Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2022, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1508-1516.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Temporal Characteristics of the Pain Empathy in Medical College Undergraduates: Evidence from an ERP Study

  

  • Received:2021-07-10 Revised:2022-09-22 Online:2022-11-20 Published:2022-12-11

医学生疼痛共情的认知过程特征:来自ERP的证据

贾磊,郑峥,汪俊   

  1. 浙江师范大学
  • 通讯作者: 汪俊

Abstract: Previous studies have shown that physician’s pain empathy was significant reduced compared to that of non-physicians, which could be manifested by their suppressed early emotional sharing processes indexed by N1 and late cognitive evaluation processes indexed by the P3 or LPP components. However, it remains unclear whether medical undergraduates at preservice education stage would have the same problem as well, and whether their pain empathy would be attenuated by repeated exposures. The investigation of these two issues would not only help us deeply understand the adaptability and plasticity of social empathies, but also provide useful empirical and theoretical references for the health protection and professional development of physicians. This study used the event-related potentials (ERPs) method to compare the cognitive processes of pain empathy between medical and non-medical undergraduates. Furthermore, we also compared the possible influences of repeated exposures on pain empathy between these two groups. During the study, a total of 25 medical undergraduates and 25 non-medical undergraduates (3 non-medical undergraduates was excluded because bad EEG recording) were tested by a three-stage experimental paradigm: pre-exposure test, repeated exposure of pain in the middle stage, post-exposure test. In both pre-exposure and post-exposure test stage, the classical picture observation paradigm (Decety et al. 2010) was used. While in the repeated exposure test stage, a free-view habituation task (Mastria et al. 2017) was used. That resulted a 2 (participants: medical student vs control group) × 2 (stimuli: pain pictures vs non-pain pictures) × 2 (task stages: pre-test vs post-test) experiment design. ERP components associated with pain empathy, such as N1, N2, P3, and LPP components, were measured and analyzed accordingly. Our behavioral results showed that both the medical and non-medical undergraduates exhibited similar pain empathy effect, and neither group showed significant difference between pre- and post-repeated exposure. However, ERP results showed that the temporal processing characteristics of the pain empathy processes in medical undergraduates were significantly different from that of non-medical undergraduates. Specifically, compared with the control group, medical undergraduates failed to exhibit similar pain empathy effects indexed by significant N1 effect between pain and non-pain stimuli, but showed the comparable increased reinforcement on late cognitive evaluation processing indexed by enhanced LPP amplitude to pain stimuli. Regarding to the repeated exposure effect, pain empathy for medical undergraduates were resistant to the repeated exposure by showing comparable enhanced LPP components to pain stimuli in both pre- and post-exposure test stages. On the contrary, pain empathy for non-medical undergraduates were significantly reduced after the repeated exposure by showing reduced LPP components to pain stimuli between pre- and post-exposure test stages. To sum up, our study showed that, although medical preservice education suppressed the early emotional sharing processes of pain empathy, medical undergraduates could maintain their pain empathy level through investing more controls and mentalizing resources at late cognitive evaluation stage. Additionally, compared to the non-medical undergraduates, their pain empathies are less influenced by repeated exposures. Taken together, these findings are not only of great significance for understanding the occupational psychological characteristics of medical staffs, but also demonstrate that pain empathy shaped by knowledge learning can resist repeated exposure or habituation.

Key words: Pain empathy, medical students, repeated exposure, emotional sharing

摘要: 以往研究发现临床医生的疼痛共情显著低于常人,表现为前者感知他人疼痛时会出现早期情绪分享和晚期情绪调节的相对抑制。而处于职前培养期的医学生是否存在相似问题,其疼痛共情又是否会受到重复暴露的影响,目前并不清楚。为此,本研究采用ERP技术比较了医学与非医学专业大学生疼痛共情的认知过程,并通过前后测设计检验了重复暴露对二者疼痛共情的影响。行为结果发现两组被试的主观疼痛判断都出现了疼痛共情效应,但未出现组别差异,也未发现重复暴露的影响。但ERP结果显示,医学生的疼痛共情过程显著区别于非医学生。他们虽表现出早期情绪分享成分N1的抑制效应,但LPP反映的晚期认知加工却显著增强,且上述两阶段加工均未受到重复暴露的显著影响。研究表明:(1)医学学习能够抑制疼痛共情的早期情绪分享,但医学生仍可通过更多晚期认知资源投入来维持其疼痛共情水平。(2)医学生的疼痛共情较少受到重复暴露的影响,呈现情绪适应特点。

关键词: 疼痛共情, 医学生, 重复暴露, 情绪分享