参考文献
1：王墨耘、傅小兰（a）。因果力比较范式下对效力PC 理论的检验，心理学报，2004，36 (2) ：160—167;
2：王墨耘、傅小兰（b）。用不同外部表征方式集中呈现信息条件下的因果力判断，心理学报，2004，36 (3) ：298～306;
3：Anderson, J. R., & Sheu, C. F. (1995). Causal inferences as perceptual judgments. Memory & Cognition, 23: 510–524;
4：Buhner M.J, Cheng P.W. Clliford D.(2003). From covariation to causation : a test of the assumption of causal power. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory and Cognition , 29 : 1119～1140;
5：Cheng , P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation : a causal power theory. Psychological Review ,104 :367 - 405;
6：Glymour, C. (1998). Learning causes: Psychological explanations of causal explanation. Minds and Machines, 8, 39–60;
7：Greville,W.J., Buehner,M.J.(2010). Temporal Predictability Facilitates Causal Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General , 139 : 756–771;
8：Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology, 51: 334–384;
9：Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009). Theory-based causal induction. Psychological Review, 116: 661–716;
10：Jenkins, H., & Ward, W. (1965). Judgment of contingencies between responses and outcomes. Psychological Monographs, 7: 1–17;
11：Luhmann,C.C., Ahn,W.K. (2011). Expextations and Intrerpretations During Causal Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37: 568–587;
12：Liljeholm, M., Cheng, P.W. (2009). The influence of virtual sample size on confidence and causal-strength judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35: 157–172;
13：Lober, K., & Shanks, D. R. (2000). Is causal induction based on causal power? Critique of Cheng (1997). Psychological Review, 107, 195–212;
14：Lu, H., Yuille, A., Liljeholm, M., Cheng, P.W., & Holyoak, K.J. (2008). Bayesian generic priors for causal learning. Psychological Review. 115: 955–984;
15：Mandel D R , Lehman D R.(1998). Integration of contingency information in judgments of cause , covariation , and probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 127 :269–285;
16：Perales, J. C., & Shanks, D. R. (2007). Models of covariation-based causal judgment: A review and synthesis. Psychonomic Bulletiin & Review, 14:577–596;
17：White, P. A. (2003). Making causal judgments from the proportion of confirming instances: The pCI rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29: 710–727;
18：White, P. A. (2004). Causal judgement from contingency information: A systematic test of the pCI rule. Memory and Cognition, 32, 353–368;
19：White. (2009). Accounting for occurrences: An explanation for some novel tendencies in causal judgment from contingency information. Memory and Cognition, 37, 500–513;