A Non-Parametric Multi-Strategy Cognitive Diagnosis Method

Wang Daxun, Xiao Qingwen, Tan Qingrong, Cai Yan, Tu Dongbo

Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 971-979.

PDF(1655 KB)
PDF(1655 KB)
Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 971-979. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.202304026
Psychological statistics, Psychometrics & Methods

A Non-Parametric Multi-Strategy Cognitive Diagnosis Method

  • Wang Daxun, Xiao Qingwen, Tan Qingrong, Cai Yan, Tu Dongbo
Author information +
History +

Abstract

A variety of cognitive diagnosis models has been proposed in the literature to achieve diagnostic functions in a wide range of practical settings, but most of them assume that all students use the same strategy to solve problems. However, it is universal that an item has multiple strategies in psychological and educational cognitive diagnostic tests. Ignoring multiple strategies and fitting data using single-strategy CDMs could result in model misspecifications and inadequate model-data fit, which, in turn, causes concerns as to the validity of inferences. Although a few multi-strategy cognitive diagnosis models have been proposed in recent years, they are all parameterized models requiring a sufficient sample size to ensure the accuracy of model estimation, which is difficult to satisfy in class-level cognitive diagnostic tests.
To further enrich and improve the research of multi-strategy cognitive diagnosis models and provide methodological support for small sample size conditions, methods from a non-parametric perspective may be feasible and promising. A nonparametric and efficient diagnostic classification method, called NCNPMSC method (Non-compensatory Nonparametric Multiple-strategy Classification), was proposed in this study based on a single-strategy nonparametric diagnostic classification method. The principal steps of this method are as follows: first, the ideal response pattern of each strategy was constructed for each potential attribute pattern( α ) depending on the Q-matrix and unobservable α; then, the ideal response pattern of αi on item j is defined as the maximum ideal response pattern among all strategies of item j; finally, the Hamming distances between the ideal response patterns and the observed item response vector are calculated, and the attribute pattern α corresponding to the minimum Hamming distance is selected as the attribute pattern of the subject i. This method can be performed with any sample size, and only requires a matrix that associates items with attributes.
Simulation research and empirical data analysis were conducted to verify the effectiveness of the NCNPMSC method and to compare it with the MS-DINA model and GMS-DINA model. The results showed that the proposed NCNPMSC method had a higher diagnostic accuracy rate, which was higher than that of the MS-DINA model and the GMS-DINA model. The NCNPMSC method was efficient and not affected by the sample size, which has potential advantages over other parameterized models. When the number of attributes increased to 7 and the number of strategies increased to 4, the NCNPMSC model still had a robust classification accuracy. The results from real data analysis showed that the NCNPMSC model had the same classification accuracy under different sample conditions, while the classification accuracy of the MS-DINA model and GMS-DINA model decreased significantly as the sample size decreased.
This study innovatively developed a simple and high-precision multi-strategy cognitive diagnosis method from a non-parametric perspective, which provides a solution for multi-strategy cognitive diagnosis under small sample conditions. The rationality and feasibility of the NCNPMSC method were proved by simulation research and theoretical derivation, which not only enriched and deepened the research of multi-strategy cognitive diagnosis but also provided methodological support for multi-strategy cognitive diagnosis in practice.

Key words

cognitive diagnosis / multi-strategy / nonparametric method / hamming distance

Cite this article

Download Citations
Wang Daxun, Xiao Qingwen, Tan Qingrong, Cai Yan, Tu Dongbo. A Non-Parametric Multi-Strategy Cognitive Diagnosis Method[J]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2023, 46(4): 971-979 https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.202304026

References

[1] 戴步云, 张敏强, 焦璨, 黎光明, 朱华伟, 张文怡. (2015). 基于CD-CAT的多策略RRUM模型及其选题方法开发. 心理学报, 47(12), 1511-1519.
[2] 李元白, 曾平飞, 杨亚坤, 康春花. (2018). 一种非参数的多策略方法: 多策略的海明距离判别法. 江西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 42(1), 67-73.
[3] 涂冬波, 蔡艳, 戴海琦, 丁树良. (2012). 一种多策略认知诊断方法: MSCD方法的开发. 心理学报, 44(11), 1547-1553.
[4] 汪文义, 宋丽红, 丁树良, 汪腾, 熊建. (2021). 非参数认知诊断方法下诊断结果的概率化表征. 心理科学, 44(5), 1249-1258.
[5] Chiu C. Y., Douglas J. A., & Li X. D. (2009). Cluster analysis for cognitive diagnosis: Theory and applications. Psychometrika, 74(4), 633-665.
[6] Chiu C. Y., Sun Y., & Bian Y. H. (2018). Cognitive diagnosis for small educational programs: The general Nonparametric classification method. Psychometrika, 83(2), 355-375.
[7] de la Torre, J., & Douglas, J. A. (2008). Model evaluation and multiple strategies in cognitive diagnosis: An analysis of fraction subtraction data. Psychometrika, 73(4), 595-624.
[8] Fuson K. C., Wearne D., Hiebert J. C., Murray H. G., Human P. G., Olivier A. I., & Fennema E. (1997). Children' s conceptual structures for multidigit numbers and methods of multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(2), 130-162.
[9] Huo, Y., & de la Torre, J. (2014). Estimating a cognitive diagnostic model for multiple strategies via the EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38(6), 464-485.
[10] Liu Y. L., Xin T., Andersson B., & Tian W. (2019). Information matrix estimation procedures for cognitive diagnostic models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 18-37.
[11] Ma, W. C., & Guo, W. J. (2019). Cognitive diagnosis models for multiple strategies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(2), 370-392.
[12] Star, J. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2008). Flexibility in problem solving: The case of equation solving. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 565-579.
PDF(1655 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/