = 1418)探讨了设计来源(人类设计 vs. AI设计)与产品类型(怀旧产品 vs. 创新产品)对消费者响应模式(欣赏 vs. 厌恶)的影响、机制及边界条件。结果发现, 对于怀旧产品, 消费者更偏爱人类设计, 呈现AI厌恶; 对于创新产品, 消费者更偏爱AI设计, 呈现AI欣赏, 即出现了“人类设计−怀旧产品”、“AI设计−创新产品”的匹配效应。进一步分析发现, 加工流畅性在此匹配效应过程中起到中介作用; 同时温暖感知与能力感知是导致加工流畅性的关键。此外, AI−人类协同设计模式、AI拟人化特征及消费者自我建构类型均在其中起到了调节作用。文章不仅揭示了消费者对人工智能设计不同类型产品的赞赏或厌恶的响应模式及其深层机理, 同时亦为人工智能新时代下的AI+设计的战略规划及营销策略提供了参考。
|
| [4] |
李斌, 朱钦, 贺汝婉, 李爱梅, 卫海英. (2023). 死亡凸显对消费者体验性消费选择偏好的影响及其作用机制. 心理学报, 55(2), 301-317.
消费者的决策心理与购买行为会受到周边环境暴露的死亡信息的影响发生变化。本文从意义维持模型出发, 通过4个实验探讨了死亡凸显对消费者体验性消费选择偏好的影响及其作用机制。结果发现, 死亡凸显情境下消费者更倾向选择体验性消费。进一步分析发现, 死亡凸显通过降低消费者的生命意义感提高了其对体验性消费的选择偏好。同时, 社会支持对此间接效应起到了缓冲作用。研究结果初步揭示, 补偿生命意义感的缺失是死亡凸显增加体验性消费选择的潜在机制, 这也为新冠疫情背景下的消费者决策行为干预提供了一定参考。
|
| [5] |
李东进, 张成虎, 马明龙. (2016). 脱销情境下消费者会购买相似品吗——自我建构视角的分析. 南开管理评论, 19(3), 98-109, 122.
|
| [6] |
李倩倩, 范宁城. (2025). 适应还是补偿: 消费者自我威胁的修复策略研究. 南开管理评论, 28(5), 161-172, 208.
|
| [7] |
刘建新, 范秀成. (2020). 心之所有, 言予他人?心理所有权对消费者口碑推荐的影响研究. 南开管理评论, 23(1), 144-157.
|
| [8] |
聂春艳, 汪涛, 赵鹏, 崔楠. (2018). 解释框架对文化混搭产品评价的影响——比较焦点和解释策略的调节效应. 心理学报, 50(12), 1438-1448.
文化混搭产品因涉及到不同国家的文化符号的同时呈现, 可能导致母国文化的完整性与生命力受到威胁, 引发外国文化入侵母国文化的感知进而降低消费者的产品评价。本研究从文化混搭产品的营销传播视角出发, 基于前人的研究基础之上, 探讨了不同信息表述框架策略的采用会如何影响消费者的文化入侵感知进而影响他们对文化混搭产品的评价, 并重点探究了它可能存在的两个边界条件, 即消费者的比较焦点和企业的不同解释策略。两个实验的结果不仅再一次验证了前人所得出的研究结论, 即文化混搭产品采用“外国文化-母国文化”的框架策略时, 会使消费者产生外国文化改变了母国文化的感知, 导致消费者对产品的评价要显著低于采用“母国文化-外国文化”的框架策略, 其中感知文化入侵起着完全中介的作用。更重要的是, 深入揭示出上述的这种不同文化混搭框架效应只有在启动的是消费者的差异性聚焦以及企业采用的是属性解释策略时才存在, 而当启动的是消费者的相似性聚焦以及企业采用关系解释策略时, 这一效应将会消失。本研究不仅深入剖析出了引发消费者对文化混搭现象产生排斥性反应的内在机理, 拓展了前人研究结论的普适性, 也为企业的文化混搭产品的营销推广提供了有用的实践启示。
|
| [9] |
庞隽, 李梦琳. (2023). 惺惺相惜: 社会身份冲突对融合式文化混搭产品偏好的影响. 心理学报, 55(9), 1558-1572.
作者考察了社会身份冲突对融合式文化混搭产品偏好的影响以及该影响的心理机制和边界条件。通过6个实验, 作者发现社会身份冲突提升消费者对融合式文化混搭产品的偏好, 产品的自我验证功能在其中起中介作用。该效应受到购买目的和购买受益人的调节, 即社会身份冲突对融合式文化混搭产品偏好的提升作用在购买目的是获取产品的功能价值(而非象征价值)以及消费者为他人(而非自己)购买时减弱。这些研究发现拓展了文化混搭、社会身份冲突和自我验证的相关文献, 并为企业如何借助情境因素营销融合式文化混搭产品提供实践指导。
|
| [10] |
卫海英, 蒯玲, 李国城. (2025). “国潮”还是“国炒”——中国文化资源典型性对消费者国潮品牌态度的影响. 营销科学学报, 5(4), 63-80.
|
| [11] |
邢海燕. (2021). “国潮”与“真我”: 互联网时代青年群体的自我呈现. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 42(1), 126-134.
|
| [12] |
杨翩翩, 杨可, 易小力, 周志民. (2024). 国潮品牌塑造及作用机制研究. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 24(3), 130-145.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
Regulatory focus theory distinguishes between self-regulatory processes that focus on promotion and prevention strategies for goal pursuit. Five studies provide support for the hypothesis that these strategies differ for individuals with distinct self-construals. Specifically, individuals with a dominant independent self-construal were predicted to place more emphasis on promotion-focused information, and those with a dominant interdependent self-construal on prevention-focused information. Support for this hypothesis was obtained for participants who scored high versus low on the Self-Construal Scale, participants who were presented with an independent versus interdependent situation, and participants from a Western versus Eastern culture. The influence of interdependence on regulatory focus was observed in both importance ratings of information and affective responses consistent with promotion or prevention focus.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
The influence of celebrity spokespersons has largely been examined using source models from the communication literature that feature explicit persuasive messages. Alternatively, theorizing by offers a more comprehensive explanation based on meaning transfer. Our research elaborates McCracken's model by investigating a cognitive process underlying meaning transfer. Evaluative conditioning procedures are used as the tool to expose this process. To assess celebrity influence as it may operate in the marketplace, well‐known brands and well‐known celebrities are featured. The results support, at the individual level, McCracken's theoretical axiom concerning meaning transfer from celebrity affiliate to brand.
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Object ownership changes how people perceive objects and self through psychological ownership-the feeling that a thing is MINE. Psychological ownership usually tracks legal ownership, but the two can and do diverge. In this integrative review, I propose a dual-process model of psychological ownership. Antecedents of psychological ownership form self-object associations prompting an implicit inference of psychological ownership, which can then be accepted, corrected, or rejected by explicit judgments. The model explains cases where psychological ownership and legal ownership conflict and predicts psychological ownership felt in a variety of relationships between people and objects, including objects they legally own and use, objects they use but do not legally own, and objects they legally own but do not use.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
The authors find East Asians to be holistic, attending to the entire field and assigning causality to it, making relatively little use of categories and formal logic, and relying on "dialectical" reasoning, whereas Westerners are more analytic, paying attention primarily to the object and the categories to which it belongs and using rules, including formal logic, to understand its behavior. The 2 types of cognitive processes are embedded in different naive metaphysical systems and tacit epistemologies. The authors speculate that the origin of these differences is traceable to markedly different social systems. The theory and the evidence presented call into question long-held assumptions about basic cognitive processes and even about the appropriateness of the process-content distinction.
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
Following concepts introduced by Markus and Kitayama, this study describes the theoretical and empirical development of a scale to measure the strength of an individual's interdependent and independent self-construals. These two images of self are conceptualized as reflecting the emphasis on connectedness and relations often found in non-Western cultures (interdependent) and the separateness and uniqueness of the individual (independent) stressed in the West. It is argued that these two images of self can and do coexist in individuals and that they can be measured. A 24-item Self-Construal Scale measuring two dimensions of self-image is presented. The two distinct dimensions of the scale were supported in confirmatory factor analyses of two multiethnic samples of college students. The scale was found to have satisfactory reliability and validity. Its implications and potential applications are discussed.
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
The current research examines the conditions under which consumers demonstrate associative versus dissociative responses to identity-linked products as a consequence of a social identity threat. Across four studies, the authors test the notion that reactions to social identity threat may be moderated by self-construal by examining subcultural differences in ethnic background, priming self-construal, and investigating cross-national differences in cultural background. Those with more independent self-construals tend to avoid identity-linked products when that identity is threatened versus not threatened. Those with more interdependent self-construals, in contrast, demonstrate more positive preferences for identity-linked products when that aspect of social identity is threatened. These effects arise because, while independents are motivated to restore positive self-worth when a social identity is threatened, interdependents access a repertoire of social identities to fulfill belongingness needs when threatened.
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
In their review of the literature on stigmatized-identity cues, Chaney, Sanchez, and Maimon (2019-this issue) summarize evidence that stigmatized-identity threat and safety cues drive consumer behavior through their effects on consumers' inferences about the company's ideology and their consequential impact on feelings of belonging. The authors also identify various factors that moderate the relationship between these identity cues and consumers' belonging perceptions. In our commentary, we identify future research opportunities by: (a) encouraging efforts to broaden the proposed framework to account for stigmatized identities defined in terms of consumption activities, (b) highlighting concepts and relationships that may require re-examination or deeper understanding, and (c) proposing additional consumer behaviors that punish or reward companies that use stigmatized-identity threat and safety cues, respectively.
|
特此感谢胡敏琦在文章写作及数据收集过程中做出的贡献与帮助。
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |