Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2022, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 574-583.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Emotion Regulation Choice of Intensity and Valence in Adolescents with Different Depressive Symptoms

  

  • Received:2020-05-30 Revised:2021-01-08 Online:2022-05-20 Published:2022-05-22

不同抑郁症状青少年调节不同强度情绪时策略选择的差异

张少华1,桑标2,3,潘婷婷1,刘影4   

  1. 1. 华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院
    2. 华东师范大学
    3. 上海市教育科学研究院
    4. 华东政法大学
  • 通讯作者: 桑标

Abstract: Emotion regulation (ER) refers to the process that a person uses emotion regulation strategies to modulate the experience and expression of emotion in order to meet the contextual demands. Based on this concept, the outcomes of emotion regulation depends not only on the effective use of ER strategies in certain contexts, but also on the appropriate selection of ER strategies in varying situations. Emotion regulation choice involves the process that individuals determine which emotion regulation strategies they prefer to use to achieve their primary goal in accord with the dynamic environment. Recently, a series of studies have demonstrated that emotional intensity and valence influenced the selection of certain emotion regulation strategies. Based on it, initial studies have preliminarily investigated the choice pattern of specific emotion regulation strategies (i.e., reappraisal and avoidance) when healthy adults confronted different emotional stimuli with high vs. low intensity and positive vs. negative valence. Main results showed that healthy participants were more likely to choose reappraisal instead of avoidance under low intensity emotional stimuli conditions, whereas more likely to choose avoidance rather than reappraisal under high intensity emotional stimuli conditions. As the most prevalent and disabling mood disorder, individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) were considered to be difficult in regulating their negative and positive emotion, which primarily manifested as the two cardinal symptoms: elevated negative affect and diminished positive affect. Furthermore, taking the perspective of dimensional approach, according to the number and quality of symptoms, depressive state could be divided into non-depressed, subthreshold depression (Sub-D), and depression. It is worth noting that, although the symptoms of Sub-D were less than MDD, the functional impairments associated with Sub-D were either very similar to that of full MDD, or even higher than those with MDD. More importantly, mounting studies have revealed that, as a crucial development period, the rate of depressive state increased substantially and rose permanently during adolescence. Thus, compared to adults, the relationship between emotion regulation choices and depressed symptoms in adolescents should be paid more attention. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has tested whether the choice pattern is compromised among adolescents with varying depressed states. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the preference to select between two emotion regulation strategies (reappraisal vs. rumination) when facing 20 daily emotion-eliciting events with varying emotional intensities (high vs. low) and valence (positive vs. negative) among youth with no depression (n = 505), subthreshold depression (n = 54), and depression (n = 58). Main results revealed that the emotional intensity and valence moderated the selection of reappraisal and rumination among groups. More specifically, under high-positive, low-positive, and low-negative emotion conditions, there were no significant differences between the three groups, while under high-negative emotion condition, subthreshold depression group and depression group chose significantly less reappraisal and more rumination than non-depressed group. These results indicated that, compared with healthy counterparts, teens with more depressive symptoms may not flexibly choose appropriate strategies in contexts with different intensities and valence, especially in high-negative emotion context. These findings might be beneficial to screening and intervention for teenagers higher in depressive symptoms.

Key words: depression, subthreshold depression, adolescence, emotion regulation, choice

摘要: 最新研究发现,情绪强度会影响健康个体的情绪调节策略选择。然而,至今尚未有研究考察情绪强度对不同抑郁症状青少年策略选择的影响。对此,本研究通过流调中心用抑郁量表划分出无抑郁、阈下抑郁和抑郁症青少年,进而考察其在面对高-低强度积极-消极日常情绪事件时选择认知重评和认知沉浸的差异。结果发现:当面对高强度积极情绪、低强度积极情绪和低强度消极情绪时,三组被试的策略选择均无显著差异;当面对高强度消极情绪时,无抑郁青少年比阈下抑郁和抑郁症青少年更多选择认知重评而更少选择认知沉浸,但阈下抑郁和抑郁症青少年之间无显著差异。结果表明:不同抑郁症状青少年在面对不同强度和效价情绪时的情绪调节策略选择存在差异,表现为高强度消极情绪下抑郁症状越多的青少年越少选择认知重评而越多选择认知沉浸。这一发现有助于识别和干预青少年的抑郁症状。

关键词: 抑郁, 阈下抑郁, 青少年, 情绪调节, 策略选择