Psychological Science ›› 2011, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 782-787.
Previous Articles Next Articles
1,
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
杨晨1,张积家2
通讯作者:
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划“973”课题;教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目;广东省自然科学基金团队项目
Abstract:
This study compared the differences between Cantonese–Mandarin diglossia speakers and Mandarin speakers about temporal reasoning. Experiment 1 and 2 showed that whether the materials is "not to five as a unit," "5 as a unit" or "character as a unit," the reaction time of Cantonese–Mandarin diglossia speakers was longer than Mandarin speakers. The experiment 3 and 4 indicated that both Cantonese–Mandarin diglossia speakers and Mandarin speakers adopted number processing in time reasoning when the materials was "5 as a unit", but to the materials of “‘character’as a unit”, Cantonese–Mandarin diglossia speakers adopted image processing.The differences of temporal reasoning between Cantonese–Mandarin diglossia speakers and Mandarin speakers can be explained by the Weaker Links Hypothesis.
Key words: temporal reasoning, Cantonese–Mandarin diglossia speaker, Mandarin speakers
摘要:
通过4个实验,考察粤-普双言者与普通话单言者周期性时间推理的差异。实验1和2表明,无论时间以5为单位、不以5为单位还是以“字”为单位,双言者反应时均显著长。实验3和4表明,当时间为以5为单位时,双言者与单言者均采用数字加工方式;当材料以“字”为单位时,双言者采用空间表象加工方式。
关键词: 时间推理, 粤–普双言者, 普通话单言者
杨晨 张积家. 粤语-普通话双言者和普通话单言者周期性时间推理比较[J]. 心理科学, 2011, 34(4): 782-787.
0 / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://jps.ecnu.edu.cn/EN/
https://jps.ecnu.edu.cn/EN/Y2011/V34/I4/782