Psychological Science ›› 2017, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 37-43.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Making choices Deplete Self-control resource: Trade-off Effect or Information Processing Difficulty Effect?

1,2, 3   

  1. 1. college of humanities and social science Anhui agricultural university
    2. College of Education, Shanghai Normal University ,
    3.
  • Received:2016-06-13 Revised:2016-10-21 Online:2017-01-20 Published:2017-01-20

选择损耗自我控制资源:取舍效应还是信息加工难度效应?

陈晓惠1,2,石文典3   

  1. 1. 安徽农业大学人文社会科学学院
    2. 上海师范大学教育学院
    3. 上海师范大学
  • 通讯作者: 石文典

Abstract: Making choice is self-control act and all acts of self-control are effortful and draw on a limited resource, resulting in a state that refers to as ego-depletion. The strength model of self-control provided a new perspective for discussing people’s choices. Studies have found that making choices would deplete self-control resource and lead to ego depletion. But we also poorly understood the reason why making choice have depletion effect. In this study we explored the reason of the choice depletion by setting and manipulating the variable of trade-off conflict difficulty and processing difficulty. Because trait self-control has robust influence on self-control behavior, we exercised strict control over subjects' trait self-control before first stage task. Trade-off conflict resolving should require self-control resources because which is most closely linked to executive function. Difficulty in information processing can make a choice seem difficult, but such difficulty may not draw much on executive resources. At the same time, ego depletion occurs mainly in series complex cognitive activity such as logical reasoning and problem solving which need executive control to transform information from a given state into other states. Reading choosing task and processing of option should not need information state transitions, so this two kinds of information processing difficulty should not induce ego depletion. Our hypothesis, therefore, is that the cause of depletion effect is trade-off conflict difficulty but not information processing difficulty. Self-control resources depletion was manipulated by Stroop task, which had been consistently proved to be effectively, distinguish high and low self-control resources. In experiment 1, participants were asked to finish trait self-control scale at first, then they were assigned to conditions in a 2 (trade-off conflict difficulty: high or low) × 2 (reading difficulty of select task: difficult or easy) between-participants design, afterwards, all participants fulfilled Stroop task. In experiment 2, before fulfilling Stroop task, participants were assigned to conditions in a 2 (trade-off conflict difficulty: choose for self or choose for other) × 2 (option information processing difficulty: 4 options or 3 options) between-participants design according to their scores of trait self-control. In both experiments, between the first and the second phase task, participants' moods were measured. The results showed that subjects' performance of Stroop task after making high trade-off conflict was significant lower than the subjects who made low trade-off conflict, reading difficulty of select task had no influence on Stroop task performance (experiment 1); Subjects' performance of Stroop task after making choices for themselves option information was significant lower than the subjects who made choices for others, number of options had no influence on Stroop task performance (experiment 2). In two experiments, the differences of Stroop task which various groups showed were not due to subjects' moods. Our findings also showed that resolution of trade-off conflict is a primary source of depletion but not information processing difficulty of choice. Future research need to reveal the function of other choice difficulties and further confirm the reason of the choice depletion.

Key words: choice, ego-depletion, trait self-control, trade-off conflict, information processing difficulty

摘要: 研究以自我控制的资源模型为理论框架,从选择难度特征的视角出发,通过两项实验考察选择损耗自我控制资源的成因。结果发现,高取舍冲突组被试的stroop任务成绩显著低于低取舍冲突组被试,高、低阅读难度组被试的stroop任务成绩差异不显著;为自己做选择组被试的stroop任务成绩显著低于为他人做选择组被试,完成3选项和4选项任务组被试的stroop任务成绩差异不显著。研究表明,选择损耗效应是由选择的取舍难度而非信息加工难度造成。

关键词: 选择, 自我损耗, 特质自我控制, 取舍冲突, 信息加工难度