Peterson, Seligman, and their colleagues proposed a system of virtues as a major personal resource for enhancing well-being. The system of virtues consists of 6 core virtues （wisdom/knowledge, courage, humanity, justice, temperance, and transcendence） and 24 character strengths. Later studies have consistently indicated that virtues and their corresponding character strengths are negatively related to psychological symptoms. Nevertheless, current studies have a strong bias toward examining the relationship between strengths and psychological outcomes. The limited research on virtues may be partly attributed to several issues related to virtue assessment or virtue structure. The cultural invariance of the virtue classification proposed by Peterson et al has recently been examined in different cultures other than the United States; various structures of virtues were obtained. The first issue is the structure of the 2-tier system （virtues vs. character strengths）; and the second is the culture-related understanding of items of different character strengths and virtues. The Combined Etic-Emic Approach was recommended in these multicultural studies, which entails the development process of cross-cultural measurement for ensuring the conceptual equivalence, metric equivalence, functional equivalence, and linguistic equivalence. Generally, it requires identifying the universal items （ie, etic items） first, and then locally relevant items （ie, emic items） are added to the established etic instrument to form a combined and new instrument. Duan, Ho, and their colleagues adopted this approach to reduce the culturally inappropriate items and developed a 96-item Chinese Virtues Questionnaire to measure 3 virtues among the Chinese. Confirmatory factor analysis and psychometric evaluation suggested 3 well-established and culturally meaningful virtues, namely, relationship, vitality, and conscientiousness. Subsequent studies implied the contributions of the three virtues to mental health. Future directions were also discussed.