胡林成,熊哲宏. (2008). 算术模块的行为与神经机制研究. 心理科学, 31(4), 1002–1004.
刘超,傅小兰.( 2004). 不同注意条件下大数与小数的加工差异. 心理学报, 36(3), 307–314.
Allen H Wolach , Maureen A McHale &Alina Tarlea .(2004). Numerical Stroop effect .Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98(1):67-77.
Balakrishnan, J.D., & Ashby, F.G. (1992). Subitizing: magical numbers or mere superstition? Psychological Research, 54, 80–90.
Bull R, Scerif G. (2001). Executive Functioning as a Predictor of Children’s Mathematics Ability: Inhibition, Switching, and Working Memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19(3): 273–293
Cohen Kadosh R, Henik A, Rubinsten, et al.( 2005). Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 43: 1238–1248
Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626–641.
Dehaene, S., Molko, N., Cohen, L., & Wilson, A. (2004). Artihmetic and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 218–224.
Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43–74.
Gevers W, Reynvoet B, & Fias W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87: B87–B95.
Gevers W, Reynvoet B, & Fias W. (2004). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organised: evidence from days of the week. Cortex, 40, 171–172.
Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006). Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 32–44.
Hock, H. S., & Egeth, H. (1970). Verbal interference with encoding in a perceptual classification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 299–303.
Ishihara M, Keller PE, Rossetti Y, & Prinz W. ( 2008). Horizontal spatial representations of time: evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex, 44, 454–461.
Ito, Y., & Hatta, T. (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 32, 662–673.
Kaufmann, L., Koppelstaetter, F., Siedentopf, C., Haala, I., Haberlandt, E., Zimerhackl, L.-B., et al. (2006). Neural correlates of the number-size interference task in children. Neuroreport, 17, 587–591.
Krajcsi, A., Szabó, E., & Mórocz, I. (2013). Subitizing is sensitive to the arrangement of objects. Experimental Psychology, 60, 227-234.
Pinel, P., Piazza, M., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number, size, and luminance during comparative judgments. Neuron, 41, 983–993.
Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416–442.
Rubinstein, O., & Henik, A. (2005). Automatic activation of internal magnitudes: A study of developmental dyscalculia. Neuropsychology, 5, 641–648.
Rusconi E, Kwan B, Giordano BL, Umilta C, & Butterworth B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113–129.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
|